github-actions[bot] wrote:
:white_check_mark: With the latest revision this PR passed the C/C++ code
formatter.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/86377
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
github-actions[bot] wrote:
:white_check_mark: With the latest revision this PR passed the Python code
formatter.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/86377
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-codegen
Author: Longsheng Mou (CoTinker)
Changes
tweak the position of the ++neededSSE when Lo is NoClass and Hi is SSE. Fix
#86371.
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/86377.diff
2 Files Affected:
- (modified)
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-backend-x86
Author: Longsheng Mou (CoTinker)
Changes
tweak the position of the ++neededSSE when Lo is NoClass and Hi is SSE. Fix
#86371.
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/86377.diff
2 Files Affected:
- (modified)
https://github.com/CoTinker created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/86377
tweak the position of the ++neededSSE when Lo is NoClass and Hi is SSE. Fix
#86371.
>From 551d1cd574cdf66a73dbe4e384a21949013e0baa Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Longsheng Mou
Date: Sat, 23 Mar 2024 11:52:04
joker-eph wrote:
LGTM overall, but the CI failure looks real.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/86318
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -418,39 +448,60 @@ static ReadySuspendResumeResult buildCoawaitCalls(Sema
, VarDecl *CoroPromise,
return Calls;
}
Expr *CoroHandle = CoroHandleRes.get();
- CallExpr *AwaitSuspend = cast_or_null(
- BuildSubExpr(ACT::ACT_Suspend, "await_suspend", CoroHandle));
@@ -0,0 +1,82 @@
+//===--- EnumInitialValueCheck.cpp - clang-tidy
---===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier:
https://github.com/5chmidti edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/86129
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -0,0 +1,82 @@
+//===--- EnumInitialValueCheck.cpp - clang-tidy
---===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier:
https://github.com/5chmidti edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/86129
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -0,0 +1,82 @@
+//===--- EnumInitialValueCheck.cpp - clang-tidy
---===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier:
https://github.com/5chmidti commented:
Just nits and a comment regarding the linear, all initialized enum. and all
other checks use west-const from what I can tell.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/86129
___
cfe-commits mailing list
@@ -0,0 +1,27 @@
+// RUN: %check_clang_tidy %s readability-enum-initial-value %t
+
+enum EError {
+ // CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-1]]:1: warning: inital value in enum EError has
readability issue, explicit initialization of all of enumerators
+ EError_a = 1,
+ EError_b,
+ //
Author: Corentin Jabot
Date: 2024-03-23T10:04:45+09:00
New Revision: b723c57f8fdb12ca8eaa6c5ee2afb820aaeb56c5
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/b723c57f8fdb12ca8eaa6c5ee2afb820aaeb56c5
DIFF:
@@ -418,39 +448,60 @@ static ReadySuspendResumeResult buildCoawaitCalls(Sema
, VarDecl *CoroPromise,
return Calls;
}
Expr *CoroHandle = CoroHandleRes.get();
- CallExpr *AwaitSuspend = cast_or_null(
- BuildSubExpr(ACT::ACT_Suspend, "await_suspend", CoroHandle));
@@ -418,39 +448,60 @@ static ReadySuspendResumeResult buildCoawaitCalls(Sema
, VarDecl *CoroPromise,
return Calls;
}
Expr *CoroHandle = CoroHandleRes.get();
- CallExpr *AwaitSuspend = cast_or_null(
- BuildSubExpr(ACT::ACT_Suspend, "await_suspend", CoroHandle));
tstellar wrote:
Do we need to backport this to release/18.x?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/84230
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
JonChesterfield wrote:
I'm sorry to hear that. I've only used the ENABLE_RUNTIMES in the context of
compiling clang first, and then compiling the libraries under runtime with that
clang. The recursive invocation drops (most) arguments passed to cmake which
has been obstructive in the past.
mikerice1969 wrote:
> This could use a test.
I thought about it, but I have no idea how to write that test. Do you have an
idea?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/86360
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
@@ -418,39 +448,60 @@ static ReadySuspendResumeResult buildCoawaitCalls(Sema
, VarDecl *CoroPromise,
return Calls;
}
Expr *CoroHandle = CoroHandleRes.get();
- CallExpr *AwaitSuspend = cast_or_null(
- BuildSubExpr(ACT::ACT_Suspend, "await_suspend", CoroHandle));
@@ -339,6 +339,9 @@ Bug Fixes in This Version
- Fixes an assertion failure on invalid code when trying to define member
functions in lambdas.
