Hi Mark
On Tue, 2009-04-14 at 22:59 -0700, Mark Fuller wrote:
On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 8:16 AM, Mark Stosberg m...@summersault.com wrote:
However, only validation can check if in fact I have all parameters I
need in the right format. That protects against the case where my
application
Hi Mark
On Tue, 2009-04-14 at 11:16 -0400, Mark Stosberg wrote:
However, only validation can check if in fact I have all parameters I
need in the right format. That protects against the case where my
application generates a link with a valid checksum, but somehow has the
wrong data in it. If
On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 8:16 AM, Mark Stosberg m...@summersault.com wrote:
However, only validation can check if in fact I have all parameters I
need in the right format. That protects against the case where my
application generates a link with a valid checksum, but somehow has the
wrong data
Mark Stosberg wrote:
Anyone here using LinkIntegrity? How are you doing lightweight query
validation?
To be honest, I don't do lightweight query validation. For projects that I work
on I normally just have 1 validation framework (based on D::FV) and any place
that's important enough to
As I considered this problem space further, I'm wondering if I should be
following the approach of the LinkIntegrity plugin instead. It adds a
checksum to internal application links, which allows tampering to be
detected:
