Peter Bex writes:
> On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 09:05:25AM +0200, Christian Kellermann wrote:
>
>> Peter Bex writes:
>> >> Must not be paying attention. Only marked in the source?
>> >
>> > Yeah, that's possible; I don't know exactly when it was marked as
>> > deprecated. Sorry for that, we'll try
On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 09:05:25AM +0200, Christian Kellermann wrote:
> Peter Bex writes:
> >> Must not be paying attention. Only marked in the source?
> >
> > Yeah, that's possible; I don't know exactly when it was marked as
> > deprecated. Sorry for that, we'll try to announce it in the NEWS fi
Peter Bex writes:
>> Must not be paying attention. Only marked in the source?
>
> Yeah, that's possible; I don't know exactly when it was marked as
> deprecated. Sorry for that, we'll try to announce it in the NEWS file
> but this looks like a historical oversight.
Also with the new deprecation