Oops...I failedit's actually src/webkit/tools/layout_tests
Also the file uses an underscore, not a dash...it's test_expectations.txt
J
On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 11:28 PM, Jeremy Orlow jor...@chromium.org wrote:
src/webkit/tools/data/layout_tests
btw, run_layout_tests.* can be used to run
On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 11:52 PM, yoav zilberberg
yoav.zilberb...@gmail.comwrote:
Jeremy, i can't see how it will make things any worse to punch these holes
I never said it's worse...just that you couldn't make it airtight.
Patches welcome. :-)
you still fork flash in its own process like
Another vote against this change for similar reasons...
On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 12:37 AM, Dirk Pranke dpra...@google.com wrote:
I also fear that I may have unwanted files sneaking in. This was less
of an issue with Perforce since you have to manually 'p4 edit' files
first anyway.
I'll be
Yoav everyone on this thread is a Chromium developer and almost everyone
posting in this thread (not me) are some of the top developers working on
Chrome and many of them have spent a good deal of time working on sandbox
related issues.
All of us have a healthy disrespect for the impossible and
On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 10:16 AM, Miguel F Mascarenhas Sousa Filipe
miguel.fil...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 6:08 PM, Jeremy Orlow jor...@chromium.org wrote:
Yoav everyone on this thread is a Chromium developer and almost everyone
posting in this thread (not me) are some
Does
http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-dev/browse_thread/thread/df20c1f0e4576131
help?
If not, please go to new.crbug.com
On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 6:04 AM, Gobbledegook aftabkha...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I've been unable to get into chrome dev (latest) ever since I
installed the Baseball
Can you check out another client and see if that fixes it for you?
On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 8:58 PM, Mohamed Mansour m0.interact...@gmail.comwrote:
Tonight I was trying to sync my project so I did git pull and it worked
fine, then I did gclient sync as well as --force. But gyp is failing:
This is not the place to ask such questions. try chromium-discuss
On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 3:45 AM, Fraser MacKenzie fmack...@gmail.com wrote:
Folks,
Whenever I need to paste an OLE Excel table in the message it appears
as text only in the body of the e-mail. Also I have to attach images
What file(s) are we talking about specifically?
On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 11:31 AM, Ben Laurie b...@chromium.org wrote:
On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 6:17 PM, Darin Fisherda...@chromium.org wrote:
This will become a non-issue once we finish upstreaming all code that
uses
WebCore. This means
On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 12:01 PM, Darin Fisher da...@chromium.org wrote:
On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 11:31 AM, Ben Laurie b...@chromium.org wrote:
On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 6:17 PM, Darin Fisherda...@chromium.org wrote:
This will become a non-issue once we finish upstreaming all code that
uses
On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 2:15 PM, Ben Laurie b...@chromium.org wrote:
On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 8:11 PM, Jeremy Orlowjor...@chromium.org wrote:
On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 12:01 PM, Darin Fisher da...@chromium.org
wrote:
On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 11:31 AM, Ben Laurie b...@chromium.org wrote:
On
run with this! :)
:DG
On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 8:45 PM, Darin Fisherda...@chromium.org wrote:
On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 8:39 PM, Ojan Vafai o...@chromium.org wrote:
On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 8:45 PM, Jeremy Orlow jor...@chromium.org
wrote:
Has anyone ever looked into printing out stack traces
On Sun, Aug 9, 2009 at 9:07 AM, Nicolas Sylvain nsylv...@chromium.orgwrote:
Some things to consider:
1. On windows, breakpad used to be wired in test_shell. And I'm pretty sure
we used to archive crash dumps for the layout tests too. It should not be
hard to do that again. Huan also write a
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 9:59 AM, Ojan Vafai o...@chromium.org wrote:
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 3:12 AM, Jeremy Orlow jor...@chromium.org wrote:
On Sun, Aug 9, 2009 at 9:07 AM, Nicolas Sylvain nsylv...@chromium.orgwrote:
2. The show stopper for any implementation of this feature
We really need a better way to submit patches that we know require a
clobber. Today alone, there were 2 WebKit deps rolls that we _knew_ would
need a clobber. Both ended up closing the tree for a bit.
