[chromium-dev] Re: [linux] nested messageloop patch landed

2009-06-04 Thread Dean McNamee
I'm really curious of why that would be. I realize the old code was a bit buggy, but I wonder exactly where the startup improvement came in. I think it would be pretty important to understand... Any takers? On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 1:34 AM, Nicolas Sylvainnsylv...@chromium.org wrote: On Wed,

[chromium-dev] Re: [linux] nested messageloop patch landed

2009-06-03 Thread Evan Martin
This patch, aside from fixing Antoine's problem and those other two bugs, seems to have significantly improved our startup time: http://build.chromium.org/buildbot/perf/linux-release/startup/report.html?history=150 (The second drop is due to running on new hardware.) I kinda suspect we're

[chromium-dev] Re: [linux] nested messageloop patch landed

2009-06-03 Thread Nicolas Sylvain
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 3:25 PM, Lei Zhang thes...@chromium.org wrote: Aren't the bots in virtual machines? Since we're in the middle of some hardware upgrades, perhaps the new host machine isn't as loaded. Would that affect the performance numbers? The first time the blue line dropped it