Re: [Cherokee] Embedding Cherokee

2006-01-23 Thread Alvaro Lopez Ortega
Helge Hess wrote: I consider using Cherokee as an embedded webserver for our SOPE application server to avoid the necessity to install an Apache module for running SOPE based applications. In other words, I would like to directly link Cherokee into the application, sometimes as a shared

[Cherokee] [Fwd: [Cherokee-bugs] Re: [Cherokee Web Server] #24: QA test 067 fails with PHP5]

2006-01-21 Thread Alvaro Lopez Ortega
Hi guys, For those of you who aren't subscribed to cherokee-bugs.. I logged a bug today about a QA test that was failing using the PHP5 interpreter (it was working with PHP4 though). I ended up realizing that is wasn't a Cherokee bug but a PHP5 one:

[Cherokee] Cherokee 0.4.30 released

2006-01-18 Thread Alvaro Lopez Ortega
Cherokee 0.4.30 In shape released! Description === Cherokee is a flexible, ultrafast, lightweight Web server. It is implemented entirely in C, and has no dependencies beyond a standard C library. It is embeddable, extensible with plug-ins, and supports on-the-fly configuration by

Re: [Cherokee] Website in spanish

2006-01-15 Thread Alvaro Lopez Ortega
Hi Antonio! This is Antonio from Lima, Peru. I was wondering if you're interested in translating the website into Spanish so people in Spain and Latin America get the contents in their own language. I thought this was a bit relevant since Cherokee is getting very nice press in Spain

Re: [Cherokee] fcgi-0013: Fixes to multiple concurrent connection failures

2006-01-15 Thread Alvaro Lopez Ortega
Hi Mohammad! After applying the patch, there is still a problem: I could never get 'ab -c 1 -n 1000' completed successfully because exactly in 501th request, the php interpreter always crashed (probably out of our scope, ie. PHP/libfcgi bug) Yeah, I got the same result yesterday.

Re: [Cherokee] feature request to support .. in pathname of URL

2005-12-31 Thread Alvaro Lopez Ortega
Mark Nipper wrote: Completely agree, I didn't notice this before. The worst thing is that Mantis doesn't support it.. so, it seems to be a really good reason go back to Bugzilla :-( According to: --- http://manual.mantisbt.org/manual.page.descriptions.login.page.php Have you

Re: [Cherokee] debugging cgi

2005-12-30 Thread Alvaro Lopez Ortega
Pablo Fischer wrote: My understanding is that Cherokee can't do much on that. I usually have to spread awful things like this along the code I need to debug. :-( echo h1I'm here: val=$val/h1; die; Anyway, I know that Jonathan or Pablo are subscribed to the list, (they are

Re: [Cherokee] cherokee panic

2005-12-29 Thread Alvaro Lopez Ortega
Eric S. Johansson wrote: Request ^/mailman/?$ { Handler redir { URL http://tbtf.com/mailman/listinfo; } } place the above in more than one virtual domain or virtual domain and default and cherokee panics. at least it does on my pack. It seems to be an

Re: [Fwd: Re: [Cherokee] Pre-release 0.5.0b2]

2005-12-18 Thread Alvaro Lopez Ortega
Rodolfo Pilas wrote: [Alvaro, cuando vas a hacer que el reply conteste directo a la lista?] I guess.. never. This is the standard behaviour, Reply to reply to the author, and Reply all to reply the author and the list. If we set the list address in the Reply-to header, it would not be

Re: [Cherokee] A lot of undefined reference... compiling cherokee embedded

2005-12-17 Thread Alvaro Lopez Ortega
Juan Eliseo Carrasco Diaz wrote: I'm using the last version of cherokee (0.4.29). ./configure --prefix=/usr --sysconfdir=/etc --disable-pthread --disable-tls --disable-largefile --disable-pcre Yeah, there were a couple of problems with the embedded version on the previous release.