What if we added an optional flag to the CL descriptions that tells the bots
that a clobber is
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 10:45 PM, Aaron Boodman a...@chromium.org wrote:
Such a system does not help when people sync your change. We should
invest the effort we would expend building this system fixing the
dependency issues.
gclient could be made to obey it as well. But I agree, it's a
in the chain)
that are just due to mistakes in the gyp files.
I would be curious which kind of dependency issue these latest ones were
(can someone point me at the CLs?, been on nacl/o3d buildbot stuff of late).
-BradN
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 11:00 PM, Jeremy Orlow jor...@chromium.orgwrote
Even with the translation, it's difficult to understand what you're saying
and asking. Chromium has a full screen feature and is open source so you
could tweak it to meet your needs. Does that help?
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 3:16 PM, Wallace Araujo wallace@gmail.comwrote:
Someone could help
Nice!!!
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 3:57 PM, Bradley Nelson bradnel...@google.comwrote:
Ok I think I've found it.It looks like a bug in the rule - makefile
emitter which is only used for webcore.
(Most gyp rules turn into custom build rules, but we added a makefile
emitter option for this one
, Aug 12, 2009 at 07:01, Wallace Araujo wallace@gmail.com wrote:
Jeremy Orlow
So, how can I do this? ^^
Dan Kegel
No, but if I can get help I would be thankful. I can't find the
material of the documentation about this.
Ricardo Vargas
Exactly, I need a screen without
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 8:24 PM, peter peterxiemin.x...@gmail.com wrote:
today I downloaded a chromium ,by the way , my os is linux of ubuntu
9.04 , it work ok but can't play flash .who can help me
Flash support is VERY experimental if working at all, last time I checked.
Also, Chromium-dev
Clobber needed?
I know Michael just enabled this within the last 24 hours.
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 1:49 PM, Paweł Hajdan Jr.
phajdan...@chromium.orgwrote:
Just got this on the Windows tryserver:
C:\b\slave\win\build\src\chrome\renderer\renderer_webkitclient_impl.cc :
error C2220: warning
Brad, looks like we might have another dependency bug in GYP?
J
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 1:57 PM, Michael Nordman micha...@google.comwrote:
I just submitted the change that ENABLE's that flag a moment ago... we're
clobbering things now
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 1:55 PM, Jeremy Orlow jor
mentioned sounds like a fine one.
TVL
-BradN
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 1:59 PM, Jeremy Orlow jor...@google.com wrote:
Brad, looks like we might have another dependency bug in GYP?
J
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 1:57 PM, Michael Nordman micha...@google.comwrote:
I just submitted the change
An infinite running script in a worker should be a valid use case.
Computing Pi to the infiniteth digit is actually the first example in the
worker spec, IIRC.
So this would just kill/timeout shared workers that no longer are connected
to any active pages, right?
J
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 3:25
This is not the right place to bring this up. http://new.crbug.com
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 3:51 AM, Gobbledegook aftabkha...@gmail.com wrote:
The option to save the password does not appear on the following login
page:
http://websms.rogers.page.ca/2way/
Chrome (3.0.197.11) only saves the
The LKGR (http://chromium-status.appspot.com/lkgr) is really stale. You
could supply your own '--revision number' when you do 'gcl try' or upload.
On Sat, Aug 15, 2009 at 12:59 PM, Mike Belshe mbel...@google.com wrote:
I'm trying to test a simple patch which does nothing more than roll the
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 2:40 PM, Daniel Cowx daniel.c...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm incorporating Chromium into an existing that uses the shared CRT.
