Re: [Chicken-hackers] [Chicken-meisters] Let's have a roadmap, just like the grown-ups

2011-09-07 Thread Imran Rafique
?) -- Regards, Imran Rafique ___ Chicken-hackers mailing list Chicken-hackers@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-hackers

Re: [Chicken-hackers] Distributed egg repo proposal

2011-03-18 Thread Imran Rafique
at it, this is the bare minimum for an egg author to do - no matter how we install eggs. A portage-like system doesn't add to this bare minimum - it just arranges things differently (hopefully, in an easier to use manner than we have now). -- Regards,        Imran Rafique

Re: [Chicken-hackers] Distributed egg repo proposal

2011-03-18 Thread Imran Rafique
on these War and Peace novels I'm spamming this thread with :) (and apologies if I'm taking this thread too far from the original topic) -- Regards,        Imran Rafique ___ Chicken-hackers mailing list Chicken-hackers@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org

Re: [Chicken-hackers] Distributed egg repo proposal

2011-03-18 Thread Imran Rafique
/zmq/patches , and then also in global_tree/networking/zmq/patches (so you can avoid needlessly duplicating some patches from the global tree that you might still be using). Or we can just use the patches/ dir from the tree we're using, if that makes things clearer. -- Regards,        Imran

Re: [Chicken-hackers] Distributed egg repo proposal

2011-03-18 Thread Imran Rafique
we're going to make about the host system is that we have the base chicken-scheme distribution already installed and available. So our archive format is something which we can easily unpack just using the tools the base distribution provides. -- Regards,        Imran Rafique

Re: [Chicken-hackers] Distributed egg repo proposal

2011-03-18 Thread Imran Rafique
(dynamite). This may never come up, or we may prefer to have 3 eggs all doing exactly the same thing. But the point is, its possible (as opposed to impossible, with the current setup) and easily manageable. -- Regards,        Imran Rafique ___ Chicken-hackers

Re: [Chicken-hackers] Distributed egg repo proposal

2011-03-18 Thread Imran Rafique
On 18 March 2011 09:15, Peter Bex peter@xs4all.nl wrote: On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 08:59:10AM +, Imran Rafique wrote: Felix said: When mixing trees that way, how do you ensure the combination of them is consistent? The global tree. I can't write to this. + networking

Re: [Chicken-hackers] Distributed egg repo proposal

2011-03-18 Thread Imran Rafique
On 18 March 2011 09:20, Peter Bex peter@xs4all.nl wrote: On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 09:00:20AM +, Imran Rafique wrote: Dynamite is popular, and gets repeatedly forked on github. Forking's bad, mmmkay? Are you lecturing me, or the denizens of github? -- Regards,        Imran Rafique

Re: [Chicken-hackers] Distributed egg repo proposal

2011-03-18 Thread Imran Rafique
On 18 March 2011 10:08, Peter Bex peter@xs4all.nl wrote: On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 10:02:17AM +, Imran Rafique wrote: On 18 March 2011 09:20, Peter Bex peter@xs4all.nl wrote: On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 09:00:20AM +, Imran Rafique wrote: Dynamite is popular, and gets repeatedly

Re: [Chicken-hackers] Distributed egg repo proposal

2011-03-17 Thread Imran Rafique
) -- Regards,        Imran Rafique ___ Chicken-hackers mailing list Chicken-hackers@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-hackers