Re: [cgiapp] use persisten instance of cgiapp with cgi::fast?

2010-07-19 Thread P Kishor
On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 6:16 AM, Dietrich Streifert dietrich.streif...@visionet.de wrote:  Hello All, I'm currently using speedy_cgi as a persistent perl process and wanted to test if fcgi would be an option for me. I am curious as to why you want to shift from SpeedyCGI to FastCGI if the

Re: [cgiapp] Unobtrusive Javascript form validation

2010-07-09 Thread P Kishor
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 11:05 AM, Nicholas Bamber nicho...@periapt.co.uk wrote: The company I work for has also been moving to JQuery, so I won't be surprised if Data.FormValidator gets updated at some point to integrate better with JQuery, possibly on a fork. This is a frustrating thing

Re: [cgiapp] Graceful Error Handling in CGI::App (compile / init stages)

2010-07-07 Thread P Kishor
On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 8:43 AM, Michael Peters mpet...@plusthree.com wrote: On 07/07/2010 05:16 AM, Mike Tonks wrote: 1) So and so CPAN module is not found 2) Config file not found (ConfigAuto - in cgiapp_init) currently these produce an ugly 500 Server Error and loeave you searching in

Re: [cgiapp] C::A::P::Routes

2010-03-04 Thread P Kishor
On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 3:33 AM, Mike Tonks fluffym...@googlemail.com wrote: I am using CAP::Routes and it works very well for me. Thanks for the report. This is good to know, because this proves I must be doing something wrong, even though I can't figure out what. I am not using ScriptAlias,

Re: [cgiapp] C::A::P::Routes

2010-03-04 Thread P Kishor
interpreting the URIs for me. Added side-effect -- since dance.pl was permanently running, it was noticeably faster than Apache restarting Perl and DBI and stuff. But, more than anything, it was clean URIs from get-go. P Kishor wrote: On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 3:33 AM, Mike Tonks fluffym

Re: [cgiapp] C::A::P::Routes

2010-03-04 Thread P Kishor
.  Which is why I'm asking. P Kishor wrote: On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 8:25 AM, Brad Van Sickle bvansick...@gmail.com wrote: Tangential discussion on this... but what is the value in using dispatching modules like CAP::Routes and CGI::Application::Dispatch? I've looked at them in the past

Re: [cgiapp] C::A::P::Routes

2010-03-04 Thread P Kishor
On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 9:26 AM, Clayton Scott clayton.sc...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 10:04 AM, Brad Van Sickle bvansick...@gmail.com wrote: All of that can be done with mod rewrite.  A (sanitized) example of a rewrite/proxy rule I have working in an existing application

[cgiapp] C::A::P::Routes

2010-03-03 Thread P Kishor
A while back I attempted working with CAPRoutes, but failed. Today I decided to revisit it, and failed again. In fact, I am failing at getting the simplest possible application running with it, and I am wondering -- either I am completely clueless about how this is supposed to work, or this module

Re: [cgiapp] C::A::P::Routes

2010-03-03 Thread P Kishor
On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 4:33 PM, Ron Savage r...@savage.net.au wrote: Hi On Wed, 2010-03-03 at 15:56 -0600, P Kishor wrote: A while back I attempted working with CAPRoutes, but failed. Today I decided to revisit it, and failed again. In fact, I am failing at I've never used it. CGI

[cgiapp] Dancer

2010-02-25 Thread P Kishor
following Mark Stosberg's email about PSGI, I decided to poke around a bit more, and landed up with Dancer. Color me very impressed. Seriously, I have seldom experienced such easy *everything*. Almost instant installation via 'sudo cpan Dancer', a simple 'dancer -a myapp', and I had a working,

Re: [cgiapp] Future of the wiki

2010-02-04 Thread P Kishor
On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 4:26 PM, Lyle webmas...@cosmicperl.com wrote: Mark Fuller wrote: On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 2:31 PM, Paul Miller listm...@voltar-confed.org wrote:  If the website for it doesn't have some kind of demo and in fact uses mostly PHP code, what good is the lib. I understand