Re: [Cherokee] fcgi-0010: some fixes to the trunk

2005-12-11 Thread Alvaro Lopez Ortega
Mohammad DAMT wrote: * Put the managers into a one static table for all threads so it will not be re-created all the time. The idea is to allocate FastCGI managers per thread. In this way, it is consistent (connections never change of thread) and we don't need semaphores to

Re: [Cherokee] fcgi-0010: some fixes to the trunk

2005-12-11 Thread Alvaro Lopez Ortega
Alvaro Lopez Ortega wrote: Damn it!! I knew something like this would happen. :-/ There is something that doesn't much sense though. The PHP server accepts multiple connection.. what for? :-? I'm gonna take a look at the code to try to figure out that is the reason for that odd

Re: [Cherokee] fcgi-0009: qa, post revisited, configuration, etc

2005-12-06 Thread Alvaro Lopez Ortega
Alvaro Lopez Ortega wrote: If interpreter is supplied, it will be invoked if handler can't communicate to the it's server. * Some fixes to post_walk_read * Connection will be reset (reconnected) if it's drop happen during communication. * Some qa scripts Okay

Re: [Cherokee] no me funciona cherokee: server.c/679: Can't bind() socket (port=80, UID=0, GID=0)

2005-12-05 Thread Alvaro Lopez Ortega
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: En primer lugar, os felicito por empezar esta iniciativa Escribo en castellano porque veo que muchos desarrolladores son, probablemente, de habla castellana. Even if there are a few Spanish speaks over here, please, use English for writing to this list, there

Re: [Cherokee] no me funciona cherokee: server.c/679: Can't bind() socket (port=80, UID=0, GID=0)

2005-12-05 Thread Alvaro Lopez Ortega
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: server.c/679: Can't bind() socket (port=80, UID=0, GID=0) Are you sure you did edit the file? It is trying to open the port 80 rather than the 81. Yes. I have sure. But thank you. I check and my mistake is that I have previous installation in with /etc/cherokee

Re: [Cherokee] Sending /Foobar params in a PHP script kills Cherokee

2005-12-04 Thread Alvaro Lopez Ortega
Pablo Fischer wrote: I'm using Cherokee and PHP (fastcgi) in my desktop/laptop for developing PHP applications (Jaws ;-)). Today I found a little bug that kills Cherokee, here's how to reproduce the bug: It is good to hear from you Pablo! BTW, you are a brave man, what a bleeding edge

[Cherokee] CGI and PHP security improvement hack

2005-12-04 Thread Alvaro Lopez Ortega
Hi all, I want to show you a little hack have written this morning. It is something Rodolfo proposed sometime ago. Basically it about changing the execution user of the CGIs and PHP to its owner user. Check this out: This is the testing script: -rw-r--r-- 1 *1000* 1000 60

[Cherokee] New logo

2005-12-04 Thread Alvaro Lopez Ortega
Hi, I would like to introduce you our new logo :-) http://www.0x50.org/brand The new logo is on the top, and the old one is still on the page contents. I will try to update it as soon as possible. I hope you will like it, I really love it! PS: Many thanks to Mike Bonales for

Re: [Cherokee] fcgi-007: round-robin, env addition, parsed header, etc

2005-11-19 Thread Alvaro Lopez Ortega
Mohammad DAMT wrote: * handler - Added ServerList directive in config file, typical use: Extension fcgi { Handler fastcgi { ServerList /tmp/sock ServerList 127.0.0.1:8090 ServerList 127.0.0.1:8070 } } I would use

Re: [Cherokee] Bug tracking system

2005-11-14 Thread Alvaro Lopez Ortega
Alvaro Lopez Ortega wrote: I have been thinking of installing a bug tracking system again (we used to have a bugzilla on http://bugs.0x50.org).. The site is now up and running again, http://bugs.0x50.org/ -- Greetings, alo. ___ Cherokee

[Cherokee] Tracing facility

2005-11-13 Thread Alvaro Lopez Ortega
Hi all, Today, I have been working in a tracing facility for Cherokee.. Basically it allows you to define a environment variable which the definition of what you want to trace. Let's see a few examples about how it works: === # CHEROKEE_TRACE=handler /usr/sbin/cherokee

[Cherokee] 0.5.0 beta1

2005-11-13 Thread Alvaro Lopez Ortega
Hi guys, The first beta of the next release is now available: http://alobbs.com/tmp/cherokee-0.5.0b1.tar.gz It includes the CHEROKEE_TRACE basic stuff, the kqueue performance patch and a fix for a bug which may cause some problems handling complex redirections using Request entries.

