I (think) I've seen folks recommending cfimport over cf_MyTag and cfmodule
template=MyTag for custom tag calls.
I usually use a custom tag for header/footer inclusion like this
cf_MySiteHeadFoot ...
my body
/cf_MySiteHeadFoot
But was wondering if there's an advantage to cfimport. (Also, does
?
www.bennadel.com/ask-ben/
-Original Message-
From: Jamie Jackson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 12, 2007 3:39 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: cfimport vs. cfmodule/cf_MyTag for Custom Tag Calls
I (think) I've seen folks recommending cfimport over cf_MyTag and
cfmodule template=MyTag
-
From: Jamie Jackson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 12, 2007 3:39 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: cfimport vs. cfmodule/cf_MyTag for Custom Tag Calls
I (think) I've seen folks recommending cfimport over cf_MyTag and
cfmodule template=MyTag for custom tag calls.
I usually use a custom
Help?
www.bennadel.com/ask-ben/
-Original Message-
From: Raymond Camden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 12, 2007 4:08 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: cfimport vs. cfmodule/cf_MyTag for Custom Tag Calls
As a negative to this positive, every CFM that wants to use this format
has
Jamie Jackson wrote:
I (think) I've seen folks recommending cfimport over cf_MyTag and
cfmodule template=MyTag for custom tag calls.
I usually use a custom tag for header/footer inclusion like this
cf_MySiteHeadFoot ...
my body
/cf_MySiteHeadFoot
But was wondering if there's an
cfmodule has no problem whatsoever with dynamic template paths. :-)
Very true. Also, I know that CFImport cannot have dynamic template path
(ie. No ## in the template attribute). Not sure if CFModule is the same
way (but I guess that it probably is).
..
Ben Nadel
6 matches
Mail list logo