Re: [cgiapp] using CPAN::Forum as the CGI::Application forum/wiki

2010-01-31 Thread P Kishor
On Sun, Jan 31, 2010 at 9:28 AM, Gabor Szabo szab...@gmail.com wrote: hi, I just came back from vacation and have not been able to read through all of my messages but I saw a couple of mails about the future of the CGI::Application wiki. You might know that the CPAN::Forum

Re: [cgiapp] Future of the wiki (was: Re: CGI::Application wiki page Examples)

2010-01-28 Thread P Kishor
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 9:18 PM, Mark Stosberg m...@summersault.com wrote: The idea was that the 315 subscribers to this mailing list are the only people in the world with the slightest motivation to delete spam from the wiki and, since its not a terribly thriving, active wiki, even we

Re: [cgiapp] Future of the wiki (was: Re: CGI::Application wiki page Examples)

2010-01-28 Thread P Kishor
be authorized. Or, some other means for double-checking the intent of the potential editors/posters. On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 9:47 PM, P Kishor punk.k...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 9:18 PM, Mark Stosberg m...@summersault.com wrote: The idea was that the 315 subscribers to this mailing

Re: [cgiapp] Future of the wiki (was: Re: CGI::Application wiki page Examples)

2010-01-28 Thread P Kishor
. At that time, Mark had very valid concerns - that MT does not offer key features required of a wiki. But that was MT4 and a re-evaluation of MT after the release of MT5 recently might be interesting. Regards Gurunandan On Thu, 2010-01-28 at 22:02 -0600, P Kishor wrote: top posting -- MovableType

Re: [cgiapp] CGI::Simple as replacement for CGI not working?

2009-11-18 Thread P Kishor
On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 3:18 PM, Richard Jones ra.jo...@dpw.clara.co.uk wrote: r...@savage.net.au wrote: Hi Richard Quoting Richard Jones ra.jo...@dpw.clara.co.uk: App working fine with default CGI, but decided to see if it works with CGI::Simple using the cgiapp_get_query() override. But

Re: [cgiapp] proposal for new cgiapp hook: loaded_html_tmpl

2009-11-11 Thread P Kishor
.. I don't know how many people use die_on_bad_params, so I don't know how worth it it is to modify the core. .. I use it exclusively, under the assumption that, like 'use strict', it is just best practice, may make my code faster and less error-ridden, and may endow me with good looks and

Re: [cgiapp] another oddity installing CGI::Application::Dispatch

2009-10-16 Thread P Kishor
On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 8:17 AM, Michael Peters mpet...@plusthree.com wrote: On 10/15/2009 08:10 PM, P Kishor wrote: What I don't like about the above is that the build script tried to futz with my Apache conf file (setting ulimit, which, on a Mac OS X machine, actually is problematic

[cgiapp] another oddity installing CGI::Application::Dispatch

2009-10-15 Thread P Kishor
I decided to try a potential alternative route to using various modules on a shared web host. I thought I would install them into a local (non-root) directory on my computer, and then upload them to the web host. As long as the modules are pure perl, they should work, no? So, I re-configured cpan

Re: [cgiapp] size of scripts and dependencies

2009-09-19 Thread P Kishor
On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 9:15 AM, Rhesa Rozendaal p...@rhesa.com wrote: Richard Jones wrote: Ron Savage wrote: Hi Richard On Sat, 2009-09-19 at 10:49 +0100, Richard Jones wrote: Ron Savage wrote: [snip] Hi Ron, hey that's nice - I just used it to profile my current app. I modified it

Re: [cgiapp] size of scripts and dependencies

2009-09-18 Thread P Kishor
what one doesn't need. Michael On Tue, 15 Sep 2009 11:10:31 -0500 P Kishor punk.k...@gmail.com wrote: Pursuant to the recent email about Titanium dependency hell, I was curious as to how big really was my tiny 20 line Perl index.cgi. So, with guidance from a couple of monks on PM, I add

Re: [cgiapp] size of scripts and dependencies

2009-09-18 Thread P Kishor
Very good points Michael. My response to some of them below -- On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 8:47 AM, Michael Peters mpet...@plusthree.com wrote: On 09/18/2009 09:33 AM, P Kishor wrote: But, now that we are done comparing our overweight weight to a morbidly obese weight, how about CGI::App on its

