[cia-drugs] FBI Turned Loose: Privacy rights may disappear if a new Senate Intelligence Committee bill passes
FBI Turned LoosePrivacy rights may disappear if a new Senate Intelligence Committee bill passes by Nat HentoffJune 23rd, 2005 6:16 PM [Since 9-11] the Constitution has gone from an objective to be satisfied to an obstacle to national defense. . . . As these changes mount, at what point do we become other than a free and democratic nation? George Washington University law professor Jonathan Turley, Los Angeles Times, January 2, 2003 Civil liberties had their origin and must find their ultimate guarantee in the faith of the people. If that faith should be lost, five or nine [votes on the Supreme Court] could not long supply its want. Supreme Court Justice Robert Jackson, Douglas v. City of Jeannette (1943) On June 6, in a closed-door session, the Senate Intelligence Committee approved a bill that, if Congress and the president agree (and he will), would dramatically expand the FBI's powers under the Patriot Act to issue secret administrative subpoenas for an unprecedented range of personal recordswithout having to go to a judge. The FBI will write its own subpoenasjust as British customs officials in the colonies did before the American Revolutionusing general search warrants (writs of assistance) to go into homes and offices at will to look for contraband. These raids so inflamed 18th-century Americans that the "general search warrant" was one of the precipitating causes of our revolution. The ACLU's superb Washington staff bluntly explains the impact of the proposal: "This power would let agents seize personal records [it deems relevant to an intelligence investigation] from medical facilities, libraries, hotels, gun dealers, banks and any other businesses, without having to appear before a judge, and without any evidence that the people whose records are collected are involved in any criminal activity." (Emphasis added.) If the FBI is targeting you in its dragnet operations for some amorphous connection to terrorism (do you go to a mosque or organize against the war?) you will not know that your personal records have been seizedand put into any number of data banks. Since these are secret administrative subpoenas, the third-party record holders who get them can't tell you what they've given up to the FBI. While this unleashing of the FBI was being debated at a May 24 open hearing of the Senate Intelligence Committee, several Democrats asked a highly pertinent question of a witness, Valerie Caproni, general counsel for the FBI: Is there any evidence that the delaycaused by having to get a judge's approval for a subpoenahas ever harmed national security? This was her answer: "Can we show you, because of delays, that a bomb went off? No, but it could happen tomorrow. It could." The administration's shadow Constitution, made up as Bush goes along, trashes the rule of law on the basis of what might happen. That's how so many thousands of Japanese Americans were herded into internment camps during the Second World War as the army gave false prospective information to President Franklin Roosevelt and the Supreme Court. If anything like 9-11 happens here again, startled speculation, fueled by fear, could bring back those internment campswith a multicultural range of inmates. Listening to the FBI general counsel's testimony before the Senate Intelligence Committee was Democratic senator Dianne Feinstein of California, who, until that moment, had been a stalwart defender of the Patriot Act, much to the administration's delight. Hearing Valerie Caproni justify awarding the FBI such overwhelming authority that this administration had previously failed to get through, Senator Feinstein was somewhat shaken. "This is a very broad power," she said, "with no check on that power. It's carte blanche for a fishing expedition." She got it! Because that vote was taken at a closed session of the Intelligence Committee, the yeas and nays have not been officially revealed. (And George W. Bush calls this "a transparent democracy"!) But I have learned that four Democrats voted against the bill as a whole, including the FBI's expanded administrative subpoenas. They were Dianne Feinstein, Jon Corzine of New Jersey, Carl Levin of Michigan, and Ron Wyden of Oregon. Republican Pat Roberts of Kansas, the aggressive chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee, moved this bill fast to steal a march on the Senate Judiciary Committee, which also has oversight authority over the Justice Department and its FBI. Among the Democrats on the Senate Judiciary Committee, ranking minority member Patrick Leahy of Vermont, Richard Durbin of Illinois, and Russell Feingold of Wisconsinthe latter being the only senator to vote against the Patriot Act in 2001should mount strong opposition to the administrative subpoenas and other parts of the bill. For example, empowering the FBI to get from postal inspectors, The
[cia-drugs] Is Condoleezza Rice a patsy?
http://www.sandersresearch.com/Sanders/upload/highres/040616Linda/Riceetal.jpg Part two: Who Created Condi Rice? By Linda Minor Excerpt:In an earlier piece we posed the question: Is Condoleezza Rice a patsy? In the world of psychological operations ("psyops"), a "patsy" refers to a decoy deliberately inserted into a psyop to deflect attention away from a team performing a special activity (such as an assassination or coup d'état), thus allowing the team time to escape unnoticed while the patsy takes the blame. "Psyop" is a word used in intelligence circles to describe the entire operation, including a cover-up by media, designed to manipulate psychologically the belief mechanisms of the nation for political reasons.It appears that Condi was groomed most of her life to be used in this way. She is not an actual decision maker, but a mere shield, as is her boss, George W. Bush. They have served their purpose by getting America involved in the war in Iraq. They are now disposable. http://www.sandersresearch.com/Sanders/NewsManager/ShowNewsGen.aspx?NewsID=978 Complete archives at http://www.sitbot.net/ Please let us stay on topic and be civil. OM Yahoo! Groups Links To visit your group on the web, go to:http://groups.yahoo.com/group/cia-drugs/ To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
[cia-drugs] Mental Health, Education and Social Control, Part 13
Values clarification has also been used outside of schools. For example, in the late 1970s, under a contract with the U.S. Army, humanist Sidney Simon implemented a values clarification program which the contract said "is an experimental program to change attitudes and behavior of 12,000 soldiers" MENTAL HEALTH, EDUCATION AND SOCIAL CONTROL Part 14 By Dennis L. Cuddy, Ph.D.June 20, 2005 In Part 13 of this series, I briefly mentioned the new book, ONE NATION UNDER THERAPY: HOW THE HELPING CULTURE IS ERODING SELF-RELIANCE (2005), by Christina Hoff Sommers and Sally Satel, M.D. The authors claim that "children, more than any group, are targeted for therapeutic improvementThe propensity of experts to pathologize and medicalize healthy children en masse has gotten way out of hand. The past decade has seen a cascade of books and articles promoting the idea that seemingly content and well-adjusted Americans---adults as well as children---are emotionally damaged." Unfortunately, President George W. Bush's New Freedom Commission on Mental Health (NFCMH) has proposed screening all of America's youth. Used to support this initiative will be the recent findings of the National Comorbidity Survey Replication (NCSR), the results of which are published in the June edition of the ARCHIVES OF GENERAL PSYCHIATRY. It found that half of those who will ever be diagnosed with a mental disorder show signs of the disease by age 14. In Rick Weiss' "Study: U.S. Leads In Mental Illness, Lags in Treatment" (THE WASHINGTON POST, June 7, 2005), one also learns that the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) funded the $20 million NCSR study, which found that one-quarter of all Americans met the criteria for having a mental illness within the past year. The study also found that almost half of Americans meet the criteria for such an illness at some point in their lives, and that less than half of those in need get treated. Thomas Insel, chief of the NIMH, expressed his disappointment to learn from the survey that about a third of people in need rely solely on nonprofessional sources such as internet support groups and spiritual advisers. You might ask yourself at this point what kind of broad definition they are using to determine that half of the American population will be mentally ill at some point, and you might also ask what is wrong with relying upon spiritual advisers? Countering advocates of mental health screening, Dr. Karen Effrem in an October 31, 2004 letter to THE WASHINGTON TIMES titled "Go Slow on Mental Health Screening" cautioned: "Given the very real problems of already existing coercion, subjective criteria, dangerous and ineffective medication, and the failure of screening to prevent suicide, none of which are covered in the NFC report, Congress would be wise to withhold the $44 million requested for state grants to implement the NFC recommendations. Whatever good may come from the other recommendations is completely overshadowed by the loss of freedom and damage that would come from labeling and drugging potentially millions of children based on these unsupportable screening and treatment programs. If we don't act now, every child in America will be screened for mental illness: thousands, perhaps millions, will be deemed 'at risk' of developing mental health problems for which they will be prescribed powerful psychotropic drugs. The screening plan has been called Orwellian and diabolical---the treatment 'model' the report recommends is a drug-industry sponsored guideline---the Texas Medication Algorithm Project (TMAP)." The first TMAP model was adopted in 1995 in Texas when President Bush was Governor of that state. One of the major forces behind TMAP was the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation (RWJF) mentioned in earlier Parts of this series. About the time TMAP began in 1995, the RWJF gave a sizeable grant for TMAP to Dr. Ken Altshuler in the Psychiatry Department at the University of Texas and Dr. John Rush in pharmacology at the same university. Chairman of the RWJF's National Advisory Council for its Mental Health Services Program for Youth (MHSPY) was former North Carolina Governor James B. Hunt, Jr., also mentioned in earlier Parts of this series. After the foundation's MHSPY National Program Office in 1990 awarded implementation grants to 8 states, it then awarded replication grants to 11 states, including Texas, between July 1994 and October 1996. In Texas and other states, the Child and Adolescent Strengths Assessment (CASA) was used, looking at whether a child had a particular vocational skill, an ability to trust others, and experienced religious/spiritual beliefs among other things. The states used outcomes-based planning and implemented outcomes-based systems of care. The TMAP, of course, was not the first government program regarding children's mental health. On September 29, 1970, a Special Studies Subcommittee
[cia-drugs] The Globalists' Best Friend: Americans' Ignorance
The Europeans are ahead of us on the world government track. But with the huge push to approve CAFTA at the top of the globalist agenda here, we are rapidly catching up. THE GLOBALISTS' BEST FRIEND: AMERICANS' IGNORANCE By Steven YatesJune 21, 2005 Authors Note: this is a slightly different version of an article published in the Times Examiner, based in Greenville, S.C., on June 15, 2005. Recently, France and the Netherlands dealt the European wing of the globalist Establishment a slap in the face. They used the polls to turn thumbs down on the European Union Constitution. They cant rest on their laurels, of course. The idea of an EU Constitution is not dead, just on hold. The same is true of the longstanding elitist plan to impose a European megastate on the once separate nations of the region. This whole affair testifies to the disparity in thought between the elites and the voting populations, and how little the former understand the latter. Copies of the EU Constitution were distributed to every household in Franceall 300 or so pages of it. A lot of the French likely read it. Perhaps they read the second paragraph of the Preface which states, The convention was asked to draw up proposals on three subjects: how to bring citizens closer to the European design and European institutions, how to organize politics and the European political area in an enlarged Union, and how to develop the Union as a stabilizing factor and a model in the new world order. Theres that phrase again. I continue to marvel at those who believe we conspiracy-theory types just imagine all this stuff. Perhaps the citizens of France and the Netherlands read an agenda that differs little from the UN agenda. Perhaps they read that the EU shall contribute to peace, security, the sustainable development of the earth, solidarity and mutual respect among peoples, free and fair trade, eradication of poverty and protection of human rights and in particular childrens rights, as well as to strict observance and development of international law, including respect for the principles of the United Nations Charter. What an intellectually confused recipe for a sprawling, ever-expanding Leviathan of unelected globocrats, micromanaging everyone and everything in sight! Or, finally, perhaps the French and Dutch read that under Article 10 in this new world order, The Constitution, and law adopted by the Unions Institutions in exercising competences conferred upon it, shall have primacy over the laws of the Member States and that Member States shall take all appropriate measures, general or particular, to ensure fulfillment of the obligations flowing from the Constitution or resulting from Union Institutions acts. There you have it: the sovereignty-destroying element of the EU Constitution. The French and Dutch read it. And they responded appropriately, at the polls. It is not as if their nations dont have immense problems. The French have a huge unemployment rate, and the Dutch have embraced euthanasia. The dominant economic systems in Europe are essentially socialist (they would prefer the term social democrat, of course). European culture is dying rapidly if it isnt already dead. But the French and Dutch value their sovereignty, and voted to preserve it from the globalists. I suppose one must start somewhere. I wonder if Americans would do the same, if confronted with a Western hemispheric constitution in the world envisioned by our wing of the globalist Establishment. The Europeans are ahead of us on the world government track. But with the huge push to approve CAFTA at the top of the globalist agenda here, we are rapidly catching up. And in America, we have a handicap the Europeans dont have. Back in January I was conversing with a man in the singles group of the church Id begun attending here in Greenville. I was explaining some of my writing and what I thought the primary threats to this nation are. As I enumerated, he asked me, Whats Sustainable Development? Just last weekend, the same person asked me, What is the Real ID bill? Thats the problem, my friends, in a nutshell. Unlike Europeans, relatively few Americans read except for entertainment. Their primary interests are money and sports. Most do not follow current events that are not affecting them directly and immediately; the few who do, are unaware of what is not covered by the mainstream media. So they cant tell you what Sustainable Development is. Theyve never heard of Agenda 21. (CAFTA? I can almost hear someone saying. Zat got somethin ta do with NASCAR?) Few Americans today can tell you there even is an EU Constitution. A sizeable fraction of school-to-work educated college and university students cannot find Europe on a map. Suppose a printed copy of the final version of CAFTA was sent to every household in America. Would Americans read it? My guess
[cia-drugs] Fair Justice [Chamish]
FAIR JUSTICE by Barry ChamishJerusalem District CourtFile No. 108/98Eskin vs.State of IsraelThe defendant Avigdor Eskin - "I have worked for the Shabak." After a week's delay releasing the verdict of Eskin's suit against me, my attorney Dov Eben-Or intervened and the verdict, as well as the court protocols, were sent to him. He phoned me. "No wonder you lost. How could you say you deliberately published an accusation against him?" "I didn't. I testified that after seven years, I had no idea if the 'offending paragraph' was writtenfor the site or whether the editor picked it off the internet." "It says in the protocols that you did know and that you deliberately chose to offend him." Allow me to quote from the previous article:On May 25, one Avigdor Eskin took me to court demanding compensation for my writing that he was a "known Shabak provocateur." I viewed the trial as nothing but a nuisance because Eskin's claims were so stupid. Quoting a nearly seven year old paragraph which appeared in an obscure American web site with no Israeli readers, this liar claimed that he was damaged. And it only took him seven years to feel the pain. My attorney, Dov Eben-Or wrote my defence argument and quoted Israeli law which puts the onusof responsibility on the publisher in such cases, not the writer. So what did Judge Chaim Lakhovitzky do? He changed the law. In an incredibly long-winded ruling, he declared that because the Internet is based on forwarded messages, web site owners cannot be responsible for damages the way a newspaper is by law. From now on in Israel, writers who post on the Internet are liable for any message they write. I raced to Dov's office to see the protocols. They made incredible reading. They were not merely wrong, they recorded the exact opposite of what I actually testified to. Not only did I testify that I could not know if I sent the 'offending paragraph' to the obscure web site, I took special pains to stress that I owned no web site, thus I did not publish on the internet, I merely write on it. The protocols changed my testimony drastically, having me admit to publishing on the internet. No wonder it took a week to release the verdict. The time was needed to rewrite the court records to make the ruling fit the law. But I had an advantage. A friend sat with me at the trial and was a witness to the forged protocols. Dov spoke to her and she agreed to sign a declaration that the court protocols had nothing to do with my testimony. Time was tight. The Hebrew Book Fair had just begun, and I would be manning a booth for the next nine working days. Dov wrote a request to the court to cancel the verdict based on the false records of the trial. I had two days to notarize my witness' statement and submit it to the Jerusalem court. Until I did, he would fax the court his appeal draft to prove it was in process. Two days later, I rushed my witness to a lawyer's office, then to the court to submit her declaration. When we got there, guess what? Based on Dov's fax, Judge Lakhovitzky had already ruled on his appeal. He declared that the court recorder had made the errors and he was not responsible for her misrecording of the proceedings. Thus, the appeal was rejected. Everyone complains about the slow pace of Israeli justice. Horror stories abound of people waiting ten years or more for a ruling on their case. Not me. I get a ruling overnight, BEFORE the declaration of the witness is submitted to the court. Dov was flabbergasted. Not only does the ruling precede the submission of the appeal, but, "This judge admits the protocols are wrong. In that case, he has to rule for mistrial. But worse, he's lying. He dictates the ruling to the recorder and watches the transcript on a screen. I've never seen such an illegal ruling." I leave the courthouse with my witness, in utter despair. I am a victim of trial fixing and I don't want to pursue an appeal. It would just be more money lost trying to fight a thoroughly rigged legal system.The Book Fair This year the Jerusalem Hebrew Book Fair is special. I have two new products to push hard. My new English language DVD called, The Deadly War Against The Settlers, has just been released, but even more important, the Hebrew edition of my newest book, Shabtai Tzvi, Labor Zionism And The Holocaust is also released on the opening day of the fair. This is a vital test. Within is a scathing indictment of the politicians plotting against the Jews of Gush Katif and Yesha. There is not much time to get that message heard widely. But the Mersel family helps me out. They gave me a thousand shekels to give the book to soldiers as gifts, hoping they will reconsider any actions against fellow Jews they may be ordered to undertake. Dozens of soldiers of every rank and unit accept the books with gusto and promise to share them with their compatriots in the IDF. Just as good...The book's first
[cia-drugs] Eminent Domain Again
Eminent Domain Again Neal Boortz, the Atlanta-based talk show host, on the topic. The only problem is that he accepts eminent domain because it comes out of the English Common Law tradition. If our next edition of Constitutionally limited government simply writes eminent domain out of the picture in order to make the property rights of law-abiding citizens inviolable, we will have made the next significant advance!Boortz, from today's Neal's Nooze (or whatever he calls it): Friday -- June 24, 2005THE END OF PRIVATE PROPERTY RIGHTSI cannot remember being more dismayed at a court ruling, and this includes the occasional ruling against me when I was practicing law. What ruling? Just in case you don't already know, the United States Supreme Court yesterday issued a ruling that goes a long way toward destroying private property rights in this country. [full text of ruling]Background. The Fifth Amendment to our Constitution restricts the government's right of eminent domain. It does not, as I heard so many commentators say yesterday, grant a right of eminent domain, it restricts it. The right of eminent domain was assumed as a basic part of English Common Law. The Fifth Amendment merely said that government could not exercise this right for a public use without paying for it. The exact working is "nor shall private property be taken for public use without just compensation."For hundreds of years the term "public use" was interpreted to mean use for something like a school, library, police or fire station, power transmission lines, roads, bridges or some other facility owned and operated by government for the benefit of the general population. As politicians became more and more impressed with their own power they started to expand this definition of public use. The new theory is that increasing the property taxes paid on a parcel of property is a public use. Increasing the number of people who can be employed by a business located on a particular piece of property can also be a public use. This would mean that government would be free to seize private property if it can be handed to a developer who will redevelop the property so as to increase the property taxes paid or the number of people employed. This is the theory that was validated by the Supreme Court yesterday in its ruling approving just such a private property seizure in New London, Connecticut. As Justice Sandra Day O'Connor said in her dissent, this decision renders virtually all private property vulnerable to government confiscation. Bottom line: If you own property, and the government wants that property --- you're screwed. You now own your private property only at the pleasure of government; and that means that you own your property, be it your home, your business or a piece of investment real estate only at the pleasure of the local controlling politicians.Let me give you a few real-life examples of just how politicians can now use this Supreme Court decision. In considering these examples, please remember one of the first rules of politics: There is absolutely no limit whatsoever to a politician's desire for more tax money to spend. First let's consider our lovely Southern Belle producer Belinda. Belinda and her husband recently purchased a tract of land behind her new home. That tract of land contains one rather small and old house plus some empty acreage. Belinda will rent the home for just enough to cover her debt service and property taxes on the new purchase .. maybe. Now, here comes a developer. He wants Belinda's land because he can build at least three, maybe four new homes on that property. Belinda says no. She likes not having houses abutting her back yard and appreciates the investment value of the land she has purchased. So .. the developer wanders off to the Capitol to talk to some politicians. He tells them that he can increase the property being paid on that tract of land tenfold if he could just get in there and build some houses, but the owners just won't sell the property to him. Under this Supreme court ruling the city can just seize the property from Belinda and hand it over to the developer to build those homes. Belinda has no way to stop this action. The city will have to pay Belinda "just compensation," but that compensation will never match what Belinda might have earned by selling the property herself. Besides ... she didn't want to sell in the first place. It was her property, and she wanted to keep it. Now it can be taken ... just like that.Another example. This time we'll use me. About two years ago I brought a building lot in the Northeast Georgia mountains. It's a lot in a mountain resort community. Before I bought the lot I made sure that there were no covenants or regulations that would require me to build a home on that lot before I was ready to do so. At present it is not my intention to build a home. I bought the lot as an investment.
[cia-drugs] Fw: SB and Elihu
- Original Message - From: James Cooper To: RoadsEnd Sent: Tuesday, December 28, 2004 1:12 PM Subject: SB and Elihu Isuggest researching the Elihu Club. Bone ties have been suspected since its founding in 1903. It is said that Bones founded Elihu andactually holdsmany of its meetings inside the walls ofElihu. The open door policy is simply a front for what occurs below ground.Some of the same families are known to havefounded and belonged toboth societies. Notice the Taft family connection. Alfonso Taft founded SB and his grandson (Walbridge Smith Taft)and great grandson (Seth Chase Taft)both belonged to Elihu. More significantly, however, is the presence of Henry Waters Taft on the membership rolls of both SB and Elihu. As you may know, HenryWaters Taft was the son of SBfounder, Alfonso Taft. Here are some of the more well know families obtained from the official Elihu Club roster: Adams Allen Ammidon Bass Bentley Biggs Bingham Bush Buckley Bull Burke Cooper Cowles Forstmann Gile Goodrich Goodyear Emerson Lieberman Pillsbury Sawyer Schiff Schwab Stevens Stewart Stillman Taft (seven members, including Henry Waters Taft, Walbridge Smith Taft, Seth C. Taft.) Thomas Anthony Thacher 1908 James F. Thacher 1945 Templeton Todd Townsend Truesdale Tuttle Tweedy Waddell Walker Weyerhauser http://www.google.com/search?biw=1259hl=enq=Elihu+ClubbtnG=Google+Search http://www.google.com/search?biw=1259hl=enq=Elihu+Club+%2B+skull+bonesbtnG=Google+Search http://www.google.com/search?biw=1259hl=enq=Elihu+YalebtnG=Google+Search --- Elihu Club Incorporated (203) 776-5485 Address: 175 Elm StNew Haven, CT 06511 Cross Street:Between High St and College St ~~~ Elihu Yale - The Great Welsh American Elihu Yale's life spanned a time of great changes in British History and also great achievements in the spheres of the Arts and Sciences, development in the form of government, the foundation of the British Empire and the expansion of trade and commerce. Yale's father was taken to America (seventeen years after the first settlers sailed in the 'Mayflower') by his stepfather to avoid discrimination against the Puritans during the reign of Charles I. Elihu was born in the same year that Charles I was executed and Oliver Cromwell came to power. Rule by an absolute monarch was succeeded by rule by a dictator both apparently equally intolerant of those subscribing to any religion other than their own. The family returned to England during the Commonwealth and must have witnessed the collapse of the Commonwealth after the death of Cromwell and the triumphant return of the Stuarts in the person of Charles II. These were exciting and dangerous times. Elihu must have been in his father's counting house in London during the Great Plague and the Great Fire and during the wars with the Dutch when the Dutch fleet sailed up the Thames, setting fire to British warships and temporarily cutting off London from the sea. This was also the period when Charles II founded the Royal Society to encourage the Arts and Sciences. The age of Isaac Newton, Christopher Wren, the poets John Milton and Dryden and many others. While Yale was in India he will have heard of events at home; the accession of James II, the failure of the Monmouth rebellion and the bloody revenge meted out to the rebels by the notorious Judge Jeffreys, the flight of James II and the Glorious Revolution, when William of Orange and Mary were welcomed to the throne of England and James' final defeat at the Battle of the Boyne which consolidated William's hold over Ireland. During this period the foundations of the British Empire were laid. The colonies in the New World were strengthened by emigration from Britain. Trading posts were established on the coast of India which would eventually lead to the inclusion of the whole of the subcontinent as a British possession. After Yale returned from India Queen Anne came to the throne and the Duke of Marlborough won his famous victories against the French. Then in 1714 the Georgian era started with the accession of George I. This was the time when government by Parliament and Cabinet as we know it today first started with Robert Walpole the first Prime Minister in all but name. Walpole was appointed in 1721, the year of Elihu's death. This was also a time when trade and commerce greatly expanded and prospered. When Elihu went to India as a humble 'writer' the East India company was notorious for the small salaries it paid to their servants. Even the Governor was only paid £100 per year. They were no doubt expected to make money by trading with the natives
[cia-drugs] Italians Detail Lavish CIA Operation
"During January 2003, they were regular patrons at the Hotel Principe di Savoia in Milan, which bills itself as "one of the world's most luxuriously appointed hotels" and features a marble-lined spa and minibar Cokes that cost about $10. Seven of the Americans stayed at the 80-year-old hotel for periods ranging from three days to three weeks at nightly rates of about $450, racking up total expenses of more than $42,000 there." Italians Detail Lavish CIA Operation13 Charged in '03 Abduction Allegedly Stayed in Finest HotelsBy Craig Whitlock, Washington Post Foreign ServiceSunday, June 26, 2005 MILAN, June 25 -- For 19 American intelligence operatives assigned to apprehend a radical Islamic preacher in Milan two years ago, the mission was equal parts James Bond and taxpayer-financed Italian holiday, according to an Italian investigation of the man's disappearance. The Americans stayed at some of the finest hotels in Milan, sometimes for as long as six weeks, ringing up tabs of as much as $500 a day on Diners Club accounts created to match their recently forged identities, according to Italian court documents and other records. Then, after abducting their target and flying him to Cairo under the noses of Italian police, some of them rounded out their European trip with long weekends in Venice and Florence before leaving the country, the records show. Milan prosecutors and police spent the last two years documenting Americans' role in the Feb. 17, 2003 disappearance of Hussan Mustafa Omar Nasr, 42, an Egyptian cleric. On Thursday, a Milan judge ruled that there was enough evidence to warrant the arrest of 13 suspected CIA operatives on kidnapping charges. The Americans' whereabouts are unknown, and Italian authorities acknowledged that the odds were slim that they would ever be taken into custody. The CIA has declined to comment. While most of the operatives apparently used false identities, they left a long trail of paper and electronic records that enabled Italian investigators to retrace their movements in detail. Posing as tourists and business travelers, the Americans often stayed in the same five-star hotels, rarely paid in cash, gave their frequent traveler account numbers to desk clerks and made dozens of calls from unsecure phones in their rooms. During January 2003, they were regular patrons at the Hotel Principe di Savoia in Milan, which bills itself as "one of the world's most luxuriously appointed hotels" and features a marble-lined spa and minibar Cokes that cost about $10. Seven of the Americans stayed at the 80-year-old hotel for periods ranging from three days to three weeks at nightly rates of about $450, racking up total expenses of more than $42,000 there. The first operative came to Milan on Dec. 7, 2002 and stayed for 11 days at the Milan Westin Palace, according to the court documents. The others started arriving in early January and by Feb. 1 almost all of them were in place. They eschewed safe houses and private homes, bunking instead at places such as the Milan Hilton ($340 a night) and the Star Hotel Rosa ($325 a night). In early February, most of the operatives gathered for a rendezvous in La Spezia, an Italian seaside resort town on the Ligurian coast, almost a three-hour drive from Milan. Hotel records show that they checked into two hotels in La Spezia but stayed for only a few hours before departing. Some of them then drove to Florence for an overnight trip, but the rest returned to Milan. According to Milan investigators, there were two distinct groups. One crew of six was in charge of planning and surveillance, checking out possible escape routes and procuring cell phones. Each of those people left the country about a week before Nasr was reported missing. The other group -- which included almost all of those whose arrests are now being sought -- was in charge of the kidnapping operation itself, according to court documents. On Feb. 17, shortly after noon, Nasr walked down the Via Guerzoni toward a mosque to attend daily prayers. He was being watched by a crew of eight operatives, who accosted him on the sidewalk, sprayed chemicals in his face and shoved him into the back of a white van, according to an eyewitness statement given to investigators. The Americans, who between them were carrying 17 cell phones, immediately started dialing numbers in Italy and the United States, according to investigators, who reported that by piecing together records of those phones' electronic signals they were able to trace the route of the van as it headed toward Aviano Air Base, a joint U.S.-Italian military installation. The van entered the base without being stopped at the regular security checkpoints, Milan investigators found. Court documents show that a U.S. colonel at the air base in charge of security received three phone calls from the operatives as they drove toward Aviano. Milan prosecutors said they
[cia-drugs] Left, Right, What Difference Does it Make?
