Are you running ColdFusion 8 on a Windows 2008 Server w/IIS7 in 64 bit? Is that
even possible? Thanks!
~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to
date
Get the Free Trial
According to the Release Docs, yes that is possible. Have I tried it? I
haven't even seen W2K8, nor would I touch it till sp2 minimum.
Steve Cutter Blades
Adobe Certified Professional
Advanced Macromedia ColdFusion MX 7 Developer
_
http://blog.cutterscrossing.com
I've been on the phone (getting the run around) with Adobe all day. They do
Officially support the Win2008/CF8 configuration. I havenât been able to
verify it's truly 64bit though. In their 8.01 update installation instructions
(released only yesterday) it states:
The 64 bit installer for
Yes, it states clearly in the release FAQ that 64-bit support is only
available for Enterprise and Developer Editions of the server.
Steve Cutter Blades
Adobe Certified Professional
Advanced Macromedia ColdFusion MX 7 Developer
_
http://blog.cutterscrossing.com
Its a little early in the release of Windows Server 2008 but since I
want to upgrade from Window 2000, I wanted to see if anyone:
1) Has installed it
2) Has had any issues running CF on it
Any feedback would be awesome.
Thanks,
Rey
. Many more tests need to be
run.
Rick Sanders
-Original Message-
From: Rey Bango [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: February-29-08 9:09 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Upgrade from Win2K to Windows 2008
Its a little early in the release of Windows Server 2008 but since I
want to upgrade from Window
Currently we have 3 production web servers all running CF5 (CFMX upgrade is not an option for us), different sites on each m/c. Each box services betwen 5 and 8 web sites. We don't run our own dns.What we would like to do is have all the m/c's look the same,and use either clustercats or win2k
Batch Jobs.
Yes, there are Other Bugs in CFMX and am hoping MM would try to solve them
asap.
Joe Eugene
-Original Message-
From: Tom Kitta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2003 10:21 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: [Reply To] (CF 6 reliability) from Re: Memory Leak on
Win2k
/ http://www.euservices.com
__
-Original Message-
From: Ryan Sabir [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 03, 2003 8:46 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re:(CF 6 reliability) from Re: Memory Leak on Win2k/CMX6.1
Hi all,
I have recently
Design
To: CF-Talk
Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2003 11:53 AM
Subject: [Reply To] (CF 6 reliability) from Re: Memory Leak on Win2k/CMX6.1
What are other people's views on this - how many people are using
MX with no problems?
You wrote
I suggest the user with problems
Subject: Update: Memory Leak on Win2k/CMX6.1
It looks as though we might at last have identified the culprit:After our
Sysadmin spent ages searching the forums about stalled servers, we thought
it might be our mail server, since we're also getting mail issues.So on
Friday we stopped the SMTP server
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 31, 2003 10:44 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Memory Leak on Win2k/CMX6.1
Well we have major issues with our server locking up every day.EVERY Day.
We've applied the SQL Patch,where you revert to the drivers used in 6.0.
We've seen jrun.exe grow day after day
with my service, my job isn't done!
- Original Message -
From: Tom Jordahl [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 03, 2003 6:24 PM
Subject: RE: Memory Leak on Win2k/CMX6.1
|
| You need to work through Macromedia Technical Support.
|
| We are listening
What are other people's views on this - how many people are using
MX with no problems?
You wrote
I suggest the user with problems with the server product, to
uninstall it completely and revert to CF 5.0, until Macromedia
gets its act
together.While a lot was
isn't done!
- Original Message -
From: Boldacious Web Design [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2003 11:53 AM
Subject: [Reply To] (CF 6 reliability) from Re: Memory Leak on Win2k/CMX6.1
| What are other people's views on this - how many people
Might be easier to ask how many people are having serious problems with MX.
Ken
Boldacious Web Design wrote:
What are other people's views on this - how many people are using
MX with no problems?