To minimize footprint, I'd like to experiment with linking Chromium to
the shared CRT as well. I've tried changing RuntimeLibrary in
common.gypi,
Are you positive it's the per-file presubmit checks slowing things down? If
so, maybe the presubmit stuff needs to be re-factored? Right now, it does
each presubmit check one by one (and each check might read in the files).
If it were changed to go file by file (reading fully into memory,
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 6:17 PM, Drew Wilson atwil...@chromium.org wrote:
I have to admit I'm somewhat fuzzy on the motivation behind our webkit API,
although I gather the plan is to eventually upstream it to WebKit, and use
it as our abstraction layer instead of using the (more mutable)
What exactly are you trying to do?
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 11:27 PM, n179911 n179...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
From this chromium document,
http://sites.google.com/a/chromium.org/dev/developers/design-documents/multi-process-architecture
Browser has an IO thread which receives messages from
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 1:00 PM, Dirk Pranke dpra...@chromium.org wrote:
Hi all,
As Glenn noted, we made great progress last week in rebaselining the
tests. Unfortunately, we don't have a mechanism to preserve the
knowledge we gained last week as to whether or not tests need to be
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 2:33 PM, Pam Greene p...@chromium.org wrote:
At least in the batch of tests I examined, the ones that needed
re-baselining weren't tests we'd originally failed and suddenly started
passing. They were new tests that nobody had ever taken a good look at.
If that matches
On Sat, Aug 22, 2009 at 4:00 PM, Peter Kasting pkast...@chromium.orgwrote:
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 8:07 PM, Jeremy Orlow jor...@chromium.org wrote:
1) We don't have notes on why tests are failing. = Why not annotate
the tests in test_lists? That's what I've always done.
Once again, we
On Sat, Aug 22, 2009 at 5:54 PM, Peter Kasting pkast...@chromium.orgwrote:
On Sat, Aug 22, 2009 at 4:29 PM, Jeremy Orlow jor...@chromium.org wrote:
On Sat, Aug 22, 2009 at 4:00 PM, Peter Kasting pkast...@chromium.orgwrote:
If you somehow managed to not see any comments in this file, I think
There's one host per renderer, so there's no need for any list.
On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 11:22 AM, hap 497 hap...@gmail.com wrote:
From
http://dev.chromium.org/developers/design-documents/multi-process-architecture,
Resoruce dispatcher Host should have the list of all the channel opened with
Oops...sorry for the misinformation...should have double checked before I
said anything. :-)
On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 1:26 PM, John Abd-El-Malek j...@chromium.org wrote:
On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 1:06 PM, Brett Wilson bre...@chromium.org wrote:
On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 12:49 PM, hap
I don't know the answer specifically, but this might help:
If your question is how to do it by hand, src/webkit/webkit.gyp should have
the answer. If you just want to compile all of chromium, you shouldn't need
to worry about it: just compile Chromium however you normally would and it
should
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 12:48 PM, Dan Kegel d...@kegel.com wrote:
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 12:28 PM, Darin Fisherda...@chromium.org wrote:
I've heard people proclaim the principle of being able to copy a profile
across systems as being a deciding factor for certain changes (e.g. the
, Jeremy Orlow jor...@chromium.org wrote:
I'd suggest putting the webkit layout test slaves under release. This
would allow us to catch debug/release build errors (since the normal bots
are on debug) and layout tests run MUCH faster under release.
On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 8:47 AM, Marc-Antoine
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 2:47 PM, Eric Seidel esei...@chromium.org wrote:
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 10:39 PM, Jeremy Orlow jor...@chromium.org wrote:
If it does work, we could definitely let them know it's an option for
those who might want to. We'd have to phrase it delicately though. They're
Please follow the instructions on the email you get from the try bot
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 8:55 PM, James Su su...@chromium.org wrote:
Hi, I tried a CL on trybot. Linux and Mac trybots finished without any
problem very soon. But windows trybot spent more than 40 minutes to compile
and
I'm just following instructions:
TRY FAILED
*If you think the try slave is broken (it happens!), please REPLY to this
email, don't ask on irc, mailing list or IM.*
Thanks!
