On Wednesday, September 18, 2002, at 05:26 , Tony Weeg wrote:
no dice, flash movie just doesn't load, only get
broken image looking thing. guess it cant find
the codebase on the server that is referenced in
the flash-html code when using https://
Sorry... we're fixing it!
My team is
that there are bigger optimizations than type checking (I'm
not saying what :) and that whilst type checking would provide some
(noticeable) benefits, the effort would be pretty big to implement it.
If you're at DevCon, chat to Edwin about this sort of stuff... :)
Sean A Corfield -- http
On Thursday, September 19, 2002, at 02:37 , Jochem van Dieten wrote:
Whatever (I don't claim to know anything about that). But would adding
optional int and double etc. declarations next to var really make
CFML a different language? We use strongly typed stuff all the time
when working with a
On Tuesday, September 17, 2002, at 11:03 , Dick Applebaum wrote:
Sean, even I can write a pre-compile scan that builds a table of any
variables that are defined and typed -- and the a post-compile scan
that replaces the currently generated code with optimal code for any
variables that are
On Thursday, September 19, 2002, at 03:07 , Alex Hubner wrote:
Does anybody noticed performance differences (such as Joe's looping
code) between CFMX for J2EE and stand-alone CFMX Servers?
This is a factor of whichever JVM you are using - on Mac OS X, CFMX uses
the built-in Apple 1.3.1 JVM
books.
An interesting Java book for the (mostly) complete applications it
provides is Industrial Strength Java - not great code but the examples
are useful and thought-provoking.
Sean A Corfield -- http://www.corfield.org/blog/
If you're not annoying somebody, you're not really alive
On Thursday, September 19, 2002, at 05:31 , Joe Eugene wrote:
The Complete Reference Java 2 by Herbert Schildt Patrick Naughton..
No, please don't ever buy books by Herbert Schildt! He's terrible! His
books are full of misinformation and errors... His C++ books are the
absolute pits!
Check
On Thursday, September 19, 2002, at 04:18 , Sean A Corfield wrote:
On Thursday, September 19, 2002, at 01:25 , Ken Brocx wrote:
Hi, IÇÙd like some advice on a good JAVA book.
I know CF and ASP, but JAVA is new to me.
Thinking In Java by Bruce Eckel is pretty good.
Also check out:
http
On Friday, September 20, 2002, at 10:46 , Joe Eugene wrote:
True, *similar*(concept) emphasized, then the CLR plays a big role in code
execution.. translating MSIL into native code.. *AS Needed*..
C# - compiles to MSIL - loaded into CLR - interprets validates code
then uses JIT compiler to
On Friday, September 20, 2002, at 02:16 , Everett, Al wrote:
What does CF5 Enterprise have that Pro doesn't?
http://www.macromedia.com/software/coldfusion/productinfo/features_by_edition/
#300
If you're not annoying somebody, you're not really alive.
-- Margaret Atwood
was that there is no practical reason why C#
compiled to MSIL and running on CLR should be any faster (or slower) than
the 'same' Java code compiled to ByteCode and running in a JIT JVM.
Sean A Corfield -- http://www.corfield.org/blog/
If you're not annoying somebody, you're not really alive
On Friday, September 20, 2002, at 05:34 , Dick Applebaum wrote:
I have Oracle running on Mac OS X -- Whew, that was quite a download
and quite an install -- almost ran out of drive space on my measly 40
Gig disk.
Hmm, I didn't even know Oracle ran on Mac OS! Wonderful... I must download
and
control)
That's the Oracle executable that starts the database listener. There
should definitely be a listener control program in the installed
distribution. Once I've caught up (345Mb download and install) I'll see
what's up.
Sean A Corfield -- http://www.corfield.org/blog/
If you're
On Friday, September 20, 2002, at 11:22 , Joe Eugene wrote:
I cant remember correctly.. but i think the port Oracle defaults to
is 1348 or some like that.
Oracle uses port 1521 by default.
If you're not annoying somebody, you're not really alive.
-- Margaret Atwood
On Saturday, September 21, 2002, at 10:37 , Sean A Corfield wrote:
On Friday, September 20, 2002, at 11:22 , Joe Eugene wrote:
I cant remember correctly.. but i think the port Oracle defaults to
is 1348 or some like that.
