Ron Savage wrote:
Is Test::WWW::Mechanize the most appropriate harness for testing CGI
(but not CGI::Application) code?
I love T::W::M (used with Test::HTML::Content). But why limit yourself to just normal CGI and not
CGI::Application code? IMO it's not only important to test the C::A code,
Hi Michael
On Wed, 2008-11-26 at 09:12 -0500, Michael Peters wrote:
Ron Savage wrote:
Is Test::WWW::Mechanize the most appropriate harness for testing CGI
(but not CGI::Application) code?
I love T::W::M (used with Test::HTML::Content). But why limit yourself to
just normal CGI and not
Hi Folks
Is Test::WWW::Mechanize the most appropriate harness for testing CGI
(but not CGI::Application) code?
--
Ron Savage
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://savage.net.au/index.html
# CGI::Application community mailing list
##