Re: [Cherokee] Patch to support DragonFlyBSD in the configure process

2005-11-11 Thread Alvaro Lopez Ortega
Rodrigo Fernandez-Vizarra wrote: hopefully this patch will allow us to compile cherokee in DragonFlyBSD. Applied. Thanks! :-) -- Greetings, alo. ___ Cherokee mailing list Cherokee@lists.alobbs.com

Re: [Cherokee] New patch to improve Kqueue performance on BSD kernels

2005-11-11 Thread Alvaro Lopez Ortega
Rodrigo Fernandez-Vizarra wrote: I wrote a new patch to fix the performance problem of kqueue. Requests per second:231.18 [#/sec] (mean) Requests per second:467.39 [#/sec] (mean) Good news, aren't they? Wo.. I'm pretty amazed, it is a huge improvement. I'm going to apply

[Cherokee] [Fwd: cherokee_0.4.29-1_i386.changes ACCEPTED]

2005-11-11 Thread Alvaro Lopez Ortega
The new Debian package is ready.. -- Greetings, alo. http://www.alobbs.com ---BeginMessage--- Accepted: cget_0.4.29-1_i386.deb to pool/main/c/cherokee/cget_0.4.29-1_i386.deb cherokee_0.4.29-1.diff.gz to pool/main/c/cherokee/cherokee_0.4.29-1.diff.gz cherokee_0.4.29-1.dsc to

[Cherokee] Cherokee 0.4.29 released

2005-11-10 Thread Alvaro Lopez Ortega
Cherokee 0.4.29 It grants you three wishes released! Description === Cherokee is a flexible, ultrafast, lightweight Web server. It is implemented entirely in C, and has no dependencies beyond a standard C library. It is embeddable, extensible with plug-ins, and supports on-the-fly

[Cherokee] Connection internals

2005-11-05 Thread Alvaro Lopez Ortega
Hi all, For those of you who are writing Cherokee code.. please, have a look at the changes I have committed to the connection structure. It will probably make your module/patch compilation to fail: http://svn.0x50.org/change/90 This is something I should did time ago: it doesn't

Re: [Cherokee] 403 Error handling

2005-11-03 Thread Alvaro Lopez Ortega
John Hampton wrote: I noticed an ErrorHandler section in the default configuration, but I couldn't find any other documentation on it. Yeah, we have to give some love to the wiki ':-) If it is not possible for cherokee to return a custom error page as provided by the site, I think it

Re: [Cherokee] 403 Error handling

2005-11-03 Thread Alvaro Lopez Ortega
John Hampton wrote: Apache: https://pacopablo.com/projects/red_tape Cherokee: http://pacopablo.com:8080/projects/red_tape The relevent code in Trac is found here: Ok, I have seen what the difference is.. So, the correct behaviour should be something like: === if error code is not

Re: [Cherokee] Request and priorities

2005-11-02 Thread Alvaro Lopez Ortega
John Hampton wrote: I just wanted to let you know I have committed some changes to add support for the priority and Request features we have been talking about this week. Sounds hot. I'm tiching to try it out. /me crosses his fingers.. There is a new beta release in the usual

Re: [Cherokee] Proposal: New Request configuration entry

2005-11-01 Thread Alvaro Lopez Ortega
Kurt McKee wrote: I don't think Alvaro is proposing to elimiate the current way redirs work, rather just add functionality. This doesn't appear to be the best fix, at least for the problem I've been experiencing - it seems to me that redirection should always occur first in the given

Re: [Cherokee] Proposal: New Request configuration entry

2005-11-01 Thread Alvaro Lopez Ortega
John Hampton wrote: Location /projects SetHandler mod_python PythonHandler trac.ModPythonHandler PythonOptionTracUriRoot /projects PythonOptionTracEnvParentDir/var/projects/trac /Location LocationMatch ^/projects/[[:graph:]]+/login AuthType Basic

Re: [Cherokee] fcgi-0006: post support

2005-11-01 Thread Alvaro Lopez Ortega
Mohammad DAMT wrote: This patch incorporate a HTTP POST support for fcgi. Great stuff! :-) cherokee_post_walk_read (cherokee_post_t *post, cherokee_buffer_t *buf, cuint_t *size) I changed the 3rd argument from cuint_t len to cuint_t *size. The size will contains the available post data