You wrote
I suggest the user with problems with the
Subject: Update: Memory Leak on Win2k/CMX6.1
It looks as though we might at last have identified the culprit:After our
Sysadmin spent ages searching the forums about stalled servers, we thought
it might be our mail server, since we're also getting mail issues.So on
Friday we stopped the SMTP server
PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 03, 2003 4:37 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Memory Leak on Win2k/CMX6.1
Macromedia was enthusiastic in responding to issues when 6.1 was first released,
and now it appears that they have gone back into their shell.Contacting Tech
support has likewise reverted back
Hi all,
I have recently installed CFMX 6.1 in a high traffic production
environment, and I can say that I haven't experienced this memory leak
problem.
I am getting quite a few deadlock errors and service too busy error,
but I suspect thats an issue with the questionable code that we
inherited.
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, 4 November 2003 12:21 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Update: Memory Leak on Win2k/CMX6.1
Mike,
I am glad to hear that you have identified the problem.
What exactly do you mean by stopped the SMTP server?
How exactly does the SMTP server relate to your CFMX
Webworks.
-Original Message-
From: Tom Jordahl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, 4 November 2003 12:21 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Update: Memory Leak on Win2k/CMX6.1
Mike,
I am glad to hear that you have identified the problem.
What exactly do you mean by stopped the SMTP
CMFX has been running really well for us since the 6.1 release. No
complaints about stability.
Brook
At 03:53 AM 11/4/2003, you wrote:
What are other people's views on this - how many people are using
MX with no problems?
You wrote
I suggest the user with
So far it's been fine for me - no problems I can't trace to my own
stupidity.
Jim Davis
-Original Message-
From: Boldacious Web Design [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2003 11:54 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: [Reply To] (CF 6 reliability) from Re: Memory Leak on
Win2k
.
Stace
_
From: Doug White [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: November 3, 2003 7:37 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Memory Leak on Win2k/CMX6.1
Macromedia was enthusiastic in responding to issues when 6.1 was first
released,
and now it appears that they have gone back into their shell.
Contacting
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: [Reply To] (CF 6 reliability) from Re: Memory Leak on
Win2k/CMX6.1
So far it's been fine for me - no problems I can't trace to my own
stupidity.
Jim Davis
-Original Message-
From: Boldacious Web Design [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2003 11
Yeah and I've been using CF for 8 years now. Obviously over time you learn
much more and need to adapt more.
Important:This e-mail is intended for the use of the addressee and may contain information that is confidential, commercially valuable or subject to legal or parliamentary privilege.If
You will love Oracle 10g then!
Important:This e-mail is intended for the use of the addressee and may contain information that is confidential, commercially valuable or subject to legal or parliamentary privilege.If you are not the intended recipient you are notified that any review,
on Win2k/CMX6.1
Well we have major issues with our server locking up every day.EVERY Day.
[snip]
[Todays Threads]
[This Message]
[Subscription]
[Fast Unsubscribe]
[User Settings]
Sorry I haven't seen the whole thread...but perhaps this would help:
http://www.bpurcell.org/blog/index.cfm?mode=entryentry=967
-Stace
_
From: Mike Kear [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: November 1, 2003 1:44 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Memory Leak on Win2k/CMX6.1
Well we have major issues
We're getting this dreaded memory leakthing on our new server -(CFMX6.1
/ Win2k)The server runs for a few hours while the sysadmin is at the
office, and then soon as he turns his back and heads for home, it stalls.
The pages slow and slow until finally we get timeouts or database not
available
pu.htm
http://www.macromedia.com/support/coldfusion/ts/documents/cfmx61_sqlserver_
cpu.htm
_
From: Michael Kear [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 31 October 2003 14:08
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Memory Leak on Win2k/CMX6.1
We're getting this dreaded memory leakthing on our new server -(CFMX6.1
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 31, 2003 6:08 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Memory Leak on Win2k/CMX6.1
We're getting this dreaded memory leakthing on our new server -
(CFMX6.1
/ Win2k)The server runs for a few hours while the sysadmin is at the
office, and then soon as he turns his back
mentioned they might look into putting a
BUG Database together, dont think this was every worked out.