Left, Right, What Difference Does it Make?by Mike (in Tokyo) RogersJune 27, 2005 I think there's a good reason why so-called Liberals are easy targets for derision. I believe it has a lot to do with a serious problem in the analytical thought process department. I mean, it seems they have a problem in thinking seemingly simple things through logically. The Neo-cons, on the other hand, are just out-and-out crooks and masters of deceit. Being skilled in dishonesty – and getting away with it – requires years of practice as well as a very gullible audience. Here's where American Joe-Average – who is always readily taken advantage of – steps in along with his very dim Liberal friends. The combination of the two makes for, literally, an entire carnival of little kids to steal candy from. In a recent article, Liberal writer Joe Conason counter-attacked Karl Rove because of Rove's attempts to divert American public attention away from the Downing Street memo, George Bush's lies, and the disastrous Iraq War. Up to his tried and true trickery, Karl Rove started pointing fingers at events of 9/11 and using them as justification for questioning the patriotism of Liberals in America. Mr. Conason writes: "In attacking liberals' reaction to Sept. 11, Bush's senior advisor once again resorts to McCarthy-style tactics. Karl Rove is a liar and a scoundrel. He is not a patriot but a pure partisan, as his own record proved long before now." Well, I don’t have too many problems with this so far. Of course Rove is a liar and a scoundrel. He's involved with American politics isn't he? Of course he's not a patriot but a pure partisan – did you Liberals just figure that one out? If so, no wonder we're in the mess we're in. What planet have you guys been living on? Here's where the problem for you, dear reader, and yours truly comes in; we have the liars and scoundrels on the one side; and the liars, scoundrels, and simpletons on the other. Take your pick. Then Mr. Conason really drops my jaw when he writes: "The truth is that liberal New York – and the vast majority of American liberals and progressives – stood with the president in his decision to invade Afghanistan and overthrow the Taliban. On the day of the attacks, I wrote a column that endorsed "hunting down and punishing" those responsible because the dead deserved justice – and noted that when the culpability of Osama bin Laden and the Taliban was established, the United States 'is fully capable of dealing with them.' " You can't be serious here. On the day of the attacks?! You, Mr. Liberal, supposedly the guys who are to be sticking up for the little guys – you actually wrote a column condoning the bombing of innocent people in Afghanistan on the day of the attacks – before any proof was presented?! And you are boasting about it? You are bragging about being suckered? Astounding! Maybe I missed something here, but I seem to remember that Colin Powell promised proof that Osama bin Laden was responsible for Sept. 11, within 72 hours after the event. I don't ever remember when any proof was given yet to this day. Do you? No wonder the so-called Liberals in America are so gutless and worthless. I can't believe that Liberals cannot see the crass hypocrisy and brainlessness of all this. How was bombing and murdering 20,000 innocent Afghani old men, women, and children to make up for – or compensate – 3,000 people who were murdered in a crime? That's right a crime – not an "act of war," Mr. Conason? I do not believe that there could be a single logically thinking person in the entire world who could come up with a suitable answer to that question. Then he goes on to write: "Six weeks after 9/11 and two weeks after the United States started bombing the terrorist camps in Afghanistan, I appeared on CBS's 'Early Show' to support the Bush administration's actions. Correspondent Lisa Birnbach made the point that liberals and Democrats who had once opposed the war in Vietnam were standing shoulder to shoulder with a president they didn't much like (and, although she didn't mention it, whose legitimacy they continued to doubt). "Noting the ubiquitous presence of American flags as we walked around the very liberal neighborhood where I live, Birnbach said, 'This old lefty [Conason] is suddenly siding with the White House.' " Pathetic. Simply pathetic. I do not wish to seem rude, but what is written here seems the apex of hypocrisy. What was it, Mr. Conason and the rest of you Liberals, that made you so blind to what was obviously going on? Was it a group "victim" complex? Or was it a savage primordial urge for revenge – an urge to show someone your powers of domination? No wonder right-wing drug addicts can go on the radio and make you guys look like flip-flopping idiots. We, the people, have the liars, cheaters, thieves, and war-criminals on the one side; and we have their flip-flopping enablers on the
[cia-drugs] US, Canada, Mexico to Tighten Security
"Deep integration uses security as a Trojan Horse for the complete surrender of our sovereignty to North American big business." U.S., Canada, Mexico to Tighten Security By BETH DUFF-BROWN, Associated Press WriterJune 28, 2005, 7:13 AM EDT TORONTO -- The United States, Canada and Mexico pledged Monday to shore up security by integrating their terrorist watchlists and beefing up joint protection of borders and bridges. At the same time, they promised to expand what is already the world's largest trading partnership by developing a single program to facilitate the free flow of people and goods across their shared borders. "We are three countries, three friends living in the same neighborhood, so we have a common interest in our mutual security and our mutual prosperity," Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff told a news conference in Ottawa after he and his Canadian and Mexican counterparts unveiled their list of targets and initiatives. "We want to confront external threats; we want to prevent and respond to threats to North America and we want to facilitate the flow of traffic across our borders," Chertoff said. "The more secure our region is, the more our prosperity will flourish." Canadian Deputy Prime Minister Anne McLellan said 300 proposals were under review to ensure security and the free flow of North American trade and harmonize the screening of dangerous people or cargo. "The proposals today will go a long way toward protecting North America, while maintaining each country's sovereignty," she said. Monday's session follows the March 23 formation of a Security and Prosperity Partnership initiative announced by President Bush, Canadian Prime Minister Paul Martin and Mexican President Vicente Fox after their meeting in Waco, Texas. The three leaders, who have sought to improve coordination since the terror attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, asked their top security and trade ministers to report back within 90 days on initiatives to enhance security and promote the economic well-being of their citizens. Some other proposals include: * Coordinating programs to ensure governments are prepared for large-scale emergencies or terrorist attacks; * Joint protection of critical cross-border infrastructure, such as the Ambassador Bridge that spans the Detroit River and facilitates one-fourth of the daily $1.4 billion in trade between Canada and the United States; * Strengthening approaches to maritime and aviation security; * Establishing a second site for a Canada-U.S. pilot project that would check cargo and passengers before they cross the border; * And creating a single, integrated program to allow "trusted travelers" who frequent the borders to travel quickly by air, land and sea. The partnership initiative has its detractors, who are concerned that further integration of North American security and trade will be skewed toward big business and a threat to Canada's sovereignty. "Deep integration uses security as a Trojan Horse for the complete surrender of our sovereignty to North American big business," Peter Julian, a New Democratic Party member of Parliament, told the House of Commons earlier this month as he pledged to fight the plan. On the economic front, U.S. Secretary of Commerce Carlos Gutierrez and his Canadian and Mexican counterparts, David Emerson and Carlos Abascal, said they would develop a coordinated strategy to combat counterfeiting and piracy by the end of next year; create more regulatory consistency and further integrate their automobile and steel industries; and relax rules that will allow for an additional $25 billion worth of duty free goods. Gutierrez said the United States, Canada and Mexico have a trading relationship worth more than $700 billion a year; an increase of 88 percent between 1993 and 2003. "So we have a lot of jobs and a lot of prosperity tied to this very important trading relationship," Gutierrez said, but added: "No market economy can thrive without safety and security for its people. The threats we face require seamless cooperation that extends beyond our borders." Emerson said the three nations must stand as one powerful trading block against other growing economies. North America accounts for one-third of the world's gross domestic product and he said investors would continue to look toward North America only if it is competitive. "The rest of the world has not been standing still -- far from it," Emerson said. "A booming China is changing the competitive landscape and causing the reconfiguration of global supply chains. India is not far behind; the European Union, despite recent setbacks, will continue to get bigger and stronger." The White House praised the efforts of the ministers, who said they would report back to their leaders in the fall. "Their report represents an important first step in achieving the goals of the SPP," read a statement from the White House. * On the
[cia-drugs] Pete Seeger's 86th birthday
Pete Seeger Is 86 by STUDS TERKEL [from the May 16, 2005 issue] A nationwide festival of tributes to the balladeer and songleader of us all, Pete Seeger, will be held on and around his 86th birthday, on May 3 (for information see www.seegerfest.com). We asked Studs Terkel, who turns 93 on May 16 (hey, Happy Birthday, Studs!), to reminisce about his young friend. As Pete and The Weavers used to sing: "Tzena, Tzena, join the celebration./There'll be people there from every nation./Dawn will find us dancing in the sunlight,/Dancing in the village square." Some years ago, DownBeat, the jazz journal, referred to Pete Seeger as "America's tuning fork." Along with Woody Guthrie, Leadbelly and Alan Lomax, he was the balladeer who stirred up the American folk-song revival in the late 1940s and early 1950s. His influence among the young was so pervasive that it brought forth this thought: When you see a kid with Adam's apple wildly bobbing and banjo held chest-high, you know that Pete Seeger, like Kilroy, was there. Pete and his wife, Toshi, live in a house he built in Beacon, New York, an upstate town along the Hudson River. His later years have been devoted to the Clearwater, as a schooner and an idea--cleaning up the Hudson River, which had through the years become polluted, "dangerous to all living things." He was 82* when he started the river project. *CORRECTION (5/30): A typo made it appear as if Pete started his project to clean up the Hudson four years ago. He started it in 1969. Also, we landlubbers called the Clearwater a schooner; it is a sloop. It is hard to think of Pete Seeger as an elderly gaffer, because the boy in him, the light, remains undimmed. It was sixty-five years ago I first ran into him. He and three of his colleagues, calling themselves the Almanac Singers, were on a cross-country jalopy tour singing and creating songs for the industrial unions aborning. The CIO had begun, and how could there be labor rallies without songs? It was in the true American tradition, like the Hutchinsons, a family of singing abolitionists during the Civil War. Some of the most heartbreaking music of that fratricidal conflict was theirs. That night when I first encountered the four wandering minstrels was a cold Chicago beauty. At 2 in the morning, my wife heard the doorbell ring. I was away rehearsing the first play in which I had ever appeared. It was Waiting for Lefty, of course. There, at the door, were the four of them. The first was a bantam--freckled, red-haired and elfin. He handed my wife a note saying: "These are good fellas. Put them up for the night." Putting them up was a rough assignment, even for a Depression-era social worker, what with the only spare bunk being a Murphy bed that sprang from the wall. Freckles announced himself as Woody Guthrie. The second was an Ozark mountain man named Lee Hayes. The third was a writer, Millard Lampell. The fourth, somewhat diffident, more in the background, was a slim-jim of 20 or so, fretting around with his banjo. He was Pete Seeger. Since then, Woody has died. So has Lee Hayes. So has Millard Lampell. Only Pete breathes and sings, mesmerizing audiences, whether they be Democrats, lefties, vegans or even a sprinkling of Republicans. For sixty-five years, he has held forth continuously through periods known more for their bleakness than for their hope: the cold war, the witchhunt, the civil rights and civil liberties battles. Pete has been in all of them. Wherever he was asked, when the need was the greatest, he, like Kilroy, was there. And still is. Though his voice is somewhat shot, he holds forth on that stage. Whether it be a concert hall, a gathering in the park, a street demonstration, any area is a battleground for human rights. That is why describing him as an 86-year-old gaffer is not quite true. The calendar often deceives. This is a sparkling case in point. Of course, he's been blacklisted so many times he probably holds the dubious record, with the possible exception of Paul Robeson, who was often his partner in crime. Before we hoist one for Pete, let's also remember that he's one of the best choirmasters in the country. He may not have the technique of Robert Shaw, but the result is just as explosive. Imagine an audience of thousands as Pete sings, say, "Wimoweh." As Pete waves his arms gently, the audience reacts as a professional choir might. I've seen a wizened little man, who obviously is somebody's bookkeeper, at the command of Pete become a basso profundo, reaching two octaves lower than Chaliapin. This is the nature of Pete Seeger, who reaches out toward the further shores more effectively and more exhilaratedly than anyone I've ever run into. Hail Pete, at 86, still the boy with that touch of hope in the midst of bleakness. There ain't no one like him. http://www.thenation.com/doc.mhtml?i=20050516s=terkel Complete archives at http://www.sitbot.net/ Please let
[cia-drugs] MKULTRA Mind Program in Washington Post
John K. Vance; Uncovered LSD Project at CIA By Joe HolleyWashington Post Staff WriterThursday, June 16, 2005; Page B08 John K. Vance, 89, a member of the Central Intelligence Agency inspector general's staff in the early 1960s who discovered that the agency was running a research project that included administering LSD and other drugs to unwitting human subjects, died May 27 of respiratory arrest. He died at the Wilson Health Care Center of Asbury Methodist Village in Gaithersburg. John Vance met people in the intelligence world while working as a military interpreter at the Nuremberg trials. Code-named MKULTRA (and pronounced m-k-ultra), the project Mr. Vance uncovered was the brainchild of CIA Director Allen Dulles, who was intrigued by reports of mind-control techniques allegedly conducted by Soviet, Chinese and North Korean agents on U.S. prisoners of war during the Korean War. The CIA wanted to use similar techniques on its own POWs and perhaps use LSD or other mind-bending substances on foreign leaders, including Cuba's Fidel Castro a few years after the project got underway in 1953. Heading MKULTRA was a CIA chemist named Sidney Gottlieb. In congressional testimony, Gottlieb, who died in 1999, acknowledged that the agency had administered LSD to as many as 40 unwitting subjects, including prison inmates and patrons of brothels set up and run by the agency. At least one participant died when he jumped out of a 10th-floor window in a hotel; others claimed to have suffered serious psychological damage. Mr. Vance learned about MKULTRA in the spring of 1963 during a wide-ranging inspector general survey of the agency's technical services division. The inspector general's report said: "The concepts involved in manipulating human behavior are found by many people both within and outside the agency to be distasteful and unethical." As a result of Mr. Vance's discovery and the inspector general's report, the CIA halted the testing and began scaling back the project. It was terminated in the late 1960s. MKULTRA came to public light in 1977 as a result of hearings conducted by a Senate committee on intelligence chaired by Sen. Frank Church (D-Idaho). Mr. Vance gave several long phone interviews to committee staff members but never had to testify. Mr. Vance was born in Seward, Neb., and graduated magna cum laude from Doane College in Crete, Neb., in 1936. He received a master's degree in economics from Columbia University in 1937 and a bachelor's degree in library science from Columbia in 1939. He began working on his doctorate at Harvard University during World War II but soon was serving in the Army. He was sent to language school to learn German and worked as a military interpreter at the postwar Nuremberg trials. In Nuremberg, he met people in the intelligence world. His CIA career began in 1947. He was on the inspector's general's staff from 1960 to 1963, and then became the director of central reference until his retirement in 1971. A member of the Maryland Ornithological Society and the Maryland Nature Conservancy, Mr. Vance helped in bird banding and also enjoyed gardening, biking, tennis and travel. He was a member of the Cedar Lane Unitarian Church in Bethesda. Survivors include his wife of 64 years, Elizabeth E. Vance of Gaithersburg; three daughters, Sally Roman of Kensington, Julia Stewart of Columbus, Ohio, and Margie Kay of Timonium, Md.; eight grandchildren; and five great-grandsons. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/06/15/AR2005061502685.html Complete archives at http://www.sitbot.net/ Please let us stay on topic and be civil. OM YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "cia-drugs" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
[cia-drugs] Personal Stories of a Bilderberg Hunter
Danny Estulin is writing three accounts from recent Bilderberg conferences which will be appearing on Online Journal www.onlinejournal.com and on www.bilderberg.org over the next few weeks. This is the first of those accounts from the 2004 Bilderberg conference in Italy.Danny has also completed a book on his experiences following Bilderberg around and is seeking publishers and publishing contacts.TonyLunatic Fringe: Personal Stories of a Bilderberg HunterAn encounter with Italian police on the way to Bilderberg 2004By Daniel Estulinhttp://www.onlinejournal.com/Special_Reports/062505Estulin/062505estulin.htmlOnline Journal Contributing Writer Editor's Note: Daniel Estulin and his family were expelled from the Soviet Union on March 23, 1980, for anti-Soviet activity. His father, a prominent scientist and a dissident, spent 3½ years in prison for seeking freedom of speech for his fellow citizens. Fearing for his life for his daring exposes of corruption, manipulation and power grabbing, Estulin has voluntarily exiled himself to Spain. His dramatic personal stories are a rare look behind the scenes at how the most powerful secret society in the world has tried to stop one of the most determined men in the world from discovering its secretsJune 25, 2005-For the longest time, the Club and I have been seeking each other's company, for the mutual disbenefit of our detractors. Although I conduct my investigation in the strictest of privacy, once per year, I come out of my shell to confront Bilderbergers on their terrain-a five star luxury hotel, the site of the annual secret gathering. In the summer 2004, I was off to Stresa, Italy.To get to this sleepy resort town that lives at the expense of globs of sun burned elderly German tourists who cohabitate with linguistically impaired Britons, Scots and Irishmen, one must fly to Milan's Malpensa International Airport.I am fond of Milan; I imagine in the hollow of the vowel that splits the M and the L, a miniature replica of the famed Cathedral, the dampness of its spring sunsets, and the echoes of the feet marking a staccato-like rhythm on its cobbled squares.So I was happy to be there again, to trudge in the opposite direction of the departing tourists, unaware of the city's elegance and hidden splendours.As I made my way through the airport terminal, my mind dreamily wondered to something I had read in the usually soiled and leafed through in-flight magazine-a peripheral article on the Novodevichy, or "New Maidens Convent" in English, the most revered cemetery in Moscow. The article shared the page space with a scantily dressed woman in a red dress, and a helpful list of addresses to not-to-be-missed sights from the Russian tourist board to such holy shrines as Lenin's mausoleum, the KGB headquarters at Lublianka, and GUM "the world's biggest shopping centre!"Novodevichy! Some of Russia's most venerated writers and poets are buried there. Chekhov was one of the first to be buried in the cemetery in 1904 and Googol's remains were re-interred here from Danilov Monastery not long after. The 20th century writers Mayakovsky and Bulgakov are buried here, as are the much-celebrated theatrical directors and founders of the Moscow Art Theatre, Nemirovich-Danchenko and Stanislavsky.I thought of the utter unpredictability of the future and the past as not a rigid succession but a storehouse of remembered images and concealed patterns that contain the key to the mysterious designs of our lives.In my imagination, I hovered over Googol's tomb that is symbolically linked with that of another famous writer, Bulgakov, author of "The Master and Margarita." When moved to Novodevichy, Googol's tomb was changed. A part of the original tomb was used in the new tomb. The remaining original stone was stored for years until Bulgakov's wife saw it and chose to incorporate it into her husband's tomb, only later discovering that it was part of Googol's first tomb.Beauty and lightness on the one hand; philosophical meditation on the other . . ."Buonasera. Would you please come with us, sir?" A sharp, piercing voice quickly dispersed those meretricious musings that had meandered so aimlessly, yet blissfully within the confines of my imagination.I looked up.He was coming towards me, garbed in a raincoat, which struck me as rather odd considering the sky was Mediterranean blue, a shiny automatic weapon slung across his shoulders.Like a host of a freak show who surrounds himself with hunchbacks, dwarfs and singing 2m tall albinos, this insignificant man, who might well have fitted terrifically into a masquerade ball, came into my personal space, clicked his heels, put his index and middle fingers to his temple and presented himself."I am Detective so and o," he announced in a perfect iambic tetrameter. "Would you please come with us?"The feeling of prearranged tragedy, or more precisely, the shadow, tragically imposed in my contra
[cia-drugs] The UN Reform Bandwagon
The UN "Reform" Bandwagonby William F. JasperJuly 11, 2005 "If and when these reforms are enacted, Mr. Speaker, the world will be safer and stronger, the American people will be assured their money is being well-spent, and the United Nations charter to prevent wars, protect human rights, and advance the cause of human freedom will be reaffirmed." So declared House Majority Leader Tom DeLay (R-Texas) on June 17 in his concluding remarks in support of H.R. 2745, the United Nations Reform Act of 2005. It must be tempting indeed for a great many folks to believe that merely passing a piece of legislation could transform the United Nations from a corrupt sinkhole of tyrants, thugs, and thieves, and a bastion of world government schemers, into a paragon of global virtue and righteous governance. UN reform, it seems, has become a near universal obsession, with Democrats and Republicans, liberals and conservatives all in agreement that the UN must be reformed and soon. It appears they only disagree on how to do it. But in the current debate on the subject, some of the most important questions aren't even being asked. For instance, is the UN even worth reforming? Was it ever worth reforming? Even more important, can it be reformed? Is it a good idea gone bad, or was it a bad idea from the beginning? And, if the UN was bad from the start, if it is an inherently dangerous, fatally flawed institution, do we really want to "enhance" it and "strengthen" it, as UN reformers are proposing? The current reform drive is being fueled by a series of UN scandals that have been keeping the UN's professional spinmeisters and their allies in Congress and the media operating in nonstop damage control mode. Last December 60 members of Congress called on United Nations Secretary-General Kofi Annan to resign from his UN post. Among the legislators urging him to step down were eight members of the House International Relations Committee and nine members of the House Appropriations Committee, which provides the UN with 22 percent of its operating budget each year. The issue that galvanized many of these Senate and House members to demand Annan's departure was his ongoing arrogant and high-handed effort to thwart congressional probes into the multi-billion dollar Iraq oil-for-food fiasco. Annan repeatedly refused to turn over documents to congressional committees and ordered UN employees not to cooperate with U.S. investigations into the scandal, which has become infamous as the biggest swindle in the history of humanitarian aid. For cover, he claimed that the congressional probes would interfere with the UN's own investigation, which was being led by his pal Paul Volcker, former chairman of the Federal Reserve. The Volcker-run "Independent Inquiry Committee" dragged its feet and, as its critics predicted, finally issued a report that turned out to be a whitewash. Annan claimed total exoneration. Then on June 14 a memo surfaced showing Annan's direct personal connection to the scandal, reigniting calls for Annan's scalp just as he was preparing to host the world's heads of state at the Millennium Goals Summit in New York City in September. Surfeit of Scandals Without a doubt, the United Nations is suffering one of the worst public relations nightmares of its inglorious 60-year existence. At every turn, it seems, the organization's seamy underbelly is being exposed, belying the claims of UN defenders that it is a noble institution in pursuit of global peace and compassionate aid for the destitute and downtrodden of the world. These are but a few of the outrages, in addition to the Iraq oil-for-food scandal, that are feeding America's growing anti-UN sentiment: Blue-helmeted UN "peacekeepers" and other UN personnel are under fire for sexually exploiting and raping young girls in the Congo and the Central African Republic over the past several years. Human rights workers are now charging that UN troops knowingly and intentionally gunned down unarmed civilians in a crowded market in Congo's Ituri province in March. Ruud Lubbers, the UN High Commissioner for Refugees who was accused of sexual harassment, was let off the hook by his pal Kofi Annan, even though an internal investigation pointed to Lubbers' guilt. Lubbers resigned in February after news reporters revealed what Annan had covered up. In April, Canadian billionaire Maurice Strong resigned as Kofi Annan's Special Envoy to North Korea, amid charges of ties to the oil-for-food scandal through Korean businessman Tongsun Park, whom U.S. prosecutors are accusing of acting as an "unregistered agent" of Saddam Hussein. Strong, who served as secretary-general of the UN's 1992 Earth Summit in Rio de Janeiro, is a longtime personal friend of and senior adviser to Annan. The UN claims to be the world's premier defender of human rights, but its infamous Human Rights Commission is an outrageous assortment
[cia-drugs] The Real Origins Of The 9/11 Truth Movement
At least three years ago Alex Jones warned people that the establishment would allow the truth about 9/11 to get out simply because it was too big a monster to hide. Alex pointed out however that the establishment would spin the issue to make people believe that the evil right-wing American imperialists were behind the terrorism and so the only solution would be a left-wing world government to counter them. So you would be forced to accept a false choice between a right-wing world government and a left-wing world government. Many prominent 9/11 researchers, either unwittingly or deliberately, have promulgated this dangerous notion, stating for example that we need a 'global democracy' to defeat the evil right-wing Neo-Cons. ~~~ The Real Origins Of The 9/11 Truth Movement Paul Joseph Watson | May 3 2005 Four years ago in May 2001, I watched a British Channel 4 documentary about Alex Jones' infiltration into Bohemian Grove. At first glance the show seemed to be a hit piece aimed at discrediting Alex and his work. But I wanted to make sure so I visited Alex's website and started listening to his radio show. Alex was gripped with anguish and apprehension. He was talking about how the government were about to carry out an act of terrorism to bolster the construction of a police state and a new world order. Alex dubbed his campaign 'Expose the Government Terrorists' and urged his listeners to call the White House and tell them to call off the operation. He gave out White House switchboard numbers on his radio and television show on a daily basis. On his television show Alex elaborated on the fact that the Globalists were about to use their asset Osama bin Laden to attack New York. Alex is not psychic. He did not have a crystal ball. He was able to make the call because he could see the conditioning in the media. Bin laden is a threat, bin Laden will attack. When bin Laden attacks, give up your rights. This was the incessantly replayed mantra from the controlled media. Click here for a clip from Alex's TV show, taped on July 25th 2001. I watched all this develop before I even spoke to Alex Jones or started my own website. Alex predicted the 9/11 attack BEFORE it happened. On the day of the attack Alex called in to the Derry Brownfield show which was being broadcast on GCN before Alex's own show came on air. Alex was adamant that the government were behind the attack. They had been conditioning the public before the attack and they had the most to gain from carrying out the attack. While others were squabbling over issues of prior knowledge, Alex was firm in pointing the finger directly at the criminals inside the Military-Industrial Complex for being intimately involved in 9/11. The evidence is now overwhelming and clear that this is exactly what happened. In the days and weeks following 9/11, Alex was the first to draw attention to the crucial testimony of people like David Shippers and Greg Palast, respectable figures blowing the whistle on government connections and protection of the terrorists. Greg Palast thanked Alex for being the only radio host to pay attention to W199I, a leaked document concerning FBI protected of groups linked to Al-Qaeda. In mid to late 2004 several prominent self-proclaimed 9/11 ringleaders started talking about the fact that wargames were used as a cover for the operational execution of the 9/11 attack. Alex was talking about this two years beforehand in his film, Masters of Terror and again in an April 2004 television show, a clip of which can be viewed here. I point out these examples not to lionize Alex Jones as some kind of messiah but in response to the claims of many researchers that they are the 'grandfather' of the 9/11 truth movement or words to that effect. It is disturbing to note that in many instances these same researchers have been seen to push obvious frauds like the peak oil theory. At least three years ago Alex Jones warned people that the establishment would allow the truth about 9/11 to get out simply because it was too big a monster to hide. Alex pointed out however that the establishment would spin the issue to make people believe that the evil right-wing American imperialists were behind the terrorism and so the only solution would be a left-wing world government to counter them. So you would be forced to accept a false choice between a right-wing world government and a left-wing world government. Many prominent 9/11 researchers, either unwittingly or deliberately, have promulgated this dangerous notion, stating for example that we need a 'global democracy' to defeat the evil right-wing Neo-Cons. The fact that these individuals have been labelled the 'godfathers of the 9/11 movement' is therefore a worrying development. This has given them the credibility required to create a '9/11 orthodoxy' and marginalize anyone who discusses 9/11 issues that THEY feel shouldn't be circulated. We
[cia-drugs] Former DEA Agent: Mexican Commandos Killing In South West US To Protect Bush Drug Cartel
Former DEA Agent: Mexican Commandos Killing In South West US To Protect Bush Drug Cartel Prison Planet | June 9 2005 Retired DEA Agent Celerino "Cele" Castillo III served for 12 years in the Drug Enforcement Administration where he built cases against organized drug rings in Manhattan, raided jungle cocaine labs in the amazon, conducted aerial eradication operations in Guatemala, and assembled and trained anti-narcotics units in several countries. Cele appeared on the Alex Jones show and dropped the bombshell that los Zetas, Mexican drug commandos trained in the U.S. at the School of the Americas at Fort Benning, Georgia to be the elite "special forces" of the Mexican military are now murdering police and conducting hits all over the South West US. This partially came out in the national media last week but the spin was that it was just a case of blowback and that these US trained commandos had come back to haunt their former handlers. The truth is that they are still working for the US government in protecting drug routes to keep the wheels of Wall Street oiled. These commandos are working directly for the Bush drug cartel in carrying out hits on rival drug smugglers who aren't paying their cut. Witnesses and innocent police, DEA and FBI agents are also being murdered. Here is the partial transcript from the show. Click here to listen. Cele Castillo: "That same blueprint they used in Guatamala and in Vietnam they have now brought it to Iraq and the same Colonel who ran the death squads down in El Salvador Colonel James Steele is now running those commando unit death squads in Iraq. So basically we have the same individuals, same cell grups that were in Vietnam that came to central America and Miami and so forth and are now in Iraq and some of them are being trained here in south Texas. There's warehouses down here we're they're training more Zetas individuals that work for the cartels. Alex Jones: "Now for those that missed that, you have evidence as a former veteran, peace officer and then head DEA agent in Latin America and you live in south Texas, that down there they are training these los Zetas groups and again they're now targeting rival cowboys that are not paying their cut, do you agree with that statement?" Cele Castillo: "Absolutely but not only that just recently last month we had a female US customs agent driving down the highway and a couple of individuals drove up to her and just shot the hell out of the car and she got hit on the ankle and they're not gonna take any more prisoners. They're now gonna target FBI agents, DEA agents and people that were able to get away from" Alex Jones: "And Bush has ordered the border patrol to stand down there in the Tuscon sector because, this was official, because it was cutting in on their drug profits." Cele Castillo: "Well exactly and now they're planning to come to south Texas and they're gonna do the same thing here in south Texas and there was a story just today in the paper which says border patrol agents say you know what we can't stop these people from coming across the border and the reason that we can't stop them is because our government is not letting us do it." Alex Jones: "Well I read in the Brownsville paper, the Dallas Moring News you name it that they're conducting murders all over Texas and killing police officers but it's a national secret Cele, it's in regional papers Cele Castillo: "Well one of the most major things that people don't realize that's going on is a lot of these people getting murdered are informants for the DEA and FBI and basically people don't wanna admit the fact or let the public know that these people are informants working for the government." Alex Jones: "Cop killers that work for Bush." Related: Mexican Drug Commandos Related: Mexican commandos seek control of border Complete archives at http://www.sitbot.net/ Please let us stay on topic and be civil. OM YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "cia-drugs" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
