From: Peter Bex peter@xs4all.nl
Subject: Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Fix performance bottleneck in compiling
large files, add profiling option
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2012 09:09:56 +0100
On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 05:47:55AM +0100, Felix wrote:
I think this option is generally useful since if
* felix winkelmann fe...@call-with-current-continuation.org [120123 06:10]:
Hello!
The attached patch add a special case of inlining by transforming
calls like (variable ...) to (standard-or-extended binding
...), where variable is known to refer to some of the builtin
procedures known as
On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 11:19:14AM +0100, Felix wrote:
I considered that, but I think in some cases it would be useful to
be able to increase the limit, or remove it altogether.
Don't forget, it's not just the C comments but also the scrutinizer
messages that are affected by this option.
* Peter Bex peter@xs4all.nl [120123 18:50]:
How about the attached patch?
I have pushed it, thanks!
--
Who can (make) the muddy water (clear)? Let it be still, and it will
gradually become clear. Who can secure the condition of rest? Let
movement go on, and the condition of rest will