Joe Eugene
- Original Message -
From: cf-talk
To: CF-Talk
Sent: Friday, October 31, 2003 11:31 AM
Subject: RE: Memory Leak on Win2k/CMX6.1
Michael,
I've been running 2003 and MX6.1
]
Sent: Friday, October 31, 2003 1:49 PM
Subject: Re: Memory Leak on Win2k/CMX6.1
I think there is a Major Issue with CFMX 6.1 DataBase Connections. The
Connection pooling
Engine seems to have Changed from CFMX 6.0 and most the posts point to
reverting back
to OLD Drivers. I am Not sure if the MM
memory
leaks.Bout time you owned up to it isn't it?
Cheers,
Michael Kear
Windsor, NSW, Australia
AFP Webworks.
-Original Message-
From: Adam Churvis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, 1 November 2003 6:02 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Memory Leak on Win2k/CMX6.1
Check
Does anybody here know how to repair or reinstall the lanman
server service on win2k server? ... The only info I can find
when I google for a solution is wanting me to make wholesale
deletions of 50+ distinct registry keys and a bunch of other
garbage (including Microsoft's own support info
. Isaac Dealey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 8:19 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: OT: win2k server - repair/reinstall lanman server service
Does anybody here know how to repair or reinstall the lanman
server service on win2k server? ... The only info I can find
when I google
It did when I did the first install.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Kief [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 04, 2003 6:39 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Installing MX on WIN2K and Not Getting IIS
Not sure if you mentioned this...but the box doesn't have CF 5 on it
does
server would be a better choice.
M
-Original Message-
From: Claremont, Timothy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 9:02 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Any reason to choose Win2K over Win2k3?
I am ready to place an order for the new server and need to decide
between Win2K
Win2K over Win2k3?
| I am ready to place an order for the new server and need to decide
| between Win2K and Win2k3.
|
| Apparently there is now a Web edition of 2k3 for half a grand less
| than full Win2k3, but it specifically states that the web edition cannot
| be used to deploy SQL Server
-
From: Chris Kief [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 04, 2003 6:58 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Installing MX on WIN2K and Not Getting IIS
Ahh - so there's the source of the problem. When you first installed CFMX,
CF 5 was tied to IIS and so CFMX wouldn't allow you to also use it with
IIS
Apparently there is now a Web edition of 2k3 for half a
grand less than full Win2k3, but it specifically states
that the web edition cannot be used to deploy SQL Server.
This is not a problem at the moment, but I do not want to
limit my options when it comes time to move up to SQL
I am ready to place an order for the new server and need to decide
between Win2K and Win2k3.
Apparently there is now a Web edition of 2k3 for half a grand less
than full Win2k3, but it specifically states that the web edition cannot
be used to deploy SQL Server. This is not a problem
Tried that. Shut down the service and ran the connectors. Still went to
the 8500 port. Hopefully a reboot will work.
-Original Message-
From: Michael T. Tangorre [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 04, 2003 6:01 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Installing MX on WIN2K
Still not working. Does anyone have any other suggestions?
-Original Message-
From: Harold Brauer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 04, 2003 6:15 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Installing MX on WIN2K and Not Getting IIS
Tried that. Shut down the service and ran the connectors
, August 04, 2003 10:06 PM
Subject: RE: Installing MX on WIN2K and Not Getting IIS
| After removing CFMX, look in the registry for HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE / SOFTWARE
| / Macromedia / Install Data / ColdFusion MX - remove this folder and then
| reinstall. I believe that should take care of it (it's been
Tried that. Shut down the service and ran the connectors.
Still went to the 8500 port. Hopefully a reboot will work.
If you install CFMX to use the built-in JRun web server, then later use the
IIS connector, the JRun web server will still be running, and you should be
able to access your files
-Original Message-
From: Dave Watts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 11:46 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Installing MX on WIN2K and Not Getting IIS
If you already have CF 5 running on IIS, you won't be able to use
both CF 5 and CFMX with the same virtual server
I am trying to install MX on my WIN2K server. During the install it does
not give me the option of choosing IIS as my web server. I uninstalled
and reinstalled and followed the instructions in the Knowledge Base that
told me how to change the jrun file. This still did not work. Can anyone
help me
PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 04, 2003 8:53 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Installing MX on WIN2K and Not Getting IIS
I am trying to install MX on my WIN2K server. During the install it does
not give me the option of choosing IIS as my web server. I uninstalled
and reinstalled and followed
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Installing MX on WIN2K and Not Getting IIS
It did when I did the first install.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Kief [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 04, 2003 6:39 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Installing MX on WIN2K and Not Getting IIS
Not sure if you
Not sure if you mentioned this...but the box doesn't have CF 5 on it does
it?
