On 2014-07-14 0:11, Felix Winkelmann wrote:
> I actually found one case: module alias definitions with listish
> module name can not be distinguished from functor instantiation:
>
> (module foo-alias = (chicken string))
>
> Which is obscure enough. Should be drop module-aliases? They are used
Felix Winkelmann writes:
> Regarding the eggification of binary-search, memory-mapped-files and
> queues - are we all agreeing about this? Does this require a
> change-request?
It may break existing code, so I guess we would need a CR. But I have a
feeling that this is just a red tape formality