Oracle uses port 1521 by default.
Dick has this all working now (I'm
If you're using CFMX, you can use cftrace...
On Sunday, September 22, 2002, at 05:38 , Michael Kear wrote:
When I write code, I often need to know the value of a variable at
different
points in a page. Up to now, I've put output tags and p tags and
displayed the variable at that point on
On Monday, September 23, 2002, at 12:12 , Alexander Sherwood wrote:
cfscript
stReturn = structNew();
stReturn.bOK = 1;
stReturn.details = '';
stReturn.result = '';
/cfscript
Why not use exceptions for the error case?
If you're not annoying somebody, you're not
# returnvariable=res/
This makes every item in the request scope available in the arguments
scope inside main.component. Then when you invoke the sub-component,
pass argumentCollection=#arguments# to ensure all those items get passed
to the sub-component. Ugly.
Sean A Corfield -- http
On Sunday, September 22, 2002, at 10:51 , Dave Watts wrote:
2. If you're using any version of CF which supports the SCOPE attribute
(4.5+, I think), use that with your CFLOCK tags around memory variables.
Just curious, do pre-MX versions of CF require scope-level locking (as
opposed to named
On Wednesday, September 25, 2002, at 10:58 , Terry Roll wrote:
Anyway to answer JAsons original question, yes theres a few channels on
different irc servers, the jerks hang our on Efnet in #coldfusion.
That would be the channel kick/banned both Michael and myself. I blogged
that. I also
On Wednesday, September 25, 2002, at 12:57 , Brian Thornton wrote:
cfset This.temp =
This.GetShowsReviews(request.affiliateid,request.Showid).results
Bear in mind this creates a public data member called temp that could be
accessed outside your object...
Also, calling functions with this.
lock (not a scoped lock).
I made some comments about this in my blog a while back:
http://www.corfield.org/blog/2002_09_01_archive.html#81527680
Sean A Corfield -- http://www.corfield.org/blog/
If you're not annoying somebody, you're not really alive.
-- Margaret Atwood
On Wednesday, September 25, 2002, at 03:53 , Brian Thornton wrote:
Why does this work:
CFSET searchDate = DateAdd(m,3,now())
#PreserveSingleQuotes(searchDate)#
and not:
#PreserveSingleQuotes(DateAdd(m,3,now()))#
I think everyone is coming to the conclusion that you can't put function
calls
runs.
Once they've been set, they'll remain set.
Sean A Corfield -- http://www.corfield.org/blog/
If you're not annoying somebody, you're not really alive.
-- Margaret Atwood
__
Get the mailserver that powers this list at http
object creation (and subsequent manipulation) to be
faster in CFMX simply because it's Java-native as opposed to having to
go through a bridge in earlier CF releases for every operation on a Java
object.
Sean A Corfield -- http://www.corfield.org/blog/
If you're not annoying somebody, you're
On Thursday, Sep 26, 2002, at 16:56 US/Pacific, Matt Liotta wrote:
I thought it was only Solaris not Linux. See Sean's blog
http://www.corfield.org/blog/2002_09_01_archive.html#82044999.
I can't speak for Linux - I'm not using it in anger - only for Solaris.
If you're not annoying somebody,
of the benefits of CFMX is that
Java integration is native instead of bridged from C++ to Java
dynamically.
Sean A Corfield -- http://www.corfield.org/blog/
If you're not annoying somebody, you're not really alive.
-- Margaret Atwood
On Thursday, Sep 26, 2002, at 20:23 US/Pacific, Dave Watts wrote:
I can't speak for Linux - I'm not using it in anger - only
for Solaris.
Could you elaborate on that? OS grudges aren't healthy, you know.
You misunderstand me (no, really!):
I love Linux, I use it at home, I run CFMX on it. I
I'm going to look the other issues up in the bugbase in the next few
days and see what's there but I'll address these issues here...
On Friday, Sep 27, 2002, at 02:36 US/Pacific, Benoit Hediard wrote:
- CFC methods defined in an included file cannot really include UDF
lib.
Indeed, CF
Just for the record...
On Friday, Sep 27, 2002, at 08:45 US/Pacific, Matt Liotta wrote:
What version of Apache 1.3.x has problems?
Just 1.3.24 or others?
On Solaris, we're seeing the problems on 1.3.22.