+- Clang now emits errors for coroutine `await_suspend` functions whose return
type is not
+ one of `void`, `bool`, or
@@ -358,6 +364,30 @@ static Expr *maybeTailCall(Sema , QualType RetType, Expr
*E,
return S.MaybeCreateExprWithCleanups(JustAddress);
}
+static bool isSpecializationOfCoroutineHandle(Sema , QualType Ty,
+ SourceLocation Loc) {
+
jansvoboda11 wrote:
This could use a test.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/86360
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/jansvoboda11 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/86358
>From 109e6039abe8bd3b598f1fdc2dbd7bca783ff4e6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jan Svoboda
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2024 15:54:14 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [clang] Move state out of `PreprocessorOptions` (1/n)
An
arichardson wrote:
It might make sense to restore the `message(FATAL_ERROR)` since that is any
easy mistake to make considering it used to be the default way of building
libunwind.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/86351
___
cfe-commits
https://github.com/jansvoboda11 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/86358
>From 109e6039abe8bd3b598f1fdc2dbd7bca783ff4e6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jan Svoboda
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2024 15:54:14 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [clang] Move state out of `PreprocessorOptions` (1/n)
An
github-actions[bot] wrote:
:white_check_mark: With the latest revision this PR passed the Python code
formatter.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/86360
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
github-actions[bot] wrote:
:white_check_mark: With the latest revision this PR passed the C/C++ code
formatter.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/86360
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-tidy
Author: Mike Rice (mikerice1969)
Changes
If any return from overwriteChangedFiles is true some fixes were not applied.
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/86360.diff
1 Files Affected:
- (modified)
https://github.com/mikerice1969 created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/86360
If any return from overwriteChangedFiles is true some fixes were not applied.
>From 492e0fc4e146d7321003470a9cd0b4be4ae39d7a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Mike Rice
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2024 16:02:54 -0700
github-actions[bot] wrote:
:white_check_mark: With the latest revision this PR passed the Python code
formatter.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/86358
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
github-actions[bot] wrote:
:white_check_mark: With the latest revision this PR passed the C/C++ code
formatter.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/86358
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Jan Svoboda (jansvoboda11)
Changes
An instance of `PreprocessorOptions` is part of `CompilerInvocation` which is
supposed to be a value type. The `DependencyDirectivesForFile` member is
problematic, since it holds an owning reference of
https://github.com/jansvoboda11 created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/86358
An instance of `PreprocessorOptions` is part of `CompilerInvocation` which is
supposed to be a value type. The `DependencyDirectivesForFile` member is
problematic, since it holds an owning reference of the
mstorsjo wrote:
This build configuration was explicitly made disallowed in
6f17768e11480063f4c2bcbeea559505fee3ea19, with an error message explaining the
situation. However that error message was later removed in
0a22dfcb11c05cbd4f654c8ef1868a4bc6085140.
arichardson wrote:
CI looks unhappy, mlir also seems to need updates:
MLIR :: Target/LLVMIR/llvmir.mlir
MLIR :: mlir-cpu-runner/x86-varargs.mlir
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/85460
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://github.com/jansvoboda11 closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/86347
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Jan Svoboda
Date: 2024-03-22T16:09:34-07:00
New Revision: b768a8c1db85b9e84fd8b356570a3a8fbe37acf6
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/b768a8c1db85b9e84fd8b356570a3a8fbe37acf6
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/b768a8c1db85b9e84fd8b356570a3a8fbe37acf6.diff
github-actions[bot] wrote:
@katzdm Congratulations on having your first Pull Request (PR) merged into the
LLVM Project!
Your changes will be combined with recent changes from other authors, then
tested
by our [build bots](https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/). If there is a problem with
a build,
https://github.com/Sirraide closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/86122
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Daniel M. Katz
Date: 2024-03-23T00:08:02+01:00
New Revision: 00248754176d74aed2e0785d9982a5ea8e91a71a
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/00248754176d74aed2e0785d9982a5ea8e91a71a
DIFF:
https://github.com/usama54321 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/86220
>From 0dab57b9f541a9fb6cbbe85f034117a19227c331 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: usama
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2024 16:56:32 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] Get the linker version and pass the it to compiler-rt tests
on
https://github.com/usama54321 closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/86220
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/akyrtzi approved this pull request.
Nice! Note that you implemented rdar://107663951
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/86347
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://github.com/rapidsna closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/86017
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Author: Yeoul Na
Date: 2024-03-23T07:26:35+09:00
New Revision: b1e97d60bd5b1d3f994345caa4012ea11c2a0f62
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/b1e97d60bd5b1d3f994345caa4012ea11c2a0f62
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/b1e97d60bd5b1d3f994345caa4012ea11c2a0f62.diff
https://github.com/5chmidti requested changes to this pull request.
