Re: [CFCDev] Maintainability vs. reusability?

2006-05-30 Thread Steve Bryant
Peter, I'm not sure this directly addresses your issue, but it seems related to me. I ran into this issue a while ago myself. DAOs seemed for my situations to be more work than they were worth. I ended up creating a component to handle common database interactions (updates and inserts). For

RE: [CFCDev] Maintainability vs. reusability?

2006-05-30 Thread Peter Bell
] Maintainability vs. reusability? Peter, I'm not sure this directly addresses your issue, but it seems related to me. I ran into this issue a while ago myself. DAOs seemed for my situations to be more work than they were worth. I ended up creating a component to handle common database interactions

Re: [CFCDev] Maintainability vs. reusability?

2006-05-30 Thread Tom McNeer
Peter,I realize you're asking about much more than just DAOs. But have you considered using Reactor, or something similar, to handle your database interaction? I think it might solve some of the same issues you're wrestling with in the consideration of a single, generic DAO. -- Thanks,TomTom

RE: [CFCDev] Maintainability vs. reusability?

2006-05-30 Thread Peter Bell
] On Behalf Of Tom McNeerSent: Tuesday, May 30, 2006 12:06 PMTo: CFCDev@cfczone.orgSubject: Re: [CFCDev] Maintainability vs. reusability?Peter,I realize you're asking about much more than just DAOs. But have you considered using Reactor, or something similar, to handle your database