[cgiapp] size of scripts and dependencies

2009-09-15 Thread P Kishor
Pursuant to the recent email about Titanium dependency hell, I was curious as to how big really was my tiny 20 line Perl index.cgi. So, with guidance from a couple of monks on PM, I add the following line to my script... END { system( 'wc', '-l', values %INC ) } and got the following (I have

[cgiapp] how to set tmpl path for application with sub applications

2009-08-14 Thread P Kishor
I have the following directory structure /htdocs/apps/index.cgi = http://../ /htdocs/apps/app1/index.cgi = http://../app1/ /htdocs/apps/app2/index.cgi = http://../app2/ .. /apps/perl/Apps.pm /apps/perl/Apps1.pm /apps/perl/Apps2.pm .. Apps1 and Apps2 use base ‘Apps’ Apps use base

Re: [cgiapp] CAP::Authorization, CAP::AutoRunmode CA::Dispatch

2009-08-12 Thread P Kishor
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 4:52 AM, Richard Jonesra.jo...@dpw.clara.co.uk wrote: Am having some difficulty with the FORBIDDEN_RUNMODE param when using CAP::Authorization with CA::Dispatch. All my application classes inherit from a base class where I have defined the 'forbidden' runmode (using

[cgiapp] order of operations

2009-08-12 Thread P Kishor
I have read the article on Order of Operations at http://cgiapp.erlbaum.net/index.cgi?OrderOfOperations but I am not clear as to what is going on in my situation. Here is what I have --- MyAuthen.pm --- package MyAuthen; 1. sub cgiapp_get_query { .. } 2. sub cgiapp_init { .. } 3. sub setup { ..

[cgiapp] Re: order of operations

2009-08-12 Thread P Kishor
Replying to my own email to clarify one point that was not obvious to me -- On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 10:27 AM, P Kishorpunk.k...@gmail.com wrote: I have read the article on Order of Operations at http://cgiapp.erlbaum.net/index.cgi?OrderOfOperations but I am not clear as to what is going on in

Re: [cgiapp] Re: order of operations

2009-08-12 Thread P Kishor
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 5:50 PM, Ron Savager...@savage.net.au wrote: Hi Puneet On Wed, 2009-08-12 at 12:07 -0500, P Kishor wrote: 1. sub setup {    my $self = shift;    $self-SUPER::setup();    $self-run_modes([qw( welcome view )]);    $self-start_mode('welcome');    $self-param

Re: [cgiapp] Re: Routes and get_current_runmode()

2009-08-11 Thread P Kishor
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 1:58 AM, Ron Savager...@savage.net.au wrote: Hi Puneet On Mon, 2009-08-10 at 23:20 -0500, P Kishor wrote: To me, C::A::P::Routes seems more in the spirit of CGI::Application than C::A::D is, and I would rather use Routes, but something needs to be changed somewhere

[cgiapp] Routes and get_current_runmode()

2009-08-10 Thread P Kishor
I am experiencing a problem with C::A::P::Routes, and I think I know what is going wrong, but I don’t know why or how to fix it. Background: I have implemented my application with C::A::Dispatch and C::A::P::Authentication, and it works well. For various reasons I like C::A::P::Routes, and would

Re: [cgiapp] Re: Routes and get_current_runmode()

2009-08-10 Thread P Kishor
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 7:46 PM, Mark Stosbergm...@summersault.com wrote: See what is going on -- C::A::P::Routes correctly thinks the runmode is ‘mainpage’ as per the URL. However, $self-get_current_runmode() returns ‘welcome’ in cgiapp_prerun(), and as a result, the mainpage is not

[cgiapp] Re: Routes and get_current_runmode()

2009-08-10 Thread P Kishor
Replying to my own email to document what I have done, and seek further advice. Please see below -- On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 3:35 PM, P Kishorpunk.k...@gmail.com wrote: I am experiencing a problem with C::A::P::Routes, and I think I know what is going wrong, but I don’t know why or how to fix

[cgiapp] error subclassing CGIApp

2009-08-05 Thread P Kishor
I have a pretty basic app modeled after the Perl CGI-App MVC pattern by Mark Rajcok. It looks like so index.cgi - use MyApp; my $App = 'MyApp'; CGI::Application::Dispatch-dispatch( table = [ 'welcome' = { app = $App, rm =

