Hi Folks
I've had an email asking if I could somehow let one of my modules use
HTTP::Server::Simple where the user didn't want to, or couldn't, set up
a stand-alone web server such as Apache.
Then I got to thinking: What are the alternatives to
HTTP::Server::Simple?
And, what do people feel
Ron Savage writes:
Hi Folks
I've had an email asking if I could somehow let one of my modules use
HTTP::Server::Simple where the user didn't want to, or couldn't, set up
a stand-alone web server such as Apache.
Then I got to thinking: What are the alternatives to
Ron Savage wrote:
And, what do people feel about these modules?
Smolder uses H::S::S (via CGI::Application::Server) and it worked great for
development but when it was deployed it would just hang several times during the
day. So I needed to restart it all the time.
Smolder now uses
Michael Peters writes:
Ron Savage wrote:
And, what do people feel about these modules?
Smolder uses H::S::S (via CGI::Application::Server) and it worked great for
development but when it was deployed it would just hang several times during
the
day. So I needed to restart it
George Hartzell wrote:
When you use H::S::S + N::S::P, are you still using C::A::S on top of
them, or is there something else in the mix?
Not for Smolder, it just used C::A::S (which is a H::S::S subclass) and then we
have
sub net_server { 'Net::Server::PreFork' }
--
Michael Peters
Plus
Hi Folks
On Fri, 2009-08-21 at 08:11 -0700, George Hartzell wrote:
Thanx for the comments.
I was wondering if Net::Server::Prefork would enter the mix...
--
Ron Savage
r...@savage.net.au
http://savage.net.au/index.html
# CGI::Application community mailing list
##
