Hi all,
* Peter Bex [110303 09:32]:
> I've written up a proposal for switching our egg repository to
> a distributed type of deal:
>
> http://wiki.call-cc.org/distributed-egg-repos
>
> Since many users have indicated they are very much fed up with
> svn and would prefer to use $FAVORITE_VCS (a
Christian Kellermann scripsit:
> - Automatically *mirror* the contributed archives on call-cc.org,
> maybe after the code has passed N salmonella rounds of master and
> experimental branches.
What is an archive in this context? Is this a .tar.gz of a whole
remote repository in some random for
Hi,
Not sure if I should be posting to this list, however, I thought I'd
take a chance and chime in on 2 points:
1. *Lower Barriers to Entry*. My guess is that the absolute easiest
way for potential contributors to contribute a package is to simply
ask them to upload a tar.gz archive of their pr
From: John Cowan
Subject: Re: [Chicken-hackers] Distributed egg repo proposal
Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2011 19:45:20 -0400
> Christian Kellermann scripsit:
>
>> - Automatically *mirror* the contributed archives on call-cc.org,
>> maybe after the code has passed N salmonella rounds of master and
>> e
> [^1]: Incidentally, the [Pandoc](http://johnmacfarlane.net/pandoc/)
> tool works well for converting various input doc formats to various
> output doc formats (including html).
We should make sure not to depend on any external tools. Everything
breaks, sooner or later, and we must be able to fix
> Additional Complexity: This is also a no brainer, whichever way we
> decide to go, we will have to change things in the long run. Either
> to adapt to the larger SVN tree or to the new scheme. Both may be
> done without breaking existing stuff (apart from path changes of
> course).
Not a no-brai
On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 1:17 AM, Felix
wrote:
>> [^1]: Incidentally, the [Pandoc](http://johnmacfarlane.net/pandoc/)
>> tool works well for converting various input doc formats to various
>> output doc formats (including html).
>
> We should make sure not to depend on any external tools. Everythin
Felix scripsit:
> I like the idea of tgz-submission (did John suggest it? I can't
> remember, it's already 60 seconds later). How about a central store
> that accepts tgz's and external clients, that keep their own
> infrastructure (and DVCS's), who regularly pull repos from the actual
> contribut
