Ron Savage wrote:
Hi Robert
So then it really comes down to a taste test. : )
Right. And to my taste HT is the one to swallow, with TT the one to spit out.
If you care to elaborate I would like to know why?
Robert
-
Hi Robert
Right. And to my taste HT is the one to swallow, with TT the one to spit
out.
If you care to elaborate I would like to know why?
HT is HTML::Template
TT is The Template Toolkit
Firstly, my choice was a decision taken years ago. It may well be
different if taken today.
o I found
Sam Tregar wrote:
On Tue, 30 Jan 2007, Ron Savage wrote:
OTOH, on each invocation of your CGI script, you're probable only calling
HT or TT once to render one page, right? Perhaps best to just not worry
about it :-).
All too true. But, if you decide to worry about it anyway be sure to
try
Ron Savage wrote:
Hi Robert
Right. And to my taste HT is the one to swallow, with TT the one to spit
out.
If you care to elaborate I would like to know why?
HT is HTML::Template
TT is The Template Toolkit
Firstly, my choice was a decision taken years ago. It may well be
different if taken
Ron Savage wrote:
Hi Robert
I have about a 5 page site. I have it going in TT since that is what I
normally use. I got to thinking about whether HT was faster since it is
just a templating system.
Well, TT is very clever, and /very/ complex, so it'd usually be slower.
OTOH, on each
