From: Thomas Chust ch...@web.de
Subject: Re: [Chicken-hackers] CR: (#439) quasiquote changes
Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2010 12:27:51 +0100
2010/12/8 Peter Bex peter@xs4all.nl:
[...]
I find this _very_ weird. It feels as if they made (+ (values 1 2 3))
be identical to (+ 1 2 3) - sorry if that's
* John Cowan co...@mercury.ccil.org [101210 21:42]:
Thomas Chust scripsit:
to me the analogy seems quite well chosen. By the way, sometimes I
actually wonder whether splicing behaviour of multiple values in an
argument list wouldn't be a good idea, but I'm unsure.
It's a Really Bad
Thomas Chust scripsit:
few Scheme compilers would report (cons (x)) as a compile time error
for lack of static type information.
You don't need any, unless you are prepared to handle reassigning (as
opposed to rebinding) the name. As long as cons is not locally rebound,
you know it takes two
