* Alan Post alanp...@sunflowerriver.org [110928 22:49]:
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 10:10:14PM +0200, Christian Kellermann wrote:
I now notice that barf says stat on an OOM error. Excuse my
nitpicking, but should that be access?
It should. To complete this patch if only for the archives, I have
From: Christian Kellermann ck...@pestilenz.org
Subject: Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] proposed bugfix for #706
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2011 09:25:21 +0200
* felix winkelmann fe...@call-with-current-continuation.org [110929 03:18]:
I would suggest simply to detect the error in C_file_info_2, and act
I am not quite sure I understand this correctly. Catch the error
and if it is an overflow, redo it with a flonum? I am not sure if
this is even possible since the internal check is against whether
you are a 32-bit application and your off_t datatype is large enough
to hold the size.
* felix winkelmann fe...@call-with-current-continuation.org [110929 12:15]:
I am not quite sure I understand this correctly. Catch the error
and if it is an overflow, redo it with a flonum? I am not sure if
this is even possible since the internal check is against whether
you are a
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 12:28:07PM +0200, Christian Kellermann wrote:
Ok, we can signal the error this way. We should also investigate
the compatibility of this -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 stuff.
I basically run all of my C code with this magic flag. I believe it
changes the type of off_t and
