I had a discussion about Views with Scott. I think I am on the side
of the fence that porting views it not a good idea. One of the things
that came up is remote X, would it be possible to ever have good
remote X performance with the Views panting model? I wouldn't want to
paint ourselves into
On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 12:59 AM, Ben Goodger (Google) b...@chromium.org
wrote:
Scott Violet, Elliot, Evan Martin, Adam Langley, Tony, Linus and I met
briefly earlier today to discuss Linux UI and Gtk.
What we agreed is that next week Elliot and I will spend some time
researching what it
On Sun, Mar 15, 2009 at 7:37 AM, Dean McNamee de...@chromium.org wrote:
I had a discussion about Views with Scott. I think I am on the side
of the fence that porting views it not a good idea. One of the things
that came up is remote X, would it be possible to ever have good
remote X
On Sun, Mar 15, 2009 at 8:55 AM, Dean McNamee de...@chromium.org wrote:
UI elements like buttons are different, my understanding is that (at
least in theory) it should be possible for all of those images of the
different states to live on the X server, so they don't need to be
sent over the
On Sun, Mar 15, 2009 at 10:09 AM, Adam Langley a...@chromium.org wrote:
On Sun, Mar 15, 2009 at 8:55 AM, Dean McNamee de...@chromium.org wrote:
UI elements like buttons are different, my understanding is that (at
least in theory) it should be possible for all of those images of the
different
From what I've seen, a large portion of the svg tests fail due to pretty
fundamental svg implementation issues. In addition, many of the tests fail
due to the same bug/root cause.
I think Dimitri is right that the best approach here is a smaller, more
focused effort whether or not fixing these
Evan told Scott and I you were rendering into Skia in a few places,
then converting into a native image format and pushing to the display.
-Ben
On Sun, Mar 15, 2009 at 8:55 AM, Dean McNamee de...@chromium.org wrote:
I don't believe we are currently using Skia for any of our UI drawing.
We
Hello!
A lot of people told me that they did not like the waterfall, mainly
because it's hard
to find out where and when a change is tested, and what the result is. (It
involves a
lot of scrolling, searching, etc). So I tried to write a better one.
The goal of this new waterfall is to be
Wow - thanks Nicolas! This looks really interesting. I look forward to
seeing it in action this week!
Mike
On Sun, Mar 15, 2009 at 6:54 PM, Nicolas Sylvain nsylv...@chromium.orgwrote:
Hello!
A lot of people told me that they did not like the waterfall, mainly
because it's hard
to find
Wow Nicolas! Very nice :) One comment, can you make urls auto link.
Many commits they place their code review / issue tracker url, but its
not linkable. Would be cool to have that :)
On Sun, Mar 15, 2009 at 10:33 PM, Mike Belshe mbel...@google.com wrote:
Wow - thanks Nicolas! This looks
Here's a pretty sweet Firefox extension that we should be able to
someday support. Tons of features. Lots of very well done UI.
Watch the video: http://www.zotero.org/
- a
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
Chromium Developers mailing list: chromium-dev@googlegroups.com
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 4:49 PM, Scott Violet s...@chromium.org wrote:
Those are easy. If the test never worked them DEFER.
I agree, if it's not a regression, and (as Linus mentioned) not a
hang/crash/leak, let's punt. I only care about not regressing tests that
are regressions, not sure how
12 matches
Mail list logo
