Re: [cgiapp] Announce: CGI::Snapp::Dispatch V 1.00 etc, with PSGI support

2012-04-13 Thread Nic Zero
I too have recently rewritten CGI::App and most of its core plugins. That was not my original plan.  You may remember recently I was recommending people make use of class-level initialisation and only do object-level initialisation (ie per cgiapp instance) for those things that can't be shared. 

Re: [cgiapp] Announce: CGI::Snapp::Dispatch V 1.00 etc, with PSGI support

2012-04-13 Thread B. Estrade
On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 06:48:34AM -0400, Nic Zero wrote: I too have recently rewritten CGI::App and most of its core plugins. That was not my original plan.?? You may remember recently I was recommending people make use of class-level initialisation and only do object-level initialisation

Re: [cgiapp] Announce: CGI::Snapp::Dispatch V 1.00 etc, with PSGI support

2012-04-13 Thread Ron Savage
Hi Nic On 13/04/12 20:48, Nic Zero wrote: * Ignore people like Ron me who are tempted to do rewrites that will never have the community that CGI::App grew. Two years from now both of our frameworks will still contain more bugs and fewer working examples than CGI::App. My plan is that