[cgiapp] Re: error subclassing CGIApp

2009-08-05 Thread P Kishor
So, I think I have discovered an answer to my problem -- seems like I can't have setup in BaseCGIApp. If I move the declaration of the runmodes to the subclassed package MyApp.pm, then things work fine. Which begs the next question -- how do I declare a bunch of runmodes in BaseCGIApp so that I

[cgiapp] help with CAP::Authentication

2009-08-02 Thread P Kishor
I am trying to implement *and* understand CAP::Authentication. My questions are -- 1. How do I set (or unset) a bunch of session variables upon successful login or on logout? For example, right now I am using a POST_LOGIN_CALLBACK to set an 'is_admin' bit like so $self-authen-config(

Re: [cgiapp] help with CAP::Authentication

2009-08-02 Thread P Kishor
...@lists.erlbaum.net [mailto:cgiapp-boun...@lists.erlbaum.net] On Behalf Of P Kishor Sent: Sonntag, 2. August 2009 17:49 To: CGI Application Subject: [cgiapp] help with CAP::Authentication I am trying to implement *and* understand CAP::Authentication. My questions are -- 1. How do I set

[cgiapp] prerun_callback

2009-08-02 Thread P Kishor
I am looking for an example of $self-CGI::Application::Plugin::Authentication::prerun_callback(); Any pointers? -- Puneet Kishor http://www.punkish.org Carbon Model http://carbonmodel.org Charter Member, Open Source Geospatial Foundation http://www.osgeo.org Science Commons Fellow,

[cgiapp] protected_mode not found

2009-06-12 Thread P Kishor
Hi, this problem is driving me batty... with $self-authen-protected_runmodes('view'); CAD croaks saying [Dispatch] ERROR' for request '/app/view': RM 'view' not found, referer: http://localhost/app/welcome If I comment out the authen-protected_runmodes line, CAD can find the 'view' runmode

[cgiapp] Re: protected_mode not found

2009-06-12 Thread P Kishor
On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 11:46 AM, P Kishorpunk.k...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, this problem is driving me batty... with $self-authen-protected_runmodes('view'); CAD croaks saying  [Dispatch] ERROR' for request '/app/view': RM 'view' not found, referer: http://localhost/app/welcome If I

Re: [cgiapp] packages autouse?

2009-06-11 Thread P Kishor
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 11:11 AM, Portajulian.po...@gmail.com wrote: Hey, folks. Question: I was wondering if anyone else (than me) thinks is annoying to declare the use of all the required models (objects? packages?) you're using in your CA app?More, when working with CAD, on each controller

Re: [cgiapp] packages autouse?

2009-06-11 Thread P Kishor
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 12:26 PM, Rhesa Rozendaalp...@rhesa.com wrote: P Kishor wrote: What I do find annoying is the number steps involved in adding a new run mode, esp. when using CAD. First, add the new run mode to the dispatch table. Second, add the run mode to the setup in the module

Re: [cgiapp] [Announce] CGI::Application::Plugin::Routes v1.01 now on cpan

2009-06-10 Thread P Kishor
, 2009 at 4:11 PM, P Kishor punk.k...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, CAP::Routes now installs fine, and seems to work, mostly. I am having a bit of difficulty trying to make it work with CAP::Authentication and as a replacement for CA::Dispatch . With CAD and CAP::Authentication, I have the following

[cgiapp] C::A::P::Auth retry

2009-06-07 Thread P Kishor
I have a couple of Authentication related queries I can't figure out on my own. 1. I have created a custom login page so when the user wants to view a protected page, my login form is presented. If the user succeeds in logging in, the protected page is presented correctly. However, if the user

Re: [cgiapp] designing a mixed open/protected application

2009-06-05 Thread P Kishor
-boun...@lists.erlbaum.net] On Behalf Of P Kishor Sent: Donnerstag, 4. Juni 2009 19:40 To: CGI Application Subject: [cgiapp] designing a mixed open/protected application Perhaps a basic question on design and organization, but reading some of the articles online hasn’t been sufficient for me, so

[cgiapp] designing a mixed open/protected application

2009-06-04 Thread P Kishor
Perhaps a basic question on design and organization, but reading some of the articles online hasn’t been sufficient for me, so I pose my query here. I am developing an app that will have both open and login content. All my apps until now have had one instance script and one module, but now I am

