Word on the street is that the ccflags are all wrong, and that release
builds aren't being built release properly.
On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 7:23 AM, Mark Mentovai m...@chromium.org wrote:
Awesome. This is seriously good news. Thanks!
Mark
Steven Knight wrote:
Linux builds have been
I can't actually get it to build (trying Release for now), I am
getting linker errors for X calls, we are probably not linking
correctly. I will debug it :\
On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 12:11 PM, Dean McNamee de...@chromium.org wrote:
Word on the street is that the ccflags are all wrong, and that
Notice the lack of -O2, etc. This also broke SYMBOLS= PROFILE=, COVERAGE=, etc.
I am tempted to revert it all.
de...@trex:build$ hammer -j6 --mode=Release SYMBOLS=1 --verbose v8_shell
scons: Reading SConscript files ...
scons: done reading SConscript files.
scons: Building targets ...
g++ -o
-lX11 -lXrender -lXext (at least) was dropped in the switch to gyp. I
tried to understand how gyp worked or where these were coming from,
but no luck.
On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 12:35 PM, Dean McNamee de...@chromium.org wrote:
I can't actually get it to build (trying Release for now), I am
(this isn't just V8, all of chromium is built without optimization in
release). There are lots of other issues all over the place.
On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 1:14 PM, Dean McNamee de...@chromium.org wrote:
Notice the lack of -O2, etc. This also broke SYMBOLS= PROFILE=, COVERAGE=,
etc.
I am
And it seems to be built without debugging flags in debug mode.
At least, I can't single-step through code on Linux.
On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 4:18 AM, Dean McNamee de...@chromium.org wrote:
(this isn't just V8, all of chromium is built without optimization in
release). There are lots of other
I confirmed the debug build line has no -g.
Also, all of the buildbots are red because of ICU issues:
http://build.chromium.org/buildbot/waterfall/builders/Modules%20Linux%20(dbg)/builds/6601/steps/test_shell_tests/logs/MimeTypeTests
On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 3:46 PM, Dan Kegel
Just a wild guess but I think it's missing the circular linker magic
start/end stuff when compiling the plugin. Will try to confirm when
I'm near a pc again ...
--Craig
On 02 Apr 2009, at 15:48, Dean McNamee de...@chromium.org wrote:
I confirmed the debug build line has no -g.
Also,
Dean, sounds like you have the seeds of a qual script. Perhaps you could
itemize them into a form which sgk can use as a proof test before the next
switch-over (assuming this gets reverted)?
jrg
On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 6:48 AM, Dean McNamee de...@chromium.org wrote:
I confirmed the debug build
On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 4:47 PM, Craig Schlenter
craig.schlen...@gmail.com wrote:
Just a wild guess but I think it's missing the circular linker magic
start/end stuff when compiling the plugin. Will try to confirm when I'm near
a pc again ...
Confirmed. Here's the line it's using to generate
Craig Schlenter wrote:
When I add -Wl,--start-group and -Wl,--end-group to that (manually
since haven't figured out how to make gyp do it), then the missing
symbol problem goes away (at least when loading chrome and navigating
to mail.google which is where I was seeing the problem).
I don't
On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 09:10, Steven Knight s...@chromium.org wrote:
Excellent idea re: qual script. What I'd like to do is turn these items
into sanity-check tests for a buildbot slave that specifically tests and
times issues about the build itself: build time stats, size of dependency
Congrats! Excellent work.
-bradn
On Apr 1, 2009 5:17 PM, Mohamed Mansour m0.interact...@gmail.com wrote:
Great work! thanks so much for making gyp for linux!
On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 7:32 PM, Steven Knight s...@chromium.org wrote:
Linux builds have bee...
13 matches
Mail list logo
