Re: port of xml-rpc to Chicken 5

2021-04-07 Thread Mario Domenech Goulart
Hi, On Thu, 8 Apr 2021 07:36:21 +0200 Peter Bex wrote: > On Wed, Apr 07, 2021 at 06:41:30PM -0700, Chris Brannon wrote: >> Mario Domenech Goulart writes: >> >> > Just double-checking to avoid misunderstandings: have you contacted >> > Peter Bex (maintainer of the egg for CHICKEN 4) about

Re: Chicken 5 compilation, coerced inexact literal number warning. What am I missing here?

2021-04-07 Thread Peter Bex
On Wed, Apr 07, 2021 at 10:42:39PM -0700, Matt Welland wrote: > There is a .h file in hostinfo and I didn't catch the error message. > Presumably that somehow put the compiler into fixnum mode. hm, if possible could you figure out what exactly did that? A C header file shouldn't change the

Re: Chicken 5 compilation, coerced inexact literal number warning. What am I missing here?

2021-04-07 Thread Matt Welland
Thanks Peter. That helped. I'm not certain but I think it was where I had put hostinfo egg from chicken 4 into a subdir and was including it. There is a .h file in hostinfo and I didn't catch the error message. Presumably that somehow put the compiler into fixnum mode. Now on to the next porting

Re: port of xml-rpc to Chicken 5

2021-04-07 Thread Peter Bex
On Wed, Apr 07, 2021 at 06:41:30PM -0700, Chris Brannon wrote: > Mario Domenech Goulart writes: > > > Just double-checking to avoid misunderstandings: have you contacted > > Peter Bex (maintainer of the egg for CHICKEN 4) about taking over the > > maintenance of xml-rpc? > > Hi Mario, > I'm

Re: port of xml-rpc to Chicken 5

2021-04-07 Thread Chris Brannon
Mario Domenech Goulart writes: > Just double-checking to avoid misunderstandings: have you contacted > Peter Bex (maintainer of the egg for CHICKEN 4) about taking over the > maintenance of xml-rpc? Hi Mario, I'm sorry; I should have been more explicit about that. Peter was the one who gave me

Re: port of xml-rpc to Chicken 5

2021-04-07 Thread Mario Domenech Goulart
Hi Chris, On Tue, 06 Apr 2021 19:53:32 -0700 Chris Brannon wrote: > I'm taking over maintenance of the xml-rpc egg. > I've ported it to Chicken 5. > The .release-info file is here: > https://the-brannons.com/cgit/cgit.cgi/chicken-xml-rpc/plain/xml-rpc.release-info Just double-checking to avoid

Re: Chicken 5 compilation, coerced inexact literal number warning. What am I missing here?

2021-04-07 Thread Peter Bex
On Tue, Apr 06, 2021 at 09:37:32PM -0700, Matt Welland wrote: > This one I sort of understand but it does seem annoying: > > Warning: coerced inexact literal number `9e+99' to fixnum > 848859130765266355329578537025198862586562510896759102769772101980841694466750283776 I don't