[cia-drugs] Federal spy probe begins into California National Guard unit
Federal spy probe begins into California National Guard unit By Don Thompson ASSOCIATED PRESS 4:52 p.m. July 6, 2005 SACRAMENTO U.S. military authorities on Wednesday began investigating whether a California National Guard unit was established to spy on U.S. citizens, as about 30 demonstrators outside guard headquarters confronted officials backed by armed soldiers. The federal probe of the nation's largest National Guard force involves the U.S. Army's inspector general, the federal National Guard Bureau's inspector general and the National Guard Bureau's legal division. The unit has raised concern among peace activists that the Guard is resorting to the same type of civilian monitoring that characterized Vietnam War-era protests. "These are your mothers, grandmothers and neighbors," said George Main, president of Veterans for Peace and an organizer of Wednesday's protest outside guard headquarters. "They are not potential terrorist threats. The excuse that these groups might be infiltrated is an insult to the intelligence of every Californian." Under scrutiny is a California National Guard unit with a tongue-twisting name the Information Synchronization, Knowledge Management and Intelligence Fusion program. It was created last year and came to public light after a recent story in the San Jose Mercury News. Investigators also are looking into the Guard's monitoring of a Mother's Day anti-war demonstration at the state Capitol that was organized by several peace groups. The activities were documented in an e-mail chain originating in Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger's press office and made public by the newspaper. That monitoring was by a second unit, the Guard's Domestic Watch Center. Both units were under the command of Col. Jeff Davis, who has since retired and left the state. Guard spokesman Col. Doug Hart said monitoring activities merely meant tracking media coverage of the protest, which included the Gold Star Families for Peace, Raging Grannies and CodePink. "Even with a seemingly innocent act as watching TV, they're breaking the law," said Natalie Wormeli, a member of Code Pink, a women's peace group. She sat in a wheelchair at Wednesday's protest wearing a T-shirt reading "One Nation Under Surveillance." The protesters spoke outside the Guard's headquarters in a suburban Sacramento office park, and at one point engaged in a verbal confrontation with Guard officials as soldiers carrying M-16 rifles stood in the background. One soldier blocked the locked headquarters door as the protesters tried to enter. California National Guard officials defended the unit. "We do not spy on people," Hart said. "Never have, never will." The Guard has described the unit as consisting of two members who monitor the military's classified e-mail system and seven others who help gauge terrorist threats to bridges, buildings and other structures. Officials in the guard and the governor's office said they will cooperate in the federal inquiry. Hart said the federal units were declining comment on their probe. Army spokeswoman Lt. Col. Pamela Hart declined to even acknowledge that an investigation was under way. Meanwhile, a state senator has begun his own investigation into the guard unit. Sen. Joe Dunn, D-Garden Grove, said he is concerned that Davis, who oversaw the unit, not only has retired but that the hard drive on his computer was erased. Doug Hart said Davis' retirement and the cleansing of the computer were routine and happened before Dunn began investigating the unit last week. Dunn runs a subcommittee that oversees the Guard's funding and is seeking Senate subpoenas for Davis and the computer. In a news conference Wednesday, Dunn said he suspects the federal probe is designed to keep evidence away from state investigators and the public hearings he plans. The acting adjutant general for the California National Guard, Brigadier General John R. Alexander, said he would provide no details to Dunn while the federal investigation is ongoing. Dunn questioned federal jurisdiction in the case and suggested that Schwarzenegger, as the state's commander in chief, should order the Guard to cooperate. He also said the governor should consider involving the California Highway Patrol to ensure that no evidence is destroyed or removed from the state. State Guard officials said they expect to be able to convince Dunn that they have done nothing wrong. Schwarzenegger originally sought a federal review of possible accounting irregularities under the Guard's former commander, Major Gen. Thomas Eres. Eres resigned abruptly in June amid questions about whether he falsified passing a required marksmanship test and tried to arrange a flight on a military aircraft for members of a Republican group. The governor's office expanded the request after questions arose about the special unit arose. Associated Press Writer Brian Melley contributed to
[cia-drugs] Pushing the edge of art and legality
"I'd like to see humans with the necks of giraffes; I'd like to see a thousand-legged dog - a dog crossed with a millipede," he said. "I'm all for things getting really, really weird." Pushing the edge of art and legalityBy Randy Kennedy The New York TimesMONDAY, JULY 4, 2005NEW YORK In a certain part of the art world, the story is recounted like a nightmare: On the afternoon of May 11 last year, Steven Kurtz, a respected artist and professor at the State University of New York at Buffalo, called an emergency number to report that his wife, Hope, 45, was not breathing.The police arrived to find Hope Kurtz dead, and in a hallway they found something else - a biological lab, with an incubator, centrifuge and bacterial cultures growing in petri dishes. Windows nearby were covered with foil, and on the shelves were books like "The Biology of Doom" and "Spores, Plagues and History: The Story of Anthrax."The FBI was called in. Agents in white biohazard suits scoured the house. Subpoenas - citing sections of the Biological Weapons Anti-Terrorism Act - were issued to Kurtz and other members of an art group he and his wife helped found, the Critical Art Ensemble. And in the summer of 2004 Kurtz was indicted by a federal grand jury on charges of mail and wire fraud, accused of illegally obtaining two of the bacteria samples in his lab, crimes that could send him to prison for up to 20 years.Information that emerged later changed the picture considerably. Medical examiners found that Hope Kurtz's death was not suspicious; she died of heart failure. As artists, she and her husband had long worked openly with biological and chemical agents, which they used at exhibitions around the world, including a 2002 show involving genetically altered plants at the Corcoran Gallery of Art in Washington. Most significant, the bacteria cultures in the Kurtz lab were determined to be essentially harmless.But federal prosecutors have continued to pursue the case, which could come to trial later this year. In the process, they have transformed Kurtz into an unlikely art world martyr-hero and shone a spotlight on an emerging art movement that blurs the lines between art and science - especially the science of genetics and biotechnology - and also the lines between art and activism.Called "bioart" or "wetware" by some of its practitioners, the field is growing rapidly in the United States and Europe, and it is producing bizarre and sometimes disturbing work.In many ways bioart represents a logical next step in contemporary art, which has eagerly embraced new approaches and nontraditional materials: video and computers beginning in the 1960s and '70s, digital technology and the Internet in the '90s. But bioart can credibly claim to have made a more revolutionary break with tradition. The artists use life itself - bacteria, cell lines, plants, insects and animals - as the medium to ask the questions that art has always asked. The work can feel genuinely subversive, even dangerous.Some bioartists credit the photographer Edward Steichen as the founder of genetic art; in the 1930s at the Museum of Modern Art he showed a collection of giant delphiniums he had mutated using selective breeding and chemicals. Biological elements have also played a part in some well-known contemporary work, like the lifecycle-behind-glass gross-out of Damien Hirst, in which maggots hatch, become flies, feed on a rotting cow's head, then die on a bug zapper.During the last decade the field has grown largely because of the very advances in biotechnology - genetically altered plants and animals, cloning, mapping of the human genome - that the artwork often addresses. In many cases the artists work alongside scientists in their labs. Joe Davis, for example, considered a father of American bioart, has worked for years as an unpaid research associate at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Occasionally the work is playful, verging on silly - serenading a strain of E. coli bacteria with Engelbert Humperdinck's greatest hits to see if that causes increased antibiotic production. (It appeared to.) Other artists are simply trying to find new ways to do old things - creating portraits on leaves or in swaths of growing grass by using photosynthesis. But much of the work is provocative and, depending on your Brave New World tolerance, disturbing: creating "victimless" meat by growing tiny steaks from biopsied frog cells; using bone cells from pigs to grow wing-shaped objects, a play on the "when pigs fly" trope; coaxing cactuses into sprouting humanlike hair; growing tissue in a petri dish that could theoretically be marketed as a hymen replacement.The five-member Critical Art Ensemble has for many years pushed the art deep into the realm of activism, questioning the activities of the biotechnology industry."The fuzzy saboteur has to stand on that ambiguous line between the legal and the illegal
[cia-drugs] Plans to test anthrax shot on children questioned
Plans to test anthrax shot on children questionedBY DAVID GOLDSTEINKnight Ridder NewspapersWASHINGTON - (KRT) - The government's effort to develop a new vaccine against anthrax has raised red flags among critics over plans to eventually test an experimental version on children.Robert Bock, a spokesman for the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, said the new anthrax vaccine would not be tested on 100 first- and second-graders until it is first tested safely on adults. That is under way now, he said."If that study is successful, there will probably be a protocol to test the anthrax vaccine in children," Bock said.While federal rules govern how children can be used in medical research, Barbara Loe Fisher, president of the National Vaccine Information Center, said the threat of anthrax exposure was too remote to subject children to a possibly dangerous substance."There is almost no risk to these children of being exposed to a form of ... anthrax that has been weaponized" so it can be inhaled, said Fisher, whose nonprofit group has been pushing for vaccine safety since the 1980s. "The benefits are zero and risk is quite high."Several pediatricians involved in bioterrorism issues, however, said that given the potential threat, it would be irresponsible not to include children in the test."Considering that in a worst-case scenario, this vaccine would have to be used in an emergency over a very short period of time, we would be in a bad position medically and ethically if it were not tested beforehand," said Stanley Plotkin, emeritus professor of pediatrics at the University of Pennsylvania.Plotkin was a consultant on a 2002 study that declared the current anthrax vaccine to be "effective" and "acceptably safe."But government researchers at the National Institutes of Health now are trying to find a better vaccine. There are concerns the current vaccine, which has been in use for several decades, causes too many side effects.They range from simple headaches and muscle pains to more serious and complex ailments, such as heart problems, arthritis, multiple sclerosis, hypertension, diabetes and blood clots.For decades, the current vaccine was largely given only to people who worked in the livestock industry, where most exposures occur. But in 1991, it was issued to some troops during the first Gulf War because of fears Saddam Hussein had biological weapons.By 1997, the military was concerned enough about the spread of such weapons that it made anthrax inoculations mandatory for all troops. Developing a national vaccine program to protect the public became a priority after the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks when five persons died from anthrax-tainted letters and 13 others were infected. The sender has never been identified.The current vaccine is given in a series of six doses over 18 months, with annual boosters. More than 1.3 million military and civilian personnel have taken it.Made by the BioPort Corp. of Lansing, Mich., the vaccine has been approved only for anthrax exposure through the skin, not through inhalation, the way it would be disseminated on a battlefield or in a public place.But numerous soldiers who have taken it under military orders have reported severe side effects.In response to a lawsuit by six anonymous service members challenging the mandatory vaccinations, a federal judge stopped the program last fall because he said federal regulators had not properly followed rules to declare it safe.Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld called the vaccine "safe and effective" following the ruling. The program has been reauthorized, however, on a voluntary basis, under provisions of the Project Bioshield Act, which permits emergency use of unapproved vaccines.In the new vaccine tests, 350 adults are randomly being given either the experimental vaccine or the BioPort vaccine to compare their effects."No children have been given a licensed or experimental vaccine in the trial," according to a statement from the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, the division of NIH that is conducting the trial. "Studies in children will not begin until the safety of the new vaccine has been demonstrated in adults."Meryl Nass, a Maine internist who has treated numerous soldiers who've experienced medical problems after taking the BioPort vaccine, said one of the primary ingredients in the experimental vaccine - the protective antigen - is a known toxin."There is no good reason to expect that (the experimental) vaccine will be any safer than the older one," she said.BioPort spokeswoman Kim Brennen Root said the company was unaware that its vaccine was being used in a new NIH trial and could not comment.Steve Robinson, executive director of the National Gulf War Resource Center, which helps former soldiers with service-related health problems, said, "Anybody who gets involved is taking a huge gamble that maybe their
[cia-drugs] UTMB Huckster Backs Anthrax Snake Oil
[COMMENT: Ah, the greed... The endorser of this snake oil is a Professor of Microbiology and Immunology at UTMB in Galveston ... and has co-published with UTMB's resident anthrax expert. Bio-Germ online: http://www.bio-germ.com/Wonder if the UTMB folks are going to rely on squirting Bio-Germ in the air when they run virulent anthrax aerosol challenges in their (perhaps leaky) Madison chamber...But wait, there's more... the all too frequent occurence of bioweapons kooks gaining access to high levels of government (..."he helped Bio-Germ get a meeting with top U.S. Health and Human Services officials by calling another friend - Tommy Thompson...") - EH ]THE DALLAS MORNING NEWSJuly 3, 2005 SundaySECOND EDITIONNEWS; Pg. 1A2443 wordsSelling shaky science? Exclusive: Experts question Dallas businessman's anti-anthrax product; supporters back offMICHAEL GRABELL, Staff WriterA Dallas businessman says he has the answer for an anthrax attack - a 16-ounce, $179 bottle of skin lotion made from grapefruit seeds and the oil of an Australian tree.He's won scientific backing from a microbiologist at a University of Texas branch known for bioterrorism research. A respected police chief and a veteran North Texas congressman have supported him. Some public safety agencies have talked about using federal homeland-security grants to buy the lotion and related products, which are sold as the Bio-Germ Protection kit."This certainly appears to be a breakthrough and the answer to the anthrax problem," U.S. Rep. Ralph Hall says on a Bio-Germ promotional video.But the company appears to be built on little more than shaky science and the long-standing friendships of the businessman's father, The Dallas Morning News has found. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration says Bio-Germ lacks federal approval and could face scrutiny for assertions made on its Web site.The businessman, scientist, congressman and police chief said they had no intentions of misleading the public. They said they only wanted to help the country be prepared for a terrorist attack.After The News began making inquiries, UT officials investigated the microbiologist, John Heggers, and ruled last week that he had overstated his research to support a commercial product."Dr. Heggers has committed significant scientific misconduct by making excessive and false claims based on his research," the officials wrote. "His misconduct is all the more egregious because his false claims involve nationally important public policy."A burn specialist at the UT Medical Branch in Galveston, Dr. Heggers published the only scientific article on Bio-Germ in an obscure online journal run by two of his former medical residents. The journal retracted the study after two scientists listed as co-authors disputed the article's findings and said they had never read or approved it.About a dozen anthrax experts who reviewed the article for The News said Dr. Heggers' work had little value because he failed to test spores - the highly infectious form of anthrax that was made into a powder and mailed in the 2001 attacks. Instead, the experts said, Dr. Heggers tested a weak form of the bacteria that is easily killed with rubbing alcohol.Yet Dr. Heggers wrote that Bio-Germ would protect the public from an anthrax attack, and he later said it probably would counter other bioterrorist threats, such as smallpox and the plague. It met government safety standards, he said, and he urged police and fire departments to buy it.He now says he exaggerated."Scientists must stay close to the facts they discover and not let hopes and expectations get ahead of them," Dr. Heggers wrote The News in an e-mail. "I failed in that regard, and for that I apologize; but I assure you my intentions were honorable and not mercenary."He also acknowledged that he has overstated findings about an alternative therapy for cancer and AIDS.Based on a study of a single patient - himself - he concluded in a 2002 presentation that aloe vera "can be used effectively as an anti-cancer alternative."Bio-Germ founder Allan Lord would not comment on The News' findings. He referred questions to the products' developer, Robert Heiman, who said he was unaware that Bio-Germ was being sold. Mr. Heiman said that the products are still in testing and that he believes they will prove effective.Mr. Hall said he was merely doing a favor for a longtime friend and did not feel that he was endorsing the product by appearing on the video in his Rockwall congressional office."I'm pretty innocent in this thing," said Mr. Hall, the No. 2 Republican on the House Science Committee. "I was trying to help a friend and the American people. I didn't mean to mislead anyone."He said he helped Bio-Germ get a meeting with top U.S. Health and Human Services officials by calling another friend - Tommy Thompson, who was secretary of the department, which oversees the FDA and the Centers for Disease
[cia-drugs] Watchdog says Drug makers' intense lobbying effort pays off
Drug makers' intense lobbying effort pays off, watchdog saysIndustry dismisses 'clearly biased' report, cites benefit to patients 07:40 PM CDT on Wednesday, July 6, 2005Associated PressWASHINGTON - The pharmaceutical industry's run of success on Capitol Hill has benefited from the more than $800 million spent since 1998 on lobbyists and political campaigns, a political watchdog group said Wednesday.The trade group representing drug makers said the money helped patients.In the last year, the industry hired nearly 1,300 lobbyists, including dozens of former lawmakers and hundreds of people who worked for congressional committees or regulatory agencies."It is astonishing to learn that no other interest has spent more money to sway public policy in this time period," said Roberta Baskin, the executive director of the Center for Public Integrity. The nonpartisan research group investigated the pharmaceutical industry's spending.Ms. Baskin described the industry's motives for its spending as profit-driven.Ken Johnson, senior vice president for the Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America, said the report was "clearly biased and one-sided."He said it failed to acknowledge that "medicines researched and developed by America's biopharmaceutical research companies save lives and improve the quality of life for tens of millions of patients from around the world."The center noted that the industry spent about $116 million on lobbying and political campaigns in 2003, which was the year Congress approved a new prescription drug benefit under Medicare.In the same legislation, drug makers fought back attempts by Democrats that would have allowed the government to negotiate drug prices on behalf of beneficiaries.Last year, according to the center, the industry spent $128 million on such efforts, including seeking tax breaks as part of a massive corporate tax-relief bill.Drug companies lobbied for $5.6 billion in spending for biodefense and for a bill that allows easier access to patents for inventions researched jointly by public institutions and private entrepreneurs.Much of the data for the center's report comes from lobbying disclosure forms filed with the Senate. More than 3,000 people over the last seven years have done lobbying work for a pharmaceutical company.The list includes former Sens. Bob Dole and Lloyd Bentsen and former Reps. Robert Livingston and Tom Foley, the center said.Overall, 75 former lawmakers are listed as serving as lobbyists for a drug company since 1998.The industry's trade group hired former Rep. Billy Tauzin, R-La., as its president in December.The industry is not happy with legislation that Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist, R-Tenn., said he will introduce that calls for a two-year ban on consumer advertising for new drugs.Nor are drug companies pleased by a proposal from the Bush administration and governors that would reduce how much Medicaid pays for prescription drugs. Complete archives at http://www.sitbot.net/ Please let us stay on topic and be civil. OM YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "cia-drugs" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
[cia-drugs] Open Secrets of Biosecurity
Open Secrets of Biosecurity Preventing the life sciences from becoming the death sciences Ronald Bailey Security experts and scientists get along much like cats and dogs. Security types reflexively treat information as power and share it sparingly with outsiders. Scientists are nearly exact opposites; they get credit for their discoveries by letting the whole world know what they've done and provide others with enough information to replicate their experiments. But what if the information enables some terrorist to replicate, say, the smallpox virus or manufacture a new designer plague? The new National Scientific Advisory Board for Biosecurity (NSABB) is filled with 24 representatives selected from both worlds, along with ex officio members from a huge range of federal agencies. The two sides faced off last week at the first session of a NSABB meeting in Bethesda, MD. "There is no doubt that our progress in fundamental science for the benefit of mankind has also created tools that have incredible capacities for mischief," declared Elias Zerhouni, the director of the National Institutes of Health. "It is an unfortunate fact of life that there could be individuals out there who would use these very technologies and discoveries to terrorize nations and threaten the public's health." The NSABB is tasked with devising policies aimed at preventing the misuse of "dual use" biotechnologies and information. "We want to help prevent the life sciences from becoming the death sciences," declared biologist Ronald Atlas who is also Co-director of the Center for the Deterrence of Biowarfare and Bioterrorism at the University of Louisville in Kentucky. What kind of bio-threats are out there? Dale Klein, assistant to the Secretary of Defense for Nuclear, Chemical, and Biological Defense Programs, told me that he had intelligence that both state and non-state actors are working to insert toxin genes into easily transmissible pathogens like the flu virus. Klein also told me that a state actor has now developed a dry version of the virus that causes Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS). Klein added that he has seen reports that some hostile researchers are trying to create pathogens that will kill only people of European descent. Sadly, creating ethnically targeted bioweapons is not a novel idea. The apartheid regime in South Africa tried to devise a "black bomb," a biological weapon that would kill only indigenous Africans. Klein noted that while the racist regime in South Africa evidently didn't succeed in devising such an ethnic bioweapon, "we can do things a lot more easily now." How easily? The NSABB held a session to discuss developments in synthetic genomics in which researchers are striving to build genomes of viruses and bacteria using DNA sequences produced in laboratories. Craig Venter, the biologist whose privately funded research raced the government project to sequence the human genome to a tie in 2000, testified before the biosecurity panel that any already sequenced viral genome including those of restricted pathogens can be made today. He further predicted that complete bacterial genomes will be synthesizable in 2 years. Back in 2002, Eckard Wimmer from the University of New York at Stony Brook synthesized polio virus using mail-order chemicals. So even if polio is completely eradicated in nature, a future bioterrorist could simply cook up some more which he could release into a human population that no longer is being vaccinated against the disease. In 2003, Mark Buller at the Saint Louis University in Missouri engineered a form of mousepox virus that was 100 percent fatal. A similar technique might be used to create an especially deadly form of smallpox. The NSABB is considering various ways to thwart future bioterrorist attacks. First, the Board is looking at devising codes of conduct so that they can inculcate a "culture of responsibility" in life science researchers. Board member Michael Osterholm, a professor of public health at the University of Minnesota and the associate director of the Department of Homeland Security's National Center for Food Protection and Defense, noted that while the vast majority of scientists already follow such codes of conduct, there have always been nations, groups and individuals willing to ignore any ethical norms. He pointed to the extensive Soviet biological warfare research program that was run in contravention to the 1972 Biological and Toxin Weapons Convention. In 2003, the National Academy of Sciences issued Biotechnology Research in an Age of Terrorism: Confronting the "Dual Use" Dilemma which recommended seven different types of "experiments of concern" receive extra review before being funded or published. These included experiments that would render vaccines ineffective; confer resistance to useful antibiotics or antivirals; enhance virulence of microorganisms; increase
[cia-drugs] Bilderberg 2003: The mysterious emissaries and a veiled warning
Lunatic Fringe: Personal Stories of a Bilderberg hunterBilderberg 2003: The mysterious emissaries and a veiled warning By Daniel EstulinOnline Journal Contributing Writer Download a .pdf file for printing. Editor's Note: Daniel Estulin and his family were expelled from the Soviet Union on March 23, 1980, for anti-Soviet activity. His father, a prominent scientist and a dissident, spent 3½ years in prison for seeking freedom of speech for his fellow citizens. Fearing for his life for his daring exposes of corruption, manipulation and power grabbing, Estulin has voluntarily exiled himself to Spain. His dramatic personal stories are a rare look behind the scenes at how the most powerful secret society in the world has tried to stop one of the most determined men in the world from discovering its secrets. July 6, 2005"I would like to speak to you." I instinctively turned to my right, except that there was no one there. The gentleman who was seeking the pleasure of my company stood slightly behind me, as if using my right shoulder as a temporary refuge. "Stay seated, please," hissed his shadow, noisily letting his breath out. "You would please pardon me, dear sirs, but I am not accustomed to being told what to do, especially since your company has not been sought," I brazenly replied. "Mr. Estulin, we are sorry to intrude into your space but we would very much like to speak to you," said the first gentleman, extending a flaccid hand in the hope I might chose to shake it. "Needless to say, we ask your maximum discretion." I could tell from his linguistic pirouettes that he learned his English in one of those posh British institutions or from a private tutor, one of these fake literati who could not extricate himself from clumsy errors of syntax. "How do you know my name? I don't remember offering it to you." "We know quite a bit about you, Mr. Estulin." I could tell that the mysterious gentleman was beginning to feel more relaxed in my company. "Please have a seat," I said, noting privately that I, too, was beginning to loosen up. He lowered his gaze, automatically fishing out his cigarette case out of the breast pocket of his well-cut jacket, and began to examine it. I sat on my bar stool waiting for one of them to break the silence. "For example, we know you are here to cover the Bilderberg conference. That you have been following us around for many years. That somehow, you seem to know the exact location of every meeting, even though most of the attendees do not find out the where it will be held until a week prior to the conference. That as much as we have tried to cover our tracks and to take all the necessary precautions, you seem to know what we discuss and most of our future plans. "Our choice of some of the attendees has even been influenced by your meddling, Mr Estulin. At one point we had thought that we had you found out. That a certain member not invited to the conference was your inside contact. And that were you to be wrong in your post-conference predictions, the unsuspecting member could have suffered great, personal consequences. Fortunately for him, you were spot on." "Kent accent," I thought. "How do you know all this stuff?" asked the not too intelligent second fiddle. "It is a professional secret," was my turn to reply laconically. I looked the man over. The second fiddle was broad-shouldered, had yellow hair, cropped moustache, huge arching eyebrows, a diminutive mouth that folded itself into a geometrically acceptable smile and a high-strung temperament. His coarse moustache and fat nose, would twitch tensely every time it was my turn to speak. Behind us, forming part of an incomprehensible mass of a barely audible group of Welch tourists sat a hunchbacked, bearded man, wearing leather gloves and a travelling cap, known to be a lover of music (that's what the fat lady with an oversized mole on her chin was telling everyone in a hushed tone). "You are quite an enigma, sir." My mysterious no name speaker repositioned his spindly legs, inserted his right hand into trouser pocket letting the divergent coat flaps reveal the watch chain across the waistcoat and said with a businesslike tone, "Now, then," and, with a glance at the restless fingers of his companion, began to speak in a quiet, yet firm tone. "Why do you follow us around? You don't work for any newspaper of renown. You write articles that make our members uncomfortable. Several congressmen in America and members of Parliament in Canada were forced to cancel their presence at our annual meeting when you named them as invited guests." "You can't win," hissed the second fiddle. "Bilderberg Group, Mr. Estulin, is a private forum where off-the-record friendly discussion takes place amongst influential members of the business community. Politicians are invited to share their personal and professional experiences with the group. All this is done with the hope that
[cia-drugs] UK, US modified weather to cause Zimbabwe droughts -report
UK, US modified weather to cause Zimbabwe droughts -reportby STAFFEDITORS (6/28/2005) The Herald, a state-run newspaper in Zimbabwe has suggested the UK and US are to blame for droughts in southern Africa. The Herald said climate change has been artificially induced "in a bid to arm-twist the region to capitulate to the whims of the world's superpowers". It said weather was being manipulated for political gain using unspecified "unconventional" chemical weapons. The Herald iswidely seen as a mouthpiece for President Robert Mugabe's government, correspondents say. It said recent droughts, which defied predictions by the Zimbabwean government and the Southern African Development Community's Drought Monitoring Centre, pointed to the possibility of the weather beingmodified for political purposes. "The overt and covert machinations by Zimbabwe's former colonial ruler Britain, which has declared its intentions to effect illegal regime change in Harare, have given credence to the conspiracy theory," the paper said. It said that the US Famine Early Warning System had predicted famine in Zimbabwe six months before it occurred. "The prediction, which was the exact opposite of other forecasts, seems to confirm that the conspiracy to remove the Zimbabwean government has gone chemical." The Herald further states that "On June 14 last year, British Prime Minister, Tony Blair openly admitted that his Labour government and its western allies are; "working closely with the MDC (Movement for Democratic Change) on measures to put pressure for change on the (President) Mugabe regime, because there is no salvation for the people of Zimbabwe until that regime is changed". The MDC leader Mr Morgan Tsvangirai is said to have mentionedon severaloccasions thatthe people of Zimbabwe would starve because they allowed the Zimbabwe Government to implement its land reform programme. "Mati mune nzara? Murikushaya chikafu? Muchashayisisa chaizvo chaizvo! (You say you are starving, you do not have food, you are really going to be without food) Mugabe akakupromisayi bumper harvest asi acha-harvester drought. (President) Mugabe is promising a bumper harvest but you will only harvest drought)." This predication is said to be a confirmationthat the conspiracy to remove the Zimbabwean Government has gone chemical Zimbabwe is currently facing a food crisis and the country urgently needs to import 1.2 million tonnes of food to avoid famine. Correspondents say the crisis is complex with erratic rains, disastrous economic policies, land reform and the spread of HIV/Aids all playing a part Source: BBC News , Harare Herald http://www.zimobserver.com/newsdetail.asp?article_id=1169 Complete archives at http://www.sitbot.net/ Please let us stay on topic and be civil. OM YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "cia-drugs" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
[cia-drugs] Did Mitterrand OK attack on Greenpeace ship?
