Re: [cgiapp] CGI::Application wiki page ArticlesAndTutorials updated by Dave

2011-08-06 Thread David Emery
Ron Savage r...@savage.net.au writes: On Sat, 2011-08-06 at 21:54 -0400, cgi...@erlbaum.net wrote: CGI::Application page http://cgi-app.org/index.cgi?ArticlesAndTutorials edited by Dave Thanx for the cleanup. Likewise to all the other who help out. No problem. Just takes a minute. As

Re: [cgiapp] how to use C::A::Dispatch with FastCGI ?

2008-02-24 Thread David Emery
Mark Fuller [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: BTW: The speedyCGI package installed with Ubuntu 7.10 (probably the same package available in Debian) seems to work. I'm not sure what version of Perl I'm getting. You'd be getting whatever version of Perl is on that machine. But, it's a pretty simple

Re: [cgiapp] Using AJAX with C::A

2006-10-19 Thread David Emery
On Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2006 09:26:33 -0400, Bruce McKenzie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: RA Jones wrote: Having at last had some success with something AJAX-based (the demo described in perl.com 'Using Ajax from Perl'), I now want to try and use AJAX in my web apps. It looks like the necessary

Re: [cgiapp] Re: Merging new dispatching idea with ::Dispatch

2005-12-11 Thread David Emery
On Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2005 04:37:50 + (UTC), Mark Stosberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 2005-12-12, Timothy Appnel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 12/11/05, Mark Stosberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: That's essentially what we already have now with @params being handled as the query string.

Re: [cgiapp] Best free DB for a web-based Perl app response results...

2005-12-01 Thread David Emery
On Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2005 14:05:17 -0500, Jesse Erlbaum [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hey Jeff -- Regarding teh rest of your email, I have got to agree with you, most web apps use way more resources than they could possibly need, but you know what ? As a counter to your argument if you needed

Re: [cgiapp] how to direct all incoming requests to a single CGI script on Apache 1.3?

2005-11-28 Thread David Emery
On Date: Sun, 27 Nov 2005 16:08:50 -0800, David Christensen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm sure this has been asked before, but I can't seem to find the question or the answer -- how do I direct all incoming requests to a single CGI script on Apache 1.3? With mod_rewrite, something like this

Re: [cgiapp] how to direct all incoming requests to a single CGI script on Apache 1.3?

2005-11-28 Thread David Emery
On Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2005 10:06:24 -0500, Michael Peters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: David Emery wrote: On Date: Sun, 27 Nov 2005 16:08:50 -0800, David Christensen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm sure this has been asked before, but I can't seem to find the question or the answer -- how

Re: [cgiapp] Re: RFC: CAP::Plugin::PathInfo

2005-07-15 Thread David Emery
On Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2005 00:08:53 -0400, Timothy Appnel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 7/12/05, David Emery [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Q: I had the impression from your REST post that DELETE and PUT were unusable from a practical POV. Are you actually able to use those in real life? It's

Re: [cgiapp] Re: RFC: CAP::Plugin::PathInfo

2005-07-12 Thread David Emery
On Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2005 18:04:32 -0400, Timothy Appnel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ideally there would need to be a runmode evaluator in the pre_run method that examined the requested URL and/or PATH_INFO in addition to the HTTP method of the request. So it would not be enough to say a

[cgiapp] RFC: CAP::Plugin::PathInfo

2005-07-11 Thread David Emery
path_info_to_query, which is not exported =head1 DEPENDENCIES Requires CGI::Application version = 4.01 (uses the new call-back functionality) =cut Regards, David Emery [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Web Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com

Re: [cgiapp] Re: RFC: CAP::Plugin::PathInfo

2005-07-11 Thread David Emery
On Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2005 20:57:11 + (UTC), Mark Stosberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 2005-07-11, David Emery [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thanks for the contribution. Here's some feedback on the POD. Thanks for the feedback, Mark. use CGI::Application::Plugin::PathInfo And doesn't

Re: [cgiapp] C::A::Generator (was BOF Minutes)

2005-07-01 Thread David Emery
On Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2005 23:11:02 -0400, Jason Purdy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: - Generator - something that would help kickstart the application. We do have CGI::Application::Generator, but it could do with an update, especially with creating test scripts at the same time. I'm curious as to

Re: [cgiapp] Re: [OT] CGI::Session is good, but we can do better (a new project is born?)

2005-06-17 Thread David Emery
From: Ron Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2005 15:44:25 +1000 Hi Mark Just curious - would we be free to name the table and all the columns any way we want? How about if you set up the session something vaguely like this: my %sess_table = (

Re: [cgiapp] [OT] CGI::Session is good, but we can do better (a new project is born?)

2005-06-16 Thread David Emery
From: Mark Stosberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2005 02:11:11 + (UTC) I've had a number frustrations with CGI::Session and am considering creating yet another alternative. What I have liked about CGI::Session is the general interface. While I'm at home writing custom SQL, I

Re: [cgiapp] Re: [OT] CGI::Session is good, but we can do better (a new project is born?)

2005-06-16 Thread David Emery
From: Mark Stosberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2005 04:14:00 + (UTC) On 2005-06-17, David Emery [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On a related note, have you looked at Apache::Session? I've read somewhere that it doesn't actually depend on mod_perl as the name would imply. I've