Re: [Chicken-hackers] [CHICKEN-5] Drop Watcom, Metroworks and Delorie (DJGPP) compilers support and remove references?

2015-06-16 Thread Arthur Maciel
Peter, sorry for the mistakes. Next time I'll send a more complete patch. Thanks for revising it! And thank you for pushing it, Evan! 2015-06-16 19:17 GMT-03:00 Evan Hanson : > Hi Arthur, Peter, > > Nice cleanup, thanks for this. Pushed to chicken-5. > > Evan > > On 2015-06-16 23:20, Peter Bex w

Re: [Chicken-hackers] [CHICKEN-5] Drop Watcom, Metroworks and Delorie (DJGPP) compilers support and remove references?

2015-06-16 Thread Evan Hanson
Hi Arthur, Peter, Nice cleanup, thanks for this. Pushed to chicken-5. Evan On 2015-06-16 23:20, Peter Bex wrote: > On Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 01:31:20PM -0300, Arthur Maciel wrote: > > In the spirit of cleaning CHICKEN-5 source code here is a patch that > > finally removes all support and reference

Re: [Chicken-hackers] [CHICKEN-5] Drop Watcom, Metroworks and Delorie (DJGPP) compilers support and remove references?

2015-06-16 Thread Peter Bex
On Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 01:31:20PM -0300, Arthur Maciel wrote: > In the spirit of cleaning CHICKEN-5 source code here is a patch that > finally removes all support and references to these three compilers. I > think that CHICKEN-4 source code could serve as a new historical reference. > > What do y

Re: [Chicken-hackers] [Proposal] Officially drop SWIG support?

2015-06-16 Thread Christian Kellermann
Ivan Raikov writes: > I am not sure SWIG ever worked in Chicken 4, and furthermore I am not > sure SWIG itself is that well maintained. > At this point Chicken provides a number of good tools for FFI, so > there really is no point in trying to support SWIG. I agree with Ivan, let's drop it. Kin