Did Mitterrand OK attack on Greenpeace ship? July 09 2005 at 03:31PM Paris - The man who was in charge of France's DGSE intelligence service when agents blew up a Greenpeace ship in New Zealand, killing a crew member, says that then president Francois Mitterrand gave the go-ahead for the attack, the Le Monde newspaper said on Saturday.Twenty years after the bombing of the Rainbow Warrior, which sank in Auckland harbour as it was due to investigate French nuclear weapons tests in the South Pacific, Le Monde published extracts of a 23-page document written by DGSE chief Admiral Pierre Lacoste the following year.The document by Lacoste, who was sacked over the affair, represents the first official confirmation of Mitterrand's involvement in what the then New Zealand prime minister David Lange described "a sordid act of international state-backed terrorism". The Rainbow Warrior was in Auckland to head a flotilla of protest boats to Mururoa Atoll in French Polynesia in an attempt to disrupt French nuclear testing, a source of discord between France on one hand and New Zealand, Australia and other Pacific nations on the other. 'Greenpeace want to make war with us, we are at war' In the document published by Le Monde, Lacoste describes a meeting with Mitterrand at 6pm on May 15, 1985, just under two months before the attack."I asked the president if he would authorise me to conduct the project of neutralisation that I had studied at the request of (defence minister Charles) Hernu. He gave me his consent while emphasising the importance he placed on the nuclear tests," wrote Lacoste, then head of the General Directorate for External Security (DGSE)."I then went into great detail on the project, the authorisation was sufficiently explicit".Earlier on May 6, 1985, Lacoste had met with defence minister Hernu to outline the plan to sabotage the Greenpeace ship."Far from being shocked by the idea of sabotage in the dock at Auckland", wrote the admiral "he made light of my reservations and encouraged me in that direction, repeating that it was an issue essential to defence policy"."They (Greenpeace) want to make war with us, we are at war, we mustn't have scruples on such vital subjects, I take full responsibility", the admiral quoted Hernu as saying.Greenpeace photographer Fernando Pereira drowned after going to his cabin between the two explosions which ripped open the hull of the Rainbow Warrior at the quayside in central Auckland.Two members of the 13-strong French secret service team which carried out the bombing, Dominique Prieur and Alain Mafart, were arrested by New Zealand police two days later as they returned their campervan to the rental company.By September that year France had been forced to admit its responsibility, defence minister Charles Hernu had resigned and Lacoste had been sacked.In November 1985, Mafart and Prieur pleaded guilty to manslaughter charges and were sentenced to 10 years in jail.French pressure to have the pair returned saw trade pressure applied to New Zealand, which relies heavily on agricultural exports to the European Union.Export shipments to France and its South Pacific territory of New Caledonia were held up or rejected.After UN mediation, a July 1986 agreement saw the agents released from jail in New Zealand for what was supposed to be three years exile on Hao atoll in French Polynesia.By the middle of 1988 both had been returned to France, a move which intensified New Zealand's bitterness towards the French government. http://www.iol.co.za/index.php?set_id=1click_id=24art_id=qw1120914541652E516 Complete archives at http://www.sitbot.net/ Please let us stay on topic and be civil. OM YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "cia-drugs" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
[cia-drugs] Nietzsche: A Precursor to Hitler?
Nietzsche: A Precursor to Hitler? - by Phillip D. Collins ©, July 12th, 2005 I recently took a college course in the history of philosophy. The instructor, who happens to be an extremely intelligent woman, was going to examine Foucault. I was eager to study Foucault and seized the opportunity. His Marxist proclivities aside, Foucault's views concerning the carceral system were certainly of merit and valuable to my research. Yet, there was another philosopher on the menu. In the halls of orthodox academia, his reputation precedes him. His name is Friedrich Nietzsche. I prepared myself for what was guaranteed to be yet another exercise in anti-Christian rhetoric. Enraptured by his vitriolic hatred for Christianity and enshrinement of moral anarchism, academia has consistently defended Friedrich Nietzsche as one of history's "misunderstood" philosophers. Cribbing from the standard litany of apologetics, many argue that Hitler somehow "misrepresented" or "distorted" Nietzsche's ideas. Is this genuinely the case? Of course, during their migration from abstraction to tangible enactment, ideas can become contaminated by any number of factors. To be sure, internal contention amongst adherents, the personal idiosyncrasies of individual analysts, and the manifestly unpredictable nature of reality itself makes an idea's journey towards tangible enactment very problematic. Yet, was Nietzscheism's journey toward tangible enactment so bastardized by Hitler that it was virtually unrecognizable? Was Nazism nothing like what Nietzsche had in the mind? Again, only an examination of the delicate segues between abstraction and tangible enactment can answer this question. In The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich, William Shirer recounts Hitler's frequent sojourns to the Nietzsche museum in Weimar (100). Commenting on Hitler's veneration for Nietzsche, Shirer writes: There was some ground for this appropriation of Nietzsche as one of the originators of the Nazi Weltanschauung. Had not the philosopher thundered against democracy and parliaments, preached the will to power, praised war and proclaimed the coming of the master race and the superman--and in the most telling aphorisms? (100) Indeed, the commonalities are numerous. Perhaps the most damning of these was Nietzsche's adoration for "the magnificent blonde brute, avidly rampant for spoil and victory" (Shirer 100). While Nietzsche also referred to the "masters" (i.e., noble men, rulers, etc.) as "blond beasts," this "blond brute" was something different. He was Nietzsche's superman, the Übermensch (Shirer 100). Of course, many apologists for Nietzsche argue that the criterion for defining the Übermensch was neither racial nor hereditary. However, Nietzsche frequently espoused eugenical concepts, suggesting that he did invest significant value in race and hereditary. For instance, consider the following social mandate set forth by Nietzsche: "Society as the trustee of life is responsible to life for every botched life that comes into existence; and as it has to atone for such lives, it ought consequently to make it impossible for them ever to see the light of day: it should in many cases actually prevent the act of procreation, and may, without any regard for rank, descent, or intellect, hold in readiness the most rigorous forms of compulsion and restriction, and, under certain circumstances, have recourse to castration ... 'Thou shalt do no murder,' is a piece of ingenuous puerility compared with 'Thou shalt not beget!!!' .. The [unhealthy] must at all costs be eliminated, lest the whole fall to pieces." (Quoted in Haller 53) Automatically, the astute reader will recognize the traditional themes of eugenics: Malthusian demands for the prohibition of procreation amongst certain populations and mandates for compulsory sterilization. Nietzsche's tirade is also replete with contradictions. He asserts that eugenical regimentation should be implemented with no regard for "rank, descent, or intellect." Simultaneously, he insists that there is an "unhealthy" population that "must at all costs be eliminated." Why must this population be eugenically expunged? Does Nietzsche fear that such "dysgenics" would interbreed with those of healthier stock? Remember, Nietzsche's remarks are made in conjunction with procreation, inferring that he believes in some connection between hereditary and the "unhealthy." Moreover, Nietzsche's bestowal of primacy upon the social "whole" betrays his collectivist proclivities. Hitler shared such propensities, as is evidenced by his virtual deification of the collective in Mein Kampf: "The sacrifice of personal existence is necessary to secure the preservation of the species" (no pagination). Sans the racialist emphasis of this statement, these words sound distinctly reminiscent of Marx's characteristic collectivism. This is no coincidence. In 1933,
[cia-drugs] The Smack Brigades - How Opium Lost the Afghan War
The Smack BrigadesHow Opium Lost the Afghan Warby Misha PozhininskySobaka ColumnistJune 8, 2005 Every few days the merchants come to our base with their big cart of junk. There had been feelings before that we shouldn't deal with them because over in Herat, one of our boys had been killed by an ambush when he was examining something in the cart and noticed a system of wire from the engine, painted the same color (or just covered in dust) as the rest of the vehicle. He backed away but it was too late, they saw him, and the whole thing was packed with dynamite and other explosives and they blew it up. It went up in flames, but the bullets in the cart kept the guys jumping around. That was a favorite tactic, cunning, of the dushmani, the Afghan mujahedin. There were also ideological problems with this "free market" buying from merchants. We in the "Limited Contingent of Soviet Forces" as someone got it in his head to call us, were there to bring the people to power and then kill the ones in the way of Afghanistan's Socialism. But no one reported this behavior, because the officers were big players in the "free market," with the merchants at the bases and some others. Most of the soldiers also had to do something with the free market if we wanted to survive. When I arrived in Afghanistan, I took care of my equipment as I was trained to do at the academy. It was after my first week that I noticed these pieces of string that were hanging from my boots. I repaired them as I was able to with strong thread from a torn uniform collar. The other soldiers from 40th Army Air who had been at Bagram longer laughed and pointed at their feet. Russia's boots defeated the Nazis 40 years before. Soviet troops were now wearing "sneakers." They held up better on the rocks and you could run in them without carrying the weight of iron on your legs. I got a pair of these myself. They were made by the Chinese and after some problems the merchants got a connection that would supply them. I remember once that some journalists from Poland were in Bagram, but one of the commanders told them to only aim their cameras from our waists to our faces, because they did not want others to know that the soldiers of the USSR were in shoes that joggers would wear. TRADING WITH THE ENEMY That was the start of the merchants. Now we would be bothered and annoyed by them all the time. The Hospital for Infectious Diseases was at Bagram also, and they were able to obtain some medicines from the merchants. It was sometimes easier to get them from nomads in the black market than to wait for supplies to come from home. The things that they would buy from the Afghans were ours anyway but the civilian needs - gifts of the "fraternal" Foreign Ministry - were met sooner than our needs were. Later there would be many things we would need. You would hope that new trousers were in the cargo coming in, but it was only the vodka or expensive food for the commissary system of the officers. We didn't make much money. And also, those merchants could be heartless. They could not understand that we could have the helicopters of the wing refueled for daily reconnaissance or attacks on dushman bases, but still lack for anything. So when they had something we would need, they wanted to be paid on the spot. Soldiers who need something don't look far for something else of value that they can trade. This was how the mujahedin got their weapons and ammunition, I think, at least a lot of it. In Afghanistan there were no weapons factories. Every bullet of the millions that we shot at each other was brought into that country from outside. We had our own ammunition, of course, but they could not live from booty raids on us or the limited supply of the weaponry the US supplied to them (this was bought by the United States from Egypt. Our spies traced captured weapons to prove this.) Like in Chechnya from 1994-96 and also today, many of the bullets which killed our soldiers were given to the Afghans by ourselves. In Chechnya the big sales of weapons and supplies and counter-sales of drugs are committed by the officers. I didn't see these big sales in Afghanistan. It was hard to conceal "wealth" in those days because you could not purchase a vehicle or land with money, or at all, because they were allocated through the party. There was a great corruption system, so maybe that did happen. The later years, when things became very bad, were when the drug trade routes were created. They say that the Russians intervening in the Tajik civil war in 1993 was to keep those trade routes intact. The Afghan dushmani and the Chechens taunt us with these facts, that their weapons come from their enemies and are usually not captured but purchased or traded. It is good propaganda because it kills a fighting instinct when you know your men are against you and helping your enemy through his own weaknesses, and
[cia-drugs] Behind the Presidency
Behind the Presidencyby Thomas R. EddlemJuly 25, 2005 Admire him or despise him, George W. Bush is essentially a figurehead for the tightly knit Establishment oligarchy that actually runs the Executive Branch of our government. When a tiny, single-engine Cessna 150 aircraft wafted into restricted Washington, D.C., airspace on May 11, the federal government went to a terrorism threat advisory level of red alert, and the nation's capitol was evacuated. As it happened, the airplane had simply been off course during a trip from Pennsylvania to an air show in North Carolina. But the fallout from the incident revealed volumes about how the executive branch of the federal government is run during a crisis. Perhaps most revealing of all was the exchange between the White House Press Corps and White House Press Spokesman Scott McClellan the next day. "Scott, yesterday the White House was on red alert, was evacuated," noted a reporter. "The First Lady and Nancy Reagan were taken to a secure location. The vice president was evacuated from the grounds. The Capitol building was evacuated. The continuity of government plan was initiated. And yet, the president wasn't told of yesterday's events until after he finished his bike ride, about 36 minutes after the all-clear had been sent. Is he satisfied with the fact that he wasn't notified about this?" "Yes the protocols that we put in place after September 11th were being followed," replied McClellan. "They did not require presidential authority for this situation." If George Bush is not even informed of a national red alert terrorism emergency when the Capitol is evacuated and his own wife is moved to a bomb shelter, then he is clearly not in charge at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue. This is not the first time that Mr. Bush has proven himself to be peripheral in a crisis situation. As captured on videotape at the time, Mr. Bush's initial reaction to being informed of the 9/11 attacks was to sit immobilized for as much as nine minutes while the children's book My Pet Goat was read to a classroom of second graders. Granted, one predictable human response to such a crisis would be a momentarily paralyzing sense of shock. Yet none of the president's staffers saw fit to jog his elbow or otherwise snap him out of his lengthy reverie, which would be the expected course of action if "presidential authority" were really required to deal with an unfolding terrorist attack. All of this raises a serious question: if George W. Bush is not running the federal government during times of crisis, who is? Cheney in Charge According to White House spokesman Scott McClellan, one of the key administration leaders in charge at the Oval Office during the May 11 red alert was Vice President Dick Cheney. According to the 9/11 Commission Report, while a stunned and distracted President Bush was contemplating a pet goat during the 9/11 crisis, Cheney issued a shoot-down order for airplanes in Washington, D.C., airspace and appeared to be in charge. The vice president is clearly the dominant personality in the Bush-Cheney team and is plainly the most important member of an informal committee that runs the executive branch of the U.S. government. "The inner circles of the U.S. national security community members of the National Security Council (NSC), a select number of their deputies, and a few close advisors to the president represent what is probably the most powerful committee in the history of the world, one with more resources, more power, more license to act, and more ability to project force further and swifter than any other convened by king, emperor, or president," wrote David J. Rothkopf of the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace in the March/April issue of Foreign Policy magazine. That committee, as described by Rothkopf, is headed by a triumvirate composed of Vice President Cheney, Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld (who had been Cheney's superior 30 years prior during the Ford administration), and Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice. The triumvirs, like many of their associates and subordinates, are or have been members of the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR). It is Cheney whom Rothkopf identifies as "the power behind the throne." "Cheney has the largest national security staff of any vice president in U.S. history one larger than President John F. Kennedy's entire NSC staff at one time," he observes. "He also has a network of close associates that extends throughout the government and who report to him or to Lewis 'Scooter' Libby, his chief of staff." Most of the details of Cheney's realm including the precise number of staffers who report to him are unknown, since the vice president's office is exempt from the Freedom of Information Act. Richard Haass, president of the Council on Foreign Relations and a veteran of both Bush administrations, explains that Cheney has "three bites at the apple. He
[cia-drugs] British Financial Warfare: How the City of London Created the Great Depression
BRITISH FINANCIAL WARFARE: 1929; 1931- 33 HOW THE CITY OF LONDON CREATED THE GREAT DEPRESSION by Webster G. TarpleyDecember, 1996 The thesis of this paper is that the great economic and financial cataclysm of the first half of the twentieth century, which we have come to know as the Great Depression, was caused by the Bank of England, the British government, and the City of London. The potential for the Great Depression derived from the economic and human destruction wrought by World War I, which was itself a product of British geopolitics and especially of the British policy, exemplified by King Edward VII, of creating an encircling anti-German alliance in order to wage war. The economic destruction of Europe was continued after 1918 by the Peace of Paris (Versailles, St. Germain, Trianon, Neuilly, Sevres) imposed by the Allies on the defeated Central Powers. Especially important here were the 55 billion gold dollars in reparations inflicted on defeated Germany, along with the war debt burden of the supposedly victorious powers themselves. Never during the 1920's did world trade surpass the levels of 1913. Reparations and war debt were a recipe for economic stagnation. Excerpted fromAGAINST OLIGARCHYEssays speeches1970-1996byWebster G. Tarpley http://www.tarpley.net/29crash.htm ~~~ George Bush:The Unauthorized Biography http://www.tarpley.net/bushb.htm ~~~ 9/11 Synthetic Terror Who done it and how - the 9/11 subterfuge exposed by Webster Tarpley in his 9/11 Synthetic Terror: Made in USA. An expert on covert operations and intrigues, Tarpley has the background as an historian and analyst to nail down the monster 9/11 plot (already in 1978 he had exposed the "Red Brigades" as stooges of the secret right-wing P2 lodge.) He has wowed audiences at the 9/11 inquiry conferences and on talk radio with his model of a network of moles, patsies, paramilitary pros and corrupt corporate media. Tarpley answers the "unanswered questions of 9/11" and the non (sen)sequiturs of the government's conspiracy theory, showing how this kind of inside job actually works. He puts 9/11 in its real context of great power conflict and the ruling oligarchy. Brilliant writing on 480 packed pages http://www.waronfreedom.org/index.html#synth http://www.waronfreedomorg/newrels.html Complete archives at http://www.sitbot.net/ Please let us stay on topic and be civil. OM YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "cia-drugs" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
[cia-drugs] Fatalities in Sichuan Linked to H5N1 Bird Flu Migration? / Death Toll From Mysterious Illness Jumps to 31 In Sichuan China
Fatalities in Sichuan Linked to H5N1 Bird Flu Migration?Recombinomics CommentaryJuly 24, 2005The Chinese news Web site Sina.com reported Saturday the people infected had symptoms like fever, lack of energy, vomiting, bleeding from blood vessels beneath the skin, and shock.Animal viruses are also being scrutinized because of bird flu fears.The above comments are from an AP story on the mysterious deaths of farmers in several villages near Ziyang in Sichuan province southeast of Chengdu. The wire report describes 20 patients with symptoms. Nine have died and 6 more are in critical condition. Only one patient ahs been discharged. The patients had been admitted between June 24 and July 21, so the delay in a diagnosis is cause for concern. Earlier reports also describe patients as being dizzy which lead to coma in some cases. These descriptions sound similar to a t least one death in Thailand after slaughtering a wild boar in May. There was no diagnosis in that cluster of cases either.The proximity of both sets of cases to H5N1 outbreaks is cause for heightened concern. The 1918 pandemic had many mis-diagnosed cases, including those with neurological complications. H5N1 has been shown to be neurotropic in the lab, and variants with the PB2 polymorphism E627K have been isolated from mouse brains from isolates in Hong Kong as well as duck meat imported to Japan from Shandiong.The E627K polymorphism is found in all human influenza A isolates, but is rarely detected in avian influenza. However, all H5N1 isolates from Qinghai Lake had E627K, signally possible neurological complications in humans infected with H5N1 with this polymorphisms. The polymorphism has been found in H5N1 isolates infected in 1997 in Hong Kong as well as 2004 in Vietnam and Thailand. Most of the isolates from tigers at the Sri Racha tiger zoo also had the change and the tigers had neurological symptoms before they died. Many H5N1 isolates from swine also have the E627K polymorphism.Ziyang is just southeast of Chengdu which is about 400 miles southeast of Qinghai Lake. Some boxun reports have indicated bird flu is widespread in Qinghai province which is adjacent to Sichuan Province. Hong Kong radio reports indicate villagers in Sichuan say the deaths are being under-reprted. Boxun reports have also indicated China has isolated 10 distinct H5N1 variants and most can infect humans.The sequence of H5N1 from Qingahi has been released and analysis indicates that several of the H5N1 polymorphisms that had previously been found only in isolates from Vietnam and Thailand are also in the isolates from Qinghai. Qinghai isolates have also acquired other polymorphisms normally found in mammalian isolates, such as the E627K polymorphism described above. The Qingahi isolates also has polymorhisms commonly found in migratory birds including polymorphisms linked to European isolates. Similar European polymorphisms have been found in isolates form Primorie and Chany Lake reserves in Russia, where over 500 bird have died recently.As birds at Qingahi Lake and nature reserves in Russia begin to migrate to the south, west, and east, there is concern that such a migration might lead to a catastrophic spread of H5N1. Human deaths in the adjacent province of Sichuan may indicate that such spread has already begun. http://www.recombinomics.com/News/07240501/H5N1_Sichuan_Spread.html ~~~ Death Toll From Mysterious Illness Jumps to 31 In Sichuan ChinaRecombinomics CommentaryJuly 25, 20051st, arises 58 examples, died 17 examples In fact isolates 219 people, inspects 113 people, arises 67 people, #30097;#20284; 23 people, confirmed 12 people, died 31 people, 17 examples die of the hospital, 14 examples died strangely of the locality, the local data turned the on-line data. (Abundant news boxun.com)The machine translation of a recent boxun report indicates the human death toll in Sichuan province associated with Ebola-like symptoms is 31. Other reports from China indicate several pigs are dying daily, as are other livestock. The area has been quarantined and reporters are told of a swine bacterial infection. However, the high case fatality rate in humans has not been previously described for the swine bacterial infection.Boxun reports indicate that the etiological agent is a strain of Ebola identified in Shenzen province in April. It has been designated EB-SZ77. Ebola that can infect poultry, pigs, and humans is cause for concern because of circulation H5N1 bird flu which can infect all three species. The Ebola env gene has a short region of homology with H5 in H5N1, raising concerns of additional recombination.http://www.recombinomics.com/News/07250503/H5N1_Sichuan_Toll_31.html http://www.recombinomics.com/whats_new.html ~~~ press, pestilence and Pollard http://ncfocus.blogspot.com/2005/06/press-pestilence-and-pollard.html ~~~ Metablogging the pandemic
[cia-drugs] Tales of Teele: Sleaze Stories
Tales of Teele: Sleaze StoriesMale prostitutes and multiple mistresses, drug money in Gucci shopping bags, bribery and extortion conspiracies. And you thought you'd heard it all about Art Teele. Art Teele is a man of very big appetites, and because of them he is now in very big trouble. As the investigative report below indicates, the once-powerful politician is possessed of a seemingly insatiable craving for all things illicit -- adulterous sex, illegal drugs, bribery and extortion. http://www.miaminewtimes.com/art/media/2005-07-28/1.jpg http://www.miaminewtimes.com/Issues/2005-07-28/news/feature_print.html ~~~ Former Miami city commissioner Arthur Teele, Jr., the subject of this week's Miami New Times feature "Tales of Teele: Sleaze Stories," killed himself in the lobby of the Miami Herald this past Wednesday. Teele, a fixture for years in city and county politics recently indicted on corruption charges, was revealed through police surveillance reports to lead a bizarre secret life. The following are stories the New Times has published about Teele over the past decade. Commissioner Who?After an exhaustive search that lasted roughly five minutes, Miami's city fathers found just the man to replace Art TeeleBy Rebecca Wakefield The Teele ConspiracyIs the Miami commissioner the target of a wicked plot? Or is he spinning a yarn so complex everyone's now dizzy?By Francisco Alvarado | Kirk Nielsen | Rebecca Wakefield Crime and Water BalloonsHave Miami city commissioners lost their (illegal) marbles?By Tristram Korten When You Strike at a King You Must Kill HimMiami Commissioner Art Teele survived an attempted coup d'etat. Now it's payback time.By Rebecca Wakefield Teele's (Or)DealA nightmarish chapter in the annals of Miami government ends. Or does it?By Kirk Nielsen Teele's DealMiami Commissioner Art Teele needed a house fast. What he got was a controversy.Robert Andrew Powell Teele, Toil, and TroubleBy Jim DeFede The Teele DealBy Jim DeFede Secrets and SunshineOne thing is clear: Some county commissioners broke the law last December. Another thing isn't so clear: Will they ever be punished?By Jim DeFede From The Back of the Bus to the Driver's SeatMiami's black community finally gets an honest shot at the county commission, and the scramble among candidates is onBy Kirk Semple Complete archives at http://www.sitbot.net/ Please let us stay on topic and be civil. OM YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "cia-drugs" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
[cia-drugs] FBI Confiscates Personal Property Of Former U.S. Army Corporal Who Blew Whistle On 1976 Government funded Perfect Terrorist Plan To Topple Twin Towers