I doubt emailing the list here asking what's up is going to help things
much. Marc-Antoine is quite responsive about
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 2:10 AM, Dimitri Glazkov dglaz...@chromium.orgwrote:
Marc-Antoine, you will forever have a special place in every WebKit
committer's heart if you can pull of setting up these trybots.
+100
Given that this thread quickly discombobulated into a general WebKit
, Jeremy Orlow jor...@chromium.org wrote:
I don't have a rietveld dev environment set up, so I wrote a quick script
to test the general algorithm. It's not as pythony as I'd like, but it
seems to be fairly robust:
#!/usr/bin/python
import re
description = \
Blah blah blah.
Blaaa
TEST
Unless we can get people upstream to compile with -Wall -Werror, that'll be
an uphill battle (every time we want to roll to a new version). It'd be
nice if we could, though.
On Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 11:35 AM, Ben Laurie b...@chromium.org wrote:
On Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 7:13 PM, Darin
Is the last version released under the LGPL version good enough for our
needs? If so, we can just use that. And not feel too bad. :-)
As a side note, if we use ps or /proc we're just scraping information that
was printed out by a GPL program. :-)
J
On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 4:22 PM, Peter
On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 8:25 AM, Nicolas Sylvain nsylv...@chromium.orgwrote:
Hi chromium-dev,
A small group of us joined forces to create a Green Tree task force.
The goal of this task
force is to make sure the tree stays green most of the time. The 2 main
pain points that
we are
I think we need to re-consider our practice of shipping beta/stable browsers
with experimental features hidden behind flags--at least when they have any
side-effects in JavaScript. An example of where this has bitten us is
http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=22181
Although part of
, 2009 at 2:31 PM, Jeremy Orlow jor...@chromium.org wrote:
I think we need to re-consider our practice of shipping beta/stable
browsers with experimental features hidden behind flags--at least when they
have any side-effects in JavaScript. An example of where this has bitten us
is http
On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 2:55 PM, Jeremy Orlow jor...@chromium.org wrote:
On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 2:47 PM, Aaron Boodman a...@chromium.org wrote:
It is really useful to have early code compiling and running as much
as possible on all platforms right from the beginning. This catches a
lot
On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 3:29 PM, John Abd-El-Malek j...@chromium.org wrote:
On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 2:31 PM, Jeremy Orlow jor...@chromium.org wrote:
I think we need to re-consider our practice of shipping beta/stable
browsers with experimental features hidden behind flags--at least when
On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 3:51 PM, John Abd-El-Malek j...@chromium.org wrote:
On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 3:43 PM, Jeremy Orlow jor...@chromium.org wrote:
On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 3:29 PM, John Abd-El-Malek j...@chromium.orgwrote:
On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 2:31 PM, Jeremy Orlow jor
:23 PM, John Abd-El-Malek j...@chromium.org wrote:
On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 3:59 PM, Jeremy Orlow jor...@chromium.org wrote:
On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 3:51 PM, John Abd-El-Malek j...@chromium.org
wrote:
On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 3:43 PM, Jeremy Orlow jor...@chromium.org
wrote:
Please reply
There are 2 major issues here (besides leaving things for the Sheriff to
clean up):
1) a lot of the gardeners are inexperienced and drop the ball. This has
bitten us many times. The last time we had a big string of problems related
to this, I meant to send out an email giving people advice on
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 6:06 PM, Dimitri Glazkov dglaz...@google.comwrote:
Today wasn't a happy day for p...@. He did a seemingly innocuous roll
that broke the world: selenium, ui tests, layout tests. I am sure it
was stressful and probably added unnecessary gray to his hair.
