On Thursday 15 Feb 2007, Kola Oyedeji wrote:
I'm with Sam on this - where possible you should aim to have a daily
build. If the daily build is broken - it gets fixed asap.
We tend to do weekly builds on longer projects, and, yes, if the intergration
build (of whatever frequency) is broken, it
On 2/8/07, Sammy Larbi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tom Chiverton wrote, On 2/8/2007 10:31 AM:
On Thursday 08 Feb 2007, Sammy Larbi wrote:
You shouldn't get hung up on always having a working HEAD.
Why do you say that? I've always been taught not to break builds when
you check-in code.
Tom Chiverton wrote, On 2/8/2007 10:31 AM:
On Thursday 08 Feb 2007, Sammy Larbi wrote:
You shouldn't get hung up on always having a working HEAD.
Why do you say that? I've always been taught not to break builds when
you check-in code. Wouldn't that require being hung up on that?
- Need versioning/backup of files in various states of editing.
- Team members should be able to get the latest build and have it function
enough to work on their own part
- Not sure the latest version of code checked in by developers should be
considered in a ready to ship state unless your
Kola Oyedeji wrote:
Taking this further off topic (;-) and feel free to mail me off list
but what exactly does subversion bring to the table that CVS doesn't
offer? Also CVS is good (and the Eclipse/CFeclipse cvs support is
really handy) but there can be issues with branching when using it on
Thanks, sounds good to me - definitely out it on my list of things to
have a look at
On Thu, 21 Oct 2004 09:05:02 -0400, John Paul Ashenfelter
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Kola Oyedeji wrote:
Taking this further off topic (;-) and feel free to mail me off list
but what exactly does
What is everyone using and how good is it???
I moved from CVS to Subversion and I can't look back anymore
The software is here:
http://subversion.tigris.org/
First class docs:
http://svnbook.red-bean.com/
For Windowws clients this is a good GUI:
http://tortoisesvn.tigris.org/
This may be
Hey -
We use MS-VSS here, I don't know about the 5K price. We use it for 3
developers and I don't think it cost that much.
I like it alot, it's very easy to use and HomeSite can leverage it. It also
does everything you were looking for. As you prolly already know.
I really dig the way you can
I've been very happy with Surround. I believe by Seapine.
I've also experimented with... Perforce. Perforce is free for up to 2
developers and looks to be able (However I think Surround is much easier to
use).
At 03:14 PM 10/19/2004, you wrote:
Any suggestions on source control products?
I
I'll second Subversion. CVS is great, but if you are starting from
scratch you might as well start with Subversion instead.
Based on your list of things you are trying, be sure you understand the
difference between CVS/Subversion and TortoiseCVS and TortoiseSVN (and
between CVSNT and WinCVS)
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Nathan Dintenfass
Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 2004 2:31 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [CFCDev] Source Control
I'll second Subversion. CVS is great, but if you are
starting from scratch you might as well start with Subversion
We use Borland StarTeam, which we've been very happy with. Downside:
it can be very expensive, depending on your needs.
--
You are subscribed to cfcdev. To unsubscribe, send an email
to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the words 'unsubscribe cfcdev'
I moved from CVS to Subversion and I can't look back anymore
The software is here:
http://subversion.tigris.org/
First class docs:
http://svnbook.red-bean.com/
For Windowws clients this is a good GUI:
http://tortoisesvn.tigris.org/
This may be worth a check to get an idea about
PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Nathan Dintenfass
Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 2004 2:31 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [CFCDev] Source Control
I'll second Subversion. CVS is great, but if you are
starting from scratch you might as well start with Subversion instead.
Based on your list of things you
Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Nathan Dintenfass
Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 2004 2:48 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [CFCDev] Source Control
What kind of problems?
Personally, I'd say that if you are on Windows you should use
Tortoise
Nathan Dintenfass [EMAIL PROTECTED]@cfczone.org on 10/19/2004
12:47:45 PM
Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:Re: [CFCDev] Source Control
What kind of problems?
Personally, I'd say that if you are on Windows you should
What did you find difficult about starting a new project? Just run
`cvs import -m created project projectName yourName start` from an
emtpy directory. That's it. Check out a working directory (which
will be empty, of course), start adding your files, and away you go.
I don't know how differen
: Tuesday, October 19, 2004 3:11 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [CFCDev] Source Control
What did you find difficult about starting a new project?
Just run `cvs import -m created project projectName
yourName start` from an emtpy directory. That's it. Check
out a working directory
Hmm, you shouldn't ever have to manually create your projects. Even at
the command line things are smoother than that.
Tortoise is your friend on Windows.
Now, what was that I was saying about keeping things on topic?
Raymond Camden wrote:
The issues were that the CVS server was on
Now, what was that I was saying about keeping things on topic?
While not obviously on-topic, I think this is definitely within
acceptable realm. Source control might not be CF-specific, but it's
definitely a common problem for CF developers, which makes it quite
appropriate, at least in
I'm going to kick myself for pursuing this, but CFCDev is not a
general-purpose CF list. There are lots of other places for that --
this list was created specifically for talking about CFC development and
associated things (like OO concepts used to build CFCs).
Barney Boisvert wrote:
Now,
]
Subject: Re: [CFCDev] Source Control
I'm going to kick myself for pursuing this, but CFCDev is not
a general-purpose CF list. There are lots of other places
for that -- this list was created specifically for talking
about CFC development and associated things (like OO concepts
used
Sure enough. Ryan's original message went to both CFCDev and CFTalk,
and my GMail labeled it as CFTalk, so I assumed that's where we were.
I retract my statement, apologize for my unability to use my mail
client correctly, and agree that this is off-topic. Sorry about that.
;)
cheers,
barneyb
it is. - Yoda
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Barney Boisvert
Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 2004 3:11 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [CFCDev] Source Control
What did you find difficult about starting a new project
Taking this further off topic (;-) and feel free to mail me off list
but what exactly does subversion bring to the table that CVS doesn't
offer? Also CVS is good (and the Eclipse/CFeclipse cvs support is
really handy) but there can be issues with branching when using it on
large web projects which
Read their home page:
http://subversion.tigris.org/
See also:
http://www.pushok.com/soft_svn_vscvs.php
http://wush.net/subversion_vs_cvs.php
Kola Oyedeji wrote:
Taking this further off topic (;-) and feel free to mail me off list
but what exactly does subversion bring to the table that CVS
2 cents -
I found this thread to be of value. It helped me to become aware of other
VersionControl systems.
I also agree with your position on short burst threads.
BN
From: Raymond Camden [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [CFCDev] Source Control
27 matches
Mail list logo