Is the Apache installation from source or RPM?
Probably a source build (since we do our
On Friday, Sep 27, 2002, at 07:21 US/Pacific, Stacy Young wrote:
http://www.macromedia.com/software/coldfusion/
seems anything pointing to CF is a 404
We had a content propagation error. We have resolved the immediate
problem and we're investigating the cause. Sorry for any inconvenience!
On Friday, Sep 27, 2002, at 11:36 US/Pacific, Matt Liotta wrote:
They were all raffled away last at BACFUG; you should have attended.
BTW, the reviews I've heard so far on the Flash integration book from
CFers is that it is too beginner to be useful.
I've actually heard the opposite - that
I think you'll find the forthcoming Rich Internet Application course
from Macromedia to be exactly what you're looking for. I don't have a
date for it yet but I'm one of the internal reviewers and so far it
seems pretty good, allowing a complete novice with Flash to work
through and build
On Monday, Sep 30, 2002, at 01:32 US/Pacific, Robertson-Ravo, Neil
(REC) wrote:
I totally disagree.. getting it 'connected' is the easy part. The
actual
movement and animation (for which Flash is designed) is the difficult
part.
Flash MX is designed to allow complex client-server
On Monday, Sep 30, 2002, at 06:29 US/Pacific, Robertson-Ravo, Neil
(REC) wrote:
anti Flash Remoting - far from it, I just dont see the business benefit
(development time = cost) of using say Flash for things which could be
developed in normal HTML.
The benefit is in the end result: a
On Sunday, Sep 29, 2002, at 12:06 US/Pacific, Raymond Camden wrote:
You mentioned typing the extra reference for CFCs (i.e.
myCFC.isEmail(...)
as opposed to isEmail() for a UDF). Beyond that
There's also the code needed to create the 'myCFC' instance (setting
myCFC =
On Monday, Sep 30, 2002, at 09:23 US/Pacific, S. Isaac Dealey wrote:
Question: (dunno if anyone has the answer to this) Do CFC's share
methods in
memory, or does each new component created have its own instances of
all the
functions defined in the cfc which take up their own space in
I've been trying to resist responding to this thread but...
On Monday, Sep 30, 2002, at 14:44 US/Pacific, Rob Rohan wrote:
cfswitch switch=attributes.fuseaction
cfcase value=listall,showone,dosomething,doanotherthing
delimiters=,
cfinclude template=index0.cfm
I checked with the DW team and they referred me to this Tech Note:
http://www.macromedia.com/support/dreamweaver/ts/documents/
translator_code.htm
Hope that helps?
On Monday, Sep 30, 2002, at 15:06 US/Pacific, Ian Lurie wrote:
Sorry if this is a repeat post, but right now in Dreamweaver MX,
On Monday, Sep 30, 2002, at 19:20 US/Pacific, jon hall wrote:
Is it possible to to a Java null in CF? Searching the archives I saw
it mentioned that it's a huge pain in the ass...I guess that means
it's not impossible :)
It is possible to create a Java null in a CF variable (with some
On Monday, Sep 30, 2002, at 20:09 US/Pacific, Rob Brooks-Bilson wrote:
I did some performance testing recently too see if it was faster to
CFINCLUDE a UDF library containing 50 UDFs, or instantiate a CFC with
the
same 50 CFCs as methods. The results were that the CFINCLUDE was
On Monday, Sep 30, 2002, at 17:55 US/Pacific, Nat Papovich wrote:
Unfortunately though, Rob's really long index doesn't appear to use
Fusebox
3's core file, which I assume, is the complex machinery you
mention,
Sean. In pre-FB3, there is very little to no machinery used, so long
cfswitch
On Tuesday, Oct 1, 2002, at 06:49 US/Pacific, Benjamin S. Rogers wrote:
This is the exact same argument that gets made against ColdFusion.
Not by me.
I'm
sure those early Word Perfect assembly programmers said the same thing
about programmers writing word processing programs in languages
the product team management, I have blogged this
link (yeah, I bet several of you went off and blogged it already
anyway!). I also blogged (yesterday) the URL into the CF FAQ that talks
about how to buy CF5 for those folks that need it.
