llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: None (martinboehme)
Changes
To avoid generating unnecessary values, we don't create a new value but instead
leave it to the specific analysis to do this if desired.
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/94217.diff
2
https://github.com/martinboehme created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/94217
To avoid generating unnecessary values, we don't create a new value but instead
leave it to the specific analysis to do this if desired.
>From dc88f5ddb98ebfb738fe26ae268d9d1f42a1957a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00
zmodem wrote:
> Ok, I have confirmed that the getMostRecentDecl() fix does indeed work on the
> main branch.
Great!
> However, this fix also causes a dllimport test to fail too, so perhaps that
> was the "failure" that I encountered, I just don't remember.
Was this about `@_ZdlPv` in
Sirraide wrote:
> Also, what do you think about the fix-it hint wording for errors such as
> `assignment to cast is illegal, lvalue casts are not supported`?
Don’t remember what that was for off the top of my head, but just the same
fix-it should be fine imo
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Pierre d'Herbemont (pdherbemont)
Changes
Today, it's only supported inside C++ classes or top level C/C++
declaration.
I mostly copied and adapted over the code from the
[[counted_by(value)]] lookup.
---
Full diff:
github-actions[bot] wrote:
Thank you for submitting a Pull Request (PR) to the LLVM Project!
This PR will be automatically labeled and the relevant teams will be
notified.
If you wish to, you can add reviewers by using the "Reviewers" section on this
page.
If this is not working for you,
https://github.com/pdherbemont created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/94216
Today, it's only supported inside C++ classes or top level C/C++
declaration.
I mostly copied and adapted over the code from the
[[counted_by(value)]] lookup.
>From 7b5c9e566c326a16d192ae478c806cbc
https://github.com/a-tarasyuk updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/94173
>From b4f5d6d43d369649711cece6057c8fe2758a5a89 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Oleksandr T
Date: Mon, 3 Jun 2024 00:22:02 +0300
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] fix(80474): use expression error on incomplete
DavidSpickett wrote:
> First Windows CI results: LLDB unit tests do not even build.
Linaro's Windows bot uses clang-cl, but I do remember something like this there
too. I will do a local build with msvc and see what I can do.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/94208
https://github.com/a-tarasyuk edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/94123
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
dkrupp wrote:
In the latest commit I fixed all remaining review comments.
GenericTaintchecker should be a dependency as mentioned in the FIXME, but it
cannot be one until the checker is not a modeling checker. This separation will
be done in a later follow-up patch. Until then, the
https://github.com/balazske commented:
The change looks good, only the test can be made more exact.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/93923
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
@@ -9674,6 +9674,40 @@ TEST_P(ASTImporterOptionSpecificTestBase,
ImportInstantiatedFromMember) {
EXPECT_TRUE(ImportedPartialSpecialization->getInstantiatedFromMember());
}
+AST_MATCHER_P(EnumDecl, hasEnumConstName, StringRef, ConstName) {
+ for (EnumConstantDecl *D :
@@ -9674,6 +9674,40 @@ TEST_P(ASTImporterOptionSpecificTestBase,
ImportInstantiatedFromMember) {
EXPECT_TRUE(ImportedPartialSpecialization->getInstantiatedFromMember());
}
+AST_MATCHER_P(EnumDecl, hasEnumConstName, StringRef, ConstName) {
+ for (EnumConstantDecl *D :
https://github.com/balazske edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/93923
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/dkrupp updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92420
>From f6fdd544a90b865e5e0e530930db87cad405216e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Daniel Krupp
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2024 15:20:52 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 1/6] [analyzer] Adding taint analysis capability to
unix.Malloc
@@ -351,6 +351,10 @@ Changes in existing checks
` check to also handle
calls to ``compare`` method.
+- Improved :doc:`modernize-use-std-format` and
mikecrowe wrote:
I spotted that just too late...
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/94104
Endilll wrote:
It'd be nice to have an approval from @tbaederr as the author of the original
test.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/94206
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
Endilll wrote:
@DavidSpickett I made the changes you suggested. Let's see how this Linux run
fares.
Any thoughts on
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/94208#issuecomment-2144949637 ?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/94208
___
https://github.com/ckandeler closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/69704
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Christian Kandeler
Date: 2024-06-03T14:48:53+02:00
New Revision: 955c2237629ae252bed44177f0b65a8805051add
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/955c2237629ae252bed44177f0b65a8805051add
DIFF:
ckandeler wrote:
I'm going to merge this without explicit format approval based on the following:
- There was a general LGTM.
