for good Exchange spam filter? (as you can
see ours ain't great)
Sorry again...
Bob
From: Tony [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thu 9/1/2005 3:21 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Spam:Re: who on this list works for nmha.org
its rob redpath, but i havent heard him on here
Redpath [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 02, 2005 11:45 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: who on this list works for nmha.org
Sorry about that everyone. (please no tar and feathers...)
Our mail admin turned on the reply to sender rule when our spam filter
detected we were getting
GFI is pretty good if you have someone to really spend time managing it.
When I was on Exchange, I was using it and I liked it just enough to
stop looking around for a replacement. The unfortunate truth seems to be
that spam filtering is *almost* purely reactive. You put something in
place and
recommendations for good Exchange spam filter? (as
you can see ours ain't great)
Sorry again...
Bob
From: Tony [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thu 9/1/2005 3:21 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Spam:Re: who on this list works for nmha.org
its rob redpath, but i havent
I keep getting these replies sent back from nmha.org when I post to
CFTALK:
FROM: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Symantec Mail Security detected prohibited content in a message
sent from your address
Body:
Subject of the message: RE: retaining checkbox selections Recipient of
the message: CF-Talk
I've started getting those messages here as well.
--
Ian Skinner
Web Programmer
BloodSource
www.BloodSource.org
Sacramento, CA
C code. C code run. Run code run. Please!
- Cynthia Dunning
Confidentiality Notice: This message including any
attachments is for the sole use of the
I'm getting the same thing all of the sudden.
On 9/1/05, Tim Laureska [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I keep getting these replies sent back from nmha.org when I post to
CFTALK:
FROM: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Symantec Mail Security detected prohibited content in a message
sent from your
its rob redpath, but i havent heard him on here in a long time...
Bob are you still around?
tw
On 9/1/05, Anthony Prato [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm getting the same thing all of the sudden.
On 9/1/05, Tim Laureska [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I keep getting these replies sent back from
It seems that some server at nmha.org thinks that our messages are spam,
and is stupid enough to send a response to the originator.
Nice use of network bandwidth.
Imagine if everyone sent an automated reply to every piece of detected spam.
Rick
9 matches
Mail list logo