Sean A Corfield -- http://www.corfield.org/blog/
If you're
On Wednesday, Oct 2, 2002, at 08:29 US/Pacific, Charlie Griefer wrote:
Very cool...and not to push it...how about Studio 5? We get quite a
few
people coming into our #cf channel asking how they can get a
(legitimate)
copy of Studio 5.
Hmm, I don't know. I'll defer to Christine L and Vern
Perhaps you have a variable called premium elsewhere in your code that
has a non-simple value?
On Wednesday, Oct 2, 2002, at 04:53 US/Pacific, Dave Wilson wrote:
Hi all,
I've just been checking through our applications after upgrading from
CF4.5
to CFMX and came across the following
On Thursday, Oct 3, 2002, at 15:55 US/Pacific, Lewis Sellers wrote:
Well, some of us just don't care to subscribe to the cf-community
because it's mostly all irrelevant, endless, juvenile chatter. :) So
many folks will never see such posts.
That sounds like an even better reason for such
On Friday, Oct 4, 2002, at 11:37 US/Pacific, Paul Giesenhagen wrote:
Yup (on CF5, good practice on CFMX but not required)
cflock timeout=20 throwontimeout=No type=READONLY
scope=SESSION
cfoutput#session.fullname#/cfoutput
/cflock
Better practice:
cflock timeout=20 throwontimeout=No
On Friday, Oct 4, 2002, at 14:27 US/Pacific, Dave Watts wrote:
This is true for versions prior to CF MX. For those versions, you
should use
the SCOPE attribute. Sean's point is only applicable to CF MX, in
which you
only lock to prevent logical errors - in that case, you want your lock
On Friday, Oct 4, 2002, at 12:07 US/Pacific, Gaulin, Mark wrote:
Actually, that using NAME is not a better practice... the SCOPE
attribute is
safer and is also what MM support advised us to use (when applicable).
Pre-MX.
Sure, the scope of a NAME-based lock will be tighter than using
On Friday, Oct 4, 2002, at 14:05 US/Pacific, Clark, Aimee wrote:
1. I have a cfset counter = 0 in the application.cfm.
This will set counter to zero on every single page request which is
probably not what you want.
I think you want something like:
cflock name=email_counter
Resurrecting an old thread...
On Thursday, Aug 15, 2002, at 21:41 US/Pacific, Matt Liotta wrote:
http://www.devx.com/xml/articles/ml062502/ml062502-1.asp. The article
Interesting article. I've just started looking at Oracle's native XML
support in 9i (release 9.2). It looks very promising...
On Monday, Oct 7, 2002, at 01:38 US/Pacific, Kola Oyedeji wrote:
I'm joining this thread late. Can I just confirm what you guys are
saying: In CFMX named locks should be used in place of scoped locks and
locks are only needed When a possible race condition could occur?
The last part is
On Monday, Oct 7, 2002, at 10:30 US/Pacific, Dave Wilson wrote:
Is it just me, or is CFMX proving totally unstable for everyone else
too?
It isn't *just* you but it is certainly a minority. Unfortunately,
mailing lists like this (and the webforums) are typically where people
come when they
On Monday, Oct 7, 2002, at 10:56 US/Pacific, Rob Rohan wrote:
We are porting cf5 to MX and had several sloppy coding errors, as
well as
some full fledged product errors. All in all, when the code is
optimized for
MX - which almost no currently existing cf code is - it runs like a
champ.
On Monday, Oct 7, 2002, at 11:02 US/Pacific, Joe Zanter wrote:
Perhaps this has been covered (but I couldn't find it in the archive)..
I used to use the auto completion feature in CF pre-DWMX. Does that
feature exist in DWMX.
Yes. DWMX will offer a drop-down context menu of tags as you type
?
- Are there other errors in the CF logs?
Sean A Corfield -- Director, Architecture
Web Technology Group -- Macromedia, Inc.
tel: (415) 252-2287 -- cell: (415) 717-8473
fax: (415) 865-3113 -- http://www.macromedia.com
An Architect's View -- http://www.corfield.org/blog/
Macromedia DevCon 2002, October 27
On Monday, Oct 7, 2002, at 11:37 US/Pacific, Rob Rohan wrote:
We actually are talking with you right now - and I mean specifically
YOU.
:) - refer to Mark J's e-mail. I'll reiterate what our issue is with
the
JDBC Driver.