- I addressed the remaining issues.
- There was no further feedback for more than half a year.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/69704
https://github.com/Endilll updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/94208
>From 5c757153a3f462d40663add6a9ae7caf42272913 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Vlad Serebrennikov
Date: Mon, 3 Jun 2024 13:33:36 +0300
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] Enable LLDB tests in pre-submit CI
---
https://github.com/mikecrowe updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/94104
>From 2972062997ca582100b5797cd548c4dc2f80c69a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Mike Crowe
Date: Fri, 31 May 2024 21:27:03 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [clang-tidy] Fix assert in modernize-use-std-format/print
https://github.com/dkrupp edited https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92420
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Endilll wrote:
> You can either install it with pip
I'll do that, but I think LLDB should follow the example of MLIR here, so that
pipeline scripts don't have hard-coded dependencies for individual projects:
@@ -351,6 +351,10 @@ Changes in existing checks
` check to also handle
calls to ``compare`` method.
+- Improved :doc:`modernize-use-std-format` and
PiotrZSL wrote:
remove modernize-use-std-format from here, as it's new check, only leave
std-print
https://github.com/Endilll closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/94203
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Vlad Serebrennikov
Date: 2024-06-03T16:39:20+04:00
New Revision: a58dd0e948040b75266b2ee02292a16ed7b2afd5
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/a58dd0e948040b75266b2ee02292a16ed7b2afd5
DIFF:
https://github.com/mikecrowe updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/94104
>From 2972062997ca582100b5797cd548c4dc2f80c69a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Mike Crowe
Date: Fri, 31 May 2024 21:27:03 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [clang-tidy] Fix assert in modernize-use-std-format/print
DavidSpickett wrote:
And I would bet that a majority of the unresolved are due to:
```
ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'pexpect'
```
You can either install it with `pip` or pass
`-DLLDB_TEST_USER_ARGS=--skip-category=pexpect` to CMake.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/94208
github-actions[bot] wrote:
:warning: C/C++ code formatter, clang-format found issues in your code.
:warning:
You can test this locally with the following command:
``bash
git-clang-format --diff 16397e8ec7ffbee2907dfec698356f67672086e8
574cc6ad99c622381eb0ba0e35f55efba52d32c9 --
DavidSpickett wrote:
> lldb-shell :: SymbolFile/DWARF/x86/module-ownership.mm
This is due to https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92083, it's been
reverted now.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/94208
___
cfe-commits mailing list
https://github.com/mikecrowe updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/94104
>From 2972062997ca582100b5797cd548c4dc2f80c69a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Mike Crowe
Date: Fri, 31 May 2024 21:27:03 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [clang-tidy] Fix assert in modernize-use-std-format/print
mikaelholmen wrote:
> @mikaelholmen Thanks for the report, should be fixed by
> [bda8d1a](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/bda8d1ad72fc72f21f6c536692594376d00db8b6).
Yep, thanks! That was fast! :)
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92885
Endilll wrote:
Linux results are ready. `SymbolFile/DWARF/x86/module-ownership.mm` is crashing.
While unresolved tests are not considered failed, if you grep for `FAILED`,
they add a lot of noise that would make harder for people to realize what the
actual reason for CI failure.
All in all, I
nikic wrote:
@mikaelholmen Thanks for the report, should be fixed by
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/bda8d1ad72fc72f21f6c536692594376d00db8b6.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92885
___
cfe-commits mailing list
@@ -20,6 +20,11 @@ namespace clang::tidy::modernize {
namespace {
AST_MATCHER(StringLiteral, isOrdinary) { return Node.isOrdinary(); }
+AST_MATCHER(QualType, isSimpleChar) {
+ const auto ActualType = Node.getTypePtr();
+ return
https://github.com/gamesh411 closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/93815
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Endre Fülöp
Date: 2024-06-03T14:23:58+02:00
New Revision: 6ef785c9517e8e44ddda8263e5f319b44f56cff8
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/6ef785c9517e8e44ddda8263e5f319b44f56cff8
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/6ef785c9517e8e44ddda8263e5f319b44f56cff8.diff
Endilll wrote:
> > @Michael137 This is for Linux. Windows works the same way just below those
> > lines:
> > https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/9a7bd8a60f03595be5d42315790df6d409f81091/.ci/generate-buildkite-pipeline-premerge#L253-L255
>
> Ah, so what would the issue be with just adding
https://github.com/AaronBallman approved this pull request.