-Original Message-
From: Harold Brauer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 04, 2003 6:27 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Installing MX on WIN2K and Not Getting IIS
Still not working. Does anyone have
I was able to fix my login problem using Raymond's suggestion I did have to go
thru the code and
append dev. to all of the cfc calls, as it is running on a subdomain.
now to get it working on my standalone cfmx.
Crit
---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]
Does anyone have a default list of windows services (on windows 2k server) installed
and what they do.. we are trying to turn off and disable any services we do not need
on our test servers
thanks!
Mike
~|
Archives:
Michael Tangorre wrote:
Does anyone have a default list of windows services (on windows 2k server) installed
and what they do.. we are trying to turn off and disable any services we do not need
on our test servers
Check out the NSA documentation for securing Win2K:
http://www.nsa.gov
Mike,
here is a pretty good list of what each service does and which ones to
disable for faster boot up.
http://www.blackviper.com/WIN2K/servicecfg.htm
Ben
- Original Message -
From: Michael Tangorre [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 13, 2003 3:13 PM
-Talk
Subject: OT: Win2K Server
Does anyone have a default list of windows services (on windows 2k
server) installed and what they do.. we are trying to turn off and
disable any services we do not need on our test servers
thanks!
Mike
We've come across a very interesting issue here. We have several
applications that generate downloadable Excel spreadsheets or Word
documents. We're using cookies as part of our authentication/authorization
process and we're running CF 5 on Win2K Server.
The way were generating the document
cfheader name=content-disposition value=attachment;
filename=#sFileName#
/cfif
cfcontent type=text/comma-separated-value
-Original Message-
From: David Hannum [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 21 March 2003 13:59
To: CF-Talk
Subject: IE 5 on Win2K bug perhaps
We've come across a very
Hey All,
A while back I must have hit the wrong sequence of keys or something because
CTRL+ALT+DEL and selecting Task Manager gives me a window that just shows
the tasks currently running with the 3 buttons (switch to, end task, new
task). I don't have the tabs to see perf mon and processes like
Message -
From: Bryan Stevenson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2003 12:42 PM
Subject: SOT: Win2K Task Manager
Hey All,
A while back I must have hit the wrong sequence of keys or something
because
CTRL+ALT+DEL and selecting Task Manager gives me a window
: Bryan Stevenson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2003 2:42 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: SOT: Win2K Task Manager
Hey All,
A while back I must have hit the wrong sequence of keys or something because
CTRL+ALT+DEL and selecting Task Manager gives me a window that just shows
the tasks
How do you folks handle the access relationships when changing to mySQL? From the
manual it looks like the equivalent functionality is covered using foreign key
constraints. Is this right?
The foreign key constraints require that both sides of the relationship have the
foreign key be the first
be configured to do that for you.
barneyb
-Original Message-
From: dan martin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 17, 2003 8:50 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: sql2k vs mySQL vs postgresql (for win2k)
How do you folks handle the access relationships when changing to
mySQL? From
Using CF4.5/5, does anyone know of a way to get NT/Win2K server uptime and status
info, kind of like what 'uptime' offers on Unix? I'm building a CF monitoring system
and I want to retrieve this info from some CF/Win boxes. Ideally, I need something
that does not need to be installed
See if you can find an uptime.exe, I think there are several of them
around.
Here is one, for example:
http://www.microsoft.com/ntserver/nts/downloads/management/uptime/default.
asp
~|
Archives:
Thanks guys. This is great information. I am excited to try it out.
~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4
Subscription:
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribeforumid=4
!