Ah, I didn't connect Rob Rohan with [EMAIL PROTECTED] in Mark's Cc:
On Monday, Oct 7, 2002, at 12:13 US/Pacific, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Sorry for the interruption. I don't wish to take away from this
thread but
how do you tell if the CFUpdater has already been installed or not? I
have
a client who doesn't remember if he installed the updater or not.
error
rate tho'...
What is the full data source configuration, including Advanced Settings?
Sean A Corfield -- http://www.corfield.org/blog/
If you're not annoying somebody, you're not really alive.
-- Margaret Atwood
~|
Archives
never had any problems with CF 4.5
- Are there other errors in the CF logs? - No
Hmm, doesn't sound like an unusual setup. That's a very frequent error
rate tho'...
What is the full data source configuration, including Advanced
Settings?
Sean A Corfield -- http://www.corfield.org/blog
On Tuesday, Oct 8, 2002, at 07:25 US/Pacific, Matt Liotta wrote:
I also expect a response when I ask questions like Why does Flash
Remoting in CFMX Enterprise not work with Java?
You've had a response to that - you just didn't like what you heard!
The response is Flash Remoting as supplied
Cathy Taylor wrote:
I'm trying to evaluate our CF MX upgrade on Solaris before I turn our
masses loose on it. I can't run it as root and our security
regulations forbid me from creating a new user to run it as (that
wouldn't work anyway since our web server runs as nobody). I've read
the
On Tuesday, Oct 8, 2002, at 13:47 US/Pacific, Sean A Corfield wrote:
scorfiel 23763 23758 0 13:40:03 pts/20:00 fgrep cf
nobody 27009 27007 0 Sep 04 ? 1435:01
/data/www/appserver/neo/bin/cfusion -start default
nobody 27007 1 0 Sep 04 ?0:00
/data/www
recently.
Sean A Corfield -- Director, Architecture
Web Technology Group -- Macromedia, Inc.
tel: (415) 252-2287 -- cell: (415) 717-8473
fax: (415) 865-3113 -- http://www.macromedia.com
An Architect's View -- http://www.corfield.org/blog/
Macromedia DevCon 2002, October 27-30, Orlando, Florida
On Tuesday, Oct 8, 2002, at 08:32 US/Pacific, Mark A. Kruger - CFG
wrote:
Pardon me for asking but... how does MM handle a situation where
something
worked correctly on CF 5, but now is failing on CFMX? Is that CFMX?
Or do
It could be user code, configuration or CFMX.
There have
On Tuesday, Oct 8, 2002, at 09:04 US/Pacific, Lee Fuller wrote:
You see, (and this is a bit of a walk down memory lane, and maybe even
borders on a fantasy dream world) when Allaire started, we had open,
clear and useful discussions about what was happening with the product.
I think pretty
On Tuesday, Oct 8, 2002, at 11:03 US/Pacific, Mark A. Kruger - CFG
wrote:
Dev workstation with XP, IIS 5 (maybe 6?), connecting to an SQL 7 box
(SP
) - SQL server was remote from the CFMX server
Production server with Win2k (sp2 and hotfixes) with IIS 5 connecting
to an
SQL 7 box (sp 3)
On Tuesday, Oct 8, 2002, at 13:43 US/Pacific, jon hall wrote:
Isn't there a Flash Remoting Java server shipped with EJB's now?
There is a Flash Remoting for J2EE product, yes:
http://www.macromedia.com/software/flashremoting/
Are there any code samples floating around that I could peek at to
On Tuesday, Oct 8, 2002, at 13:47 US/Pacific, Sean A Corfield wrote:
As far as I know, our guys just followed the installation instructions
but I'll ask them if there were any issues around the 'nobody' user.
I asked the engineers who did the installs: they just followed the
instructions
On Tuesday, Oct 8, 2002, at 10:55 US/Pacific, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I personally believe that this is the root of nearly every problem at
Macromedia right now. Internally and externally. Internally, probably
mostly due to the fragmented communities of employees in the east/west
coast
On Tuesday, Oct 8, 2002, at 14:15 US/Pacific, Lee Fuller wrote:
Sorry.. Let me clarify..
