Re: [cgiapp] testing the new CAD::PSGI version

Hi Mark Another attempt. More below. On Thu, 2011-05-19 at 11:26 +1000, Ron Savage wrote: Hi Mark Doesn't work for me. I assume it's due to the exact combination of modules used and their parentage. (1) 1 line change to Local::Application::Controller: package

Re: [cgiapp] testing the new CAD::PSGI version

Hi Mark Doesn't work for me. I assume it's due to the exact combination of modules used and their parentage. (1) 1 line change to Local::Application::Controller: package Local::Application::Controller; #Patch#use parent 'CGI::Application'; use parent 'CGI::Application::Dispatch::PSGI'; use

Re: [cgiapp] testing the new CAD::PSGI version

CGI::Application::Dispatch::PSGI gives any CGI script using CGI::App access to PSGI's amazing capabilities. It's what I use for every CGI script, nowadays. Ron, Could you test the Github version of CAD::PSGI if you haven't already? As part of re-implementing it better, it should be a little

[cgiapp] testing 1, 2, 3...

Is this thing on? Sorry for the list downage. it needed a: chown mailman ~mailman Seems qmail ignores .qmail control files in home directories that are not owned by their owner thanks, Dan. Whilst yum feels that /usr/lib/mailman should be owned by root, and makes its feelings known

Re: [cgiapp] testing 1, 2, 3...

Hi David On Tue, 2011-05-10 at 16:19 -0400, David Kaufman wrote: Is this thing on? I'm receiving. Got this and Colm's post, but nothing for some unknown time before that. But then, perhaps no-one posted... Sorry for the list downage. it needed a: chown mailman ~mailman Seems qmail

[cgiapp] Testing Methods

Hi All, Can anyone recommend a method or point me to some examples for testing CGI::App run modes? Our app is getting ever more complex and could really do with some automated tests. I'm able to build tests against the MCV 'model' classes, but not the controllers or views (never mind the

Re: [cgiapp] Testing harness for non-CGI::App code

Ron Savage wrote: Is Test::WWW::Mechanize the most appropriate harness for testing CGI (but not CGI::Application) code? I love T::W::M (used with Test::HTML::Content). But why limit yourself to just normal CGI and not CGI::Application code? IMO it's not only important to test the C::A code,

Re: [cgiapp] Testing harness for non-CGI::App code

Hi Michael On Wed, 2008-11-26 at 09:12 -0500, Michael Peters wrote: Ron Savage wrote: Is Test::WWW::Mechanize the most appropriate harness for testing CGI (but not CGI::Application) code? I love T::W::M (used with Test::HTML::Content). But why limit yourself to just normal CGI and not

[cgiapp] Testing harness for non-CGI::App code

Hi Folks Is Test::WWW::Mechanize the most appropriate harness for testing CGI (but not CGI::Application) code? -- Ron Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://savage.net.au/index.html # CGI::Application community mailing list ##

[cgiapp] Testing

Ping? Jesse Erlbaum The Erlbaum Group, LLC http://erlbaum.net/ 817 Broadway, 10th floor New York, NY 10003 212-684-6161 (office) 917-647-3059 (mobile) 212-684-6226 (fax) [EMAIL PROTECTED] blocked::mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] # CGI::Application community mailing list

Re: [cgiapp] Testing

I see this. On Dec 12, 2007 10:27 AM, Jesse Erlbaum [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ping? Jesse Erlbaum The Erlbaum Group, LLC http://erlbaum.net/ 817 Broadway, 10th floor New York, NY 10003 212-684-6161 (office) 917-647-3059 (mobile) 212-684-6226 (fax) [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [cgiapp] Testing

PONG! On 13/12/2007, Jesse Erlbaum [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hehe.. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:cgiapp- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joel Gwynn Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2007 11:34 AM To: CGI Application Subject: Re: [cgiapp] Testing 64

RE: [cgiapp] Testing

, 2007 11:34 AM To: CGI Application Subject: Re: [cgiapp] Testing 64 bytes from joelman (here): icmp_seq=0 ttl=53 time=16.9 ms 64 bytes from joelman (here): icmp_seq=0 ttl=53 time=16.9 ms 64 bytes from joelman (here): icmp_seq=0 ttl=53 time=16.9 ms 64 bytes from joelman (here): icmp_seq=0 ttl=53

[cgiapp] testing

Just a test. Jesse Erlbaum The Erlbaum Group, LLC 817 Broadway, 10th floor New York, NY 10003 212-684-6161 (office) 917-647-3059 (mobile) 212-684-6226 (fax) [EMAIL PROTECTED] blocked::mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] # CGI::Application community mailing list

[cgiapp] Testing CGI::Applications

I have not seen it mentioned here and I have just recently find out about Test::WWW::Mechanize::CGI which is a subclass of Tes::WWW::Mechanize. With this module one can directly test CGI::Applications without a web server. Using this module makes it also easy to run coverage on the tests with

[cgiapp] Testing CGI::Application with HTTP::Server::Simple(::CGI)

After (actually right now during) attending the talks on CGI::Application, with all the testing talks and that people are interested in how to test CGI::Application applications, I thought to share what I'm currently doing. HTTP::Server::Simple is a module by Jesse Vincent. It uses

Re: [cgiapp] Testing

Joel, Check out these examples of testing. This code was written from studying the testing done by the CGI::Application release tests. Then expanded to test for an application. It gives you a view of testing CGI::apps, supporting classes and the screens.

Re: [cgiapp] Testing

HTTP::Recorder looks quite cool. On Mon, 28 Feb 2005 11:06:48 -0500, William McKee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sun, Feb 27, 2005 at 10:21:33AM -0500, Joel Gwynn wrote: What do people use for automated testing of their CGI::Application apps? How about testing things like user account

Re: [cgiapp] Testing

On Sun, 27 Feb 2005 10:21:33 -0500, Joel Gwynn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What do people use for automated testing of their CGI::Application apps? How about testing things like user account creation forms, use menus, and they myriad of options that can be selected, and things that go wrong?