[chromium-dev] Re: Writing tips to our build instructions?

2009-02-18 Thread 坊野 博典
Thank you all those who updated the build instructions. Regards, Hironori Bono E-mail: hb...@chromium.org On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 3:09 AM, Evan Martin e...@chromium.org wrote: On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 9:37 AM, Pam Greene p...@chromium.org wrote: And I've updated

[chromium-dev] Re: Qt now a possibility?

2009-02-18 Thread kokoko3k
On 17 Gen, 19:45, Ben Goodger (Google) b...@chromium.org wrote: +1 FWIW, the changes I've made in the browser over the past few months (MagicBrowzr) should have made it possible for the front end to be written in any number of native toolkits. Our first test is going to be Cocoa on OS X.

[chromium-dev] Re: Qt now a possibility?

2009-02-18 Thread kokoko3k
On 17 Gen, 19:45, Ben Goodger (Google) b...@chromium.org wrote: +1 FWIW, the changes I've made in the browser over the past few months (MagicBrowzr) should have made it possible for the front end to be written in any number of native toolkits. Our first test is going to be Cocoa on OS X.

[chromium-dev] Re: Is there a scroll bar?

2009-02-18 Thread Marc-Andre Decoste
OK, Thanks... I'll try to find the slowdown then... BYE MAD On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 6:48 PM, Brett Wilson bre...@chromium.org wrote: On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 3:43 PM, Marc-Andre Decoste m...@google.com wrote: Salut, I'm looking for a way to know, at the BrowserView (or even at the

[chromium-dev] Re: checkdeps failure when a unit test relies on v8.h

2009-02-18 Thread Darin Fisher
Right... I meant the particular vector of faking the proxy auto config file to achieve HTTP interception. That Windows has auto detect proxies enabled by default would seem to make this an easy target for hackers. -Darin On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 10:16 PM, Adam Barth aba...@chromium.org wrote:

[chromium-dev] Re: checkdeps failure when a unit test relies on v8.h

2009-02-18 Thread Darin Fisher
Hmm... coffee kicking in... to answer my own question, since wpad interception would probably be DNS based, the attacker could also just use the same approach to intercept specific hostnames for plaintext HTTP. even with PAC, the attacker wouldn't have much luck intercepting HTTPS, so the attack

[chromium-dev] Re: how keyboard input works

2009-02-18 Thread Avi Drissman
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 7:28 PM, Darin Fisher da...@chromium.org wrote: The intent was for WebKeyboardEvent to mirror PlatformKeyboardEvent such that conversion between the two was a simple as copying fields directly. The issue with this approach is that PlatformKeyboardEvent is not a simple

[chromium-dev] Re: how keyboard input works

2009-02-18 Thread Avi Drissman
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 11:22 AM, Darin Fisher da...@chromium.org wrote: Notice that except for a bool, the rest are not part of the structure when PLATFORM(CHROMIUM) is defined, so for us PlatformKeyboardEvent is platform independent. Yes, I just found PlatformKeyboardEventChromium.cpp.

[chromium-dev] Re: how keyboard input works

2009-02-18 Thread Avi Drissman
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 11:43 AM, Darin Fisher da...@chromium.org wrote: We can extend WebKeyboardEvent if we need to, but what additional information do you need? Don't worry, I've got it now. Avi --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ Chromium Developers mailing list:

[chromium-dev] Re: how keyboard input works

2009-02-18 Thread Darin Fisher
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 8:28 AM, Avi Drissman a...@google.com wrote: On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 11:22 AM, Darin Fisher da...@chromium.org wrote: Notice that except for a bool, the rest are not part of the structure when PLATFORM(CHROMIUM) is defined, so for us PlatformKeyboardEvent is platform

[chromium-dev] Using Purify - how to fix the buildbots

2009-02-18 Thread Erik Kay
I added a page to the wiki that talks about using Purify in the Chromium project: http://sites.google.com/a/chromium.org/dev/developers/how-tos/using-purify For Googlers, this is an updated version of an old page you may have seen before. It has a few important changes however, so I encourage

[chromium-dev] Re: [linux] plugin info caching

2009-02-18 Thread Evan Stade
It appears that Mozilla (maybe for similar reasons) caches this info across browser runs and relies on the file mtime to see when its cache has expired, much to some users' dismay: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=125469 Or at least they did in 2002. ;) yea, they definitely

[chromium-dev] Merge 41017:41057 also needs a clobber for Windows folks

2009-02-18 Thread Dimitri Glazkov
Hi All, Because the latest merge introduces a change to third_party/WebKit/WebCore/css/html4.css, which is only picked up by DerivedSources.make, making that change actually appear in your build requires a clobber. :DG --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ Chromium Developers

[chromium-dev] Re: Merge 41017:41057 also needs a clobber for Windows folks

2009-02-18 Thread Dimitri Glazkov
As it turns out, the clobber applies to Mac and possibly Linux builds. Basically, clobber all. :DG On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 3:11 PM, Dimitri Glazkov dglaz...@google.com wrote: Hi All, Because the latest merge introduces a change to third_party/WebKit/WebCore/css/html4.css, which is only

[chromium-dev] Re: Qt now a possibility?

2009-02-18 Thread inaneframe
I'm not understanding the animosity shown toward GTK in this thread thus far. A majority of GNU/Linux distros are now using GNOME as the default distro, I use and nearly every Free Software user that I know IRL uses and prefers it. I'm not going to bad mouth QT, I used it predominately a couple

[chromium-dev] Re: Qt now a possibility?

2009-02-18 Thread inaneframe
I'm not understanding the animosity shown toward GTK in this thread thus far. A majority of GNU/Linux distros are now using GNOME as the default desktop, I use and nearly every Free Software user that I know IRL uses and prefers it. I'm not going to bad mouth QT, I used it predominately a