LGTM!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/94203
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/AaronBallman edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/94203
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/AaronBallman edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/94203
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -282,6 +288,8 @@ namespace {
}
void HandleTranslationUnit(ASTContext ) override {
+ IRGenFinished = true;
AaronBallman wrote:
shouldn't this be set at the end of `HandleTranslationUnit` rather than the
beginning?
@@ -138,6 +138,8 @@ namespace {
assert(!M && "Replacing existing Module?");
M.reset(new llvm::Module(ExpandModuleName(ModuleName, CodeGenOpts), C));
+ IRGenFinished = false;
AaronBallman wrote:
Why is IR gen *finished* when we're just
Michael137 wrote:
> @Michael137 This is for Linux. Windows works the same way just below those
> lines:
>
> https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/9a7bd8a60f03595be5d42315790df6d409f81091/.ci/generate-buildkite-pipeline-premerge#L253-L255
Ah, so what would the issue be with just adding
mikaelholmen wrote:
Hi @nikic
The following starts crashing with this patch:
```
opt ic2.ll -S -o /dev/null -passes=instcombine
```
It hits
```
opt: ../include/llvm/Support/Casting.h:578: decltype(auto) llvm::cast(From *)
[To = llvm::TruncInst, From = llvm::Value]: Assertion `isa(Val) &&
Rajveer100 wrote:
Tests which fail currently:
Clang :: Sema/exprs.c
Clang :: Sema/va_arg_x86_32.c
Clang :: SemaObjCXX/sel-address.mm
Also, what do you think about the fix-it hint wording for errors such as
`assignment to cast is illegal, lvalue casts are not supported`?
https://github.com/AlexVlx updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/93914
>From 34b9646a38c6bdd0419dd9d2eb1bc847c4d16596 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Alex Voicu
Date: Tue, 28 May 2024 20:09:15 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 1/8] Fix `emitUsed` to place `used` globals in the Global AS.
https://github.com/klensy updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92231
>From 910a674252a7f0968db46c9ed09879ae58e90d3b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: klensy
Date: Wed, 15 May 2024 12:14:56 +0300
Subject: [PATCH] [ExtractAPI,test] fix filecheck annotation
---
steakhal wrote:
Fixed most NFC typos and suggestions.
Let's continue the discussion.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/93408
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -1730,6 +1721,21 @@ def UnixAPIPortabilityChecker : Checker<"UnixAPI">,
} // end optin.portability
+
+//===--===//
+// Taint checkers.
https://github.com/steakhal updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/93408
>From f9e841ddaa865d529c806b2d115d5ddbc7109243 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Balazs Benics
Date: Sun, 26 May 2024 11:40:01 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 1/6] [analyzer] Refine invalidation caused by `fread`
This
@@ -717,18 +717,71 @@ const ExplodedNode
*StreamChecker::getAcquisitionSite(const ExplodedNode *N,
return nullptr;
}
+/// Invalidate only the requested elements instead of the whole buffer.
+/// This is basically a refinement of the more generic 'escapeArgs' or
+/// the
https://github.com/cor3ntin approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/93206
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/cor3ntin commented:
I think it makes sense.
I kinda wish there would be a more generic way to skip over requires
expressions but I also can't think of other contexts we'd want to skip over, so
this looks fine.
Thanks for fixing a large number of issues
Endilll wrote:
@Michael137 This is for Linux. Windows works the same way just below those
lines:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/9a7bd8a60f03595be5d42315790df6d409f81091/.ci/generate-buildkite-pipeline-premerge#L253-L255
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/94208
@@ -937,8 +990,21 @@ void StreamChecker::evalFreadFwrite(const FnDescription
*Desc,
// At read, invalidate the buffer in any case of error or success,
// except if EOF was already present.
- if (IsFread && !E.isStreamEof())
-State = escapeArgs(State, C, Call, {0});
Michael137 wrote:
> > Should we just run the tests for the LLDB C++ language plugin (i.e., the
> > part of LLDB that invokes Clang and the JIT). And then we could expand the
> > set of tests from there later?