Regards,
John Paul Ashenfelter
CTO/Transitionpoint
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: dan martin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, March 09, 2003 9:31 PM
Subject: sql2k vs mySQL vs postgresql (for win2k)
Hi,
I am currently using ms access
]
To: CF-Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2003 11:17 PM
Subject: RE: Getting server uptime in NT/Win2K?
See if you can find an uptime.exe, I think there are several of them
around.
Here is one, for example:
http://www.microsoft.com/ntserver/nts/downloads/management/uptime/default
Howdy Dan,
Sunday, March 9, 2003, 8:31:54 PM, dan martin wrote:
... I am wondering if it would make more sense to migrate to an open
source db: mySQL or postgresql. I am running win2k with cf5 and would
like to keep the db on the same server.
One thing you didn't mention was your environment
vs mySQL vs postgresql (for win2k)
Howdy Dan,
Sunday, March 9, 2003, 8:31:54 PM, dan martin wrote:
... I am wondering if it would make more sense to migrate to an open
source db: mySQL or postgresql. I am running win2k with cf5 and would
like to keep the db on the same server.
One thing you
: mySQL or postgresql. I am running win2k with cf5 and would
like to keep the db on the same server.
Does anyone have experience or comparison information between the 3 choices running
on win2k? How much work is it to port access to mysql or postgresql?
Access to PostgreSQL is very little work
.
Some more hints:
http://phd.pp.ru/Software/SQL/PostgreSQL-vs-MySQL.html
http://www.google.com/search?q=mysql+versus+postgresql
Best regards,
Peter
Orginale Nachricht
Von: dan martin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Betreff: sql2k vs mySQL vs postgresql (for win2k)
Datum/Zeit: Montag, 10. März
BTW, one database you didn't mention was Firebird. I hear it is almost
as capable as PostgreSQL and it does have a native Windows version.
firebird's not quite as standard as postgreSQL (it offers many ANSI
SQL-92 features), has some syntax differences from sql server/access. it
has some nice
Peter Mayer wrote:
Hello!
mysql has a very good performance but if you need certain features like
views or subselect this database is out of the game. Postgresql fullfills
almost all standard criterias for a real database engine but it is a
little bit more complex. Running Postgresql on
Thanks very much for the information. It looks like it is definitely worth more
investigation. Both alternatives to sql2k look very promising for my purposes.
~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4
. I am running win2k with cf5 and would like to
keep the db on the same server.
Does anyone have experience or comparison information between the 3 choices running on
win2k? How much work is it to port access to mysql or postgresql? For sql2k the
upgrade tool does most of the work for you
something on an ecommerce site, only to find out that the SSL
portion wouldn't work because they already had ten connected
SSL users. I
got a nice little IIS banner explaining it very clearly.
Bottom line, get the 5 CAL version of Win2k Server.
Or, maybe, consider Apache 2 on Windows
How well does Apache run on Win 2k? I'm running
into issues w/ IIS FTP sites for my virtual
directories, and I'm hoping that Apache might
work better for me.
It seems to work well enough for me - but I'm not putting it under any load,
either.
Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software
Apache runs quite will on Win2k - very stable and very popular
I use serv-U for my FTP accounts. In IIS it seems to require a unique port
number for each FTP account
=
Douglas White
group Manager
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.samcfug.org
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2003 1:15 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Apache on Win2k - WAS: win 2000 professional for web
server?
How well does Apache run on Win 2k? I'm running
into issues w/ IIS FTP sites for my virtual
directories, and I'm hoping that Apache might
work
samcfug wrote:
I use serv-U for my FTP accounts. In IIS it seems to require a unique port
number for each FTP account
IIS does not require unique port numbers.
Jochem
~|
Archives:
I use serv-U for my FTP accounts. In IIS it seems to
require a unique port number for each FTP account
Umm, only if you configure it that way. :) If each FTP site has it's own
IP address there is no reason that they can't all use the same port.
Even if you run all your FTP sites on the same IP
to upgrade to SP3 on Win2k Server.
UD I did this two days ago.
