From: Moritz Heidkamp
Subject: Re: [Chicken-hackers] importing modules of not yet loaded extensions
Date: Sun, 12 Dec 2010 02:08:49 +0100
> Felix writes:
>> Being able to import a module without requiring the loading of the
>> libary is necessary to allow cross-compilation. Ch
Felix writes:
> Being able to import a module without requiring the loading of the
> libary is necessary to allow cross-compilation. Chicken separates this
> and I consider it a feature.
Right, Christian pointed this out, too. I wonder though: Are modules
which use `require-extension' cross-com
From: Moritz Heidkamp
Subject: [Chicken-hackers] importing modules of not yet loaded extensions
Date: Sat, 11 Dec 2010 18:27:56 +0100
> Fellow Chickeneers,
>
> when investigating the problem described in ticket #450, Christian and I
> had a discussion about whether it makes sense to be able to i
* Alan Post [101211 18:42]:
> Generally, however, it is a bit annoying that import is an
> all-or-nothing thing, tightly binding sets of libraries together by
> not being able to separate importing from loading. Your e-mail here
> notwithstanding.
Generally that is exactly what import does: Sepa
On Sat, Dec 11, 2010 at 06:27:56PM +0100, Moritz Heidkamp wrote:
> Fellow Chickeneers,
>
> when investigating the problem described in ticket #450, Christian and I
> had a discussion about whether it makes sense to be able to import
> modules for which the extension defining them has not yet been