>
> In the bash script that currently handles this, "targets that we need to
>
sdkrystian wrote:
This does seem to cause an error in libstdc++:
```
include/c++/11/bits/shared_ptr.h:365:10: error: use 'template' keyword to treat
'__shared_ptr' as a dependent template name
this->__shared_ptr<_Tp>::operator=(__r);
^
```
Since `this` is dependent (it's of
https://github.com/AaronBallman closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/93942
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Takuto Ikuta
Date: 2024-06-03T07:30:14-04:00
New Revision: 9a7bd8a60f03595be5d42315790df6d409f81091
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/9a7bd8a60f03595be5d42315790df6d409f81091
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/9a7bd8a60f03595be5d42315790df6d409f81091.diff
Endilll wrote:
First Windows CI results: LLDB unit tests do not even build.
```
FAILED:
tools/lldb/unittests/Process/gdb-remote/CMakeFiles/ProcessGdbRemoteTests.dir/GDBRemoteCommunicationClientTest.cpp.obj
sccache C:\BuildTools\VC\Tools\MSVC\14.29.30133\bin\Hostx64\x64\cl.exe /nologo
/TP
Endilll wrote:
> Should we just run the tests for the LLDB C++ language plugin (i.e., the part
> of LLDB that invokes Clang and the JIT). And then we could expand the set of
> tests from there later?
In the bash script that currently handles this, "targets that we need to check
if lldb is
Michael137 wrote:
I.e., also broke the macOS LLDB buildbots:
https://green.lab.llvm.org/job/llvm.org/view/LLDB/job/lldb-cmake/2637/execution/node/97/log/
```
Assertion failed: (!((*IDAddress) >> 48) && "We should only set the module ID
once"), function setOwningModuleID, file DeclBase.cpp,
Michael137 wrote:
Worth a shot i guess. Though it could be somewhat disruptive if we do in fact
have flaky tests. I don't think we need to run *all* tests. Should we just run
the tests for the LLDB C++ language plugin (i.e., the part of LLDB that invokes
Clang and the JIT). And then we could
https://github.com/cor3ntin approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/94206
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
hctim wrote:
Hi from the sanitizer buildbot mainter, thanks for the fast revert! For full
reproduction, you can use
https://github.com/google/sanitizers/wiki/SanitizerBotReproduceBuild and
`buildbot_fast.sh`. But, you can reproduce it quicker by using
`-DCMAKE_C_FLAGS="-fsanitize=undefined"
DavidSpickett wrote:
This also broke an lldb test:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/96/builds/58449
`lldb-test: ../llvm-project/clang/lib/AST/DeclBase.cpp:132: void
clang::Decl::setOwningModuleID(unsigned int): Assertion `!((*IDAddress) >> 48)
&& "We should only set the module ID
Endre =?utf-8?q?F=C3=BCl=C3=B6p?=
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
https://github.com/steakhal approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/93815
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
Author: Chuanqi Xu
Date: 2024-06-03T18:49:18+08:00
New Revision: 6b30180b663e1fe4de32046398581a374c8a54f2
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/6b30180b663e1fe4de32046398581a374c8a54f2
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/6b30180b663e1fe4de32046398581a374c8a54f2.diff
ChuanqiXu9 wrote:
I'll close it as there are some crashes.
---
The crash log:
```
** TEST 'Clang :: Modules/redecl-ivars.m' FAILED
Exit Code: 1
Command Output (stderr):
--
RUN: at line 2: rm -rf
NagyDonat wrote:
> With the current version I have the following observations:
>
> * There is a warning for `( + 1) - ` and `( - 1) - `. Should this
> be fixed?