Looks good, but the `operand` node may also be in an unevaluated context, you
only guard against the non `++/--` expr being in an unevaluated context here.
Fix: add `unless(IsInUnevaluatedContext)` to both
github-actions[bot] wrote:
:white_check_mark: With the latest revision this PR passed the Python code
formatter.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/86220
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://github.com/benlangmuir approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/86347
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
github-actions[bot] wrote:
:white_check_mark: With the latest revision this PR passed the Python code
formatter.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/86351
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
github-actions[bot] wrote:
:white_check_mark: With the latest revision this PR passed the C/C++ code
formatter.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/86351
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-libunwind
Author: Jon Chesterfield (JonChesterfield)
Changes
When a CMakeLists.txt is missing a 'project' statement you get the default
supported languages of C and CXX.
https://cmake.org/cmake/help/latest/command/project.html. The help says ASM
https://github.com/JonChesterfield created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/86351
When a CMakeLists.txt is missing a 'project' statement you get the default
supported languages of C and CXX.
https://cmake.org/cmake/help/latest/command/project.html. The help says ASM
should be listed
github-actions[bot] wrote:
:white_check_mark: With the latest revision this PR passed the C/C++ code
formatter.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/86220
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://github.com/usama54321 edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/86220
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/usama54321 edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/86220
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/usama54321 edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/86220
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/usama54321 edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/86220
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
github-actions[bot] wrote:
:white_check_mark: With the latest revision this PR passed the Python code
formatter.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/86347
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Jan Svoboda (jansvoboda11)
Changes
Since b4c83a13f664582015ea22924b9a0c6290d41f5b, `Preprocessor` and `Lexer` are
aware of the concept of scanning dependency directives. This makes it possible
to scan for them on-demand rather than
@@ -0,0 +1,68 @@
+//===--- MathMissingParenthesesCheck.cpp - clang-tidy
-===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier:
github-actions[bot] wrote:
:white_check_mark: With the latest revision this PR passed the C/C++ code
formatter.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/85460
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://github.com/jansvoboda11 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/86347
>From 9536d6007457091ff27da3dd38405382ae9000f1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jan Svoboda
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2024 13:29:43 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] [clang][deps] Lazy dependency directives
Since
github-actions[bot] wrote:
:white_check_mark: With the latest revision this PR passed the C/C++ code
formatter.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/86347
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://github.com/jansvoboda11 created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/86347
Since b4c83a13f664582015ea22924b9a0c6290d41f5b, `Preprocessor` and `Lexer` are
aware of the concept of scanning dependency directives. This makes it possible
to scan for them on-demand rather than eagerly
@@ -0,0 +1,68 @@
+//===--- MathMissingParenthesesCheck.cpp - clang-tidy
-===//
+//
+// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM
Exceptions.
+// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
+// SPDX-License-Identifier:
https://github.com/rjmccall approved this pull request.
Okay. Thanks for putting up with such a protracted review! I really like
where we've ended up.
LGTM. Please wait a few days before merging to give other reviewers a chance
to give final feedback.
github-actions[bot] wrote:
:white_check_mark: With the latest revision this PR passed the Python code
formatter.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/86339
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
github-actions[bot] wrote:
:warning: C/C++ code formatter, clang-format found issues in your code.
:warning:
You can test this locally with the following command:
``bash
git-clang-format --diff 3b3de48fd84b8269d5f45ee0a9dc6b7448368424
ab7d280abf053b67b716e0723e2e70876e639810 --
https://github.com/zahiraam created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/86339
None
>From ab7d280abf053b67b716e0723e2e70876e639810 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Zahira Ammarguellat
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2024 13:55:44 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] Fix printing of templated records.
---
HazardyKnusperkeks wrote:
My pleasure.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/86150
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
github-actions[bot] wrote:
:white_check_mark: With the latest revision this PR passed the Python code
formatter.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/65742
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
urnathan wrote:
@rjmccall thanks, here is an update with those changes. I've collapsed it to
the 3 commits mentioned earlier
1) Tests marked up for the current behaviour
2) TargetInfo strict/flexible alignment load predicate
3) The new algorithm
@@ -109,9 +109,22 @@ int unused_with_implicit_default_def(void) { return 1; }
int unused_with_implicit_forward_default_def(void) { return 0; }
__attribute__((target_version("lse"))) int
unused_with_implicit_forward_default_def(void) { return 1; }
-// This should generate a
alexcrichton wrote:
Yes it's expected that wasi-sdk will need changes to incorporate this PR. I'm
waiting for this to be in an LLVM release before updating wasi-sdk.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/84569
___
cfe-commits mailing list
github-actions[bot] wrote:
:white_check_mark: With the latest revision this PR passed the Python code
formatter.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/85340
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
github-actions[bot] wrote:
:white_check_mark: With the latest revision this PR passed the C/C++ code
formatter.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/85340
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://github.com/bob80905 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/85340
>From 3cdcfa4e63550b9677c8ffe2f33eab85899b2c45 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Joshua Batista
Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2024 17:04:12 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/9] add test
---
.../clang/Basic/DiagnosticDriverKinds.td
rnk wrote:
> As a data point, I've been setting core.autocrlf=true on Windows for years.