Re: [Cherokee] possible if-range bug in Cherokee reply

2005-11-01 Thread Alvaro Lopez Ortega
Mark Nipper wrote: If the entity tag given in the If-Range header matches the current entity tag for the entity, then the server SHOULD provide the specified sub-range of the entity using a 206 (Partial content) response. If the entity tag does not match, then the server SHOULD return the

Re: [Cherokee] Trac with Cherokee: news and mini-Howto

2005-10-31 Thread Alvaro Lopez Ortega
John Hampton wrote: When using the original configuration for trac (no scriptalias), trying to login causes cherokee to segafult. [..] Directory /cgi-bin/trac.cgi/login { Auth Basic { Name Trac Method htpasswd { PasswdFile

[Cherokee] Proposal: New Request configuration entry

2005-10-31 Thread Alvaro Lopez Ortega
Hi all, I have been talking with Rodrigo about the last two problems (RFE, or bug, you name it) that have been sent to the list. 1.- http://0x50.org/archive/2005-October/001027.html 2.- http://0x50.org/archive/2005-October/001031.html Both of them seem to have a common cause.

Re: [Cherokee] Re: Cherokee content-length

2005-10-30 Thread Alvaro Lopez Ortega
Sébastien Arnaud wrote: Does it hurt? I mean, is it a problem for the compilation on MacOS 10.3 or greater? If not, I would leave it like that as a compilation work around for the older versions. Well, it does not hurt that bad, it just does not look clean ;)

Re: [Cherokee] Trac with Cherokee: news and mini-Howto

2005-10-29 Thread Alvaro Lopez Ortega
John Hampton wrote: Thanks again for the fixes. I'm still having one problem, however. All of the sub links work except for the login link. I get a 404 error when clicking on the login link in the upper right-hand corner (http://pacopablo.com:8080/projects/est/login). Below is are the

Re: [Cherokee] Problems with authentication and the admin module

2005-10-28 Thread Alvaro Lopez Ortega
John Hampton wrote: I just installed cherokee-0.4.28 and I have to say that I'm am liking it so far. I had a little problem setting up basic authentication and finally realized that it's because I followed a bad example. That bad example lies in the form of the admin module. Yep, you

Re: [Cherokee] Problems with authentication and the admin module

2005-10-28 Thread Alvaro Lopez Ortega
John Hampton wrote: The binary is called cherokee_logrotate. If you want to rotate your logs, but you don't want to shut down the server, you can just do: cherokee_logrotate http://localhost/admin/ /var/log/cherokee.log Cool, so it was working properly, I just wasn't passing in a

Re: [Cherokee] Trac with Cherokee: news and mini-Howto

2005-10-28 Thread Alvaro Lopez Ortega
John Hampton wrote: I have also uploaded a beta version of the next release with those changes. I know some of you have problems compiling Cherokee from the SVN, so it might be handy for you: http://www.alobbs.com/tmp/cherokee-0.4.29b1.tar.gz I gave it a spin and it works

Re: [Cherokee] Traffic shaping patch 20051023

2005-10-27 Thread Alvaro Lopez Ortega
Diego Giagio wrote: Tomorrow I will try to test the patch. I will let you know :-) Did you have a chance to test the patch ? Did anyone else test ? I just want to know whether we are going on the right direction ;) I have been thinking about the current code and the current

Re: [Cherokee] Traffic shaping patch 20051023

2005-10-27 Thread Alvaro Lopez Ortega
Eric S. Johansson wrote: This is the scheme in my mind. Tell me what you think of it :) Server | +|+ throttler --+ | | client| |

[Cherokee] Cherokee 0.4.28 released

2005-10-27 Thread Alvaro Lopez Ortega
Cherokee 0.4.28 Stable, in capitals released! Description === Cherokee is a flexible, ultrafast, lightweight Web server. It is implemented entirely in C, and has no dependencies beyond a standard C library. It is embeddable, extensible with plug-ins, and supports on-the-fly