The expression `( + 1) - ` is valid and should not produce a warning. It
could appear e.g. in code that's structured like
```
https://github.com/gamesh411 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/93815
From 1da3d4dc3c74f1240e7d921c97b0c7eea2a53e33 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Endre=20F=C3=BCl=C3=B6p?=
Date: Wed, 29 May 2024 00:38:07 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [clang][analyzer] Move
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-lldb
Author: Vlad Serebrennikov (Endilll)
Changes
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/94208.diff
2 Files Affected:
- (modified) .ci/generate-buildkite-pipeline-premerge (+1-3)
- (modified)
https://github.com/Endilll created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/94208
None
>From 5c757153a3f462d40663add6a9ae7caf42272913 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Vlad Serebrennikov
Date: Mon, 3 Jun 2024 13:33:36 +0300
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] Enable LLDB tests in pre-submit CI
---
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Vlad Serebrennikov (Endilll)
Changes
This patch refactors an existing test for
[CWG2390](https://cplusplus.github.io/CWG/issues/2390.html) "Is the argument of
`__has_cpp_attribute` macro-expanded?" to use `#error` instead of emitting a
https://github.com/Endilll edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/94203
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/Endilll created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/94206
This patch refactors an existing test for
[CWG2390](https://cplusplus.github.io/CWG/issues/2390.html) "Is the argument of
`__has_cpp_attribute` macro-expanded?" to use `#error` instead of emitting a
variable
pointhex wrote:
Done: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/94205
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91317
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
bgra8 wrote:
heads-up @yronglin: we've bisected many compilation breakages to this patch.
We're working on a reproducer.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92527
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
@@ -0,0 +1,74 @@
+// RUN: %clang_analyze_cc1 -analyzer-checker=alpha.core.PointerSub -verify %s
+
+void f1(void) {
+ int x, y, z[10];
+ int d = - // expected-warning{{Subtraction of two pointers that do
not point into the same array is undefined behavior}}
+ d = z - //
https://github.com/NagyDonat commented:
This change follows both the letter and the spirit of PEP8. (Note that `True`
and `False` are not "singletons like `None`" because the type `bool` has two
possible values -- but different rules still claim that the original code was
bad and the new code
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Vlad Serebrennikov (Endilll)
Changes
In #94167 I found out that `cwg28xx.cpp` has been running without
`-pedantic-errors` and fixed that. This patch fixes that for the rest of the
test suite. Only one tests as affected with a trivial fix
https://github.com/Endilll created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/94203
In #94167 I found out that `cwg28xx.cpp` has been running without
`-pedantic-errors` and fixed that. This patch fixes that for the rest of the
test suite. Only one tests as affected with a trivial fix (warning
https://github.com/jtb20 updated https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92731
>From 4337a97fb8982addfd6740db2ff08dfb0398842e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Julian Brown
Date: Wed, 1 May 2024 06:35:59 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] [OpenMP] OpenMP 5.1 "assume" directive parsing support
This is a
=?utf-8?q?Bal=C3=A1zs_K=C3=A9ri?=
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
https://github.com/steakhal approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/93980
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
=?utf-8?q?Balázs_Kéri?=
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
https://github.com/steakhal edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/93980
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
zyn0217 wrote:
@cor3ntin I have reduced the test cases (removed duplicate ones) and hopefully
they look better. Can you please take another look? thanks!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/93206
___
cfe-commits mailing list
https://github.com/mydeveloperday edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91317
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/mydeveloperday approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/94189
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/zyn0217 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/93206
>From 658e9d46adf6dd79aa6aef03a1817444a880348a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Younan Zhang
Date: Thu, 23 May 2024 22:35:11 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [Clang][Sema] Tweak tryCaptureVariable for unevaluated
@@ -1576,7 +1576,10 @@ ExprResult Parser::ParseLambdaExpressionAfterIntroducer(
TrailingReturnTypeLoc, ),
std::move(Attributes), DeclEndLoc);
-Actions.ActOnLambdaClosureQualifiers(Intro, MutableLoc);
+// We have called
mydeveloperday wrote:
Please log an issue explaining the problem you are trying solve, its not clear
to me what problem led you to this.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91317
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://github.com/Endilll closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/94167
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Vlad Serebrennikov
Date: 2024-06-03T13:47:28+04:00
New Revision: 4f2dba3c0b4e5f11b968a840b5f70070f5288cfe
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/4f2dba3c0b4e5f11b968a840b5f70070f5288cfe
DIFF:
github-actions[bot] wrote:
@AlexGhiti Congratulations on having your first Pull Request (PR) merged into
the LLVM Project!
Your changes will be combined with recent changes from other authors, then
tested
by our [build bots](https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/). If there is a problem with
a
https://github.com/dtcxzyw closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/93831
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: AlexGhiti
Date: 2024-06-03T17:27:02+08:00
New Revision: 6b7444964a8d028989beee554a1f5c61d16a1cac
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/6b7444964a8d028989beee554a1f5c61d16a1cac
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/6b7444964a8d028989beee554a1f5c61d16a1cac.diff
1 - 100 of 436342 matches
Mail list logo
