[cgi-prototype-users] Switch to Subversion?
Hi all, a while ago, Sourceforge began offering Subversion for version control, in addition to CVS. They offer an option for older projects to migrate their repositories from CVS to Subversion in-place. Should we do this for the CGIP repository? Regards, -- Aristotle Pagaltzis // http://plasmasturm.org/ --- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=120709bid=263057dat=121642 ___ cgi-prototype-users mailing list cgi-prototype-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cgi-prototype-users
Re: [cgi-prototype-users] Re: Tried to use My/App, unable to make it work
* Randal L. Schwartz merlyn@stonehenge.com [2005-10-13 14:10]: For a better tiny app, see my Linux Magazine articles (google site:stonehenge.com CGI::Prototype for the location). Randal: just point people at http://cgi-prototype.sf.net/ – there are links to those articles in the Resources section. Terrence: would you please `chmod -R g+w *` the web site? You have created a directory and a bunch of files that I can’t do anything with because they only have owner write permission. Regards, -- Aristotle Pagaltzis // http://plasmasturm.org/ --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Power Architecture Resource Center: Free content, downloads, discussions, and more. http://solutions.newsforge.com/ibmarch.tmpl ___ cgi-prototype-users mailing list cgi-prototype-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cgi-prototype-users
Re: [cgi-prototype-users] CGI::Prototype::PathInfo resource tokenizing
* Terrence Brannon [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-09-09 21:05]:
I think the resource id should be a reference to an anonymous
array
[ 283188, 43 ]
Then split the string into an array and save it in a slot in
`app_enter`?
It might be a good thing if this were the default behaviour, but
I have no basis on which to make that call, so I didn’t.
Regards,
--
#Aristotle
*AUTOLOAD=*_=sub{s/(.*)::(.*)/print$2,(,$\/, )[defined wantarray]/e;$1};
Just-another-Perl-hacker;
---
SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference EXPO
September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices
Agile Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects Teams * Testing QA
Security * Process Improvement Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf
___
cgi-prototype-users mailing list
cgi-prototype-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cgi-prototype-users
Re: [cgi-prototype-users] Re: CGI::Prototype::PathInfo
* Terrence Brannon [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-09-03 01:40]: A. Pagaltzis [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: PS.: merlyn, your mailer is misconfigured. Itâs sending UTF-8, Aristotle, what sort of control characters are in your mail? There aren’t any control characters. It’s perfectly good plaintext in UTF-8 encoding. I see little boxes and hex characters every so often, making the messages harder to read... I read mail with plain text Xemacs/Gnus under Debian. I read and write mine on the console using mutt and vim. I also know for a fact that Gnus can handle UTF-8. That means your mailer is also misconfigured… Regards, -- Aristotle Pagaltzis // http://plasmasturm.org/ --- SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference EXPO September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices Agile Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects Teams * Testing QA Security * Process Improvement Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf ___ cgi-prototype-users mailing list cgi-prototype-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cgi-prototype-users
Re: [cgi-prototype-users] CGI::Prototype::PathInfo
* Randal L. Schwartz merlyn@stonehenge.com [2005-08-15 19:50]:
Ewww. I'd never use code like that.
At the HTTP level, it is cleaner design. Nobody on the other side
of the app interface will care whether it requires uglier
scaffolding under the hood, nor should they. Thus, neither do I.
Yeah, hadn't envisioned that. In my mind, state should come
entirely from the incoming environment. Mapping that to a
class should be a separate responsibility for maximum
pluggability. Looks like the best way is to leave -dispatch
and call yours something like
CGIP::Dispatch::VariablePathinfo
or something like that, using ::Dispatch:: rather than
::State:: or ::Mapping:: to show that it's replacing both.
I suppose that I’ll stick with the current monolithic design and
mind my own business for the time being, then. Since ::PathInfo
builds onto CGIP itself it should be unaffected by stuff that
gets added on top of that. I will see how it can be merged with
the future CGIP design that materializes.
Regards,
--
#Aristotle
*AUTOLOAD=*_=sub{s/(.*)::(.*)/print$2,(,$\/, )[defined wantarray]/e;$1};
Just-another-Perl-hacker;
---
SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference EXPO
September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices
Agile Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects Teams * Testing QA
Security * Process Improvement Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf
___
cgi-prototype-users mailing list
cgi-prototype-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cgi-prototype-users
Re: [cgi-prototype-users] Re: CGI::Prototype::PathInfo
* Randal L. Schwartz merlyn@stonehenge.com [2005-08-11 08:35]:
My phrasing is biased toward TT (Randal's favorite), but any
templator can be chosen insteasd.
Okay then; I twiddled it to closely match that phrasing.
Note that I’ve made the file group-writable, so whoever of you
guys wants to change something there can go right ahead.
Regards,
--
#Aristotle
*AUTOLOAD=*_=sub{s/(.*)::(.*)/print$2,(,$\/, )[defined wantarray]/e;$1};
Just-another-Perl-hacker;
---
SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference EXPO
September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices
Agile Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects Teams * Testing QA
Security * Process Improvement Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf
___
cgi-prototype-users mailing list
cgi-prototype-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cgi-prototype-users
Re: [cgi-prototype-users] CGI::Prototype::PathInfo
* Randal L. Schwartz merlyn@stonehenge.com [2005-08-11 17:20]: If you are thinking that the release currently called CGI-Prototype should be altered, we can talk about making the changes directly there. Well, kinda; I was hoping to start refactoring ::Hidden into bits that can be reused in ::PathInfo and others and those which can’t. ::PathInfo could then be separate or be part of the distro, but that’s a different issue. I’d like to know your thoughts on this; see my previous, more detailed mail. Let's settle on the naming first... :) We need to sort out the structure first; do you agree with my assessment that the state-to-class mapper can be reused by state deductors, but vice versa does not work so well? I used ::Simple for the mapper in ::Hidden which ::PathInfo would reuse, but I’m not wedded to that name at all. Regards, -- Aristotle Pagaltzis // http://plasmasturm.org/ --- SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference EXPO September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices Agile Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects Teams * Testing QA Security * Process Improvement Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf ___ cgi-prototype-users mailing list cgi-prototype-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cgi-prototype-users