Re: [Cherokee] Re: Cherokee content-length

2005-10-26 Thread Alvaro Lopez Ortega
Marko Mikulicic wrote: -#if _FILE_OFFSET_BITS == 64 +#if SIZEOF_OFF_T == SIZEOF_UNSIGNED_LONG_LONG # define FMT_OFFSET %llu # define CST_OFFSET unsigned long long -#else +#elif SIZEOF_OFF_T == SIZEOF_UNISGNED_LONG # define FMT_OFFSET %lu # define CST_OFFSET unsigned long +#else +#

Re: [Cherokee] Re: Cherokee content-length

2005-10-26 Thread Alvaro Lopez Ortega
Sébastien Arnaud wrote: Here is the output I get for: AC_SYS_LARGEFILE checking for special C compiler options needed for large files... no checking for _FILE_OFFSET_BITS value needed for large files... no checking for _LARGE_FILES value needed for large files... no I added the following

Re: [Fwd: [Cherokee] fcgi-0002: improved manager]

2005-10-26 Thread Alvaro Lopez Ortega
Mohammad DAMT wrote: fcgi_manager_step returns immediately if there is a response from fcgi server which has not being picked up by handler. then handler would reset the buffer after pick the data and return it to the main thread. Well, my original idea was: If the manager get

Re: [Fwd: [Cherokee] fcgi-0002: improved manager]

2005-10-25 Thread Alvaro Lopez Ortega
Mohammad DAMT wrote: Seems that this mail (attached) has not been answered yet *-) Oopss.. sorry for the delay! Btw I'd like to have a new configuration keyword for fcgi server. I'd like to have something like ServerList 127.0.0.1:9090;/tmp/unix.sock;other.host:port Well, it okay,

Re: [Cherokee] Re: Cherokee content-length

2005-10-25 Thread Alvaro Lopez Ortega
Marko Mikulicic wrote: Explanation: on macosx off_t is 8 bytes long. It pushes on the stack 8 bytes, and since it is a big endian machine when the buffer_add_va access it as 4 byte wide data it accesses the most significant 4 bytes with are 0 for when the offset is under 4*10^9... Ok, I

Re: [Cherokee] extension problems with parameters

2005-10-24 Thread Alvaro Lopez Ortega
Jorge Salamero Sanz wrote: i've set up a small webserver with cherokee and i've some problems with php and perl scripts, i can execute them but if i pass them variables thougth the url they don't get interpreted :? Umm.. it is really odd. The configuration looks alright. I have

Re: [Cherokee] Cherokee performance

2005-10-24 Thread Alvaro Lopez Ortega
Alberto Gonzalez wrote: A couple of days ago I was testing some web servers performance and downloaded Cherokee to test it too. By mistake, I downloaded 0.4.9 thinking it was the latest (it was a t the bottom of the download page). The performance was superb ! With httperf (benchmark tool)

Re: [Cherokee] alternative port SSL problems

2005-10-24 Thread Alvaro Lopez Ortega
Eric S. Johansson wrote: using the svn code as of last night (9pm edt (-4 gmt)) with squirrelmail, the application works normally if you use the default ports (http/https) but if you use a nonstandard port, and try to send a message, you get the following message from the server after you

Re: [Cherokee] cherokee process seemingly wedged

2005-10-22 Thread Alvaro Lopez Ortega
Mark Nipper wrote: So my guess would be either whatever path is being exercised by that 206 response from the rather abusive client at 202.155.126.36 or something in the logging path. These connections don't look bad to me.. it is only a guy who is using a download accelerator, it should

Re: [Cherokee] problem when building from subversion

2005-10-21 Thread Alvaro Lopez Ortega
Eric S. Johansson wrote: openssl-0.9.7e-r2 is installed # bash autogen.sh ... checking for struct crypt_data... -D_GNU_SOURCE ./configure: line 34866: syntax error near unexpected token `1.0.4,' ./configure: line 34866: `AM_PATH_LIBGNUTLS(1.0.4, have_gnutls=yes, have_gnutls=no)'

Re: [Cherokee] invalid Content-Range headers

2005-10-20 Thread Alvaro Lopez Ortega
Mark Nipper wrote: So I did a little more investigating on this after switching back to Cherokee 0.4.27. I'm attaching two runs from a client machine using: --- apt-get -o Debug::Acquire::Http=true update After looking at that, I went and looked up some information on

Re: [Cherokee] No logging on Debian|cherokee-0.4.26 ?