Re: [cgiapp] [Announce] CGI::Application::Plugin::Routes v1.01 now on cpan

2009-06-04 Thread P Kishor
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 5:28 PM, Porta julian.po...@gmail.com wrote: Hi folks. Just in case anyone's interested, CGI::Application::Plugin::Routes hit v1.01 and it's available on CPAN http://search.cpan.org/~porta/CGI-Application-Plugin-Routes-1.01/lib/CGI/Application/Plugin/Routes.pm Install

Re: [cgiapp] [Announce] CGI::Application::Plugin::Routes v1.01 now on cpan

2009-06-04 Thread P Kishor
, Jun 4, 2009 at 9:09 PM, P Kishor punk.k...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 5:28 PM, Porta julian.po...@gmail.com wrote: Hi folks. Just in case anyone's interested, CGI::Application::Plugin::Routes hit v1.01 and it's available on CPAN http://search.cpan.org/~porta/CGI

Re: [cgiapp] designing a mixed open/protected application

2009-06-04 Thread P Kishor
On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 7:48 PM, Stewart Heckenberg stewart.heckenb...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Puneet, Now, re. the authen mechanism. I tried Cees Hek’s Plugin::Authentication and found it very easy to implement. However, I am still thinking of rolling my own because I want to extend the

Re: [cgiapp] Re: Proposed new look and branding for cgi-app.org

2009-05-03 Thread P Kishor
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 3:54 AM, Richard Jones ra.jo...@dpw.clara.co.uk wrote: Mark Stosberg wrote: Still, I'm also OK with Titanium and it has been in use some. On the other hand, a major marketing  push and most of the users of this framework still lie ahead of, and may not know of it at

Re: [cgiapp] Re: Proposed new look and branding for cgi-app.org

2009-04-25 Thread P Kishor
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 10:20 AM, Mark Stosberg m...@summersault.com wrote: I don't mind the name Titanium, although I actually like saying CGI Application or cgi app -- do we shorten Titanium to tit? :-) We would say Ti for short, like the chemical symbol. Apart from the Ti chemical symbol

Re: [cgiapp] Re: Proposed new look and branding for cgi-app.org

2009-04-25 Thread P Kishor
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 10:46 AM, P Kishor punk.k...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 10:20 AM, Mark Stosberg m...@summersault.com wrote: I don't mind the name Titanium, although I actually like saying CGI Application or cgi app -- do we shorten Titanium to tit? :-) We would say Ti

Re: [cgiapp] Ajax and JSON recipe

2009-04-09 Thread P Kishor
On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 9:53 AM, Lyle Brooks bro...@deseret.com wrote: I have a need to incorporate Ajax calls with JSON data into our application.  I was looking for something in terms of a piece of starter code or a recipe.  I didn't see anything on the website related to it. CGI

Re: [cgiapp] Re: Proper Way To Load Template Params

2009-03-19 Thread P Kishor
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 2:30 PM, a...@spatialsystems.org wrote: My template is getting data via a SQL query. There is exactly one row retrieved. Currently I use the below method to show all records using a loop: $template-param( RESULTS = $self-dbh-selectall_arrayref(' SELECT age, day FROM

Re: [cgiapp] Turning off Template output for AJAX

2009-01-29 Thread P Kishor
On 1/29/09, kropotkin enquir...@mms-oxford.com wrote: Hi I see - yes; I found the place in postrun where we are loading the layout template and I just turn it off. I suppose you could use a template for AJAX but since the body is no more than the AJAX response text I'm not sure I can

Re: [cgiapp] getting C::A::Dispatch to ignore certain URLs

2009-01-25 Thread P Kishor
On 1/25/09, Bradley C Bailey cgi...@brad.memoryleak.org wrote: You didn't say what environment you're using. My apologies... I am using plain vanilla CGI on Mac OS X with Perl 5.10. If you're using Apache/mod_perl you can add this to your configuration: Location /img SetHandler

