Did you try to unpublish and then publish the extension again and download?
☆PhistucK
On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 10:37, Anders Bergh ande...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 23:48, Aaron Boodman a...@chromium.org wrote:
Hello all,
I'm happy to announce that the developer area of our
Hi Drew Albert,
I picked your names off the WebKit sheriff calendar.
I've landed a change to switch the Mac port over from ATSUI-Core Text APIs
on the WebKit tree at http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/51633 .
If you see stability or performance issues on the next WebKit roll then feel
free to
Our messages crossed in the ether ...
On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 10:07 AM, Ojan Vafai o...@google.com wrote:
+chromium-dev as others who look at the waterfall might also be confused.
On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 8:50 AM, Dimitri Glazkov dglaz...@google.com wrote:
Sending out random people, because it's
On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 10:07 AM, Ojan Vafai o...@google.com wrote:
+chromium-dev as others who look at the waterfall might also be confused.
On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 8:50 AM, Dimitri Glazkov dglaz...@google.com wrote:
Sending out random people, because it's early :)
There's a couple of things
On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 10:09 AM, Dimitri Glazkov dglaz...@google.comwrote:
On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 10:07 AM, Ojan Vafai o...@google.com wrote:
+chromium-dev as others who look at the waterfall might also be confused.
On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 8:50 AM, Dimitri Glazkov dglaz...@google.com
wrote:
On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 10:17 AM, Nicolas Sylvain nsylv...@chromium.org wrote:
Should unexpected flakiness turn the bot red?
If it turns the bot red, then it defeats the purpose of that code. Might as
well not retry and mark it as FAIL. (which turns the tree red).
Duh :) Makes sense.
How
On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 10:21 AM, Dimitri Glazkov dglaz...@google.com
wrote:
How about we turn red for unexpected crashiness?
Makes sense to me. We can just not retry tests that unexpectedly crash.
On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 10:09 AM, Dirk Pranke dpra...@google.com wrote:
On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at
On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 10:25 AM, Ojan Vafai o...@chromium.org wrote:
On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 10:21 AM, Dimitri Glazkov dglaz...@google.com
wrote:
How about we turn red for unexpected crashiness?
Makes sense to me. We can just not retry tests that unexpectedly crash.
On Thu, Dec 3, 2009
On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 10:25 AM, Ojan Vafai o...@chromium.org wrote:
On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 10:21 AM, Dimitri
Glazkov dglaz...@google.com wrote:
How about we turn red for unexpected crashiness?
Makes sense to me. We can just not retry tests that unexpectedly crash.
I'll make this change if
I filed a bug on this, including a proposal for how to improve build
times by breaking DerivedSourcesAllInOne into four pieces (with a
workaround to keep it building all-in-one for configurations that
require that.)
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32128
I'll do it, if people think
Automatically closing tree for net_unittests on Modules XP (dbg)
http://build.chromium.org/buildbot/waterfall/builders/Modules%20XP%20%28dbg%29/builds/20009
http://build.chromium.org/buildbot/waterfall/waterfall?builder=Modules%20XP%20%28dbg%29
--= Automatically closing tree for net_unittests
I've written a document describing our current implementation of the audio
and video tags:
http://sites.google.com/a/chromium.org/dev/developers/design-documents/video
If you're interested in helping out, feel free to reply to me privately or
take a look at our
Hi Jeremy,
My next roll will be to 51642 (in progress). I'll ping you when it lands so
you can keep an eye on it too.
-atw
2009/12/3 Jeremy Moskovich jer...@chromium.org
Hi Drew Albert,
I picked your names off the WebKit sheriff calendar.
I've landed a change to switch the Mac port over
I'm working on some UI related to downloads, and I need a clean indication
that a download is finished. Not just finished but Finished. And I've found
we're getting two notifications: one before auto-opening happens, and one
after it happens.
If we look at
I've got a cl that builds fine on win/mac/linux but I'm afraid I could
impact views_linux. And, since there's no trybot, I have no way of
knowing until I actually check in and break it.
That's where you come in! Would someone mind trying
http://codereview.chromium.org/465005/show
for me with
Isn't gcl try cl -b linux_view what you want?
On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 1:46 PM, Mike Pinkerton pinker...@chromium.orgwrote:
I've got a cl that builds fine on win/mac/linux but I'm afraid I could
impact views_linux. And, since there's no trybot, I have no way of
knowing until I actually check in
The same is true of view_chromeos, FWIW.
On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 5:45 PM, Mike Pinkerton pinker...@chromium.org wrote:
Yes, except it's down and hasn't worked in days.
On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 5:44 PM, Jeremy Orlow jor...@chromium.org wrote:
Isn't gcl try cl -b linux_view what you want?
On
Yes, except it's down and hasn't worked in days.
On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 5:44 PM, Jeremy Orlow jor...@chromium.org wrote:
Isn't gcl try cl -b linux_view what you want?
