I agree,
I would also like to add that we should stick with the name you choose
here. As was mentioned before, we don't want it to be known as the
Framework that keeps changing its name.
Thanks for all the work on the framework.
Leonard
P Kishor wrote:
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 3:54 AM,
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 3:54 AM, Richard Jones ra.jo...@dpw.clara.co.uk wrote:
Mark Stosberg wrote:
Still, I'm also OK with Titanium and it has been in use some. On the
other hand, a major marketing push and most of the users of this
framework still lie ahead of, and may not know of it at
On Sat, 25 Apr 2009 22:17:31 +0100
Richard Jones ra.jo...@dpw.clara.co.uk wrote:
Mark Stosberg wrote:
Still, I'm also OK with Titanium and it has been in use some. On the
other hand, a major marketing push and most of the users of this
framework still lie ahead of, and may not know of
On Sat, 25 Apr 2009 18:14:08 -0700
a...@spatialsystems.org wrote:
As far as branding... I'd say get a mail server that works all the
time...
When a user frustrates over the flaky mail server, isn't good for the
brand.
Agreed. I have contacted the server owner privately about this. If we
On Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 2:17 PM, Richard Jones ra.jo...@dpw.clara.co.uk wrote:
I vote we stick with Titanium.
I like the name Titanium. But, I get a previous poster's comment about
it being difficult to google for. It does seem a bit non-specific,
unlike names like Jifty or Ruby on Rails. (But,
Mark Stosberg wrote:
Still, I'm also OK with Titanium and it has been in use some. On the
other hand, a major marketing push and most of the users of this
framework still lie ahead of, and may not know of it at all, so now is
better than later if there's going to be name change.
So, shall I
Mark Stosberg wrote:
Still, I'm also OK with Titanium and it has been in use some. On the
other hand, a major marketing push and most of the users of this
framework still lie ahead of, and may not know of it at all, so now is
better than later if there's going to be name change.
So, shall I
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 10:20 AM, Mark Stosberg m...@summersault.com wrote:
I don't mind the name Titanium, although I actually like saying CGI
Application or cgi app -- do we shorten Titanium to tit? :-)
We would say Ti for short, like the chemical symbol.
Apart from the Ti chemical symbol
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 10:46 AM, P Kishor punk.k...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 10:20 AM, Mark Stosberg m...@summersault.com wrote:
I don't mind the name Titanium, although I actually like saying CGI
Application or cgi app -- do we shorten Titanium to tit? :-)
We would say Ti
Porta wrote:
+1 Mantle
+1
--
Michael Peters
Plus Three, LP
# CGI::Application community mailing list
####
## To unsubscribe, or change your message delivery options, ##
## visit:
Given that:
The project should evoke simplicity, a foundation, easy, flexibility,
room to grow and that it's more like a seedwork with
little documentation
I propose Spring, Evergreen, Seedbed... or something along organic lines.
Maybe even the name of a tree.
Julio
# CGI::Application
+1 Mantle
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 12:20 PM, Mark Stosberg m...@summersault.comwrote:
I don't mind the name Titanium, although I actually like saying CGI
Application or cgi app -- do we shorten Titanium to tit? :-)
We would say Ti for short, like the chemical symbol.
Apart from the Ti
Another reason to not use it: It's already been taken.
http://snook.ca/archives/html_and_css/titanium
That other Titanium project launched after ours, so it wasn't already
taken when we chose the name. I have already been in touch with the
author about that, and they intend to use another
On Thu, 16 Apr 2009 16:50:16 -0400
Steve st...@octane.to wrote:
I also like the general look and feel, but if you're looking for
nit-picky, I think the inside content area could use at least double the
whitespace around the left hand menu and the image and all of the body
copy. Just feels
I would agree that CGI::App is a bit generic and often confusing. I'm
not sure I care for the name of Titanium.
How about 'Mantle'? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pearl,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mantle_(geology)
A couple of positive meanings, easy to say and type, short and not
used
However something buged me about the left nav, and I couldn't put my
finger on it, and my co-worker helped me figure it out. It doesn't have
a 'how to get' section. He was surprised that Titanium had been released
and that he could use it today. At that point he figured he could get it
I don't mind the name Titanium, although I actually like saying CGI
Application or cgi app -- do we shorten Titanium to tit? :-)
We would say Ti for short, like the chemical symbol.
Apart from the Ti chemical symbol logo and the name Titanium itself,
the site isn't very metallic what with
Stewart Heckenberg wrote:
I don't mind the name Titanium, although I actually like saying CGI
Application or cgi app -- do we shorten Titanium to tit? :-)
Apart from the Ti chemical symbol logo and the name Titanium itself,
the site isn't very metallic what with the trees/leaves and green.
It's
http://cosmicsitedesign.com/cgi-app/
The update addresses long standing complaints about the genericness of the
name
CGI::Application or that the project name includes CGI at all. The
words
CGI::Application also just hard to create a brand and marketing materials
around. So the
I don't mind the name Titanium, although I actually like saying CGI
Application or cgi app -- do we shorten Titanium to tit? :-)
Apart from the Ti chemical symbol logo and the name Titanium itself,
the site isn't very metallic what with the trees/leaves and green.
It's kind of like calling
20 matches
Mail list logo
