[chromium-dev] Skia is moving

2009-05-12 Thread Stephen White
I'm in the process of updating chromium to use tip-of-tree skia, and in the same CL, moving skia to a third_party directory, retrieved via DEPS. What this means for you: 1) Any outstanding CL's in which you've added #include skia/include/... will have to be changed to the corresponding path in

[chromium-dev] Re: Skia is moving

2009-05-12 Thread Stephen White
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 5:48 PM, Nicolas Sylvain nsylv...@chromium.orgwrote: On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 2:22 PM, Stephen White senorbla...@chromium.orgwrote: I'm in the process of updating chromium to use tip-of-tree skia, and in the same CL, moving skia to a third_party directory, retrieved

[chromium-dev] Re: Skia is moving

2009-05-13 Thread Stephen White
, Stephen White senorbla...@chromium.orgwrote: I'm in the process of updating chromium to use tip-of-tree skia, and in the same CL, moving skia to a third_party directory, retrieved via DEPS. What this means for you: 1) Any outstanding CL's in which you've added #include skia/include/... will have

[chromium-dev] Re: Run-Time Check Failures

2009-05-16 Thread Stephen White
Hi John, This is likely because skia's dependencies did not get correctly invalidated after the sync, and you're linking against the old version while compiling against the new (SkBitmap changed in size). While a clobber build is safest, you might be able to get away with just cleaning and

[chromium-dev] Re: Getting pixel tests running on the Mac

2009-09-23 Thread Stephen White
Could we make them TEXTFAIL and IMAGEFAIL, just to be clear? Stephen (And then post them to failblog if they're really embarassing.. J/K ;) On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 3:33 PM, Ojan Vafai o...@chromium.org wrote: +pam, tc, darin in case they disagree with what I'm saying here. Also a bunch of

[chromium-dev] Re: Getting pixel tests running on the Mac

2009-09-24 Thread Stephen White
tomorrow, unless someone else would rather do it. I might actually prefer FAIL-TEXT and FAIL-IMAGE, but that's just me. I agree that TEXTFAIL is better than TEXT. Anyone else care to express a preference? -- Dirk On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 1:50 PM, Stephen White senorbla...@chromium.org

[chromium-dev] MSVC2005 vs Win7 PlatformSDK

2009-09-30 Thread Stephen White
Just in case someone else runs into this: I recently installed MSVC2005 and the Win7 Platform SDK on my win7/64 machine and it gave me this error at link time: shell32.lib(shguid.obj) : fatal error LNK1103: debugging information corrupt; recompile module Installing hotfix 949009 (

[chromium-dev] Re: MSVC2005 vs Win7 PlatformSDK

2009-09-30 Thread Stephen White
I see it's now listed as required for MSVC2005 (thanks to whoever updated the build instructions). On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 1:39 PM, Stephen White senorbla...@chromium.orgwrote: Just in case someone else runs into this: I recently installed MSVC2005 and the Win7 Platform SDK on my win7/64

[chromium-dev] Re: FAIL not catching image failures

2009-10-02 Thread Stephen White
I think that's a Release builder, and the tests are marked DEBUG, no? Stephen On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 12:34 PM, Avi Drissman a...@google.com wrote: Latest Mac pixel test result is here:

[chromium-dev] Re: [LTTF][WebKit Gardening]: Keeping up with the weeds.

2009-10-13 Thread Stephen White
I agree with Dimitri that we're fighting a losing battle here. In my last stint as gardener, I did informally what I proposed formally last time: I spent basically 1 full day just triaging failures from my 2 days gardening. Not fixing, but just running tests locally, analyzing, grouping,

[chromium-dev] Re: [LTTF][WebKit Gardening]: Keeping up with the weeds.

2009-10-14 Thread Stephen White
with. On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 11:53 AM, Stephen White senorbla...@chromium.org wrote: I agree with Dimitri that we're fighting a losing battle here. In my last stint as gardener, I did informally what I proposed formally last time: I spent basically 1 full day just triaging failures from

[chromium-dev] Re: Crashing layout tests

2009-10-20 Thread Stephen White
On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 1:25 PM, Jeremy Orlow jor...@chromium.org wrote: On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 10:19 AM, David Levin le...@google.com wrote: That sounds like a reasonable policy. Hmm...I thought this was the policy. I guess not? :-) There is the current idea of figuring out something

Re: [chromium-dev] WebKit roll status

2009-12-08 Thread Stephen White
For the curious, as of WebKit 51800, SVG Filters are enabled by default. In theory (since this code is cross-platform), this should just require us turning them on in Chrome, and rebaselining the affected tests (about 24 on Windows). In practice, however, some of the code behind #if

Re: [chromium-dev] seeking c++ expertise for a tiny tricky bit of code

2010-01-13 Thread Stephen White
I put a drive-by comment on the bug, but here's my understanding: gcc 4.4 now has -fstrict-aliasing on by default, whereas it was off by default in 4.2. gcc's behaviour, while annoying, is actually correct in this case: the C++ spec says that pointers to different types may not alias, and gcc

Re: [chromium-dev] seeking c++ expertise for a tiny tricky bit of code

2010-01-13 Thread Stephen White
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 12:19 PM, Dan Kegel d...@kegel.com wrote: On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 9:12 AM, Stephen White senorbla...@chromium.org wrote: 2) Most of the supposed performance advantage of strict aliasing rules is probably taken care of by memory disambiguation in modern (ie., Core2

[chromium-dev] Re: buildbot failure in Chromium on Chromium Builder, revision 36378

2010-01-15 Thread Stephen White
Fix is in as of r36382; reopening. Stephen On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 1:57 PM, build...@chromium.org wrote: http://build.chromium.org/buildbot/waterfall/ Automatically closing tree for compile on Chromium Builder

[chromium-dev] Re: buildbot failure in Chromium on XP Tests, revision 36403

2010-01-15 Thread Stephen White
XP Tests clobbered due to .grd changes; should cycle green. Tree reopened as of r36407. Stephen On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 4:21 PM, build...@chromium.org wrote: http://build.chromium.org/buildbot/waterfall/ Automatically closing tree for unit_tests on XP Tests