FBI Confiscates Personal Property Of Former U.S. Army Corporal Who Blew Whistle On 1976 Government funded "Perfect Terrorist Plan" To Topple Twin Towers Timothy McNiven says he has been harassed by the FBI and now had DOD card taken without a warrant ever since trying to alert the American people about the government's prior knowledge of 9/11. July 31, 2005 By Greg Szymanski A former U.S. Army corporal who blew the whistle on a 1976 government funded study to topple the Twin Towers using jetliners, Arab terrorists and box cutters on July 6 had four FBI agents threaten to "tear his apartment apart" if he didn't turn over his legally obtained Department of Defense ID card. Timothy McNiven, who said he was threatened and harassed by agents in the hallway outside his Bellingham, WA., apartment, claims to be a part of a military unit stationed in Strasbourg, Germany, during the 1970s, assigned the task to brainstorm "the perfect terrorist plan" and what turned out to be the exact same scenario that took place at the WTC on 9/11. McNiven said his military unit's 9/11-like assignment, lasting over six months and funded by Congress under the guise of airline safety preparedness, proves the government had "plenty of foreknowledge" about possible airline attacks at the WTC. He even suggested what seemed like a harmless military airline safety study may have been used later to perfect a way to bring down the WTC in order to create another Pearl Harbor like event to facilitate a world wide climate of war. And since 9/11, McNiven has tried in every way possible to alert the American people about his unit's mock military assignment, creating even more suspicion of the government's hand in 9/11, by first creating a web site and then telling his story in March to The American Free Press and The Arctic Beacon news web cast. McNiven's accusations about the hidden purpose behind the Congressional study are also included in a signed affidavit as part of a 9/11 related federal conspiracy (RICO) lawsuit filed against President Bush and others in 2004 by Philadelphia attorney Phil Berg. The publicized version of the study, commissioned by Congress, was to identify security lapses and submit corrective measures to lawmakers," said McNiven. "However, the real purpose of the study was to brainstorm how to pull off a terrorist attack using the exact same 9/11 scenario." To back up his story, he passed a credible lie detector test, the same type of credible test taken by Daniel Ellsberg and other famous whistle blowers as well as providing many names of the men his unit who also participated in the mock WTC assignment. McNiven claims, however, since going public and being a part of the law suit, his efforts have been met with government indifference, outright harassment and constant FBI monitoring, the July 6 FBI visit to his Bellingham home another example. "Our commanding officer back in 1976, Lt. Michael Teague, gave our unit of about 100 a direct order and assignment to brainstorm how to bring down the Twin Towers using jetliners and even box cutters," said McNiven this week from his apartment in Bellingham about the study commissioned to C-Battery 2/81st Field Artillery, U.S. Army, stationed in Strasbourg, Germany. "I remember Lt. Teague changed the scenario from a 100 story building to the Twin Tower, acting on specific orders from unknown superiors. He then said it was very strange to be asked to devise a plan to blow up your own home town as he was from New York. "But as I watched the Twin Towers really collapse on the morning of September 11th, I realized I was watching the very same thing we devised in the 1976. McNiven recalls at first Lt. Teague demanded strict silence regarding the assignment, but later took him aside, giving him a direct order to "never stop alerting the American people" about the government's obvious hand in working on a plan to bring down the Twin if it ever really happened. "I still feel I am under this direct order and have no intention of disobeying it," said McNiven, adding he still feels his active military duty has not ended due to 9/11. Regarding the FBI visit to McNiven's home on July 6, a spokesperson from the Bellingham, WA., office confirmed agent Lance Boyer and three others confiscated McNiven's DOD card outside his apartment on the date mentioned, but refused to comment further about the nature, legality or purpose for taking his personal property. The FBI spokesperson added that his property was taken without a proper warrant, McNiven claiming he only gave it up after being "threatened and harassed" by the four agents in the hallway outside his apartment. "Agents did go to Mr. McNiven's home and did take his ID card, but that's all we can say right now," said the Bellingham FBI spokesman several hours after the incident occurred. Although the FBI refused to elaborate, McNiven said he has
[cia-drugs] 1948 Nation Report Explodes Palestine Liberation Myth
Palestinian Arab leaders derive legitimacy from the accepted view that in 1948 their predecessors fought a National Liberation war against British-backed Jewish colonists. A 1948 Nation magazine study proves the opposite happened.* The British Record on Partition *Reprinted from The Nation magazine, May 8, 1948Comments by Jared Israel, Emperor's Clothes[Posted 26 July 2005]Eye-opening Memorandum1948 Report to the UN Explodes the PLO's Myth of National Liberationby Jared IsraelEmperor's Clothes here makes available, for the first time on the internet, the Nation's 1948 UN Memorandum on British instigation of anti-Jewish terror. The memorandum is posted in full, in text form, following Jared Israel's comments below, and also as a PDF file, scanned from the original, at http://emperor.vwh.net/history/pdf.htmTaught to use the language of National Liberation politics at Soviet bloc schools in the 1960s, '70s and '80s, today's Palestinian Arab leaders employ the rhetoric of Third World anti-colonial struggle. This has given us the spectacle of Cuba, which was the passion of leftist intellectuals in the 1960s and '70s, teaching Arabs to blow up Israeli Kibbutzim, which were the passion of leftist intellectuals in the 1950s.The 1948 Arab-Israeli war plays a key part in the Arab National Liberation tale. The Israeli victory in that war is presented as the defining event, the nakba or catastrophe. In order to claim that the PLO and Fatah are fighting for National Liberation in 2005, their promoters argue that British imperialism, using Jewish proxies, crushed Palestinian Liberation in 1948. The corollary: if the Jews will just grant Arabs the National Liberation they were denied in '48, Arab leaders will deliver on peace with Israel.Of course, if this story is false, if in 1948 the Arab armies fought for genocide, not National Liberation, and if it was not the Jews but Arab leaders who were agents of imperial Britain, then it certainly suggests that their proteges are not fighting for National Liberation today.Below is our text transcription of The Nation magazine's 1948 memorandum on Britain's role in the Arab attempt to kill Israel in the cradle. Based on British intelligence documents and written for the United Nations, the memorandum is significant today because it contradicts widely held views about the origins of the Arab-Israeli conflict, including those put forward in today's Nation magazine.Just for starters, the memorandum proves the falsity of the common perception that the creation of Israel was a project of Western colonialism. The Nation shows that during the half year prior to the all-out Arab invasion on 15 May, Britain incited, micro-managed and did public relations work for a campaign of Arab troop infiltration and terror. And this at a time when Britain was responsible for security in its Palestine Mandate territory.The intelligence documents cited below show that before the 15 May invasion, British intelligence knew that the Arabs terrorizing the future Israel were being led in part by Nazi advisers. These included Bosnian Muslims from the infamous Handzar Division of the Waffen SS. According to a French intelligence document published by The Nation seven months later, the British sent thousands of Nazi prisoners of war, including top war criminals, to assist the Arab attack. This was after the Arab invasion. [1]Consistent with British tolerance for and apparent employment of Nazi war criminals against new-born Israel, the Nation memorandum shows that the British adopted a propaganda line reminiscent of the Nazis' "Jewish-Bolshevik plot" motif. The British accused Jewish Holocaust survivors trying to get to Palestine of being Soviet Communist infiltrators. A 1948 article in the London Times shows that Arab leaders were saying the same thing:[Text of London Times article starts here . To view scanned image of article, go to http://emperor.vwh.net/history/ltmay748.htm ]"Zionist Danger to Lebanon"From our CorrespondentBeirut, May 7M. Chamoun, Minister for Home Affairs and Health, addressing a Press conference to-day, emphasized the Zionist danger to Lebanon if the Jews succeeded in forming a Jewish Stated intended, he said, to include Lebanon, Syria, and Transjorand at a later date.He revealed that the Foreign Ministers of the Arab League decided on April 26 to invade Palestine, but he blamed the Arab States for their military unpreparedness and the Palestinians for the lack of organization. The Arabns he added, were now defending the world against Communism, which was being introduced to the Middle East under the cover of Zionism.London Times, 8 May 1948[Text of London Times article ends here.]An Emperor's Clothes researcher found the Nation memorandum, "The British Record on Partition," in a bound volume of The Nation for 1948, while researching the Israeli War of
[cia-drugs] The Bank for International Settlements Calls for Global Currency [Veon]
THE BANK FOR INTERNATIONAL SETTLEMENTS CALLS FOR GLOBAL CURRENCY The BIS is at the apex of the global financial system. It was birthed in 1944 when the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank were set up By Joan VeonAugust 3, 2005 Basel, Switzerland -- The Bank for International Settlements (BIS) released their 75th Annual Report on June 27 to commemorate its founding in 1930. Most countries today have a central bank which is a private corporation that handles its monetary system. Bi-monthly, central bank ministers from 40 countries meet at the BIS to review ways to promote the co-operation of central banks and to provide additional facilities for international financial operations. Once a year the worlds central bankers meet in Basel to take a closer look at the status of the worlds central banking system. Besides the annual review, this years Report considered the need for new mechanisms to keep the financial system more in balance. The BIS report highlighted the uneven global expansion that they see. While world output expanded by 5% in 2004, the highest rate in nearly thirty years, they said its growth showed a new uneven economic expansion. Although the United States is an engine of growth, they noted the key Asian economies as being at the second pole of global dynamism, while slower growth can be seen in other larger advanced economies. The U.S. and China accounted for nearly 50% of the worlds increase in global output with the global economy growing at 4% in 2005, in spite of oil prices which are projected to remain high for a prolonged period of time. The BIS is at the apex of the global financial system. It was birthed in 1944 when the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank were set up. Should we dare to mention that its founders were Harry Dexter White who worked in the Treasury Department and who was a communist spy along with John Maynard Keynes, a Fabian socialist? Keynesian economics is at the heart of the reason for all levels of government being broke. In 1971, President Richard M. Nixon took the dollar off the gold standard, which forced all the other countries of the world to follow suit, thus changing the global monetary system from one of fixed currencies to one of floating currencies. When a currency is no longer backed by gold it is then possible to play all kinds of games with its value. By buying or selling a large quantity of one particular currency, an economically powerful individual or bank can literally move the market in their favor by buying low and selling high. The new patterns of booms and busts which the BIS refer to are not only man-made, as a result of the floating currency, but the highs and lows have been exacerbated by the fact that the barriers between the nation-states are gone. The ability to buy and sell currency on a global basis was seen in the Asian Crisis. For the countrys that refused to open their markets to the World Trade Financial Services Agreement, their currencies were crashed. Furthermore, the highs and lows of a countrys stock market is a result of the respective central bank buying and selling that countrys treasury bills. For example, when the Federal Reserve adds money to our banking system, interest rates drop and the stock market rises. Since the NASDAQ crash, interest rates in the U.S. have fallen to 45 year lows, stimulating both the prices of real estate to historic highs and the stock market. The BIS Annual Report cited three such cycles of highs and lows. The first began in the 1970s when the dollar was taken off the gold standard. Mr. White said that the change in the gold standard with very important in world affairs. The second cycle began in the mid-1980s, ending in a property bust; and the current cycle began in the mid-1990s. All Americans should be concerned about this report for the worlds bankers are signaling the end of the third cycle which can only end with higher interest rates as money is taken out of the market. Will we have another property bust as seen in the mid-1980s or will we have a repeat of the Nasdaq? Interestingly enough, the BIS cites household debt being at historic highs. In a way they created it. Of course buyers would seize the opportunity to trade up their home for a bigger one since they can afford more because of lower interest rates. As a result, Spain, the U.K., France, the U.S. and the Nordic countries have had huge increases in property values with household debt-to-income ratios at unprecedented highs. Furthermore, household saving is not evident in the U.S. to the same extent that it is in the Asian countries. World national savings rose to 25% of Gross Domestic Product or about 1% point more than the annual average for the current decade. This was due to higher savings habits in the developed world and in particular, China, where savings rose to 48%. High debt-to-income ratios and low
[cia-drugs] Without Africa's Poverty, Global Taxation is Not Possible [Veon]
WITHOUT AFRICA'S POVERTY, GLOBAL TAXATION IS NOT POSSIBLE At every turn, it is public-private partnership, the selling off of government owned resources, or privatizing through partnering with business. By Joan VeonJuly 30, 2005 The focus for the last seven years, since the last G8 in England, has been aid for Africa. In 1998, the churches organized the Jubilee Debt Relief Campaign. The terminology used was to remind world leaders of the Biblical Year of Jubilee recorded in the Old Testament where the debts of debtors were forgiven. I remember going to one of the non-governmental organizations-NGOs workshop on global tax. There I interviewed a key leader who told me that with the huge flows possible that it would be more than enough for the UN and Africa! Then in 2000, the United Nations held the Millennium Summit in which they set forth their goals for the 3rd Millennium. These goals will cost the world $50B a year which will escalate to $126B by 2015 when the UN is suppose to have reduced poverty, hunger and HIV/AIDS by 50%, and provide basic education and clean drinking water to the whole world. Seven years later, both debt forgiveness and the concept of global taxation have come full circle. This is it. This is where the rubber meets the road. Over the last ten years, the idea of global taxation has gone through a number of revisions. Last year, French President Jacques Chirac put the idea of global tax on the leaders agenda. At that time he proposed a tax for the poor and said he would make concrete proposals after a major study was completed. This year he has called his international tax scheme an International Solidarity Levy. The levy would be a tax on airline tickets. Countries in favor include Brazil, China, and Germany. This would be easy to set up as there are no international treaties which prohibit the creation of a flat tax on airline tickets since a number of airlines already have various types of taxes on airline tickets for airport renovation and the like. The rate would be personalized according to the level of a countrys willingness with airlines collecting the revenues and passing them on to the respective government to supplement their foreign aid funds. So why has Africa perpetually poor? There are a number of reasons, but we can go back to World Bank loans that were forced on a number of African countries during the 1970s. Under World Bank President Robert McNamara, who served as president from 1969 to 1981, World Bank economists forced their way into African countries in order to come up with a financial plan for their development. Their plans were so secret that not even the president of that country was privy to what the plan called for. He was pressured into taking huge World Bank loans to carry out these grandiose projects which were suppose to bring the country enough income to repay the loans. Unfortunately most of these projects became White Elephant projects, leaving these countries with huge indebtness. These are the Highly Indebted Poor Countries which you and I are being asked to bail out with increased foreign aid, debt forgiveness, and/or international taxation. So how much does Africa owe the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund? According to John Hilary from War on Want, about $532B is owed by the 60 Highly Indebted Poor Countries. Currently only 18 countries have qualified for debt forgiveness as a result of meeting World Bank conditions. The amount of debt forgiveness is $40B but the debt servicing of the remaining $492B owed is $45B a year. Hence the reason for global tax. The World Bank requires countries to take specific steps in order to qualify for debt forgiveness which include: changing their structure of government to be more accountable, make all financial figures public, privatize their energy sector, water, electricity, etc. and set up regional government structures. At every turn, it is public-private partnership, the selling off of government owned resources, or privatizing through partnering with business. This is seen in President Clintons New Partnership for African Development-NEPAD. President Bush has set up his own initiative, the Millennium Challenge Corporation-MCC, a U.S. government corporation, to administer funds. An informational brochure handed out at the G8 described it as an innovative new foreign assistance program designed to eliminate extreme poverty and promote sustainable economic growth. The purpose of which is to set up public-private partnerships where governments end up transferring assets into this new partnership to be run by the corporations. As expected, there are steps that countries need to take in order to be eligible, just like the World Bank qualifications. For example, the MCC Board approved a Compact with Cape Verde for approximately $110M. The Compact will support their efforts in achieving its overall
[cia-drugs] Tarpley Index
VENICE V1. The Venetian Conspiracy Address delivered to the ICLC Conference near Wiesbaden, Germany, Easter Sunday, 1981; (appeared in Campaigner, September, 1981) V2. The Role of the Venetian Oligarchy in Reformation, Counter-reformation, Enlightenment, and the Thirty Years' War ICLC Conference, 6 September 1992; (appeared in New Federalist, April, 1993) V4. How the Dead Souls of Venice Corrupted Science ICLC Conference, September, 1994 V5. Venice's War Against Western Civilization Appeared in Fidelio, Summer 1995 V6. The War of the League of Cambrai, Paolo Sarpi and John Locke From ICLC Conference panel titled: "The Axioms of the American System," Feb. 18, 1996; (appeared in New Federalist, March 18, 1996) THE BRITISH B1. How the Venetian System Was Transplanted Into England New Federalist, June 3, 1996 B3. The British Empire Bid for Undisputed World Domination, 1850-1870 Schiller Institute Food For Peace Conference, Chicago, February 22-23, 1992 B4. Lord Palmerston's Multicultural Human Zoo ICLC Conference, February 20, 1994 B5. King Edward VII of Great Britain: Evil Demiurge of the Triple Entente and World War 1 ICLC Conference, February, 1995 Return to ABJ Press Home Page or to Webster G. Tarpley Home Page. * * * http://www.abjpress.com/tarpindx.html Complete archives at http://www.sitbot.net/ Please let us stay on topic and be civil. OM SPONSORED LINKS United state patent United state army United state flag United state navy flag United states patent office Central intelligence agency YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "cia-drugs" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
[cia-drugs] A credible plan to take down the Internet - Ciscogate
A credible plan to take down the Internet By Robert VamosiSenior editor, CNET ReviewsAugust 5, 2005 Forget the Fantastic Four. As I write, the forces of Good (the White Hats) and Evil (the Black Hats) are fighting for control of the Internet as we know it. At stake is the exploitation of flaws affecting the once-invincible Cisco router hardware, which currently carries most of the Internet's traffic on a daily basis. Once a working exploit for the Cisco IOS Shellcode is available on the Internet, it'll be only a matter of days before someone finds a way to craft it into a network worm. And then it's going to be a rough ride for everyone who uses the Internet. Unless, of course, the forces of Good prevail. Hyperbole? Perhaps, but a credible threat to the infrastructure of the Internet does exist. All indications suggest that the clock is ticking toward some kind of showdown between criminal hackers and the good guys. Unfortunately, the bad guys have a head start. At stake is the exploitation of flaws affecting the once-invincible Cisco router hardware, which currently carries most of the Internet's traffic on a daily basis. The threatPrior to this year's Black Hat security conference, security researchers and network administrators assumed that Cisco routers were invincible, a reputation that surely helped lead to the widespread adoption of Cisco routers across the Internet. The Cisco operating system is proprietary, and much of the specific internal hardware in the Cisco router is undocumented. Until recently, the idea of penetrating the Cisco Shellcode via remote access was fanciful. That was before security researcher Michael Lynn stepped up the lectern at this year's Black Hat conference, and after first stumbling through a deliberately faux presentation on VoIP security, proceeded to describe some (but not all) of his research to a skeptical audience. During his presentation, Lynn offered a quick demo of how he could access the root of a Cisco router remotely. Like the first runner breaking the four-minute-mile mark, Lynn emboldened other researchers to go out and see for themselves. Lynn said in his press conference one day later that his Black Hat presentation was perhaps only 5 percent of what someone would need to know to wreak havoc on the Internet, but he confirmed that his exploit, which he is legally barred from sharing, has the potential to harm hardware: "It's a software flaw that damages hardware." What he means is that by remotely attacking the Cisco IOS Shellcode, you could destroy the instruction set on the hardware that tells the router to turn on again. Talk about disrupting the regular flow of traffic on the Internet! Following Black Hat, Cisco issued an advisory detailing how flaws in the way older Cisco IOS system process IP6v packets could allow a remote user control of the router. But it's not really a secret, is it?But the point here isn't whether Lynn should have presented at Black Hat; it's whether Cisco was going to elaborate on information that many security researchers already suspected was in the hands of the bad guys. Lynn started his research in late January at the behest of his former employer, Internet Security Systems (ISS), and by February, he found a hole. In an interview with Cisco really is under attackLast summer, someone stole the Cisco IOS source code, chunks of which are rumored to be on sale even today via the Internet. Lynn said he worked with reverse-engineered binary code--1s and 0s--which is much harder to piece together, but he did it. If the bad guys already have access to the source code, their task would be that much easier, especially now that Lynn's entire presentation--literally Researchers I spoke to at the Black Hat conference said they weren't expecting a network worm to surface anytime soon, but all admitted that the possibility exists. And it gets worse. Cisco has confirmed that its customer password system has been compromised. Details are unclear, but the compromise might detail the hardware that individual customers are running. This is exactly the kind of preliminary research that a criminal hacker would do before crafting an attack, either a one-time attack on a specific company or a government, or a widespread network worm. So now someone may own a copy of the Cisco IOS source code, may be working on an exploit of a known flaw, and may even have a list of Cisco customers and the hardware they own--sounds to me like a credible, nefarious plan to take down the Internet. What this means to you and meMany security researchers I spoke to at the Black Hat conference said they weren't expecting a network worm to surface anytime soon, but all admitted that the possibility exists. If anything, the flurry of news reports about the flaw has prompted large companies to patch their Cisco routers ASAP. That's good.
[cia-drugs] Fwd: SJ-R.COM - Fees to Kjellander probed
--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]... wrote: rovegate/cornwellgate/calabresegate http://www.sj-r.com/Sections/News/Stories/63233.asp Fees to Kjellander probed In investigation of pension fund for teachers By MIKE ROBINSONTHE ASSOCIATED PRESS Published Wednesday, August 10, 2005 CHICAGO - Federal prosecutors investigating corruption at a state pension fund have subpoenaed records concerning $4.5 million in fees a Washington-based investment firm is paying the new treasurer of the Republican National Committee, government sources confirmed Tuesday. The subpoena calls for documents related to the fund, the Carlyle Group and Robert Kjellander, said sources familiar with the investigation who spoke only on condition of anonymity, saying prosecutors want details of the probe kept secret. Kjellander, a Springfield-based lobbyist who headed President Bush's re-election campaign in three states, was named the RNC's treasurer over the weekend. Officials of the Illinois Teachers Retirement System expressed concern about the amount of finders fees Carlyle offered Kjellander for helping to land business with the pension fund - $3.1 million paid and $1.4 million due. "I believe that we were all taken aback when we learned of the size of his compensation for services to the Carlyle Group," said Jon Bauman, executive director of the pension fund. He said the amount would not be unusual if paid to a major firm that places such business, such as Merrill Lynch or Goldman Sachs, but is extraordinary for payment to a small operation. Neither the Carlyle Group nor Kjellander and his Springfield Consulting Group have been accused of any wrongdoing in connection with the investigation. Kjellander did not immediately return calls to his Springfield office Tuesday. Carlyle officials have been summoned to a pension board meeting in Chicago on Thursday to answer questions about the investment firm's relationship with Kjellander and the finders fees it is paying him. The subpoena was part of an ongoing federal investigation of corruption involving the fund, which pays the pensions of retired downstate and suburban teachers. A former fund trustee and two Chicago attorneys already are under indictment. One of the two lawyers, Joseph Cari Jr., is a former finance chairman of the Democratic National Committee. Carlyle spokesman Christopher Ullman said Kjellander's fees are in line with what such private equity firms usually pay to placement agents and that the pension funds investment in Carlyle is simply smart business. The average return on these funds is 45 percent per year, he said. Youre not going to get that out of an SP fund. The pensioners and board are doing very well investing in Carlyle. He said Kjellander represents Carlyle before eight other public bodies in Illinois but declined to name them or say whether they have committed to investing with the firm. Cari was indicted one week ago along with Chicago attorney Steven Loren and millionaire political contributor Stuart P. Levine on charges of shaking down firms that sought to provide investments to the $30 billion teachers pension fund. Levine was a trustee for the fund. All three are to be arraigned today and are expected to plead not guilty, although Lorens attorney has said he is cooperating with the investigation. Bauman said teachers pension fund workers have found a January 2002 memo from Levine to a fund staff member, saying, Call me about this. Attached was a letter to Levine from a Carlyle official that said: At the request of Bob Kjellander, I enclose for your consideration four items concerning the Carlyle Group and more specifically Carlyle Venture Partners II. Kjellander was quoted in Tuesdays editions of the Chicago Tribune as saying he might have sent the board a background thing about Carlyle that indicated he would appreciate consideration of the investment firm. Thats part of my job, he said. My job was to say, Give these guys an opportunity to present their case. Kjellander - pronounced shuh-LAN-dur - is a member of the RNC and friend of presidential adviser Karl Rove. He was patronage chief under Gov. James Thompson. RNC spokesman Danny Diaz said the Republican group was aware of news reports concerning Kjellander and considers him an effective leader who can help advance the agenda of President Bush. The RNC is privileged to have such an accomplished and experienced individual in the treasurers position, Diaz said. The latest scrutiny of Kjellanders business dealings provided ammunition for state Sen. Steve Rauschenberger of Elgin, a Republican candidate for governor who has feuded with Kjellander and other party leaders. It may be legal but its not good public policy, Rauschenberger said during an unrelated news conference in Chicago. We shouldnt have a system where somebody gets a finders fee of several million
[cia-drugs] Trouble with Brussels Sprouts: Is the EU Food and Supplements Directive the real target?