Stuff like
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 6:16 PM, Nicolas Sylvain nsylv...@chromium.orgwrote:
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 6:10 PM, Jeremy Orlow jor...@chromium.org wrote:
There are 2 major issues here (besides leaving things for the Sheriff to
clean up):
1) a lot of the gardeners are inexperienced and drop
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 11:30 AM, Evan Martin e...@chromium.org wrote:
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 11:26 AM, Mark Mentovai m...@chromium.org wrote:
If a test exposes a case where something requires 53/64-bit IEEE
double precision as opposed to 64/80-bit double extended, and we're
changing our
Same here. I see it both on windows and mac.
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 1:35 PM, Elliot Glaysher (Chromium)
e...@chromium.org wrote:
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 1:25 PM, John Abd-El-Malek j...@chromium.org
wrote:
I have to delete the v8 directory and run gclient sync again (or remove
the
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 1:43 PM, John Abd-El-Malek j...@chromium.org wrote:
I've seen this before last week as well.
I have too.
Can this really be added to v8's svn:ignore? These VS generated files have
the username in them.
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 1:39 PM, Mark Mentovai
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 6:35 PM, Adam Barth aba...@chromium.org wrote:
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 6:25 PM, John Abd-El-Malek j...@chromium.org
wrote:
Is this even possible? i.e. I had uploaded a WebKit patch on codereview
but
none of the patchsets got run on the try server
--dst-prefix=src/third_party/WebKit
on
your diff command.
On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 1:43 PM, Jeremy Orlow jor...@chromium.org
wrote:
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 6:35 PM, Adam Barth aba...@chromium.org
wrote:
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 6:25 PM, John Abd-El-Malek j...@chromium.org
wrote
IIRC, someone asked this a couple months ago. I believe the answer was
that http://code.google.com/p/chromiumembedded/ might be of interest.
I could see patches being welcome as long as they were fairly clean. I know
that's not an official answer, but you're probably not going to get a
yes from
Not sure, but it's possible shutting off precompiled headers is part of it.
In addition, I'm sure the code base has grown. It'd be interesting to know
how many lines of code there are now vs. then.
Even if those are major contributors, I'd find it surprising if they were
enough to double the
On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 5:30 AM, Mohamed Mansour m...@chromium.org wrote:
I tried ChromeFrame it is very good, but it doesn't work if the Kiosk Mode
flag is set. If the Kiosk mode is set ( iexplorer.exe -k
http://www.google.com ) it renders it as IE Renderer. It renders it fine
in a Chrome
On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 10:01 AM, Amanda Walker ama...@chromium.org wrote:
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 9:06 PM, Dimitri Glazkov dglaz...@google.comwrote:
This all means that we have to be a bit more diligent. We shouldn't be
paying these unnecessary costs. So, from now on, I propose a fairly
No objections.
I think it's a good idea, you're not the only one who wants this, and it
seems like it can be done very cleanly.
On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 10:47 AM, Adam Barth aba...@chromium.org wrote:
On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 10:43 AM, Mohamed Mansour m...@chromium.org
wrote:
I could submit a
If you click no on an info bar, then how would you later change your mind?
I really liked the proposal because it'd just always be there. Much like
the RSS feed UI.
It seems like we can either just keep adding infobars or make an investment
in training users what these icons mean.
On Fri, Sep
I updated
http://sites.google.com/a/chromium.org/dev/developers/contributing-to-webkit
On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 12:14 PM, Andrew Scherkus scher...@chromium.orgwrote:
For those that use third_party/WebKit as a full WebKit checkout, you'll
need to add the following line to your .gclient:
:08 PM, Jeremy Orlow jor...@chromium.orgwrote:
If you click no on an info bar, then how would you later change your
mind?
I don't know. Maybe at that point the icon appears in the address bar.
PK
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
Chromium Developers mailing list
Sounds like we need a presubmit check.
On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 6:38 AM, Marc-Antoine Ruel mar...@chromium.orgwrote:
It's too late for git but not for svn and tarballs. Please move them to
DEPS.
M-A
On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 6:26 PM, Evan Martin e...@chromium.org wrote:
We have already
On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 5:30 PM, Nick Baum nickb...@chromium.org wrote:
First of all, thanks for putting together this proposal, great to see
progress on this!
