Felix Winkelmann felix.winkelm...@bevuta.com writes:
Regarding the eggification of binary-search, memory-mapped-files and
queues - are we all agreeing about this? Does this require a
change-request?
It may break existing code, so I guess we would need a CR. But I have a
feeling that this is
On 2014-07-14 0:11, Felix Winkelmann wrote:
I actually found one case: module alias definitions with listish
module name can not be distinguished from functor instantiation:
(module foo-alias = (chicken string))
Which is obscure enough. Should be drop module-aliases? They are used
On 2014-07-09 13:05, Felix Winkelmann wrote:
It would be nice to have some hierarchical naming for core
modules, what do you think about chicken.string, chicken.list
etc. (even though I prefer the plural form, that is, strings)? In
R7RS that would map to (chicken string) and so on. I can't
From: Evan Hanson ev...@foldling.org
Subject: Re: [Chicken-hackers] library unit restructuring
Date: Sun, 13 Jul 2014 14:37:57 -0700
On 2014-07-09 13:05, Felix Winkelmann wrote:
It would be nice to have some hierarchical naming for core
modules, what do you think about chicken.string
On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 2:13 AM, John Cowan co...@mercury.ccil.org wrote:
Felix Winkelmann scripsit:
There is some ambiguity with that, when import-modifiers come into
play...
The R7RS-small committee thought about that, and decided that people
who name their modules (only this) or
From: Evan Hanson ev...@foldling.org
Subject: Re: [Chicken-hackers] library unit restructuring
Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2014 14:29:46 -0700
Hi Felix,
I don't have a substantive reply just ATM, but I have also put some
ideas and tagged some identifiers with where they might go in a
reogranization
Felix Winkelmann scripsit:
Ah, very good. A nice list. I like the simple generic names string,
list. It would be nice to have some hierarchical naming for core
modules, what do you think about chicken.string, chicken.list
etc. (even though I prefer the plural form, that is, strings)?
+1 on
From: John Cowan co...@mercury.ccil.org
Subject: Re: [Chicken-hackers] library unit restructuring
Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2014 13:13:22 -0400
Felix Winkelmann scripsit:
Ah, very good. A nice list. I like the simple generic names string,
list. It would be nice to have some hierarchical naming
Hello, again...
I am currently trying to put together a plan about the library
restructuring that seems to be badly needed to make the core libraries
smaller, more fine-grained and hopefully easier to use.
* As already stated, I think it would be good to move some units
into eggs. Currently
Hi Felix,
I don't have a substantive reply just ATM, but I have also put some
ideas and tagged some identifiers with where they might go in a
reogranization at: http://wiki.call-cc.org/core-libraries-reorganization
Cheers,
Evan
___
Chicken-hackers
10 matches
Mail list logo