Trouble with Brussels SproutsIs the EU Food and Supplements Directive the real target?by Phillip Day The word was quickly passed. A million alternative health networks shuddered involuntarily like cobwebs vibrating in the evening breeze as the shocking news spread: the European Union was going to seize the vitamins and the herbals. The drug industry was having its long-awaited spasm and clamping down on 'unregulated' nutritional treatments to shore up the millions in drug revenues it was losing to the vitamin 'quacks'. Something sinister called Codex Alimentarius was casting its Big Brother shadow across the Eurozone. Americans and other world populations looked on with apprehension. The Campaign for Truth in Medicine, which I represent, received its initial briefing on the Euro move to regulate the alternative health industry's supplements quite a while ago. As we snuffled around, we discovered that getting information on the proposed legislation was like trying to pull a string of sausages out of the jaws of an elkhound. No-one in the EU seemed to be talking or willing to show their hand. Real information was sketchy. The rumour mill chuntered away on overtime. As different muddy angles on the European vitamin affair began to materialise, our excavations soon began moving away from the draconian European Directive on Vitamin Supplements and settled on an altogether more culpable target - the real zero - the European Union itself. THE EU SUPPLEMENTS DIRECTIVE - WHAT'S IT ALL ABOUT? On 12th March 2002, while Samantha and I were preparing for our seminar in Norwich, England, the breeze suddenly stiffened and a piece of legislation silently passed hundreds of miles to the south-east. With barely a ripple in the ether, the EU had voted and passed the directive which would limit the upper intakes of hundreds of nutrients to ridiculously low levels - in certain cases, 1/50th or even less of what many nutritional doctors recommend as therapeutic doses. Like Germany and France, many were now facing the prospect of not just severe censure in the amounts of nutrients they could take, but what they could buy at all. For, hidden within the Trojan Horse 'harmonisation' proposals used to justify entering the launch codes against the nutritional supplements industry, was the realisation that anything not on the EU list of 'accepted' supplements was now in for an outright ban. Manufacturers who wished to field anything atrociously 'new' would be required to spend millions proving benefit through exhaustive 'drug testing' - a state of affairs guaranteed to bankrupt even the most stalwart of the green corporations. For 13 years, European pharmaceutical conglomerates have been contemplating a standardised market for vitamin and mineral supplements in order to bring these threatening red-headed stepchildren into check. Various attempts to harmonise the industry met with sustained opposition, not least from the UK government and its vitamin consumers. In January 2000, the Brussels Commission, during one of those rare, brief periods in which it was not being found guilty of fraud and accounting corruption, tabled a White Paper on Food Safety. A later document, 500PC0222 (what sort of monster invents that kind of archiving system?) concluded that a wide disparity existed on alternative medicine dosages, and proposed legislation to correct the imbalance. In France and Germany, for instance, no products containing more than one times the Recommended Daily Allowance may be sold without a drug licence. And this is a problem. Vitamin C's RDA is 40-60mg. Yet the therapeutic dosage of C begins at 500mg and goes up beyond 10,000mg. So if you wish to treat yourself with megadoses of Vitamin C for your cancer, best visit Homebase now and buy up a wheelbarrow in readiness to haul all those expensive, tiny vitamin pills back to base-camp. MASSIVE PUBLIC BACKLASH TO NO AVAIL Most UK Members of the Euro Parliament (MEPs) voted against the vitamin initiative, which nevertheless passed. In spite of some 400 million pieces of mail, e-mails, faxes and skywritings thrown at Brussels vociferously protesting this attack on human rights - naturally along with the predictable media black-out - the motion was approved, with 383 MEPs in favour and 139 against. Considerable resources had been expended by the pharmaceutical industry to lobby members for their vote. The public's outrage was ignored. So where are we now? There is an intervening period currently occurring which is designed to allow member states to pass laws aligning themselves with the new directive. Products that do not comply with the directive will be banned after 1st June 2005. Upper safe limits have been arbitrarily allocated to such a conservative list of nutrients, over which supplement dosage will be regulated, that the vast majority of other, more specialised nutrients not included on the list will be
[cia-drugs] Baigent, Freemasonry, Lord Northampton, Sion
Michael Baigent is a contributor to this Freemasonic publication:http://wwwfreemasonrytoday.com/public/editorials.phpAnd he is a trustee of the Canonbury Masonic Research Centre (CMRC):http://www.canonbury.ac.uk/?pasteventshttp://www.canonbury.ac.uk/?library/lectures/pierreLord Northampton is the Founder, Past Chairman and Grand Master of The Cornerstone Society, with Michael Baigent being a member:http://www.cornerstonesociety.com/Information/credits.htmlAnd there is this link between Lord Northampton and Sion:Temple Mount Fanatics Foment a New Thirty Years' Warhttp://www.larouchepub.com/other/2000/temple_mount_2743.htmlLord Northampton:Rebuilding The Templehttp://freemasonry.bcy.ca/anti-masonry/rebuild_temple.htmlLord Northampton, who has been atop the Temple Mount conducting "Temple studies," candidly has admitted in interviews, that he is an adherent of British Israelism Lord Northampton is, by his own admission, a practitioner of the satanic rituals of Aleister Crowley. Indeed, as he explained to an interviewer, Lord Northampton installed one of the world's leading "scholars" of the Golden Dawn cult, R.A. Gilbert, as the editor-in-chief of Ars Quatuor Coronarum, the theoretical journal of the lodge. Crowley had written an account of his "spiritual progress" in magic and Satanism under the title The Temple of Solomon the King. Masons and the Mounthttp://www.redmoonrising.com/tm.htmThe Quest to Rebuild the Temple- Two weeks after the 1967 Six-Day War which saw Jerusalem and the Temple Mount brought under Israeli control, there occurred the greatest freemasonic meeting in history in London, celebrating 250 years since the founding of UGLE, at which the Duke of Kent was installed as the new Grand Master.- Shortly after, the QC Lodge dispatched a member, the Jewish physicist Dr. Asher Kaufman, to begin studies on the exact location of where the Temple originally stood.- The Temple Mount Faithful was also established at this time by Stanley Goldfoot, which is presently led by Gershon Solomon.- In December of 1995, a month after Rabin was assassinated, the Jerusalem Lodge was established adjacent to the Temple Mount in the underground Grotto of King Solomon.- This lodge was founded by Giuliano Di Bernardo, and at the opening ceremony he declared, "The rebuilding of the Temple is at the center of our studies."Paul Smith Complete archives at http://www.sitbot.net/ Please let us stay on topic and be civil. OM SPONSORED LINKS United state patent United state army United state flag United state navy flag United states patent office Central intelligence agency YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "cia-drugs" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
[cia-drugs] Orwellian Doublethink In London
Orwellian Doublethink In London If liberty means anything at all, it means the right to tell people what they do not want to hear. - George Orwell Related: Prisonplanet.tv Reading Room: 1984 By George Orwell It was quite simple. All that was needed was an unending series of victories over your own memory. "Reality control," they called it: in Newspeak, "doublethink." - George Orwell (Nineteen Eighty Four) During Alex Jones' flying visit to London we experienced again and again instances of what George Orwell penned as "Doublethink". As experts on Orwell's novel we were shocked to see how far down the line our society has gone towards actually becoming Nineteen Eighty Four. Five years ago I concentrated on Orwell's novel for my University dissertation, I had concluded that Orwell's novel was one of extreme importance and artistic quality due to the fact that it continued to provide us with a warning of what we could become and how we must resist such an eventuality. Now, I am sorry to say, we are in that eventuality. We can still get out though, it is not too late, there are still more "oldthinkers" than there are "newthinkers", or those who engage in doublethink. The first instance of doublethink we happened upon in London concerned the masses of surveillance cameras that have gone up everywhere. Upon noticing a pole with at least four or five black cameras on it, we interviewed an employee of the Hard Rock Cafe establishment in the vicinity. He stated that "there are a lot of things going on in London that need to be kept track of." He then went on to reveal he had been working in he cafe for over a year and had never noticed the cameras. Furthermore he told us "I choose to ignore them, for me they do not exist". Shocked and horrified we asked for clarification, praying we had misheard what he had said. "Those cameras do not exist" he reiterated. This is classic doublethink. The man knows that the cameras do exist but chooses to believe they do not exist! His mind slid away into the labyrinthine world of doublethink. To know and not to know, to be conscious of complete truthfulness while telling carefully constructed lies, to hold simultaneously two opinions which canceled out, knowing them to be contradictory and believing in both of them, to use logic against logic, to repudiate morality while laying claim to it, to believe that democracy was impossible and that the Party was the guardian of democracy, to forget, whatever it was necessary to forget, then to draw it back into memory again at the moment when it was needed, and then promptly to forget it again, and above all, to apply the same process to the process itself -- that was the ultimate subtlety: consciously to induce unconsciousness, and then, once again, to become unconscious of the act of hypnosis you had just performed. Even to understand the word "doublethink" involved the use of doublethink. - George Orwell (Nineteen Eighty Four) We traveled on and discovered a second site at London Bridge, where a massive pole was still being fitted deep into the ground. All along the pole were not just cameras but motion detectors and some other form of scanning technology. In total there must have been 15-20 pieces of surveillance technology on one large black pole. Ironically, as I was shooting video, two policemen walked by, pointing at the pole and seemingly questioning what on earth it was all for. However, when we kept rolling and Alex started commentating on the Orwellian aspects of the fixture, patrons in the cafe behind us began laughing and pointing at us. Alex then noticed one man was physically shaking with anger and commenting that he should assault us. All this because we were daring to film the cameras and question why they were there. Alex then asked them if they would comment on the cameras and they refused to. They seemed to be unaware even of who George Orwell was or what Nineteen Eighty Four is. It is true that now more people know Big Brother as a tv show, than know it as the Primary controlling overlord of Orwell's novel. Alex joked that the national symbol of Britain, the Union Jack (we were then berated and told it is a bulldog - which is not true, we don't put a picture of a bulldog behind Tony Blair when he conducts speeches) had been replaced by the surveillance camera. The people around us failed to grasp that this was a joke, an analogy for the fact that there are more of these cameras in plain view than there are Union Jacks. They again became aggressive. This is akin to another form of Orwellian doublethink - Crimestop: "The faculty of stopping short, as though by instinct, at the threshold of any dangerous thought. It includes the power of not grasping analogies, of failing to perceive logical errors, of misunderstanding the simplest arguments if they are inimical to Ingsoc, and of being bored or repelled by any train of thought which is
[cia-drugs] Terror Expert Admits Government Sponsored Terror
Media Darling Terror Expert Admits Government Sponsored Terror Loftus Says Rogue Elements of intelligence Agencies Protecting Terrorists Steve Watson/Infowars | August 5 2005 We have continually documented how those at the top of British and US intelligence services have again and again recruited, funded and employed useful terrorists. In 1993, the bomb used in the first WTC attack was cooked by the FBI and the driver was under their instruction. It was the same story in 1995 with the destruction of the Alfred P Murrah Building in Oklahoma, again the Feds were implicated, the stooges were under their control. And we know for a fact that Bin Laden was a protected CIA asset, he even had the codename Tim Osman. We have previously revealed how former MI5 officer David Shayler has alleged, and French intel sources have corroborated, that the MI6 paid a Libyan al-Qa'ida cell £100,000 in 1995 to assassinate colonel Qaddafi. The use of the group that has come to be known as "Al Qaeda" as assets by Intelligence services the world over is well documented. So It came as little surprise that the so called mastermind of the 7/7 London Bombings was in the employ of British Intelligence. The July 29 edition of FOX News Channel's Day Side programme revealed that Haroon Rashid Aswat, had been working for MI6. Former Justice Dept. prosecutor and Terror expert John Loftus revealed that the Al-Muhajiroun group, based in London had formed during the Kosovo crisis, during which Fundamentalist Muslim Leaders were recruited by MI6 to fight in Kosovo. Mr Loftus Appeared on The Alex Jones Show earlier this week and revealed even more detail concerning the case of Aswat and the "War on terror". Although it seemed that Loftus was reluctant to accept that time and time again the "failures" of the Intelligence agencies are more than just coincidence, he had no choice but to verify the stone cold facts that Alex presented him with during the 20 minute interview. Loftus firstly pointed out that the Israeli services have long known that British Intelligence have allowed Muslim extremists to train and recruit in Britain with the promise of safe haven so long as British interests are kept off the hit list. Loftus went on to spell out that British Intelligence and the US dept of Justice had protected Haroon Rashid Aswat before in 1999 when he traveled to America. The Justice Department failed to indict Aswat as he attempted to set up a terrorist training school in Oregon: "His superiors, his subordinates were indicted, not him. The New York office claims The British told them he was dead, he wasn't dead he was hiding in South Africa." Loftus highlighted. Aswat was then allowed back into Britain just weeks before the bombings even though he was on a watch list and was a known terrorist and a wanted man. Mr Loftus made this clear in explicit detail: "The only explanation is that the Arab Newspapers were right and this guy was working for the British Secret service." COINCIDENCE? When questioned over the drills that were being operated on 7/7 at the exact same times and locations as the bombings, Loftus asserted that it "was a coincidence, a lot of those are run, there is no conspiracy there". Yet as we have reported, the chances of this happening are literally millions to one. Furthermore Loftus suggested that Tony Blair and the British Government had no knowledge of Aswat and that opportunist bureaucrats in MI6 were to blame. Alex pointed out that even if this was the case there are compartmentalized crime groups within the intelligence services that are funding Al Qaeda leaders to attack Western citizens. This equates to Government Sponsored terror. Loftus could only agree: "Boy you have put your finger right on it there. There are compartmentalized groups who engage in crimes. Are these authorized by the Government or is it wink and a nod stuff? We haven't got to the bottom of this yet and a lot of us are very very concerned." Mr Loftus then reasserted what Alex has been addressing for a long time now, that the whole Al Qaeda Phenomenon began in the mid forties as the CIA was recruiting Nazi Arabs. In the mid eighties Loftus himself testified before Congress on the illegal use of Nazi war criminals by US intelligence. "The Muslim Brotherhood was an Arab Nazi Movement. The CIA shredded all its files on the Muslim Brotherhood, but you can find out what's in them by doing a google search on two words - Banna and the second word is Nazi. Search those two words and you're gonna find about 20-30 very interesting articles on how this whole Al qaeda stuff began. It began in 1945 when the British recruited this Nazi Arab Movement, The Muslim Brotherhood, CIA took them over in the Early 50s, we hid them in Saudi Arabia." Loftus pointed out that Saddam Hussian was a member of the Brotherhood by proxy through his family who were directly recruited by the CIA in the 50s. And all
[cia-drugs] CRISP-ER: Search Tool to Track Biodefense Research
CRISPERComputer Retrieval of Information on Scientific Projects - Extended Results ENTER CRISPER BASIC, AGENT, AND ADVANCED SEARCH FORMS New Search (beta testing): TOTAL GRANT SUM About CRISPER CRISPER is a new way to search and organize National Institutes of Health (NIH) grant data. CRISPER pulls information from NIH's CRISP database and pairs it with NIH financial data, providing cleanly-formatted results with additional features (see left) that aren't available anywhere else. No other public search tool puts as much information at your fingertips about government-sponsored biological research. While CRISPER is optimized for searches related to research on biological weapons agents, its features are also useful for anyone interested in NIH biomedical programs. CRISPER is developed by the Sunshine Project, a non-profit organization. CRISPER is available for non-commerical use by any member of the public, free of charge. If you find CRISPER helpful, please support its development by clicking "Donate Now" (at left). Why CRISPER ? CRISPER is a multifaceted research tool for the public and public interest organizations working on safety, security, health and biomedical research issues. CRISPER is relevant to peace and security, biosafety, public health, biodiversity, biotechnology, and other fields. The financial information and search summaries available in CRISPER have never before been available in a publicly-accessible search tool. Foremost, CRISPER promotes open government: At a time when access to government information is declining, CRISPER stands for transparency and public accountability in federally-sponsored scientific research, particularly research involving biological weapons agents. All of the information available through CRISPER is public record, however, the government does not make it available in the same place or in compatible formats. For example, pairing a CRISP abstract with its associated financial data involves searching over 500 NIH files that use nine distinct data formats. Institutional Biosafety Committee (IBC) information (in development) has previously been available only through the Freedom of Information Act. By intelligently bringing together public records, CRISPER provides unprecedented access to NIH research programs. Transparency and accountability of these programs will encourage safety, security and sound judgment in biomedical research. The Future of CRISPER CRISPER 1 was developed in two weeks by three people working part-time with a budget of zero dollars. Providing the capabilities of CRISPER to the public is thus well within the reach of a government agency as large and capable as NIH. By demonstrating a path to greater research transparency, CRISPER's goal is to put itself out of business by prompting NIH to incorporate CRISPER's capabilities into NIH's CRISP website. NIH Director Zerhouni recently told the Washington Post that "We can't lose the public trust. Not just at NIH, but into research in general... I believe in candor as an instrument of leadership." NIAID Director Anthony Fauci, in Science and on National Public Radio, has recently called on people to look more carefully at NIH spending. CRISPER allows people to do precisely that, and aims to show NIH a way to make good on its eloquence about openness in research. Having said that, few are unaware that government can move at the speed of frozen molasses. While encouraging NIH to build CRISPER into its website, the Sunshine Project will enhance CRISPER with new functions and data as rapidly as possible. To preserve the system's integrity while it is under development, the CRISPER programming and website are copyrighted. Once CRISPER has reached an appropriate level of maturity we will move to a Creative Commons or similar license. Data returned by CRISPER is, of course, unrestricted public record. If you wish to support development of CRISPER, please make a donation. If you have ideas about new functions or if you are interested in volunteering your technical skills, please send us an e-mail (tsp [at] sunshine-project.org). Thank you for your interest and happy searching! CRISPER Capabilities Demo Graphics from CRISPER data CRISPER Features All NIH CRISP functions, plus: Latest financial info on grants, '96 - '05 Clear, cleanly-formatted results Downloadable (.csv) results Summary of every search Live data retrieval from NIH CRISP Simple and Advanced search pages Optimized for research on biodefense Drill down to IBC data (in development) On-the-fly inflation adjustment (planned) http://www.cbwtransparency.org/crisper/ http://www.cbwtransparency.org/crisper/index2.html http://www.cbwtransparency.org/crisper/crisper_continuing_search.php Complete archives at http://www.sitbot.net/ Please let us stay on topic and be civil. OM SPONSORED
[cia-drugs] The National Biodefense Analysis and Countermeasures Center
The National Biodefense Analysis and Countermeasures Center (NBACC)A selection of documents about NBACC research and construction plans The Leading Edge of Biodefense: The National Biodefense Analysis and Countermeasures CenterDepartment of Homeland Security / USAMRIIDSource: Internet (www.afpmb.org, since removed), 2004PDF, 34 powerpoint slides, 8.5 mb The NBACC was established in 2002 and publicly unveiled in detail in a 28 April 2004 press conference with HHS Secretary Thompson, DHS Secretary Ridge, and DOD Deputy Secretary Wolfowitz. This description of the NBACC and its controversial proposed activities was briefly placed on the website of the US Armed Forces Pest Management Board, following a presentation about NBACC to a military entomology conference in February2004. The file was removed from the military website on or about 23 April 2004, when it came to the attention of arms control organizations. Notes in the original Powerpoint file indicate that this version of the presentation, made by Lt. Col George Korch, was originally prepared for Major General Lawlor, Commander, Joint Task Force Civil Support, U.S. Joint Forces Command. The notes, which are not reproduced in the PDF file, read: Briefing to MG Lawlor Sir, thanking for giving us the opportunity to brief our proposal, or working concept to you this new research initiative, counteringbiological terrorism research program. Purpose: The purpose of the brief is to present to you our working concept for developing a new applied research initiative and to seek your buy-in and approval for the proposed concept. NBACC Planning and Feasibility StudyCUH2A, Smith Carter, Hemisphere (contractors), for DHSSource: Department of Homeland Security, 2004 PDF, 160 pages, 6.9 mb This study, dated April 2004, provides a detailed physical description of the planned NBACC, including its BSL-2, 3, "3E", and 4 space, aerosol, and animal facilities. The document also (briefly) discusses relationships between the labs planned for Ft. Detrick, Mayland and other element of the NBACC program, including those at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory and Plum Island, NY. The study makes reference to an NBACC Phase II. According to other DHS documents, the status of Phase II plans is presently unclear. Attendance Record of Pre-Submittal Conference / Site Visit Department of Homeland SecuritySource: Department of Homeland Security, 2004 PDF, 19 pages, 1 mb The attendance record of the 1 December 2004 conference and site visit for potential bidders on the design services contract for the NBACC at Fort Detrick. Pre-submittal Conference Site Visit: MinutesDepartment of Homeland SecuritySource: Department of Homeland Security, 2004 PDF, 3 pages, 28 kb Minutes of the pre-submittal conference on 1 December 2004. NBACC Design Services Contract: Questions and Answers Department of Homeland SecuritySource: Department of Homeland Security, 2004 PDF, 7 pages, 28 kb A document providing DHS answers to design questions from potential bidders. No date indicated; but probably early December 2004. AR15-6 Investigation Into Anthrax Contamination at USAMRIIDUS ArmySource: FOIA, 2002PDF, 15 pages, 1.3mb This 15 page document contains a memorandum and associated paperwork of a May, 2002 US Army investigation into anthrax contamination at ths US Army Medical Research Institute for Infectious Disease (USARMIID) in Frederick, MD. The investigation found multiple instances of accidental release of virulent anthrax at the Army's premiere biodefense facility. Two major newspaper stories have focused on this report, Anthrax Slip-Ups Raise Fears About Planned Biolabs (USA Today, 14 October 2004) and Anthrax Leaks Blamed on Lax Safety Habits (Los Angeles Times, 20 August 2004). University of Texas National Biocontainment Laboratory Application (Extract) University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston, February 2003(proposal to the NIAID biodefense program)Source: Texas Public Information Act, Texas Attorney General's Ruling OR2003-3219PDF, 46 pages, 1.9 megabytes, redactions This document contains the introductory pages and the research section of UTMB's application for a National Biocontainment Laboratory, plus additional pages of interest. In the research section, information deemed to be intellectual property has been redacted. Areas where redactions have been made appear as blank (white) spaces in the document. Proposal for the Region VI Center for Biodefense and Emerging Infections (Extracts) University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston, January 2003(proposal to the NIAID biodefense program)Source: Texas Public Information Act, Texas Attorney General's Ruling OR2003-6103 Introductory Materials (PDF, 17 pages, 600kb)This extract provides the list of
[cia-drugs] U.S. seeks massive stock of smallpox vaccine
Jim Rarey + Acambis + Baxter = http://www.google.com/search?hl=enlr=q=Jim+Rarey+%2B+Acambis+%2B+BaxterbtnG=Search ~~~ U.S. seeks massive stock of smallpox vaccineAug 16, 5:48 AM (ET) By Pete Harrison LONDON (Reuters) - The United States has issued a tender for up to 80 million doses of a smallpox vaccine to guard against terrorist attack, worth over $1 billion, vaccine-makers said on Tuesday. The United States has been building vaccine stocks ever since the discovery of anthrax spores in its mail system in 2001 sparked fears of a major bioterrorist assault. "The U.S. government plans to procure a stockpile of MVA as part of its defense against the threat of smallpox virus being used as a bioterrorist weapon," Britain's Acambis said of its weakened MVA vaccine. The weakened version is designed for the elderly and patients with immune disorders and skin conditions such as eczema. Acambis said the U.S. tender was for 20 million doses of the weakened MVA vaccine in the first two years, with the option of a further 60 million doses later on. Analysts said the full 80 million doses could be worth over $1.2 billion. The United States has already stockpiled more than 180 million doses of full-strength vaccine against smallpox, seen as the deadliest biological agent that terrorists could unleash. The highly contagious virus killed untold millions until officially eradicated in 1979. Small stocks of the virus have been kept in laboratories, and the United States fears that some have been sold onto the black market. Thirty percent of victims die and the rest are scarred for life by skin ulcers and pustules. Acambis, once a biotech minnow, has been battling with Danish rival Bavarian Nordic for the United States' lucrative vaccine orders. Bavarian also confirmed the tender. Analysts said the long-anticipated MVA order, to be awarded in February 2006, would probably be split between the two companies. But some thought Acambis, which manufactures its vaccine in Massachusetts, might have the edge for reasons of supply security. "We expect the initial doses to be priced at $10 per dose and believe that the award could well be evenly split," said analyst Martin Wales at UBS Investment Research. Acambis is co-developing the MVA vaccine with U.S. firm Baxter Healthcare. http://reuters.myway.com/article/20050816/2005-08-16T094809Z_01_DIT627882_RTRIDST_0_NEWS-ACAMBIS-DC.html Complete archives at http://www.sitbot.net/ Please let us stay on topic and be civil. OM SPONSORED LINKS United state patent United state army United state flag United state navy flag United states patent office Central intelligence agency YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "cia-drugs" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