A few comments:
- UI: I prefer the infobar, as per the arguments above. I don't think
this will happen frequently enough to
Good point. Done: http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=23277
On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 10:43 AM, Marc-Antoine Ruel mar...@chromium.orgwrote:
As usual, please file a feature request unless you plan on doing it,
otherwise I'll forget.
On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 3:59 PM, Jeremy Orlow
Yeah, the loader lock is held the entire time while in the DLL main. The
lock allows re-entrance, but if you do anything that starts another thread
and then tries to dynamically load a DLL you'll get a deadlock.
Unfortunately, it's very hard to predict what will cause a dynamic load (or
one of
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 12:05 PM, Eric Seidel esei...@chromium.org wrote:
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 11:53 AM, Yaar Schnitman y...@chromium.org
wrote:
1. An internal webkit chromium port try bot: Will help test webkit-only
patches. At first stage, it will test build failures (saving many of
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 12:52 PM, Jeremy Orlow jor...@chromium.org wrote:
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 12:05 PM, Eric Seidel esei...@chromium.orgwrote:
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 11:53 AM, Yaar Schnitman y...@chromium.org
wrote:
1. An internal webkit chromium port try bot: Will help test webkit
That is one of the goals of creating and upstreaming the WebKit API.
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 1:01 PM, Evan Martin e...@chromium.org wrote:
Q. Does this mean you can build a libwebkit.so independently of Chrome?
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 11:53 AM, Yaar Schnitman y...@chromium.org
wrote:
Hi,
This would be a VERY VERY VERY useful feature. Especially if we wanted to
open try server access up to other WebKit committers. Many Apple engineers
also have difficult testing their patches against Windows and simply commit,
watch the WebKit build bots, and iterate.
For that matter, having mac
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 4:20 PM, Brett Wilson bre...@chromium.org wrote:
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 4:15 PM, Jeremy Orlow jor...@chromium.org wrote:
I'm guessing different people/companies will have different needs for a
kiosk mode.
Maybe all of these should be separate flags rather than one
I saw this on Vista 64 as well.
On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 10:39 AM, Stephen White senorbla...@chromium.orgwrote:
Just in case someone else runs into this: I recently installed MSVC2005
and the Win7 Platform SDK on my win7/64 machine and it gave me this error at
link time:
S much better than grid view. :-)
On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 3:49 PM, Adam Barth aba...@chromium.org wrote:
Nice!
On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 3:47 PM, Eric Seidel esei...@chromium.org wrote:
Who knew?
Looks like Mark (Rowe) recently updated their buildbot:
On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 12:38 PM, Scott Hess sh...@chromium.org wrote:
On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 11:32 AM, Mike Belshe mbel...@google.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 11:27 AM, Scott Hess sh...@chromium.org wrote:
Could we set jemalloc on selected renderer processes? I realize that
wouldn't
I totally agree. I envision it being something much more like RSS feeds.
In my mind, it should always advertise itself to the browser and then the
browser should decide how to advertise it to the user. Requiring scripts to
initiate things seems silly to me.
Is this API even part of any
On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 2:48 PM, Peter Kasting pkast...@google.com wrote:
On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 2:47 PM, Jeremy Orlow jor...@chromium.org wrote:
Is this API even part of any standard? Maybe we should bring this up on
WhatWG?
The thread title is a clue that these are specced in HTML5
all of this functionality for
a site in one shot... e.g. if the site published the data via some
kind of link tag then a menu item in the browser might activate that
the user could use to activate it.
-Ben
On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 2:55 PM, Jeremy Orlow jor...@chromium.org wrote:
On Fri, Oct 2
On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 11:14 AM, Amanda Walker ama...@chromium.org wrote:
On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 2:08 PM, Marshall Greenblatt
magreenbl...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm putting together a new computer and I'd like to optimize my chromium
build times :-) Is anyone currently building chromium using a
How is this different from ChromeBot?
