[chromium-dev] Re: Mac Valgrind Bots

2009-07-17 Thread Thomas Van Lenten
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 10:31 AM, Dan Kegel d...@kegel.com wrote: On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 2:07 PM, Nicolas Sylvainnsylv...@chromium.org wrote: We've finished the shuffle of the Mac Valgrind bots over to release builds. It looks like some of the slower tests now run 2x as fast, so the

[chromium-dev] Re: Mac Valgrind Bots

2009-07-17 Thread Nicolas Sylvain
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 7:40 AM, Dan Kegel d...@kegel.com wrote: On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 2:34 PM, Thomas Van Lententhoma...@chromium.org wrote: We're already running at -O1 on Linux, so there isn't much improvement left to be had, I suspect. It might be worth it, dunno. There is a lot

[chromium-dev] Re: Mac Valgrind Bots

2009-07-17 Thread Dan Kegel
TThomas Van Lententhoma...@chromium.org wrote: We're already running at -O1 on Linux, so there isn't much improvement left to be had, I suspect. =A0 It might be worth it, dunno. There is a lot of code cut out by being NDEBUG instead of DEBUG, that's where I think the mac is getting its speed

[chromium-dev] Re: Mac Valgrind Bots

2009-07-17 Thread Dan Kegel
Right, we use -O1 instead of -O2 or -O0 with valgrind; it strikes a good balance between good stack and speed. On Jul 17, 2009 9:46 AM, Erik Kay erik...@chromium.org wrote: On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 8:12 AM, Nicolas Sylvain nsylv...@chromium.org wrote: On Fri, Jul ... One other tradeoff to