On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 1:46 PM, Mike Pinkerton pinker...@chromium.org
wrote:
I've got a cl that builds fine on win/mac/linux
Automatically closing tree for net_unittests on Modules XP (dbg)
http://build.chromium.org/buildbot/waterfall/builders/Modules%20XP%20%28dbg%29/builds/20030
http://build.chromium.org/buildbot/waterfall/waterfall?builder=Modules%20XP%20%28dbg%29
--= Automatically closing tree for net_unittests
Automatically closing tree for net_unittests on Modules XP (dbg)
http://build.chromium.org/buildbot/waterfall/builders/Modules%20XP%20%28dbg%29/builds/20032
http://build.chromium.org/buildbot/waterfall/waterfall?builder=Modules%20XP%20%28dbg%29
--= Automatically closing tree for net_unittests
I filed http://crbug.com/29364
On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 2:45 PM, Mike Pinkerton pinker...@chromium.org wrote:
Yes, except it's down and hasn't worked in days.
On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 5:44 PM, Jeremy Orlow jor...@chromium.org wrote:
Isn't gcl try cl -b linux_view what you want?
On Thu, Dec 3,
When I try to commit my change, I am getting following error there - any
ideas what might be causing this?
gcl commit my_change
Presubmit checks took 1.7s to calculate.
Loaded authentication cookies from
C:\Users\zelidrag/.codereview_upload_cookies
svn: Commit failed (details follow):
svn:
Sounds like you're trying to commit to the read-only repo?
On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 3:31 PM, Zelidrag Hornung zelid...@chromium.org wrote:
When I try to commit my change, I am getting following error there - any
ideas what might be causing this?
gcl commit my_change
Presubmit checks took 1.7s to
If you're a committer, you should have recieved instructions on how
to set up your client (it will have an svn rather than an http url)
when you got your commit password.
On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 3:51 PM, Zelidrag Hornung zelid...@google.com wrote:
How do I know if the repo is read-only? This is
Automatically closing tree for test_shell_tests on Webkit Linux
http://build.chromium.org/buildbot/waterfall/builders/Webkit%20Linux/builds/14929
http://build.chromium.org/buildbot/waterfall/waterfall?builder=Webkit%20Linux
--= Automatically closing tree for test_shell_tests on Webkit Linux
Automatically closing tree for unit_tests on Mac10.5 Tests
http://build.chromium.org/buildbot/waterfall/builders/Mac10.5%20Tests/builds/9314
http://build.chromium.org/buildbot/waterfall/waterfall?builder=Mac10.5%20Tests
--= Automatically closing tree for unit_tests on Mac10.5 Tests =--
Automatically closing tree for check deps on Chromium XP
http://build.chromium.org/buildbot/waterfall/builders/Chromium%20XP/builds/9003
http://build.chromium.org/buildbot/waterfall/waterfall?builder=Chromium%20XP
--= Automatically closing tree for check deps on Chromium XP =--
Revision:
Automatically closing tree for compile on Linux Builder (ChromiumOS)
http://build.chromium.org/buildbot/waterfall/builders/Linux%20Builder%20%28ChromiumOS%29/builds/931
http://build.chromium.org/buildbot/waterfall/waterfall?builder=Linux%20Builder%20%28ChromiumOS%29
--= Automatically closing
Automatically closing tree for compile on Linux Builder (Views dbg)
http://build.chromium.org/buildbot/waterfall/builders/Linux%20Builder%20%28Views%20dbg%29/builds/5398
http://build.chromium.org/buildbot/waterfall/waterfall?builder=Linux%20Builder%20%28Views%20dbg%29
--= Automatically closing
Hi Anders,
That's a pain, sorry about that.
I've filed a bug and asked our gallery team to take a look at it, I'll let
you know what they find.
-Nick
On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 12:37 PM, Anders Bergh ande...@gmail.com wrote:
At least more than 24h.
On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 16:06, Erik Kay
It looks like this had some negative perf issues:
http://build.chromium.org/buildbot/waterfall/builders/Mac10.5%20Perf%281%29/builds/6289/steps/page_cycler_intl2/logs/stdio
http://build.chromium.org/buildbot/perf/mac-release-10.5/intl2/report.html?history=150
(my DEPS roll was 33776)
I'm going
Hi,
I just switched to use make to build chromium linux, but I found that
make all didn't work at all. It only told me: make: Nothing to be done for
`all'. Though it works if I specify the target name explicitly, such as
make chrome. Is it a known issue of gyp? Or I missed something?
- James Su
I think you don't need to specify a target to build everything i.e.
just type make and it should work.
--Craig
On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 7:44 AM, James Su su...@chromium.org wrote:
Hi,
I just switched to use make to build chromium linux, but I found that
make all didn't work at all. It only
Unfortunately, it doesn't work. Actually, make == make all.
- James Su
2009/12/4 Craig Schlenter craig.schlen...@gmail.com
I think you don't need to specify a target to build everything i.e.
just type make and it should work.
--Craig
On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 7:44 AM, James Su
Hi
One known problem with the make build is that you sometimes have to
run it twice to rebuild the chrome target as the strings sometimes
don't get rebuilt properly but if make chrome does something, then in
theory make/make all should have built that too.
What does make chrome build that make
make chrome works as expected, it builds out the chrome binary. But make
or make all doesn't work at all.
- James Su
2009/12/4 Craig Schlenter craig.schlen...@gmail.com
Hi
One known problem with the make build is that you sometimes have to
run it twice to rebuild the chrome target as the
36 matches
Mail list logo