I was specifically talking about the Server Settings section of the
summary. I know that you probably don't want your datasources, etc.,
all strewn about the net. :)
And also make sure y'all don't
On Tuesday, Oct 8, 2002, at 14:24 US/Pacific, JLH All Turbo wrote:
I'm getting that error when verifying a connetion through the CFMX dsn
creator. I also get it when I try to run any CFMX cfm pages that use
that
dsn.
YET when I try connecting and verifying through Win2k's ODBC set up..
On Tuesday, Oct 8, 2002, at 14:07 US/Pacific, Rob Rohan wrote:
dateFormat(now(), dd/mm/yy (ddd))
No longer works in MX. looks like only certain characters work in date
format.
I get:
date is 08/10/02 (Tue)
using this code:
cfoutput
cfset str = dateFormat(now(), dd/mm/yy (ddd))/
date is
On Tuesday, Oct 8, 2002, at 18:05 US/Pacific, S. Isaac Dealey wrote:
I thought all the db drivers were 3rd party ... Has Allaire / MM
actually
developed db drivers?
Er, no, I just meant that the JDBC drivers about which people are
complaining were not written by us... which means that we
On Tuesday, Oct 8, 2002, at 15:09 US/Pacific, Matt Liotta wrote:
And as I responded in IM, that isn't answer. Why?
It *is* an answer. Saying wibble would be an answer. I never claimed
it was a helpful answer!
1. If that was true I could buy Flash Remoting for J2EE and use it with
CFMX
2.
On Tuesday, Oct 8, 2002, at 17:21 US/Pacific, Drew Harris wrote:
So, what is the difference between Flash Communication Server and Flash
Remoting Server?
Flash Communication Server is a server (like a web server or an
application server) that allows multiple Flash clients to shared
objects
On Tuesday, Oct 8, 2002, at 20:45 US/Pacific, Matt Liotta wrote:
According to Sean, there is no way to use Flash Remoting with CF and
Java from the same application server.
That is not what I said. You're just twisting people's words.
I have always wished that my computer would be as easy to
On Tuesday, Oct 8, 2002, at 20:44 US/Pacific, Matt Liotta wrote:
In my book, an answer is
supposed to be a solution to a problem; not wibble.
Yeah? Well, not everyone reads your book...
* Flash Remoting doesn't work...
Blah, blah, blah. OK, now you're really just being annoying. I've
dateFormat error in MX? would have been more descriptive (and more
tactful).
-Original Message-
From: Sean A Corfield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2002 8:03 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Not Another MX boo boo?
On Tuesday, Oct 8, 2002, at 14:07 US/Pacific, Rob Rohan
On Wednesday, Oct 9, 2002, at 08:41 US/Pacific, Jesse Noller wrote:
So, say you use something like, (lets pick on something easy) fusebox.
Fusebox
Let me jump in before people start flaming Jesse for picking on
Fusebox...
is a methodology for programming your CF application. Now, say you
On Wednesday, Oct 9, 2002, at 09:14 US/Pacific, Rob Rohan wrote:
Error Occurred While Processing Request
{ts '2002-10-09 09:12:48'} is an invalid date format.
The Error Occurred in D:\http\test\datetest.cfm: line 8
6 : /FORM ---
7 :
8 : CFSET str = dateformat(now(),mm/dd/yy (ddd))
9 :
On Wednesday, Oct 9, 2002, at 09:28 US/Pacific, Rick Faircloth wrote:
I've just been monitoring the thread, but from what I've read earlier,
this and maybe other CF-lists and other software lists might be worth
assigning someone to, to monitor and respond to as their day job.
Like a Community
On Monday, Oct 7, 2002, at 11:34 US/Pacific, Yexley Robert D Contr Det
1 AFRL/WSI wrote:
Line 90 is nothing more than the line with my /cfstoredproc on it.
So it appears obvious to me that somewhere within my stored proc call
that I have something wrong or missing or whatever. But I
Edwin Smith's session should be just what you need:
http://www.macromedia.com/v1/conference/
ConferenceProgramDetails.cfm#SS320W
CFMX: Under the Hood (Level: Expert, Format: Workshop)
ColdFusion MX is based on J2EE architecture. In addition to leveraging
the Servlet API up-front, JDBC
.X 5%
Netscape 3.X 6%
That's about 78% IE.
Hope that helps.
Sean A Corfield -- http://www.corfield.org/blog/
If you're not annoying somebody, you're not really alive.