If that's the case, my information is stale, which I accept.
> To be clear, this may do nothing on checkout if a user has set a config
> option.
That addresses my concerns.
https://github.com/python3kgae approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/86323
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
github-actions[bot] wrote:
:white_check_mark: With the latest revision this PR passed the C/C++ code
formatter.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/85684
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
changpeng wrote:
> There is no issue in changing the names in principle. Curious, what is the
> rationale to use more demangled names?
more user friendly.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/86313
___
cfe-commits mailing list
github-actions[bot] wrote:
:white_check_mark: With the latest revision this PR passed the Python code
formatter.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/85460
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
@@ -1318,16 +1318,16 @@ define void @instructions.va_arg(i8* %v, ...) {
%ap2 = bitcast i8** %ap to i8*
call void @llvm.va_start(i8* %ap2)
- ; CHECK: call void @llvm.va_start(ptr %ap2)
+ ; CHECK: call void @llvm.va_start.p0(ptr %ap2)
va_arg i8* %ap2, i32
; CHECK:
@@ -1069,6 +1069,10 @@ Address X86_32ABIInfo::EmitVAArg(CodeGenFunction ,
auto TypeInfo = getContext().getTypeInfoInChars(Ty);
+ // Empty records are ignored for parameter passing purposes on non-Windows.
+ if (!IsWin32StructABI && isEmptyRecord(getContext(), Ty, true))
https://github.com/yuxuanchen1997 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/85684
>From 4e10b2c4dfed3fb59ee03c716852f7fb45de081a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Yuxuan Chen
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2024 10:45:20 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] Check if Coroutine await_suspend type returns the right
yuxuanchen1997 wrote:
@ChuanqiXu9
I have updated the patch to check for `std::coroutine_handle` and does not
rely on `SemaExprCXX` changes. Please let me know what you think.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/85684
___
cfe-commits mailing
https://github.com/labrinea edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/85454
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -68,13 +68,15 @@ int __attribute__((target_version(""))) unsup1(void) {
return 1; }
void __attribute__((target_version("crc32"))) unsup2(void) {}
void __attribute__((target_version("default+fp16"))) koo(void) {}
+//expected-error@-1 {{function multiversioning doesn't
ldrumm wrote:
> So, is there a way to do CRLF -> LF on checkin, but do nothing on checkout?
To be clear, this *may* do nothing on checkout if a user has set a config
option. The point of the present policy is not to control local preferences as
far as the filetype isn't *reqired* to have a
https://github.com/yuxuanchen1997 edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/85684
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
github-actions[bot] wrote:
:white_check_mark: With the latest revision this PR passed the Python code
formatter.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/85684
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
TerrorJack wrote:
@alexcrichton This is breaking `wasi-sdk` build with:
```
/workspace/wasi-sdk/build/install/opt/wasi-sdk/bin/clang --target=wasm32-wasip2
-nodefaultlibs -shared
--sysroot=/workspace/wasi-sdk/build/install/opt/wasi-sdk/share/wasi-sysroot \
-o
https://github.com/yuxuanchen1997 edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/85684
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/yuxuanchen1997 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/85684
>From 6887adae7500c4791a8620fa5b558e195e2c64cc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Yuxuan Chen
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2024 10:45:20 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] Check if Coroutine await_suspend type returns the right
srpande wrote:
There is no issue in changing the names in principle. Curious, what is the
rationale to use more demangled names?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/86313
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
pogo59 wrote:
As a data point, I've been setting `core.autocrlf=true` on Windows for years.
I've been trained to make sure _new_ files have LF endings (usually I copy an
existing file instead of creating a new file) but both Notepad and the Visual
Studio editor are willing to preserve the
https://github.com/coopp approved this pull request.
SPIRV in the house!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/86323
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/bob80905 approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/86323
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
1 - 100 of 260 matches
Mail list logo