2005-10-19 Thread Alvaro Lopez Ortega
Hola Jens! Before I create a Debian bugreport I just like to know if anybody has experienced the same behavior of cherokee-0.4.26 on Debian. Since upgrading to the newest version available I have no logs anymore. I created a folder /var/log/chreokee/ and changed the direction for the logs

[Cherokee] 0.4.27b5 uploaded

2005-10-16 Thread Alvaro Lopez Ortega
Hi all, I have uploaded a new beta version of the 0.4.27 release. It is almost finished and ready to be released on Monday or Tuesday. If you have the chance, please test it: http://alobbs.com/tmp/cherokee-0.4.27b5.tar.gz It includes full Digest authentication support, the htpasswd

Re: [Cherokee] Re: Re: Traffic shaping patch 20051016

2005-10-16 Thread Alvaro Lopez Ortega
Ryan McIntosh wrote: Long time listener, first time caller. I tried this patch out and it is good stuff :) I'm not much of a programmer, but I have a suggestion that it might be beneficial to set a bandwidth limit per connection (as well as an overall limit). Wouldn't this completely

Re: [Cherokee] Traffic shaping patch 20051016

2005-10-16 Thread Alvaro Lopez Ortega
Diego Giagio wrote: I've already tried returning ret_eagain, but it'll consume 100% CPU even with a single connection on the server. This happens when the thread is on 'process_active_connections' and there's not enought bandwidth to proceed. The thread will keep looping throught

Re: [Cherokee] [PATCH] validator_pam.c

2005-10-14 Thread Alvaro Lopez Ortega
Alexander Serkov wrote: I've just checkouted cherokee tree. Attached modification was needed to compile. I thought it would be appropriate to notify you guys? Thanks for the patch. I forgot to update the PAM validator after changing some stuff on the validator base class. I have applied

[Cherokee] Wiki updated

2005-10-12 Thread Alvaro Lopez Ortega
Hi all, I have updated the wiki, from mediawiki 1.4.4 to 1.5.0. http://www.0x50.org/wiki/ It seems to be working okay, but it needed to update the database structure, so if you see something wrong, please drop me a line.. :-) -- Greetings, alo. http://www.alobbs.com

Re: [Cherokee] fcgi bounty

2005-10-11 Thread Alvaro Lopez Ortega
Mohammad DAMT wrote: Is there anybody doing the fcgi stuff? If not, I will try to get this thing working. Yes, it is still available. Actually, it seems to be the hardest task, but there is code I made some weeks ago with the base.. Alright, is there any deadline for this? No,

Re: [Cherokee] Bandwidth throttling and sendfile()

2005-10-11 Thread Alvaro Lopez Ortega
Diego Giagio wrote: The throttler interface may be the following: throttler.h/throttler.c cherokee_throttler_new() cherokee_throttler_free() cherokee_throttler_check() cherokee_throttler_update(bytes_recvd) Yeah, looks good :-) To enable the throttler we could create wrapper

Re: [Cherokee] Debian vs. Cherokee

2005-10-09 Thread Alvaro Lopez Ortega
Mark Nipper wrote: I will set up a Cherokee backport for Sarge as soon as I finish some other packaging-related chores (i.e., I have still not upgraded the package to 0.4.26), and will tell you here. I'm actually using Apache 2.1 built locally for the time being on my mirror server

[Cherokee] Spanish translation project

2005-10-08 Thread Alvaro Lopez Ortega
Hi all, I want to announce a new subproject inside Cherokee: Gilberto Gonzalez [1] is heading a work group to translate the current documentation to Spanish. They are working in: http://www.0x50.org/wiki-es/ As soon as they translate everything, we are going to export it to the web

Re: [Cherokee] Debian vs. Cherokee

2005-10-07 Thread Alvaro Lopez Ortega
Rodolfo Pilas wrote: A good solution would be something like 'sensible-webserver. But that would be a matter of Debian policy... I solved the problem: # apt-get install apache # invoke-rc.d apache stop # update-rc.d -f apache remove ready! Ummm.. not really. The next update of Apache