UD Windows resist this with the
UD following message:
UD Bei der Systemaktualisierung ist ein Fehler aufgetreten
UD (in english s.th. like: While trying to update the system
UD an error occurred). Very much information, isn't
Hi list,
this is off-topic !
I have a problem trying
to upgrade to SP3 on Win2k Server.
I did this two days ago.
Windows resist this with the
following message:
Bei der Systemaktualisierung ist ein Fehler aufgetreten
(in english s.th. like: While trying to update the system
an error occurred
We run Win2K Server and we've found that ServU is great
Had to upgrade to the latest version because of our firewall settings
(locked down the ports and our IP is now stealth and without the upgrade
some (not all) Unix and Mac customers were getting intermittent
connections, failed
Hi, Rafael...
Is it necessary to make any changes to Win2K server
when using Serv-U?
Do I have to disable IIS FTP management to use it,
as someone mentioned with another FTP management tool?
Or just install it and use it, leaving Win2K Server as is?
Thanks for the info...
Rick
At 11:15 AM 1/31/03 -0500, you wrote:
Do I have to disable IIS FTP management to use it,
as someone mentioned with another FTP management tool?
It's been over a year since I installed it on the Win2k server. Don't
remember if we deactivated that or not. I do remember it being simple to
set up
Is it necessary to make any changes to Win2K server
when using Serv-U?
Do I have to disable IIS FTP management to use it,
as someone mentioned with another FTP management tool?
Or just install it and use it, leaving Win2K Server as
is?
If you're running any other FTP server
You don't have to disable iis ftp, but you certainly should, since servu
replaces it entirely. Only takes a few secs in the component services
cpanel list.
Cheers,
--Matt Robertson--
MSB Designs, Inc.
http://mysecretbase.com
Thanks, Matt!
I'll give it a try...
Rick
-Original Message-
From: Matt Robertson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 11:55 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: SOT: Serv-U? on Win2K=great
You don't have to disable iis ftp
I'm running CF5 on Win2k IIS5 with mssql2000 and getting
unknown exception condition
PCodeRuntimeContextImp::executeSQLTagCFStoredProc::endTag
The error occurred while processing an element with a general identifier of
(CFSTOREDPROC), occupying document position (40:1) to (41:64
Looks fine to me...
I'd try double-checking the data types and paraeters as well...
-Original Message-
From: S.Isaac Dealey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 13, 2003 10:23 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: unknown exception condition within cfstoredproc - win2k iis5 cf5
We are about to add a new production environment that will be CFMX and are
evaluating whether to go Linux or stay with Win2k. What are the general
feelings about ColdFusion MX on Linux as opposed to Windows 2k and are there
any issues with Flash Remoting in a Linux environment.
Kind Regards
, December 26, 2002 3:42 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: CFMX on Linux or Win2k?
We are about to add a new production environment that will be CFMX and are
evaluating whether to go Linux or stay with Win2k. What are the general
feelings about ColdFusion MX on Linux as opposed to Windows 2k and are there
any
My move function would not work on w2k.
~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=listsbody=lists/cf_talk
FAQ:
. Can't
figure it out, but hey, it's running!!!
Dave
- Original Message -
From: Bob Haroche [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 8:44 PM
Subject: Re: Win2K SP3 killed my IIS
Hmm...
First, can you un-install SP3 via the control panel?
Second
OK - I installed SP3 on my Win2K Pro dev box. Now I can't start IIS 5.0. I
can't even get the admin console to come up. I can't find anything in the
MS KB. Anybody know anything about this?
Dave
~|
Archives: http
What error message do you get? You might have to re-install it..
At 08:14 PM 15/10/02 -0400, you wrote:
OK - I installed SP3 on my Win2K Pro dev box. Now I can't start IIS 5.0. I
can't even get the admin console to come up. I can't find anything in the
MS KB. Anybody know anything about
Hmm...
First, can you un-install SP3 via the control panel?
Second, in the past I've had trouble with Zone Alarm loading at start
up hanging other services, including IIS and the IIS admin console. If
you have ZA, try disabling it at start up or even un-installing it.
Good luck.
PS. Next
1 - 100 of 336 matches
Mail list logo
