In case you wanted to boring technical details on the topic:
From the ICCCM:
http://tronche.com/gui/x/icccm/sec-4.html#s-4.1.10
If the window will be visible for a very short time and should not be
decorated at all, the client can set override-redirect on the window.
In general, this should
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 8:17 AM, Dean McNamee de...@chromium.org wrote:
I wonder if the situation is at all similar on Mac.
The Mac is pretty flexible in this regard--we can create arbitrarily
shaped windows that are grouped/stacked with existing windows however
we want (or put another way,
Right. So the idea is a child window, borderless, with custom drawing.
Shouldn't be too hard, and I'm envisioning some use of Core Animation to do
things like the fading...
Avi
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 9:17 AM, Amanda Walker ama...@chromium.org wrote:
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 8:17 AM, Dean
YES! DEFER!
-Scott
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 11:25 AM, Dimitri Glazkov dglaz...@google.com wrote:
Team,
We have many brains working the layout test puzzle. And that's a good
thing. We've got this Rubik's cube nearly all finished. However, it
somewhat pains me seeing lots of engineers
I think this is fine, but we should stay on top of new svg regressions
from here forward.
Ojan
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 11:48 AM, Marc-Antoine Ruel mar...@chromium.org wrote:
Stress reliever. But I won't have fixed any layout tests. :(
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 2:28 PM, Scott Violet
Although we don't have any prospect of a generic, non-root solution to
sandboxing on Linux we can target Apparmor on Ubuntu and SELInux on
Fedora.
Apparmor on Ubuntu is pretty straight-forward. It triggers based on
the path of the binary. We can hard link
We agreed on IRC to mark all the http layout tests as PASS CRASH
TIMEOUT on the mac. This way we'll still catch tests that start
failing. Unfortunately, I went to make this change and couldn't
because we have some http tests in the ignore file and you can't have
tests listed in both the ignore
Are we only talking about regressions since 1.0? How many tests are
we talking about?
-Darin
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 12:28 PM, Scott Violet s...@chromium.org wrote:
On thinking about this a bit more this would mean a break from our
policy of no rendering regressions since 1.0. Are we OK
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 15:01, Darin Fisher da...@chromium.org wrote:
Are we only talking about regressions since 1.0? How many tests are
we talking about?
I agree we should set a baseline and not tolerate regressions from here
forward.
The latter question is the really important one to
Those are easy. If the test never worked them DEFER.
-Scott
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 4:37 PM, Ricardo Vargas rvar...@google.com wrote:
At least the tests that I've been following have never worked.
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 3:20 PM, Peter Kasting pkast...@google.com wrote:
On Fri, Mar 13,
Scott Violet, Elliot, Evan Martin, Adam Langley, Tony, Linus and I met
briefly earlier today to discuss Linux UI and Gtk.
What we agreed is that next week Elliot and I will spend some time
researching what it would take to use views with Gtk, including the
Widget/Window types and NativeControl.
I started a page describing some of the high level tradeoffs between the
two. Please add items or elaborate.
http://code.google.com/p/chromium/wiki/GtkVsViewsGtk
On Fri, 13 Mar 2009, Ben Goodger (Google) wrote:
Scott Violet, Elliot, Evan Martin, Adam Langley, Tony, Linus and I met
briefly
12 matches
Mail list logo