Re: [cgiapp] getting C::A::Dispatch to ignore certain URLs

2009-01-25 Thread P Kishor
On 1/25/09, Michael Peters mpet...@plusthree.com wrote: P Kishor wrote: How can I make C::A::Dispatch ignore URLs that point to anything in the server/img/ directory? Let's try re-phrasing that question... How do I make my webserver not call C::A::Dispatch for anything under /img

Re: [cgiapp] getting C::A::Dispatch to ignore certain URLs

2009-01-25 Thread P Kishor
On 1/25/09, Matthew Whipple mwhip...@kothartech.com wrote: P Kishor wrote: Very well put. So, how do I make the webserver (in my case, Apache without mod_perl, for now) serve directly anything under /img (or any other specified folder) without invoking C::A::Dispatch? Many thanks

Re: [cgiapp] [Fwd: Re: ValidateRM not PP]

2009-01-25 Thread P Kishor
On 1/25/09, Jaldhar H. Vyas jald...@braincells.com wrote: On Sun, 25 Jan 2009, Michael Peters wrote: Dealing with HTML requires a parser. Anything else won't make people happy. Agree. On a side note, get a hosting provider that gives you a compiler, gee wiz! Easy for you to

Re: [cgiapp] [Fwd: Re: ValidateRM not PP]

2009-01-25 Thread P Kishor
On 1/25/09, Ron Savage r...@savage.net.au wrote: Hi Lyle I see. But there isn't a Pure Perl parser available, and for those that really can't get HTML::Parser on their cheap shared hosting, isn't a regexp that works most/some of the time better than nothing? No, it's not 'better

Re: [cgiapp] [Fwd: Re: ValidateRM not PP]

2009-01-25 Thread P Kishor
On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 7:00 PM, Lyle webmas...@cosmicperl.com wrote: Joshua Miller wrote: As for HTML::FillInForm, it's better to do nothing, than to use some regexp. I believe that is the point to which Ron was pointing. Using a regexp can cause you far more problems than good. That's not

Re: [cgiapp] [Fwd: Re: ValidateRM not PP]

2009-01-25 Thread P Kishor
On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 7:40 PM, Ron Savage r...@savage.net.au wrote: Hi Folks Fortunately I am neither advocating nor desiring a pure-Perl form validation module, but I don't understand the resistance to this. The poor bloke is saying -- look, I have folks who want to utilize my scripts

[cgiapp] getting C::A::Dispatch to ignore certain URLs

2009-01-24 Thread P Kishor
The way I have set up my application, the following 3 URLs all result in displaying Target, that is, the 'view' runmode server/ server/Target server/view/Target I have other runmodes that are like so server/edit/Target servercreate/New_Target and so on. Here is the problem... if a

Re: [cgiapp] The benefits of vanilla CGI vs. FastCGI

2008-11-23 Thread P Kishor
On 11/23/08, Mark Stosberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: There's running Vista on computers built before 2006, and there's the new crop of web frameworks which need FastCGI or mod_perl to have decent performance to run Hello World. Then there's CGI::Application, which continues to perform

Re: [cgiapp] Re: The benefits of vanilla CGI vs. FastCGI

2008-11-23 Thread P Kishor
On 11/23/08, Mark Stosberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 1. Provide a link to, or better yet, include the number from your recent web framework benchmarking; Thanks, I'll consider adding that. 2. Each of the examples you have provided where vanilla cgi might make a lot of sense are,

Re: [cgiapp] suitability of Autorunmode

2008-11-21 Thread P Kishor
On 11/21/08, Richard Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Bradley C Bailey wrote: Cees Hek wrote: On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 5:50 AM, Richard Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: See my earlier posting - CAP::AutoRunmode not working with mod_perl again ?? It's viewable here:

Re: [cgiapp] suitability of Autorunmode

2008-11-20 Thread P Kishor
On 11/19/08, Richard Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: P Kishor wrote: Greetings, I got the AutoRunmode plugin all set and running in my application finally, and like it so far. However, I just read Mark Stosberg's review, albeit of an earlier version where he found AutoRunmode

[cgiapp] suitability of Autorunmode

2008-11-19 Thread P Kishor
Greetings, I got the AutoRunmode plugin all set and running in my application finally, and like it so far. However, I just read Mark Stosberg's review, albeit of an earlier version where he found AutoRunmode to not be suitable for production. Problems with modperl, and other unlisted problems.