Re: [Cherokee] Modsecurity

2005-10-02 Thread Alvaro Lopez Ortega
H wrote: Does Cherokee has anything like Modsecurity? Is it a good idea for cherokee to have somethink like that? No, there is nothing equivalent. I think that is not the right way; the server must be safe enough without any kind of protective plug-in. Hence, Cherokee includes the most

Re: [Cherokee] dokuwiki

2005-09-30 Thread Alvaro Lopez Ortega
yokoy wrote: yes, I've read the document but I don't want to use a different php interpreter for different php-versions. in sites-availible/defaults Extension php, php3, php4, php5 { Handler phpcgi } is ok, I think. it should load /usr/lib/cgi-bin/php (?) I am not

Re: [Cherokee] Cherokee 0.4.25 released

2005-08-04 Thread Alvaro Lopez Ortega
Sébastien Arnaud wrote: When was the last time you updated the SVN repository? I am trying to get cherokee new release to compile on OS X but it looks like the source I checked out from SVN is actually quite old: http://svn.0x50.org/listing.php?repname=Cherokee+Web+Serverpath=% 2Fsc=0 It

Re: [Cherokee] htpassd module doesn't compile on FreeBSD

2005-08-04 Thread Alvaro Lopez Ortega
if test $have_crypt $have_crypt_include != yes yes; then modules=`echo $modules | sed s/htpasswd//` fi Could you please check with the 0.4.25 release? I'm wondering if I have already fixed it :-) 2005-07-12 Alvaro Lopez Ortega [EMAIL PROTECTED] * configure.in

[Cherokee] Cherokee 0.4.25 released

2005-08-03 Thread Alvaro Lopez Ortega
Cherokee 0.4.25 It's a bird, it's a plane, it's.. released! Description === Cherokee is a flexible, ultrafast, lightweight Web server. It is implemented entirely in C, and has no dependencies beyond a standard C library. It is embeddable, extensible with plug-ins, and supports

Re: [Cherokee] Running cherokee with --disable-shared

2005-07-12 Thread Alvaro Lopez Ortega
Volkan YAZICI wrote: I've compiled cherokee with --disable-shared configure option and when I try to run it, it dumps below error message: # cherokee module_loader.c/203: ERROR: dlopen(/usr/local/lib/cherokee/libplugin_read_config.so): /usr/local/lib/cherokee/libplugin_read_config.so: cannot

Re: [Cherokee] Cherokee 0.4.21 stability issue?

2005-05-20 Thread Alvaro Lopez Ortega
Sébastien Arnaud wrote: I just compiled Cherokee 0.4.21 in Gentoo on PPC [...] server.c/1600: Cherokee feels panic! *** glibc detected *** free(): invalid pointer: 0x3039202b *** Yeah, Bass - one of the Gentoo developers - reported me the same problem yesterday. It seems to be a endianness

Re: [Cherokee] Patch for Solaris 10 event ports

2005-05-20 Thread Alvaro Lopez Ortega
Rodrigo Fernandez-Vizarra wrote: This patch completes the support of Solaris 10 event ports for Cherokee. I guess Cherokee is the first ever web server with Solaris 10 event ports!! Thanks a million for the patch.. great stuff!! Yeah, it seems like we are the first free software project

[Cherokee] u-Cherokee's great diet

2005-05-20 Thread Alvaro Lopez Ortega
Hi guys, I only wanted to let you know u-Cherokee has made a wonderful diet. It has lost the 45% of its weight without losing any functionality! === -rwxr-xr-x 1 alo alo 123116 2005-05-20 14:27 u-cherokee === It includes the file, dirlist, common, cgi and php handlers, the epoll, poll

Re: [Cherokee] [Version 0.4.21} Where is daemon debian?

2005-05-16 Thread Alvaro Lopez Ortega
Ogoshi wrote: In before version, in root of cherokee have a directory that debian with a script that I use for init cherokee when computer is ON but in this versión (0.4.21), this directory and script is missing. Where is?? Cherokee is now an official Debian package, so it doesn't make

[Cherokee] Cherokee 0.4.22 b01

2005-05-10 Thread Alvaro Lopez Ortega
Hi guys, I have uploaded the first beta version of the next release. It fixes all the problems that people have found in the 0.4.21 release. http://alobbs.com/tmp/cherokee-0.4.22b01.tar.gz -- Greetings, alo. ___ Cherokee mailing list