[cia-drugs] FCC Issues Rule Allowing FBI to Dictate Wiretap-Friendly Design for Internet Services-Tech Mandates Force Companies to Build Backdoors into Broadband, VoIP
FCC Issues Rule Allowing FBI to Dictate Wiretap-Friendly Design for Internet Services Tech Mandates Force Companies to Build Backdoors into Broadband, VoIP Washington, DC - Today the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) issued a release announcing its new rule expanding the reach of the Communications Assistance to Law Enforcement Act (CALEA). The ruling is a reinterpretation of the scope of CALEA and will force Internet broadband providers and certain Voice-over-IP (VoIP) providers to build backdoors into their networks that make it easier for law enforcement to wiretap them. The Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) has argued against this expansion of CALEA in several rounds of comments to the FCC on its proposed rule. CALEA, a law passed in the early 1990s, mandated that all telephone providers build tappability into their networks, but expressly ruled out information services like broadband. Under the new ruling from the FCC, this tappability now extends to Internet broadband providers as well. Practically, what this means is that the government will be asking broadband providers - as well as companies that manufacture devices used for broadband communications to build insecure backdoors into their networks, imperiling the privacy and security of citizens on the Internet. It also hobbles technical innovation by forcing companies involved in broadband to redesign their products to meet government requirements. "Expanding CALEA to the Internet is contrary to the statute and is a fundamentally flawed public policy," said Kurt Opsahl, EFF staff attorney. "This misguided tech mandate endangers the privacy of innocent people, stifles innovation, and risks the functionality of the Internet as a forum for free and open _expression_." At the same time, the Department of Justice (DOJ) is asking airlines to build similar backdoors into the phone and data networks on airplanes. EFF and the Center for Democracy and Technology (CDT) submitted joint comments to the FCC arguing against the DOJ's unprecedented and sweeping new technology design mandates and anticipatory wiretapping system. The FCC's new proposal to expand CALEA to airline broadband illustrates the fallacy of law enforcement's rationale for its CALEA request. The DOJ takes the position that broadband has "substantially replaced" the local telephone exchange, but this claim is reduced to the point of absurdity aboard an airplane and opens the door for CALEA to cover just about anything. For this release:http://www.eff.org/news/archives/2005_08.php#003876More about CALEA:http://www.eff.org/Privacy/Surveillance/CALEA/Washington Post: "Groups Slam FCC on Internet Phone Tap Rule":http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/08/10/AR2005081001626.htmlWired: "Critics Slam Net Wiretapping Rule":http://www.wired.com/news/privacy/0,1848,68483,00.htmlGovExec.Com: "Justice Department Effort to Eavesdrop on Airline Passengers Challenged":http://www.govexec.com/dailyfed/0805/080405c1.htm ~~~ Make Online Anonymity Easy Announcing the Tor Graphical User Interface Competition San Francisco - Now information designers can make it easier for people to protect themselves online. The developers of Tor, a software tool for communicating anonymously online, today announced the Tor graphical user interface (GUI) competition. Entrants will create a usable and aesthetically pleasing GUI for the Tor program, which will allow people to install and configure Tor easily and monitor the software's performance while it's running. "Security depends on knowing what's working correctly and what isn't," said Roger Dingledine, Tor project leader. "A good interface tells users what's going on so they can make smart decisions." Tor, which is currently being developed with support from the Electronic Frontier Foundation, helps anonymize web browsing and publishing, instant messaging, IRC, SSH, and other applications that use the TCP protocol. Tor also provides a platform on which software developers can build new applications with built-in anonymity, safety, and privacy features. The competition has two phases. First, there will be a design competition where entrants can submit mock-up sketches of good interfaces. Second, there will be a competition to create working implementations of good interfaces. People are encouraged to submit to either phase or both phases. Winning entries will be open source, exhibit strong graphic design, and include an intuitive and simple interface. Students, freelancers, and professionals at all levels are encouraged to enter. Everyone who enters will get a free Tor t-shirt, and the best sketches and working implementations will be published on the Tor website. The competition winners will be announced at the 2006 SOUPS conference. http://tor.eff.org/gui/ Complete archives at http://www.sitbot.net/ Please let us stay on topic and be civil. OM SPONSORED
[cia-drugs] Al Quada and Londonistan
QUOTING FROM ""911 Synthetic Terror: Made in the USA." WEBSTER GRIFFIN TARPLEY: (page 24) "It is now proverbial in Washington to remark that there is no proof linking Saddam Hussein to 911, and this is certainly true. But by the very same token, there is also no proof in the public domain anywhere that adds up to a case against Osama Bin Laden and Al Qaeda... Bin Laden was a creation of the CIA, and his Al Qaeda followers, to the extent that they exist at all, are doubtless characterized by a surfeit of criminal intent. But we must not join the anonymousCIA agent [Michael Scheuer,] author of the recent book "Imperial Hubris" in portraying the ineptunstable Bin Ladenas an evil genius. Taken by themselves, Bin Ladenand his band represent supermarket caliber terrorists, capable of bombing a shopping center, or of destroying a bus. Any capabilities above and beyond this can only be explained through assistence provided byintelligence agencies, primarily but not limited to the American ones. NOT JUST THE ECONOMIC TERRORISM EMANATING FROM THE BANK OF ENGLAND AND "The City of London", BUT ALSO TRAINING OF ISLAMIC -- (ELITE SPONSORED) -- TERRORISTS. QUOTING FROM TARPLEY'S BOOK "911 Synthetic Terror: Made in the USA, PAGE 156-157 THE EXCELLENT CHAPTER ON LONDON AS THE EPICENTER FOR INTERNATIONAL TERROR -- A HIGHLIGHT: TARPLEY: "In an appearance on the popular Al-Jazeera program "The Opposite Direction" Qaddafi condemned the 911 attacks, and refered to Bin Laden's Arab Afghans as "stray dogs" and terrorists. But then Qaddafi began to talk about the support network for al Qaeda: QADAFFI: (Qatar, Tripoli, October 25, 2001) "I am actually puzzled. I mean, if America were serious about eliminating terrorism, the first capital it should rock with cruise missiles is LONDON." INTERVIEWER: "London?!" QADAFFI: London. It is the center of terrorism. It gives safehousing to the terrorists. I mean, as long as America does not bomb London, I think the US is not serious... London is far more dangerous than Kabul. How could it rock Kabul with missiles and leave London untouched? TARPLEY: "The interviewer, a former BBC employee, quickly changed the subject before the mercurial dictator could say more. At this time, al Jazeera was closely monitored by all the international wire services, since it had the best reporting from inside Afghanistan. But none of them reported these...remarks from Qadaffi..." http://brishon.com/content.php?content.409 ~~~ The London Bombs, The Rogue Network And IranBy Webster G. Tarpley7-12-5 WASHINGTON, DC -- Last week's London explosions carry the characteristic features of a state-sponsored, false flag, synthetic terror provocation by networks within the British intelligence services MI-5, MI-6, the Home Office, and the Metropolitan Police Special Branch who are favorable to a wider Anglo-American aggressive war in the Middle East, featuring especially an early pre-emptive attack on Iran, with a separate option on North Korea also included. With the London attacks, the Anglo-American invisible government adds another horrendous crime to its own dossier. But this time, their operations appear imperfect, especially in regard to the lack (so far) of a credible patsy group which, by virtue of its ethnicity, could direct popular anger against one of the invisible government's targets. So far, the entire attribution of the London crimes depends on what amounts to an anonymous posting in an obscure, hitherto unknown, secular Arabic-language chatrooms in the state of Maryland, USA. But, based on this wretched shred of pseudo-evidence, British Prime Minister Tony Blair who has surely heard of a group called the Irish Republican Army, which bombed London for more than a decade has not hesitated to ascribe the murders to "Islam," and seems to be flirting with total martial law under the Civil Contingencies Act. We are reminded once again of how he earned his nickname of Tony Bliar. SCOTLAND YARD KNEW IN ADVANCE That the British Government knew in advance that blasts would occur is not open to rational doubt. Within hours of the explosions, Israeli Army Radio was reporting that "Scotland Yard [London police headquarters] had intelligence warnings of the attacks a short time before they occurred." This report, repeated by IsraelNN.com, added that "the Israeli Embassy in London was notified in advance, resulting in Foreign Minister Binyamin Netanyahu remaining in his hotel room rather than make his way to the hotel adjacent to the site of the first explosion, a Liverpool Street train station, where he was to address an economic summit." This report is attributed to "unconfirmed reliable sources." At around the same time, the Associated Press issued a wire asserting that "British police told the Israeli Embassy in London minutes before Thursday's explosions that they had received warnings of possible terror attacks in the
[cia-drugs] Democracy is an Illusion
Democracy is an Illusion By Henry Makow Ph.D. August 20, 2005 A "Far Side" cartoon describes our innocence about democracy. A slave rowing a Viking ship puts up his hand and calls to the whip master: "Yoo-hoo! Oh, yoo-hoo... I think I'm getting a blister."Like this man, most people cling to the belief that our leaders represent our interests. "Yoo, hoo, Mr. Bush, you lied about Iraq having weapons of mass destruction." At an elite gathering, Bush peered under his lectern and quipped: "Where are those weapons of mass destruction?" A tiny cabal of international bankers chooses our "leaders". This clique, which subtly controls every significant facet of our society is gradually establishing an Orwellian global police state. Much of the ruling class has been duped to think they are building a better world. Prove it, you say? "The Naked Capitalist" by W.C. Skousen (available at www.abe.com www.bookfinder.com) is yet another smoking gun. It is based on the revelations contained in Professor Carroll Quiqley's "Tragedy and Hope: A History of the World in Our Time." (1966) Quiqley, a Professor of History at the Foreign Service School at Georgetown University was a trusted insider who had access to their private archives. He felt the plot, which he supported, was too important to be kept hidden. However, shortly after publication, his book was taken off the market. Cleon Skoussen was an FBI agent for 16 years and the Police Chief of Salt Lake City for four years. His "The Naked Capitalist" distills the most shocking evidence from Quigley's daunting 1300-page book. At just 122 pages, "The Naked Capitalist" (1970) is a concise, lucid and absolutely convincing account of the international banker conspiracy. Historians who have largely ignored this material have betrayed the public trust. OUR PREDICAMENT Quigley confirms that a network of banking dynasties has, in Skousen's words, "acquired a choke-hold on the affairs of practically the entire human race." According to Quigley, they include "Baring, Lazard, Erlanger, Warburg, Schroder, Selingman, the Speyers, Mirabaud, Malet, and above all Rothschild and Morgan." (Citations are from Tragedy and Hope, 51-52) Quigley confirms that, starting with the Bank of England in 1694, these dynasties organized themselves in a system of central banks that charge their respective nations billions of dollars in interest for the privilege of using currency backed by the nations' own credit. In other words, they have carried off a swindle of monstrous proportions. Quigley quotes William Gladstone who as Chancellor of the Exchequer said in 1852: "The government itself was not to be a substantive power in matters of Finance, but was to leave the Money Power supreme and unquestioned." (325) Put another way, a private credit monopoly controls the governments' purse strings. Able to create money out of nothing, they naturally grabbed as much of the world's real wealth as they could. Quigley writes about the formation of their American cartels: "The period 1884-1933 was the period of financial capitalism in which investment bankers moving into commercial banking and insurance on the one side, and into railroading and heavy industry on the other were able to mobilize enormous wealth and wield enormous economic, political and social power." (71) Indeed their representatives, the "Eastern Establishment" i.e. the Morgans and now the Rockefellers run the United States. (72) The principle mechanism is the Council on Foreign Relations. According to Quigley, the ultimate goal is "nothing less than to create a world system of financial control in private hands able to dominate the political system of each country and the economy of the world as a whole. This system was to be controlled ...by the central banks...acting in concert." (324) Quigley confirms that the bankers have usurped mankind's collective instincts by financing the Socialist and Communist movements. Bankers love big government because the ultimate monopoly is the State. Through it, they take over their competition and control debt, resources, market demand and labor. Speaking of the Communist takeover of the US government in the 1930's and 1940's, Quigley writes, "it must be understood that the power that these energetic left-wingers exercised was never their own power of Communist power but was ultimately the power of the international financial coterie." (954) In other words, millions of idealists committed to human brotherhood and equality were (and are) duped into advancing a totalitarian scheme to concentrate the world's wealth and power into the hands of the superrich. More savvy Leftists, Communists, Feminists and Globalists continue to prosper while unctuously pretending to serve humanity. The Money Power controls the debate and encourages gridlock by backing all shades of the political spectrum and marginalizing anyone who shines the spotlight on them.
[cia-drugs] Cheney's Paraguay Caper Is Intended To Produce 'A Splendid Little War'
Cheney's Paraguay Caper Is IntendedTo Produce `A Splendid Little War' by Dennis Small U.S. Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld arrived in Paraguay on Aug. 16, with the principal mission of putting the final touches on Vice President Dick Cheney's scheme of establishing a U.S. military base in that country, in the heart of South America. The proper response to that development, advised U.S. statesman Lyndon LaRouche, is to issue the following urgent security advisory across South America: Redouble the guards at the cemeteries and the morgues, and put a special watch on all university anatomy classes. Those psychopathic policy twins, Cheney and Rumsfeld, the "Burke and Hare" of Washington, D.C., are on the loose in South America. William Burke and William Haremade famous in such locations as Robert Louis Stevenson's tale, The Body-Snatcherwere 1820s Scottish entrepreneurs of sorts, who set themselves up as procurers of fresh corpses to satisfy the lively demand of Edinburgh's medical schools' anatomy classes. When demand outstripped the supply available from digging up the graves of the recently departed in the dead of night, the two free marketeers turned to supply-side economics, and started murdering people directly. They weren't caught until they had produced 16 victims. In the 21st-Century Cheney-Rumsfeld re-run of Burke and Hare's antics, most of the corpses are intended to be Brazilian. What is the actual intent behind Cheney's Paraguay caper? Locate the regional South American developments in the context of the documented short-term drive for pre-emptive war against Iran, including nuclear strikes, which has been launched by Dick Cheney and his allied gang of "spoon-bender" Utopian lunatics within U.S. military and intelligence circles. And locate them, as well, in the framework of a rapidly disintegrating global financial system, which Cheney et al. have been deployed to salvage, at all costs. Here are the principal South American elements leading into the dangerous Paraguay caper: On Feb. 24, 2005, the Argentine government of Nestor Kirchner successfully negotiated a 60% writedown of $82 billion of public debt, over the violent opposition of the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the world's financial oligarchy. On March 29, 2005, the heads of government of Brazil, Colombia, Venezuela, and Spain gathered in the Venezuelan city of Ciudad Guayana, to discuss the details of regional great infrastructure projects to pull their economies out of poverty, and to lay the foundations of lasting, regional peace. This surprise development was a significant setback for the international financial interests that Cheney and Rumsfeld speak for, whose regional objective is both to ensure their control over strategic raw materials, and to sink the entire region into chaos such that no unified opposition to the dying IMF system can be mustered. In April 2005, a further political blow was dealt to Cheney and the neo-cons, with Washington's inability to impose their preferred candidate as the next Secretary General of the Organization of American States. Cheney and his Wall Street friends were not amused. So, on May 5, 2005, the United States induced the Paraguayan government to sign an agreement authorizing joint military training activities over the 18-month period running from July 1, 2005 to Dec. 31, 2006, which accord can be extended indefinitely. The base for the maneuvers is to be the Mariscal Estigarribia military base and airfieldwhich was built by the U.S. to be able to handle large military transport planes, and house up to 16,000 troopslocated in the middle of the largely uninhabited Chaco region of northwestern Paraguay. This is the very region which was the scene of the bloody Gran Chaco War of 1932-35 between Paraguay and Bolivia (see map). On May 26, 2005, the Paraguayan Congress granted the participating U.S. troops legal immunity from prosecution for crimes committed while in Paraguay, an exception that the Bush-Cheney government had previously also demanded of Brazil, Argentina, and other South American countries, and had been firmly rebuffed. And then came the most revealing development: On June 10, 2005, Paraguayan Vice President Luis Castiglioni travelled to Washington, D.C., where he held private meetings with Cheney, Rumsfeld, and neo-con hatchetman Roger Noriega, then Assistant Secretary of State for Western Hemisphere Affairs. The totally disproportionate attention paid to Castiglioniin particular the private meeting with Cheneyindicated that the scheme had gone live, and that Cheney was hands-on. On July 1, 2005, the first 500 American troops began to arrive in Paraguay. On July 7, the U.S. Embassy in Paraguay issued a public disclaimer stating that they had no intention of establishing a permanent military base in the country. But in late July, an unconvinced Brazilian Army launched military maneuvers
[cia-drugs] Lucifer and the Cult of Freedom
Lucifer and the Cult of Freedom by David Livingstone "Religion does not forbid pleasure. Rather, it merely requires that it be tempered by a sense of greater responsibility towards one's fellow human beings. The broader reality, however, is that Western citizens are accomplices in the exploitation of the rest of humanity. They have been duped by the propaganda that, because nature is evolving, the rest of the world is merely behind a stage of evolution. This, of course, is to disguise the fact that the World Bank and the IMF, following the dictates of the financial and banking elite, are deliberately impoverishing the rest of the world, to secure both cheap labor and natural resources." "In all corners of the earth the words Liberty, Equality, Fraternity brought to our ranks, thanks to our blind agents, whole legions who bore our banners with enthusiasm. And all the time these words were canker-worms at work boring into the well-being of the goyim, putting an end everywhere to peace, quiet, solidarity and destroying all the foundations of the goy States. "As you will see later this helped us to our triumph; it gave us the possibility, among other things, of getting into our hands the master card - the destruction of the privileges, or in other words of the very existence of the Aristocracy of the goyim, that class which was the only defense peoples and countries had against us. On the ruins of the natural and genealogical Aristocracy of the goyim we have set up the Aristocracy of our educated class headed by the Aristocracy of money." Protocols of Zion on Liberty "Freedom" and "Liberty", both terms originally devised by the Illuminati, are sham slogans, that have been used time and again to rally the masses of the Western world against some contrived foe. "Freedom" is a relative term. By itself it does not have any meaning. Human relationships, whether they be between one individual and another, or between the state and the individual, are defined by limitations. Man may be entitled to certain freedoms, but these must have defined limits, so that he can be prevented from encroaching on others, and others against he. Therefore, man cannot be "free". Ultimately, the principles of "freedom" and "liberty" are rooted in the occult. "Liberty", along with "equality", and "fraternity", were concepts originally promulgated by the Freemasons. In turn, the dogma of the Freemasons is derived from the Gnostic tradition. Gnosticism is a heresy of Christianity that belonged to the first centuries AD. It derived its influence from the Jewish Kabbalah, and reversed the interpretation of the Bible. Therefore, God became the evil one, while the devil was he who sought to "liberate" man by teaching him the forbidden knowledge, or magic. According to Gnostics then, all the laws proclaimed by the creator God of the Bible were to suppress man. Instead, he believed, man would only become free by indulging in as many vices as he could. Therefore, proponents of "liberty" offer an alternative principle to counter what they regard as the repression meted out by religion. They claim that we ought to be allowed to do as we please, as long as we do not harm anybody else. This is the same principle as that touted by modern-day witches, or Wiccans, as stated by the godfather of modern Satanism, Aleister Crowley: "Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the Law". Therefore, the delusion Satanists are offering is that the laws of the monotheistic faiths are somehow repressive. And so, Satanism reverses that which is taught by them, and suggests that we ought to be allowed to indulge in what we please, as long as we do not harm anybody else. What they fail to recognize, however, is that the commandments of the monotheistic faiths are not to restrict indulgence, but also to prevent the harming of others, and therefore, forbid adultery, murder, theft, deception, exploitation and so on. And yet, indecency and vulgarity is praised as courage against prudishness. The female body is exploited everywhere to market products. Though, religion did not teach us to be "ashamed" of our bodies, but to "have shame" . Nevertheless, through the influence of Satanism, Hollywood is promoting exhibitionism as "body consciousness". To the Freemasons of the Enlightenment, who had been indoctrinated by the Illuminati, the use of "reason" supposedly helped man recognize that ultimately there is no God, that the Bible was a book of superstitions, and therefore, that he ought to seek "liberty" from the Catholic Church, which he came to regard to as "despotism". Using the "philosophes" of the period as their mouthpiece, the Illuminati deceived the masses into believing that man no longer needed religion, but could discover laws by himself, through the use of "reason". In this way, the first attempts to devise such laws were known as "inalienable rights", first conceived and discussed in the
[cia-drugs] Globalists and the Creation of the Wahhabi Terrorism
Globalists and the Creation of the Wahhabi Terrorism by David Livingstone (Thursday August 26 2004) "The result has been that, in order to nonetheless appear to be espousing Islam, the Saudi regime and its puppet scholars have evolved a version of Islam that emphasizes ceremonial details of the religion, at the expense of helping to understand broader political realities. Their manner has encouraged a literal interpretation of Islamic law, permitting the likes of bin Laden to exploit the Koran to justify the killing of innocents." Following the dictates of Hegelian dialectic, the Globalists have created two antagonizing forces, the "Liberal-Democratic" West, against Terrorism, or "political Islam", to force us into the acceptance of their final alternative, a New World Order. The West and Islam have had a long era of compatibility, but this history has been denied to foster the myth of a "Clash of Civilizations". In order to inflame the sentiments of the West against Islam, our attention has been focused on the specter of fanatical Wahhabism, and more specifically, its most notorious exponent, Ossama bin Laden. However, as outlined in an excellent article by Peter Goodgame, The Globalists and the Islamists, the Globalists have had a hand in shaping and financing all the terrorist organizations of the twentieth century, including the Muslim Brotherhood of Egypt, the Hamas of Palestine, and the Afghan Mujahideen. But the history of their duplicity dates farther back still, to the eighteenth century, when British Freemasons created the Wahhabi sect of Saudi Arabia itself, to further their imperialistic objectives. That a British spy by the name of Hempher was responsible for shaping of the extreme tenets of Wahhabism was mentioned in a Turkish work, Mir'at al-Haramain , by Ayyub Sabri Pasha between 1933-1938. British policy in its colonies often involved the creation of deviant sects, in order to Divide and Conquer, as was the case with the Ahmadiyya sect of Islam in India in the nineteenth century. The details of this conspiracy are outlined in a little known document by the name of The Memoirs of Mr. Hempher published in series (episodes) in the German paper Spiegel, and later on in a prominent French paper. A Lebanese doctor translated the document to the Arabic language and from there on it was translated to English and other languages. The document is a first-hand account by Hempher of his mission for his government, who sent him to the Middle East to discover ways to undermine the Ottoman Empire. Among the vices the British were to promote were racism and nationalism, alcohol, gambling, fornication, and tempting Muslim women to uncover themselves. But most important was the strategy to "insert heresies into Muslims' creedal tenets and then criticize Islam for being a religion of terror." To this purpose, Hempher located a particularly corrupt individual by the name of Mohammed Ibn Adbul Wahhab. To understand the brand of fanaticism that Wahhabism inculcated, it is first necessary to recognize that Islam called upon all Muslims, regardless of their race or nationality, to see themselves as brothers in faith. The killing of another Muslim was strictly forbidden. However, as part of their strategy of Divide and Conquer, the British hoped to pit the Arab Muslims against their Turkish brothers. The only way to do so was to find a loophole in Islamic law whereby the Arabs could declare the Turks as apostates. Abdul Wahhab was the instrument by which the British were able to insinuate this vile idea into the Muslims of the Arabian Peninsula. Basically, Wahhab contrived the idea that, simply by the trivial act of offering prayers to saints, that their Turkish brethren had forfeited their faith, and therefore, that it was permitted to kill all who refused to adhere to his reforms, and enslave their women and children. But, that included the entire Muslim world, expect for his small misguided band of followers. But, the Wahabbi movement was insignificant without the allegiance of the Saudi family, who, despite claims otherwise, were descended from a Jewish merchant from Iraq . Orthodox jurists of the time branded the Wahhabis as heretics, and condemned their fanaticism and intolerance. Nevertheless, the Wahhabis then demonstrated their contempt for their pretended faith by indiscriminately slaughtering Muslims and non-Muslims alike. The Wahhabis then set about destroying all the holy tombs and burial grounds. They stole the Prophet's treasure, which included holy books, works of art and innumerable priceless gifts sent to the city during the previous thousand years. The leather and gilt bindings of the Islamic holy books they had destroyed were used to make sandals for the Wahhabi criminals. The Ottoman Sultan brought an end to the first Wahhabi rebellion in 1818, but the sect revived under the leadership of the Saudi Faysal I.
