On Sat, May 25, 2013 at 05:59:37PM +0200, Moritz Heidkamp wrote:
Mario Domenech Goulart mario.goul...@gmail.com writes:
Maybe readlink -f ?
OK, Peter found that even that is not portable so I changed the test
itself to do the path canonicalization. Turns out that while the posix
unit's
Mario Domenech Goulart mario.goul...@gmail.com writes:
Ah good catch, but unfortunately OpenBSD does not expose realpath
as a shell command (or binary utility). Is there a way to do this
portably? John, do you know?
Maybe readlink -f ?
Thanks, that works, as well! Attached is an updated
Mario Domenech Goulart mario.goul...@gmail.com writes:
Maybe readlink -f ?
OK, Peter found that even that is not portable so I changed the test
itself to do the path canonicalization. Turns out that while the posix
unit's read-symbolic-link has a CANONICALIZE option it doesn't quite
behave like
* Moritz Heidkamp mor...@twoticketsplease.de [130525 01:49]:
The private repository path tests didn't work when run from inside a
path containing symlinks because runtests.sh didn't expand symlinks
while the -private-repository mechanism does. This lead the test
assertion which compares the
On Sat, 25 May 2013 02:01:24 +0200 Christian Kellermann ck...@pestilenz.org
wrote:
* Moritz Heidkamp mor...@twoticketsplease.de [130525 01:49]:
The private repository path tests didn't work when run from inside a
path containing symlinks because runtests.sh didn't expand symlinks
while the
