re: Your comment the cost is big.
FWIW: One item that I recall was very complex was the message loop
implementation, which handles both native Windows events and coordinates
inter-thread Task processing.. It was quite difficult to create a task
processing system that integrated with the Windows
No use case. I was just creating a new GYP file and wanted to know
what encoding to save the file as...that's all :-)
On Jun 26, 10:52 pm, Bradley Nelson bradnel...@google.com wrote:
The intention was ascii AFAIK. Unless someone has a use case?
-BradN
On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 3:05 PM,
I have a third_party project that assumes that WIN32_LEAN_AND_MEAN is
*not* defined. Unfortunately, common.gypi defines it, so I'm getting
lots of compiler errors that I dont particularly want to track down.
What's teh best way to either a) undefine WIN32_LEAN_AND_MEAN from
common.gypi, or b)
Okay, I've figured out that I can do:
snip
'msvs_settings': {
'VCCLCompilerTool': {
'UndefinePreprocessorDefinitions': 'WIN32_LEAN_AND_MEAN',
},
},
/snip
Though this works, it will cause a command line warning D9025 to be
issued b/c you're undefining a previous define. I'd prefer if
You can undefine items with:
'defines!: [
'WIN32_LEAN_AND_MEAN',
],
-BradN
On Sat, Jun 27, 2009 at 1:47 PM, Daniel Cowx daniel.c...@gmail.com wrote:
Okay, I've figured out that I can do:
snip
'msvs_settings': {
'VCCLCompilerTool': {
'UndefinePreprocessorDefinitions':
Awesome. Thanks Brad!
On Jun 27, 1:52 pm, Bradley Nelson bradnel...@google.com wrote:
You can undefine items with:
'defines!: [
'WIN32_LEAN_AND_MEAN',
],
-BradN
On Sat, Jun 27, 2009 at 1:47 PM, Daniel Cowx daniel.c...@gmail.com wrote:
Okay, I've figured out that I can do:
If I recall correctly, the best way we found to measure the total memory
usage of a multi-process system like chrome was to measure the total commit
charge of windows as you run the test. This will correctly account for
shared memory, mapped pages that have been touched, kernel memory, etc. I
This is fine except for the other 50% of users who do want the browser
to change tabs for them.
And before you reply with there are more than 50% of users who want
new tabs queued in the background or say that it's your preference, I
would like to see explicitly a statement from Google's testing
On Sat, Jun 27, 2009 at 2:50 PM, Linus Upsonli...@google.com wrote:
If I recall correctly, the best way we found to measure the total memory
usage of a multi-process system like chrome was to measure the total commit
charge of windows as you run the test.
My favorite test is to plot the
This one is the hardest to test, you need to run a pristinely clean system
to execute.
Also - don't forget to make the browser window sizes the same (and with the
same amount of visible window) for all browsers under test, because if the
kernel can't offload to the graphics card, the display
Hi Dean,
So I've dropped in a change that switches directories to have name like:
(base)
(test_shell)
This will allow you to run things at the command line again.
I don't find this choice particularly ascetic myself. But the options where
limited, because the following characters cannot appear
I argued from the point of consistency and mentioned my personal preference
only as an afternote to point out that the consistent behavior would not be
universally despised.
PK
On Jun 27, 2009 4:08 PM, krtulmay krtul...@gmail.com wrote:
This is fine except for the other 50% of users who do
12 matches
Mail list logo
