On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 12:50:56PM +0100, Felix wrote:
- [PATCH] fix special cases for vector/list-ref in scrutinizer when
argument count is wrong
(here there's a reply with a modified patch)
Hm. Can't find that one.
original mail:
From: Christian Kellermann ck...@pestilenz.org
Subject: Re: [Chicken-hackers] pending patches
Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 16:04:29 +0100
* felix winkelmann fe...@call-with-current-continuation.org [120312 12:53]:
- [PATCH] Raise error on construction of too large vectors/blobs
(this is a long
* felix winkelmann fe...@call-with-current-continuation.org [120316 08:33]:
- [PATCH] Bugfix for #791 and unpack flonums correctly for integer?
Can't remember.
http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/chicken-hackers/2012-03/msg00010.html
Signed off and pushed.
This patch breaks
* felix winkelmann fe...@call-with-current-continuation.org [120316 08:34]:
From: Christian Kellermann ck...@pestilenz.org
Subject: Re: [Chicken-hackers] pending patches
Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 16:04:29 +0100
* felix winkelmann fe...@call-with-current-continuation.org [120312
12:53
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 08:25:45AM +0100, Felix wrote:
Hi!
Too many patches are floating in limbo in the moment (and I'm aware of
being unable to catch up, particularly in the case of the more involved
patches which I really like to review before they go into master).
There are no really
From: Peter Bex peter@xs4all.nl
Subject: Re: [Chicken-hackers] pending patches
Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 10:13:29 +0100
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 08:25:45AM +0100, Felix wrote:
Hi!
Too many patches are floating in limbo in the moment (and I'm aware of
being unable to catch up, particularly
Hm. Can't find that one.
original mail:
http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/chicken-hackers/2012-02/msg00050.html
I replied to that twice, but nongnu has issues displaying the thread
properly. So here's the link of my second reply directly:
* felix winkelmann fe...@call-with-current-continuation.org [120312 12:53]:
- [PATCH] Raise error on construction of too large vectors/blobs
(this is a long thread with multiple patches)
I have to review this, since it seems to duplicate ##sys#check-range.
Oh, that has been your
I have tried to devote some attention to this one and found that I
am still no good at modifying Chicken and then successfully running
the result. I do have some comments on the patch, which I had hoped
to provide as a patch, but since I seem unable to do that, I will
provide them more
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 01:51:47PM +0100, Felix wrote:
I have tried to devote some attention to this one and found that I
am still no good at modifying Chicken and then successfully running
the result. I do have some comments on the patch, which I had hoped
to provide as a patch, but
Hi!
* felix winkelmann fe...@call-with-current-continuation.org [11 14:10]:
Note that the following patches are still pending for review:
http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/chicken-hackers/2011-11/msg9.html
I must have overslept pushing that one after our little exchange, will push
On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 02:29:59PM +0100, Christian Kellermann wrote:
http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/chicken-hackers/2011-11/msg00010.html
This I will need a little more time, if someone likes to take over
(or work in parallel) she is more than welcome to. This is also a critical
12 matches
Mail list logo