How you control things depends on what level of realism you want. If
you're just verifying the sites work correctly, you might just use the code
the UI tests use. If you want to actually simulate button clicks and such,
then you'll need something more like
I'm 99% sure we use what's in third_party
On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 11:06 PM, hap 497 hap...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Can you please tell me if chromium on Mac OS X uses the networking
code in src/third_party/WebKit/WebCore/platform/network/mac?
Or the code there is for Webkit? I asked because
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 4:59 PM, John Abd-El-Malek j...@chromium.org wrote:
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 4:30 PM, Carlos Pizano c...@google.com wrote:
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 4:14 PM, John Abd-El-Malek j...@chromium.org
wrote:
I'm not sure how Carlos is doing it? Will we know if something is
Pawel, I was responding to the idea of suspending a tab. I agree that
exposing this information to extensions wouldn't be too hard and could be
quite useful.
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 12:37 PM, Charles Reis cr...@chromium.org wrote:
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 12:25 PM, Jeremy Orlow jor
Part of this has to do with your level of experience and how big the review
is. Doing code reviews for people not yet up to speed is _painful_. And
large reviews also can be. I think part of the reason things seem better to
you is a reflection on your level of experience.
That said, some of us
Is there documentation anywhere for all the parameters you can feed into the
buildbot webpage? If not, a cheat sheet would be really helpful.
On Sat, Oct 10, 2009 at 6:25 PM, Nicolas Sylvain nsylv...@chromium.orgwrote:
Hello,
Today I upgraded buildbot to the latest version.
If you have a
I think the bigger issue is how/when Area-Misc bugs get triaged. Do they
ever? If not, we should probably change that.
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 11:50 AM, Guria guria...@gmail.com wrote:
Please confirm the bug
http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=12900
It really annoys me.
I
Right now, we don't have a good story for what to do with
WebCore::SecurityOrigins in Chromium. We now have a WebSecurityOrigin in
WebKit, but if you want to move the data between processes, you need to
convert it to a string and then send that. In some cases we then convert
the string to a
::WebSecurityOrigin). We can then deal with these details only
if/when we need to.
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 1:36 PM, Jeremy Orlow jor...@chromium.org wrote:
Right now, we don't have a good story for what to do with
WebCore::SecurityOrigins in Chromium. We now have a WebSecurityOrigin in
WebKit
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 2:23 PM, Darin Fisher da...@chromium.org wrote:
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 2:08 PM, Jeremy Orlow jor...@chromium.org wrote:
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 2:00 PM, Michael Nordman micha...@google.comwrote:
+1 SecurityOrigin class
Sounds like a reasonable plan.
I suspect
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 3:50 PM, Adam Barth aba...@chromium.org wrote:
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 2:48 PM, Michael Nordman micha...@google.com
wrote:
As mentioned f2f, this falls apart as soon as Chrome tries to manufacture
a
security origin. I'm not sure, may already have instances of that
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 2:48 PM, Darin Fisher da...@chromium.org wrote:
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 2:47 PM, Darin Fisher da...@chromium.org wrote:
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 2:30 PM, Jeremy Orlow jor...@chromium.orgwrote:
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 2:23 PM, Darin Fisher da...@chromium.orgwrote
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 3:58 PM, Dumitru Daniliuc d...@chromium.org wrote:
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 2:47 PM, Darin Fisher da...@chromium.org wrote:
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 2:30 PM, Jeremy Orlow jor...@chromium.orgwrote:
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 2:23 PM, Darin Fisher da...@chromium.orgwrote
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 2:48 PM, Michael Nordman micha...@google.comwrote:
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 2:08 PM, Jeremy Orlow jor...@chromium.org wrote:
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 2:00 PM, Michael Nordman micha...@google.comwrote:
+1 SecurityOrigin class
Sounds like a reasonable plan.
I suspect
101 - 200 of 279 matches
Mail list logo