-- Margaret Atwood
~|
Archives: http
On Wednesday, Oct 9, 2002, at 11:39 US/Pacific, Troy Simpson wrote:
Anyone know what product is the upgrade to ColdFusion Studio 5?
I can not find a ColdFusion Studio MX product on Macromedia's website.
If a ColdFusion Studio MX product does exist, is it worth upgrading
from
ColdFusion
On Thursday, Oct 10, 2002, at 10:00 US/Pacific, Rob Rohan wrote:
Yeah we still are. If you'd like I'll send you a link to our dev
server (off
list) with a page that shows whats going on. Mail me off list if you
want to
see. Sean has the link too.
I can confirm that Rob is definitely
On Thursday, Oct 10, 2002, at 05:58 US/Pacific, Everett, Al wrote:
Anybody using the BigIP load balancer from F5? Have you had any
problems
with sticky sessions?
We have run F5's Big IP in the following setup with no problems:
F5 Big IP
/ \
On Friday, Oct 11, 2002, at 09:30 US/Pacific, Rob Rohan wrote:
It's the Default Locale, and JRE 1.4.1
Hmm, a lot of people are running JRE 1.3.1 so this might be the
culprit? Can anyone else running 1.4.1 confirm (or deny) this
dateFormat problem? Can anyone who *is* seeing the bug please
On Wednesday, Oct 9, 2002, at 20:26 US/Pacific, Joshua Miller wrote:
I appreciate your posting this to the list. Let me take this
opportunity to extend an invitation to anyone using JEdit with
ColdFusion to contribute their findings, advice, screenshots, macros,
etc. to the FAQ.
I blogged
On Thursday, Oct 10, 2002, at 12:40 US/Pacific, Smith, Don , , WHS/PSD
wrote:
So who has a good book to recommend? I'm looking for a book that uses
broad
concepts that can be implemented in CFMX, so something like Object
Modeling
for Visual Basic would contain a lot of info I just
Yes, that's a pretty solid book (almost anything by Martin Fowler is
worth reading - check out his website: http://www.refactoring.com).
On Sunday, Oct 13, 2002, at 16:37 US/Pacific, John Wilker wrote:
I've read much of: UML Distilled: A Brief Guide to the Standard Object
Modeling Language
On Monday, Oct 14, 2002, at 09:12 US/Pacific, Jeffry Houser wrote:
But got confused when someone said they use telnet to check there
mail. ( What they must have meant was they use telnet to get into the
server, and then use a server-side program to check there mail ).
Nope, you can telnet
Which version of CF? Which OS? etc etc
On Monday, Oct 14, 2002, at 09:39 US/Pacific, Clark, Aimee wrote:
This is my first attempt at creating a cfschedule page. Unfortunately,
it is
not working. I coded it to run the test2.cfm page at 11:35AM, but it
did not
generate the emails I was
On Monday, Oct 14, 2002, at 16:06 US/Pacific, Mosh Teitelbaum wrote:
Macromedia's perceived lack of response has been a fairly popular
topic on
this list. While I don't completely agree with the perception,
anything
that allows developers greater interaction with MM (such as a JCP-like
On Monday, Oct 14, 2002, at 17:13 US/Pacific, S. Isaac Dealey wrote:
There is another way to simulate variables or ranges in a case
statement
with a cftry and cfcatch blocks...
try/catch is a pretty heavy operation - you should only use it for
(unexpected) error cases, not normal
On Monday, Oct 14, 2002, at 18:00 US/Pacific, Dick Applebaum wrote:
I should probably stay out of this--- oh, what the hell.
Now look what you've started! :)
BTW, Vince, I'd like typing of variables and Nulls in CFML :)
Hey Vince, ya wanna see my feature wishlist? It's *really* long!!
In no
obviously *proves* that strong typing
is not needed.
Sean A Corfield -- http://www.corfield.org/blog/
If you're not annoying somebody, you're not really alive.
-- Margaret Atwood
~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists
On Monday, Oct 14, 2002, at 19:30 US/Pacific, Dick Applebaum wrote:
Rather than have the chaos of Babel, at some point, if there are lots
of implementers of CFML, control of the (non-copyrighted) CFML language
should be placed in the hands on an independent entity.
Well, we told Sun that back
1 - 100 of 1199 matches
Mail list logo
