* Peter Bex [130522 19:44]:
> That said, I'm impressed by your results and I think we can surely
> consider this an "early start" for rewriting SRFI-1 :)
> On the other hand, if we do decide to rewrite the handling of MV,
> this optimization may be a little premature because we don't know
> what w
Hi!
Thank you both, I have pushed this.
Kind regards,
Christian
--
In the world, there is nothing more submissive and weak than
water. Yet for attacking that which is hard and strong, nothing can
surpass it. --- Lao Tzu
___
Chicken-hackers mailing l
* Peter Bex [130616 21:36]:
> Hi all,
>
> Attached is a patch to allow non-integral flonum arguments for the
> numerator and denominator procedures. They are supposed to accept
> rational numbers, and flonums, though inexact, can be rational (if
> they're not Inf or NaN). This fixes #1016 for c
On Sat, Jun 29, 2013 at 03:36:56PM +0200, Christian Kellermann wrote:
> * Peter Bex [130627 20:44]:
> > On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 08:34:47PM +0200, Michele La Monaca wrote:
> > > It's a window-specific signal (Ctrl-Break) defined in posixwin.scm.
> > >
> > > (define signal/break _sigbreak)
> >
> >
* Peter Bex [130627 20:44]:
> On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 08:34:47PM +0200, Michele La Monaca wrote:
> > It's a window-specific signal (Ctrl-Break) defined in posixwin.scm.
> >
> > (define signal/break _sigbreak)
>
> Ah, I see now. I had no idea Windows supported signals, let alone
> defined some of
