Whoops, here it is: https://github.com/dieggsy/srfi-123
- Diego
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On May 17, 2018 4:13 AM, Christian Kellermann <ck...@pestilenz.org> wrote:
>
>
> Hi!
>
> - Diego dieg...@pm.me [180516 20:29]:
>
> > I ported srfi-123 to chi
that in chicken scheme are provided by other eggs, so I
just went ahead and made those a requirement for this one (rather than some
conditional checking if they're loaded?). Technically, they're not _required_
for this srfi to work.
- Diego
___
Chicken-users
edit with the web
interface.
- How do I go about aliasing srfi.123 to srfi-123?
Diego
___
Chicken-users mailing list
Chicken-users@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
types.
Note that I had to change identifer? to symbol?, the consequences of which I'm
still not entirely sure, and I had to change one test due to differences in how
append works.
- Diego
___
Chicken-users mailing list
Chicken-users@nongnu.org
https
about ANNs and have never used them in basically any capacity, so I'm not sure
how practical this particular library/egg are, but I thought it'd be fun to
experiment with in any case.
- Diego
___
Chicken-users mailing list
Chicken-users@nongnu.org
(e.g. racket-math?) so as
to avoid ambiguity or confusion.
- Diego
___
Chicken-users mailing list
Chicken-users@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
module.
Here's the release-info file:
https://code.dieggsy.com/srfi-105/plain/srfi-105.release-info
And some more details, which will go into the wiki if/once the egg is
added:
https://code.dieggsy.com/srfi-105/tree/srfi-105.svnwiki
- Diego
ere the wiki
search is implemented.
- Diego
, and the release-info url is
here:
https://code.dieggsy.com/r7rs-tools/plain/r7rs-tools.release-info
I've not tested this for very large or complicated projects, but it seems to
work so far for simple examples.
Docs are available here:
https://wiki.call-cc.org/eggref/5/r7rs-tools
- Diego
)" str 1)
rest
- Diego
https://code.dieggsy.com/srfi-160/plain/srfi-160.release-info
* srfi-197: https://code.dieggsy.com/srfi-197/plain/srfi-197.release-info
- Diego
. Currently, only the two
procedures stated in the SRFI document are using the FFI, but I'm not sure if
the claims made about Larceny hold for us as well.
- Diego
m to have
a notion of modules at all - only egg names. So in any case it would
be listed as (r7rs string-map). It might be worthwhile to look into
adding module introspection to chicken-doc in the future...
- Diego
fl+ etc.
> and, where necessary, direct FFI calls and see if they are faster
I agree about FFI procedures. I would very strongly expect them to be faster
than the scheme procedures, but I'd rather not do it without an actual
benchmark, which I haven't gotten around to yet.
- Diego
I made chicken-update for the first thing:
https://wiki.call-cc.org/eggref/5/chicken-update
I think you can use chicken-status (?) for the second thing, but not at a
computer at the moment.
Diego
Original Message
On Jun 7, 2022, 21:41, Alin Mr wrote:
> Hi, is there a
Looks like I missed this one:
(srfi-143
"https://git.sr.ht/~dieggsy/srfi-143/tree/master/item/srfi-143.release-info;)
Diego
--- Original Message ---
On Friday, November 4th, 2022 at 11:47 AM, Diego wrote:
> Thanks. Here's the fixed url for r6rs-bytevectors:
>
> (r6
eggsy/srfi-144/blob/master/srfi-144.release-info;)
(srfi-160
"https://git.sr.ht/~dieggsy/srfi-160/blob/master/srfi-160.release-info;)
(srfi-179
"https://git.sr.ht/~dieggsy/srfi-179/blob/master/srfi-179.release-info;)
(srfi-197
"https://git.sr.ht/~dieggsy/srfi-197/blob/master/srfi-197.release-info;)
Diego
Thanks. Here's the fixed url for r6rs-bytevectors:
(r6rs-bytevectors
"https://git.sr.ht/~dieggsy/r6rs-bytevectors/blob/master/r6rs.bytevectors.release-info;)
Diego
--- Original Message ---
On Friday, November 4th, 2022 at 11:41 AM, wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> >
...aaand I've erred once more. Sorry, the following is the correct link for
srfi-143:
(srfi-143
"https://git.sr.ht/~dieggsy/srfi-143/blob/master/srfi-143.release-info;)
Diego
--- Original Message ---
On Sunday, November 6th, 2022 at 12:52 PM, Diego wrote:
> Looks like
to the sources at https://git.sr.ht/~dieggsy/srfi-143, or
transfer the egg to a different maintainer/repo entirely if that approach is
preferred.
Diego
On Tuesday, February 6th, 2024 at 11:04 AM, felix.winkelm...@bevuta.com
wrote:
> > Aha, so as long as something is wrapped we don't see the sam
On Monday, April 22nd, 2024 at 11:56 PM, Jeremy Steward
wrote:
> Sorry to reply to myself, but I've provided some better patches now, see
> attached.
Whoops, I got this in the middle of pushing the previous change. I'll try and
apply the new patches. Thanks for this.
Diego
ctive on email (IRC, if I ever get
around to setting it up again) going forward to keep track of this and my other
eggs, should they come up.
Diego
is that it doesn't seem to support
passing values to long options with a space instead of an "=" (even though one
of th examples provided says otherwise, the "--apples" "Granny Smith" bit).
Diego
Original Message
Subject: Re: [Chicken-users] Bug with #:optional
With the example on the args eggref
(http://wiki.call-cc.org/eggref/4/args#examples) slightly modified to this:
#!/usr/local/bin/csi -script
(use args)
(define opts
(list
.
- It implements a couple flonum operations in C
- It has fairly extensive tests, which I've converted to use the test egg.
It'd be nice to have this in the egg repo for Chicken 5, assuming I haven't
made any glaring mistakes.
- Diego A. Mundo
on a response from the person who maintained the website, as far
as I can tell). Looking on web archive, there's some pretty fun and interesting
sounding stuff in there. Maybe we could create a snow compatibility egg to
avoid code duplication across snow eggs.
- Diego
diff -uN snowtar-old/snow
been like a day, I'm not in a rush. Though if you know some other
place that code might be, let me know.
- Diego
___
Chicken-users mailing list
Chicken-users@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
egg
servers in the future, but ATM the only way I can think of doing it is to query
the server for each egg's version (as henrietta doesn't support listing all
eggs with the latest version), and that seems like it could be slow and
expensive, esp. with more eggs installed.
- Diego
28 matches
Mail list logo
