[chromium-dev] Re: linux startup regression

2009-09-03 Thread Dean McNamee
I will investigate this today. On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 4:29 AM, James Hawkinsjhawk...@chromium.org wrote: No, and it's only invoked during tab dragging. On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 7:20 PM, Michael Nordmanmicha...@google.com wrote: There's is nothing platform specific about r25099, since other

[chromium-dev] Re: linux startup regression

2009-09-03 Thread Dean McNamee
Ug, I can't reproduce this on my desktop. If I had to take a guess, I would guess Brett's gfx::Font change. TOT: *RESULT warm: t= [134.82,133.98,135.04,134.37,134.95,135.01,134.78,134.69,134.55,134.21,134.27,137.12,134.31,134.20,134.56,135.37,135.02,134.68,134.22,134.58,] ms r25120: *RESULT

[chromium-dev] Re: linux startup regression

2009-09-03 Thread Evan Martin
On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 9:33 AM, Brett Wilsonbre...@chromium.org wrote: On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 9:26 AM, Evan Martine...@chromium.org wrote: Ok, I'll mark that I own this here and unassign it if I can't figure it out: http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=20991 On Thu, Sep 3, 2009

[chromium-dev] Re: linux startup regression

2009-09-03 Thread Michael Moss
Should we be archiving perf tests so we can backtrack these regressions more easily? For instance, Windows archives some tests (e.g. http://build.chromium.org/buildbot/continuous/LATEST/chrome-win32.test/), though startup isn't one of them. Michael On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 9:47 AM, Michael

[chromium-dev] Re: linux startup regression

2009-09-03 Thread Evan Martin
Ok, I'll mark that I own this here and unassign it if I can't figure it out: http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=20991 On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 2:41 AM, Dean McNameede...@chromium.org wrote: Ug, I can't reproduce this on my desktop. If I had to take a guess, I would guess Brett's

[chromium-dev] Re: linux startup regression

2009-09-03 Thread Brett Wilson
On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 9:26 AM, Evan Martine...@chromium.org wrote: Ok, I'll mark that I own this here and unassign it if I can't figure it out: http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=20991 On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 2:41 AM, Dean McNameede...@chromium.org wrote: Ug, I can't

[chromium-dev] Re: linux startup regression

2009-09-03 Thread Evan Martin
On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 9:33 AM, Brett Wilsonbre...@chromium.org wrote: On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 9:26 AM, Evan Martine...@chromium.org wrote: Ok, I'll mark that I own this here and unassign it if I can't figure it out: http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=20991 On Thu, Sep 3, 2009

[chromium-dev] Re: linux startup regression

2009-09-03 Thread Evan Martin
On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 11:50 AM, Evan Martine...@chromium.org wrote: It could be my font change. It does measure some extra text on startup. But I would have thought this was nothing compared to the text we already measure. Bad news: here's the graph after I reverted your change.

[chromium-dev] Re: linux startup regression

2009-09-02 Thread Michael Nordman
There's is nothing platform specific about r25099, since other platforms don't show a hit... probably not it. r25112 - use x11_util::GetXWindowStack Does that load additional libraries? On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 6:41 PM, James Hawkins jhawk...@chromium.org wrote: Maybe r25099? I don't know

[chromium-dev] Re: linux startup regression

2009-09-02 Thread Evan Stade
Maybe r25099?  I don't know how long it takes between commit time and when the results show up in the graph, so this is a rough guess. the perf tests are run continuously on the buildbot, so the regression is somewhere in the range between 25120 and 25132.My suspicion lies on r25126 or 25128.