[cia-drugs] Pat Robertson says let's assassinate Chavez
THE DEATH SQUADS: BRINGING IN THE KINGDOM OF GOD THROUGH TERROR, TORTURE AND DEATH - Then there's the story of Dr. Myrna Cunningham in the Miskitu Indian border area between Honduras and Nicaragua. In December 1981, she was captured by Contra forces - elements of the same Contra forces supported by Pat Robertson, Tim LaHaye and Larry Lea - and was beaten and repeatedly raped. Dr. Cunning-ham described the bizarre rape scene during which the Miskitus were singing hymns and praying. The Contras who had been involved in the rape later reported that they had been told by their pastors that killing and even torture (when necessary to obtain vital information) were permissible in a "just war" against an anti-Christ system[3] - and, if in the heat of the moment excesses like rape should occur, well, that certainly wasn't good, but that if they later confessed their sins, God would forgive and understand; after all, the purpose for which they were fighting was just.[4] [5 ] - This is the kind of "expertise" the Argentineans passed on to Death Squad leaders operating in Honduras, Guatemala, El Salvador, and so forth - leaders like D'Aubuisson, the Calero brothers, etc.; the same people Pat Robertson, Phil Derstine, Larry Lea, Cubie Ward, etc. were fond of "running around with" in their trips down to the Contra camps in Honduras and Guatemala; the kind of people evangelical politicos like Barbara Alby of Sacramento, California paraded around before Christian audiences as "Christian soldiers" in a "Holy War" against the forces of "godless communism." God preserve us all from such soldiers, and the Christian leaders who promote them! - Let's take just one example of the Religious Right's in-volvement: Pat Robertson. In the Spring of 1984 Pat Robertson and CBN reporter Norm Mintle traveled to El Salvador where they met with the late Roberto D'Aubuisson and other anonymous individuals connected with the political right in that war-torn and impoverished country. Following the trip, the "700 Club" aired four 20-30 minute segments on El Salvador, the major theme being that D'Aubuisson and the others were "very nice fellows" who were being maligned by the "biased liberalism" of Newsweek, Time and U.S. News and World Report. - Once again, we've used CBN's Pat Robertson as an example here - primarily because he is perhaps the leading proponent of Christian activity directed at taking "America back for Christ and the church;" but what has been said of Robertson could just as easily have been said of any number of other so-called Christian leaders who callously insist on maintaining a relationship with people who have been clearly identified with Death Squad activity, for example Phil Derstine's[34] relationship with Enrique Bermudez of Nicaragua,[35] a former top-ranking Somocista with the Nicaraguan National Guard who - together with Roberto D'Aubuisson - was also implicated in the assassination of Archbishop Oscar Romero; or Derstine's relationship with Adolfo Calero, a top Contra leader who - like D'Aubuisson - is closely associated with the Death Squads; or Beverly LaHaye of Concerned Women of America (CWA) who never seems to tire of recounting how several prominent businessmen in Brazil successfully overthrew "socialist" Joao Goulart in 1964 "after much prayer and intercession" - of course, what she fails to add is that this same group of businessmen (all associated with the Institute for Economic and Social Research) later became identified - together with Moon's Unification Church (through WACL) - with some of the most notorious Death Squad activity in all of Latin America.[36] http://wwwantipasministries.com/html/file105.htm - Indeed, the truth is, the pastoral system that now predominates in the evangelical world is as despotic as is the one that is found in today's business world, and so much so that those who stand at the head of most of today's evangelical churches are as tyrannical and autocratic as their corporate counterparts - maybe even more so; i.e., evangelical leaders like Charles Stanley, D. James Kennedy, Tim LaHaye, the late John Wimber, Juan Carlos Ortiz, C. Peter Wagner, Beverley LaHaye, Ern Baxter, Kenneth Copeland, Kenneth Hagin, Oral Roberts, Pat Robertson, Jerry Falwell, Chuck Colson, Jack Hayford, David Yonggi Cho, Robert Stearns, Mike Bickle, Reuven Doron, Che Ahn, Frank Hammond, Cindy Jacobs, Bill Hamon, John Eckhardt, Bobbie Byerly, Dutch Sheets, Jim Goll, John Paul Jackson, James Ryle, Frank Damazio, Ed Silvoso, Carlos Annacondia, Claudio Freidzon, Roger Mitchell, Ted Haggart, Paul Cain, Chuck Pierce, Rick Joyner, Kingsley Fletcher, Jim Laffoon, Barbara Wentroble, ad infinitum. http://www.cephasministry.com/church_and_state_george_bush_and_promise_keepers.html http://www.cephas-library.com/mystery_gb_the_pk_and_principles_of_messianic_leadership.html -- 1. PAT ROBERTSON, ILLUMINISM, AND THE NEW WORLD
[cia-drugs] CIA history of the Bay of Pigs
A CIA HISTORY OF THE BAY OF PIGSAn internal CIA history of the Bay of Pigs has found its wayinto the public domain as one of the beneficent effects ofthe JFK Assassination Records Collection Act.Most internal CIA histories are routinely withheld fromdisclosure, regardless of their age. But apparently becausethe Bay of Pigs history touched on the question ofassassination policy, it was caught up in the broad sweep ofthe JFK Act and declassified.The document was located at the National Archives by Prof.David Barrett of Villanova University, who copied the 295page volume and posted it on his web site.See "The Official History of the Bay of Pigs Operation, volumeIII: Evolution of CIA's Anti-Castro Policies, 1951-January1961": http://www14.homepage.villanova.edu/david.barrett/bop.html - During the 1970s, CIA historian Jack Pfeiffer wrote a Top Secret multi-volume history of 1961s Bay of Pigs intervention in Cuba. Before his death, Pfeiffer sued unsuccessfully to de-classify some of the History. Though it is widely believed that all volumes are still classified, one is available at National Archives JFK Assassination Records Collection. Pfeiffer writes of incompetence at CIA, of an out-of-touch Allen Dulles, of too-close relations between CIA and anti-Castro U.S. corporate leaders, and about The Question of Assassination. Click below for PDF files with the Introduction and Chapters 1 through 8. (Endnotes and Appendices are not posted here, but are available with the History in Box 1 of the CIA Miscellaneous sub-collection.) ForewordChapter 1-1Chapter 1-2Chapter 2-1Chapter 2-2Chapter 2-3Chapter 2-4Chapter 2-5Chapter 2-6Chapter 3Chapter 4-1Chapter 4-2Chapter 5-1Chapter 5-2Chapter 6-1Chapter 6-2Chapter 7Chapter 8 ~~~ CIA boasts of ability to manipulate news in Bay of Pigs document http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/news/archive/2001/03/24/international0049EST0410.DTL ~~~ "Events are the ephemera of history." Fernand Braudel INVASION at Bay of Pigs http://wwwhistoryofcuba.com/history/baypigs/pigs.htm ~~~ Bay of Pigs Invasion Documents http://www.parascope.com/articles/1296/baydocs.htm Complete archives at http://www.sitbot.net/ Please let us stay on topic and be civil. OM SPONSORED LINKS United state patent United state army United state flag United state navy flag United states patent office Central intelligence agency YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "cia-drugs" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
[cia-drugs] Darwinism: Then and Now
Darwinism: Then and Now - by Erik G. Magro ©, Aug. 16th, 2005 The Victorian Age in England was a time of dramatic changes, new inventions, the Industrial Revolution, and an introduction to new ideologies, all of which would transform the way significant portions of society lived and thought of life forever. The overwhelming external changes in daily life during this period would match in intensity the nature of changes happening in the internal lives of the public. Charles Darwin, as a naturalist, helped usher in this change after a long voyage to the South Seas where he observed several widely unknown species. In 1859, a year after his return, he presented his observations in a book, The Origin of Species by means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life. In it he deduced from their widely diverse natures a common thread that linked all species to a single ancestor; the Theory of Evolution as he called the phenomenon soon became a household word and stirred up massive controversy and debate, still resounding today. The implications of Darwin's theory created a deep divide in culture, a conflict of natural versus supernatural order. Not only did it offer an alternate account of the genesis of life from the Old Testament, but it also gave a sense of moral freedom from the divine Creator and His judgment; it became a cause unto itself in society among leaders in political and industrial circles, effecting science and academia. Darwinism, as the collection of theories was called, changed the course of man's history forever. In the immediate aftermath of unleashing the evolution theory to the public, the common man was faced with a choice of how to look at life and live it. Among those exposed to these choices were some of the most important men in the business community, men who could, with their influence of wealth and power, determine the lifestyles of the middle class population by means of their product prices, work policies, and wages in the factories they owned. A staunch supporter of evolution, Herbert Spencer, developed the social application of Darwinism, which was highly influential on the practices of such powerful moguls. The ideology was known as Social Darwinism and made use of the models Darwin used to describe evolution in nature, namely, survival of the fittest and natural selection. These orders of development were the philosophical basis that publicly justified the methods factory owners were already applying in their businesses to stay competitive. As leaders of industry, they believed they had the right to impose whatever treatment they saw fit for those below them on the social ladder. Social Darwinism reduced society to the rule of the jungle in a sense. Man became a commodity, a worker bee to be exploited by a stronger species - as opposed to a sacred being made in the image of God. Soon larger segments of society in Europe and America suffered brutal working conditions throughout most of the Industrial Revolution. Extremely long hours, puny wages, underage workers, little or no benefits, and broken spirits were the rule of the day. The strong words of activist Annie Besant give testimony of the desperate frustration during this time: "Oh if we had but a people's Dante, to make a special circle in the Inferno for those who live on the misery, and suck wealth out of the starvation of helpless girls" (1717). Once the tremendous hardships were no longer bearable, public attention eventually organized successfully to agitate reform in labor laws and would soon influence other industrialized countries around the world like America, Germany, and France, opening the door for further progress in the workplace effecting workers even today. Whether or not they were conscious of it, by the masses taking such actions they were in essence rejecting the precepts of Darwinism: a great instance of irony, as they were popular during this time. Even as the materialism and dialectic principles were known and influential among the ruling and elite classes long before the Victorian Age, thinkers like Darwin, Malthus, and Spencer repackaged and updated them with new observations and analysis of the natural world and society, helping to popularize them among intellectual spheres and civilians. Once these widely shared worldviews were politicized, new forms of government emerged employing many of the perceived scientific principles described by evolutionists. Two very important shapers of political thought during this time were Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels. They believed Social Darwinism provided a way to perfect mankind behaviorally and socially. Marx even offered to dedicate his first volume of Das Kapital to Darwin. Darwin's book had given God's presence "the death-blow," he exulted to fellow socialist, Lassalle (Marx). By enhancing Socialism with Darwinism, Communism emerged as a
[cia-drugs] Illuminati Conspiracy Part One: A Precise Exegesis on the Available Evidence
Terry, who maintains Conspiracy Archive, has published one of the mostcomplete histories of the Illuminati. He has truly tied together manyof the dots and developed a comprehensive overview of conspiratorialhistory. I cannot recommend this enough! Please, check this out!Phillip D. Collins ..Part one of an intensive investigation into the real history of theIlluminati: timeline; extensive membership list (80+), aliases,profiles and influence; Illuminati cyphers, occult connections, theBrethren of Minerva and more. New discoveries never before seen inprint or on the Web. Illuminati Conspiracy Part One: A Precise Exegesis on the AvailableEvidence * Illuminati Conspiracy Part One: A Precise Exegesis on theAvailable Evidence o A Metaprogrammer at the Door of Chapel Perilous o New Promethean Possibilities o The Bavarian Illuminati: The "Insinuating Brothers" of ¨` + A Chronological Overview # 1748 # 1755 # 1768 # 1772 # 1773 # 1775 # 1776 # 1777 # 1780 # 1782 # 1784 # 1785 # 1786 # 1787 o Illuminati Membership List: Alias, Occupation, Residenceand Associates o An Intimate Look inside the Illuminati + Insinuators and Scrutators + The "Brethren of Minerva" http://www.conspiracyarchive.com/NWO/Illuminati.htm Complete archives at http://www.sitbot.net/ Please let us stay on topic and be civil. OM YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "cia-drugs" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
[cia-drugs] BRITAIN'S POLICE STATE: The cry now is treason or th e Star Chamber revisited
BRITAIN'S POLICE STATE: The cry now is treason or the Star Chamber revisited by William Bowles August 13, 2005 williambowles.info Secret, judge-only courts where the accused has no access to the evidence? Changes to the law will include making it illegal to advocate violence to further a persons belief, justifying or validating such violence, or fostering hatred. Under the Lords Chancellor Cardinal Wolsey and Archbishop Cranmer (1515-1529), the Court of Star Chamber became a political weapon for bringing actions against opponents to the policies of Henry VIII, his Ministers and his Parliament. Then, under James the 1st and Charles the 1st, the Star Chamber Court sessions were held in secret, with no indictments, no right of appeal, no juries, and no witnesses. Evidence was presented in writing. On October 17, 1632, the Court of Star Chamber banned all news books.[1] Sound familiar? This is a moment to seize. The Kaleidoscope has been shaken. The pieces are in flux. Soon they will settle again. Before they do, let us re-order this world around us."Tony Blair @ the Labour Party Conference, October 1st 2001 Tony Blair tells us that Let no one be in any doubt. The rules of the game are changing, but whose changing them and whose game is it? [2] The cry of Treason, is after all, the logical conclusion to a policy based upon demonisation of the other and the latest sign of a ruling class in desperate need to justify not only its onslaught on the people of Iraq but the attacks on our rights and liberties. Not surprisingly, the bombings of July 7 and the topping up of July 21 came in very handy in the run-up to the cry of treason! The terrible irony of our current situation is that although the state is undergoing an unprecedented crisis of credibility because of its policy of allying itself with the US imperium, there is no real domestic opposition. So what is it that the state is allegedly so afraid of? What should not be let out of our sight is the fact that unless the domestic population is presented with a clear and present danger, the state faces the real possibility of a genuine opposition developing to its policies. This is the real danger. For the reality is that it is precisely the policies of Blairs government along with that of the US that is the cause of the current situation. Hence the need to continually up the ante, and thus, the danger is now amongst us and who better to use as a target than not only the alien, the Asian, but also an alien religion, one that still has its more traditional adherents who insist on treating women as property hence the hijab becomes overnight, a symbol of all that is alien to our alleged British values. Modernity versus tradition become ideological weapons of the state even as it turns the clock back to an earlier age of naked imperialism! These guys know no shame. The key to understanding the tactics of the Blair government are the phrases, The British way of life and British values, catch-all phrases that are, by themselves completely hypocritical, especially in the context of the concerted propaganda campaign of the past three decades that centred on the creation of an allegedly multi-cultural Britain. Thus whilst the experts thrash around looking for a clear-cut definition of Britishness To be British seems to us to mean that we respect the laws, the democratic political structures, and give our allegiance to the state in return for its protection, the group declared. To be British is to respect those overarching specific institutions, values and beliefs that bind us all, the different nations and cultures together in peace and in legal order. To be British does not mean assimilation into a common culture so that original identities are lost. Declares the government-backed study, the Life in the UK Advisory Group, the obvious fact of a country where racism is institutionalized admitted by the governments own investigations into the Lawrence murder at every level from education to the police, apparently escapes the notice of these experts. [3] Moreover, that the self-same government that has waged wars of terror and mayhem against the populations of Yugoslavia, Afghanistan and Iraq over the past decade and a half, now
[cia-drugs] Unanswered questions about Sri Lankan foreign minister's a ssassination
Unanswered questions about Sri Lankan foreign ministers assassination By W.A. Sunil and K. Ratnayake26 August 2005 It is now two weeks since Sri Lankan foreign minister Lakshman Kadirgamar was shot dead by a sniper at his private residence in Colombo late in the evening of August 12. As far as the Sri Lankan media and political parties are concerned, there is no doubt that the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE) carried out the murder. Within hours of the killing, senior police officials and military spokesmen announced that the LTTE was responsible. Sinhala chauvinist parties, including the Janatha Vimukthi Peramuna (JVP) and Jathika Hela Urumaya (JHU), seized on the assassination, denounced the current ceasefire with the LTTE and began agitating for demands that are tantamount to a return to war. As part of their campaign, they have denounced anyone who has failed to name the LTTE as the killers. The Colombo press has been full of analysis and stories, many of them simply cooked up, about Kadirgamars murder and the police investigation. All of them begin by assuming that the LTTE, which has publicly denied any responsibility, was to blame. No alternatives have even been canvassed. It is possible that the LTTE did order the assassination. It has gained very little from the ceasefire. Peace talks have been stalled since 2003 and efforts to establish a joint tsunami aid mechanism with Colombo have been delayed repeatedly. In the Eastern Province, its officials, offices and fighters are being attacked regularly by a breakaway faction that receives covert support from the Sri Lankan military. However, the chief beneficiaries of Kadirgamars assassination have been the JVP, the JHU and sections of the security forces that have adamantly opposed the aid agreement, the ceasefire and the entire peace process. It is certainly possible that elements from these reactionary layers could have hatched a conspiracy to murder Kadirgamar and pin it on the LTTE so as to poison any renewal of peace talks. Virtually no one in Colombo has even raised the possibility. Before falling into line with the clamour against the LTTE, President Chandrika Kumaratunga blamed the killing on political foes opposed to the peaceful transformation of conflict. The comment is particularly significant as the president is well aware of the entrenched opposition inside the military as well as the hostility of the JVP, which quit the ruling coalition in June over her decision to sign an aid agreement with the LTTE. Just as significant are the reasons for Kumaratungas about-face. In last weekends Sunday Times, the newspapers political editor, who has many high-level political connections, revealed that Kumaratunga had come under sharp behind-the-scenes criticism from the JVP for failing to blame the LTTE. [H]ow can I blame the LTTE? I am the president and I must have some evidence before I say such a thing, an exasperated Kumaratunga told a ministerial colleague. Yet that evening [August 14] she appeared on national television and declared that the LTTE was responsiblewithout offering a shred of evidence. Immediately after the killing, the police announced that they had detained two TamilsLTTE suspectsengaged in surveillance with a video camera near Kadirgamars house a fortnight earlier. Since then, the police investigation has produced no proof that the LTTE carried out the murder. The limited evidence is circumstantial and inconclusive, and raises more questions than answers. The killer or killers have not been caught. Moreover, the police appear to have few leads. The WSWS spoke to Senior Police Superintendent Sarath Lugoda, director of the Colombo Crime Division and a member of the investigative team. Asked about progress in the case, he said: There is no clue still as to the persons who did the crime. While he believed that the LTTE was responsible, Lugoda added: [I]t is not possible to say whether it [the killing] was done by the LTTE or any other group until the investigations are over. He said that about 100 people had been questioned but no one had been detained. The WSWS also spoke to the chief military spokesman, Brigadier Daya Ratnayake, who insisted that there was no doubt that the LTTE killed Kadirgamar. When asked about evidence, he admitted that it [the LTTEs responsibility] has not been established. The investigations are being carried out in an open mind. In fact, the investigation is being carried out with anything but an open mind. No effort is being made to investigate the possible involvement of the military, the police or various Sinhala communal organisations. Virtually all of those who are being rounded up for interrogation are Tamils in an effort to find a connection to the LTTE. Yet, despite two weeks of inquiries, the police still have no clue as to the killers. Lack of evidence Based on what has been made public, there
[cia-drugs] Plum Island: One Step Forward - Two Steps Back
Hello All: On Labor Day, Sept. 5, 2005 Jeff Rense will be offering a special Plum Island Update Program. As it is Labor Day we will be presenting a former Plum Island employee who was hired during the long strike.He has a horror story to tell of treatment of the workers by Plum Island management. In short, as the workers were from long distances, many from Fort Carson, Colo. they had to sleep and eat on the island with the exception of one day when they could go on the ferry to town for a few hours. John Doe, as we will call him, told me the meals consisted of a half granola bar for breakfast, one granola bar and bottle of water for lunch and scant goulash for dinner. This went on for a month. Each worker was given One cot, One pillow and ONE sheet. They slept in the boiler building and another group in a warehouse building. Needles to say the temps on some days were into the 100s and the men only received ONE bottle of water.I have seen some reports that Plum Island is a BSL4 and I am wondering if they sneaked in the upgrade. If anyone can find information on a BSL 4 upgrade at the Plum, please post here.The following shows that Plum Island is still business as usual. There were two separate FMD cross contaminations and Plum Island could not figure out how they occurred. I am sure that many here, from the UK, Pat and others KNOW how it happened. FMD virus is extremely easy to spread. Those like Pat who lived through the horror of the 2000/2001` FMD outbreak in the UK know that it spread so easily that even veterinarians carried the virus on their shoes. The answer at Plum? Someone got careless.I have found other documents that indicate:There have been allegations that several foreign scientists had been found in biolabs without escorts and personnel other than bench scientists could also go into the labs without escort. More recently, nonscientific workers are escorted into the biocontainment labs by escorts but are left alone to do their work. I, frankly, do not think that the Plum will change. Management has a long way to go.Patricia Doyle--- Plum Island ProblemsPlum Island: One Step Forward - Two Steps Backby Robert S. DeLuca The Group for the South Fork would like to congratulate the members of the Coalition of Neighborhoods for the Protection of Sag Harbor (CONPOSH) for taking the initiative to sponsor a community forum on the safety and bio-security issues facing the Plum Island Animal Disease Research Facility. The CONPOSH event clearly demonstrated the broad base of grass roots public interest in the safety, bio-security, and accountability problems at Plum Island. We were extremely pleased that -- after some internal debate and hesitation -- Plum Island's new director Dr. Beth Lautner agreed to join me and Congressman Tim Bishop at the Sag Harbor meeting held in late June. The forum provided each participant with an opportunity to present his or her assessment of the facility, its progress on safety and security issues and the concerns that remain to be addressed. Those attending also had the opportunity to directly question those on the panel. The presence of Dr. Lautner at this meeting was a major step forward for the facility, which had of late been resistant to numerous recommendations for increased public availability and oversight. We believe the event also demonstrated to Dr. Lautner that those seeking such meetings are not simply trying to subject the facility to irresponsible public attacks. Questions posed by those in the audience were thoughtful, probing and exceptionally even-handed. We remain hopeful that this meeting had a positive impact on our continuing campaign to have top Plum Island officials schedule periodic open meetings on both the North and South Forks. We are strongly advocating that these meetings provide the public with access to the facility's technical experts and leadership to assure that such meetings do not degenerate into a simple public relations campaign for the lab. We are joined in this goal by our colleagues on the North Fork, as well as by those representatives from Congressman Tim Bishop and Senator Hillary Clinton's offices who are also active members of the lab's "Community Forum" . NOW THE BAD NEWS Within a month of Dr. Lautner's presentation at the CONPOSH forum in Sag Harbor, Plum Island officials confirmed two separate cross-contamination events that resulted in the "inadvertent infections" of several lab animals with foot and mouth disease. Although the infections were reportedly contained within the facility's secure laboratory areas, Plum Island officials could not offer an explanation as to how either of the infections
[cia-drugs] Re: Fw: Press Release - Bolton Under Media Attack for Resisting U.N. Push for Global Taxes - August 29, 2005
I wouldn't put much credence in anything that "Accuracy in Media" puts out. Each press release that they regurgitate convinces me of their duplicitous agenda that much more. n. The Bolton Deceptionby William Norman GriggApril 13, 2005Described by allies and critics alike as the bane enemy of the UN, John Bolton, the Bush administration's nominee to serve as U.S. ambassador to the UN, has pledged to strengthen the world body, rather than work for its abolition. Prior to Senate hearings into his nomination to be U.S. ambassador to the UN, John Bolton was portrayed by both his allies and critics as the bane enemy of the world body. Some critics of the Bush administration have suggested that Boltons nomination is part of a plot to destroy the UN. Yet during the opening day of Senate hearings Bolton made it clear that the Bush administration, its "unilateralist" posturing notwithstanding, is not only willing to work with the UN, but actually eager to strengthen the organization. "Walking away from the United Nations is not an option," insisted Bolton in opening remarks before a hearing of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee. "The United States is committed to the success of the United Nations, and we view the UN as an important component of our diplomacy . If confirmed, I look forward [to forging] a closer relationship between the United States and the United Nations, which depends critically on American leadership." Bolton predicted that the UN would play a central role in the Bush administrations "global democratic revolution." "Now more than ever the UN must play a critical role, as it strives to fulfill the aspirations of its original promise," he declared. While conceding that he had often spoken critically of the UN in recent years, Bolton asserted that the "consistent theme" of his public criticism "is that for the UN to be effective requires American leadership. I say it over and over again. I deeply believe it. My criticisms during the 1990s were in large measure because of what I thought was the lack of effective American leadership." It is the Bush administrations intention, he continued, to "strengthen" the UN by making it "a more efficient and uncorrupt organization." This performance was enough to overcome the resistance of Senator Lincoln Chafee (R-R.I.), a Republican UN supporter who had expressed misgivings about Bolton. "You said all the right things in your opening statement," Chafee informed Bolton. Among those "right things" was Boltons claim that he had earned the warm endorsement of UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan. The Bush administrations most vocal constituency is found among conservative Americans who understandably despise the UN and all its works and pomps. Yet most of them have rallied behind the Bolton nomination out of simple partisan reflex: They have taken Bolton (a member of the globalist Council on Foreign Relations, the body that essentially created the UN) to their bosom simply because he has drawn rhetorical fire from Democratic politicians and their activist allies. Among those herding conservative Americans behind the Bolton nomination is "Move America Forward," a Republican Party front organization created by a GOP-aligned consulting group in California. Through advertisements on television and the Internet, Move America Forward has promoted a petition drive devoted to the theme, "Get the UN Out of the U.S." It has also served as an uncritical booster of Bolton, insisting that as UN ambassador he would help make the UN work on behalf of U.S. interests. The April 11 Wall Street Journal described Move America Forward as "a conservative group that wants the U.S. to withdraw entirely from the UN ." In fact, while the group has called for the eviction of the UN from the U.S., it has never called for the U.S. to reclaim its independence by leaving the body. Move America Forwards advertising campaign at once artlessly mimics, and subtly inverts, the long-established John Birch Society catchphrase "Get US Out of the UN." In substantive terms, Move America Forward is saying: "Keep US In the UN as long as its headquarters are located abroad." As long as the U.S. remains in the UN, it makes no material difference where the UNs headquarters is located. After all, the World Trade Organization, which is already issuing rulings that have a direct impact on our economy, is headquartered in Geneva, not New York. Granted, removal of UN Headquarters to Geneva (or, more appropriately, to Moscow or Beijing) would do much to improve the civic hygiene of New York City. But with the Bush administration committed to strengthening the UN, nothing would be gained by merely changing its address. And this reality is probably not lost on the PR flacks who created Move America Forward, who have distinguished themselves only by the slavishness with which theyve shilled for the Bush administration. The Journal also took
[cia-drugs] Perpetual War for Perpetual Evolution Part Two
Perpetual War for Perpetual Evolution Part Two- by Phillip D. Collins ©, July 29th, 2005Members of the Black Hand and Their Emblem In the previous installment in this series, we established the centrality of war to the elite's occult doctrine of transformism. This occult doctrine has presented itself under numerous appellations, but its core theme has remained the same: humanity is gradually evolving towards apotheosis. The most recent incarnation of this doctrine is Darwinism, which depicts life as an enormous struggle to survive. On the microcosmic level, this struggle is bodied forth by the competition between species. On a macrocosmic level, this struggle manifests itself as war between nations. In hopes of facilitating the purported evolutionary ascent of man, the power elite has instigated war after war. In this installment, we shall examine how the ruling class manufactured World War I. Read the entire article at:http://www.conspiracyarchive.com/Commentary/Perpetual_War_Evolution_2.htm Complete archives at http://www.sitbot.net/ Please let us stay on topic and be civil. OM SPONSORED LINKS United state bankruptcy court western district of texas United state life insurance United state patent United state patent search United states patent office United state flag YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "cia-drugs" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
[cia-drugs] Privatizing the Truth; Bush's war on information
Privatizing the Truth; Bush's war on information Bush's lying is not a matter of human frailty or corruption, but a statement of administration policy by Mike Whitney August 25, 2005 ''We're an empire now, and when we act, we create our own reality". Bush aide; Ron Suskind, New York Times Magazine 10-17-04 A great deal of print has been wasted on President Bush's inability to tell the truth. In fact, it really makes little difference whether Bush is a pathological liar or not. What is meaningful however is that deception is the primary tool for the maintenance of the state. Transparency and candor are now seen as direct threats to the preservation of the status quo. This suggests that Bush's lying is not simply a matter of human frailty or corruption, but a clear statement of administration policy. This may seem like a minor point, but in fact the conduct of the Bush administration cannot be seriously evaluated without understanding that deceit is the cornerstone of their class-based world view. Evidence of this is everywhere, right down to the language that is painstakingly minted in right-wing think tanks to conceal the real meaning of administration policy. "The war on terror", preemption", and "enemy combatant" are just three expressions that are intentionally designed to mislead the public. The real purpose of this language is to elicit support for unpopular policies that serve the exclusive interests of elites. Administration policy is normally reduced to snappy sound-bytes that charm the public and keep the main players "on message". They are released as "talking points" to their political and media surrogates and disseminated from every newsroom and radio-station across the country. This is the true meaning of propaganda; "to propagate" one's ideas from many vantage points. No one has succeeded at this better than the Bush administration. As many commentators have already noted, the lead up to the war in Iraq was perhaps the "high-water mark" for state propaganda. Dissenting, anti-war voices were excluded from all the major media and the false, uncorroborated charges against Saddam were highlighted in a way to make war inevitable. Reflecting on the imagery and theatrics that went into marketing unprovoked aggression, the media-coup was carried out with astonishing precision. Since then, however, media credibility has steadily declined; leaving the public increasingly disenchanted with the ongoing occupation and distrustful of the coverage. The "privately" owned media is only capable of producing a narrative that is compatible with the goals of ownership. Curtailing civil liberties (Patriot Act, National ID etc) and waging war are never in the public interest; they only serve the narrow objectives of the few who stand to gain from them directly. It is critical that the propaganda-system be progressively exposed so the public can see its destructiveness and work to create a different model. At present, the American system of governance is so inherently corrupted that there is very little worth salvaging. The electoral system has been clumsily rigged with voting technology that maintains the appearance of democracy, but eliminates the real possibility of majority rule. Similarly, the US Military, now deeply imbedded into domestic affairs is directly involved in "Strategic Intelligence" operations that are almost exclusively designed to deceive the American people to sustain support for foreign interventions. Pat Tillman and Jessica Lynch are classic examples of intentionally misleading Military information, but there are countless others related to the use of banned weapons, bombed wedding parties and fabricated civilian casualty-rates. Similar to the Bush administration, Pentagon deception is a matter of policy not simply a "cover-up". Nothing they say should be taken at face value. In Iraq, we have seen the military insert friendly journalists into their operational structure; ensuring that the message they produce corresponds with their overall strategic goals. The "embedded" journalist-phenomenon establishes news organizations as a front-line part of the military apparatus. The media is now a fully integrated part of the armed services. The American people have seemingly accepted this transparent absurdity without question. On the other hand, we've seen journalists, who prefer to stay beyond the reach of the military's control,
[cia-drugs] Trinational Elites Map North American Future in NAFTA Plus
Trinational Elites Map North American Future in "NAFTA Plus" By Miguel Pickard | August 24, 2005 I would like you [of the press] to understand the magnitude of what this means. It is transcendent, its something that goes well beyond the relationship we have had up to now. President Vicente Fox, regarding NAFTA Plus, onboard the presidential plane returning to Mexico from George W. Bushs Crawford ranch, March 2005. NAFTA (North American Free Trade Agreement) has been in effect almost 12 years and a new stage, NAFTA Plus, is in the works, referred to as deep integration, particularly in Canada. The elites of the three NAFTA countries (Canada, the United States, and Mexico) have been aggressively moving forward to build a new political and economic entity. A trinational merger is underway that leaps beyond the single market that NAFTA envisioned and, in many ways, would constitute a single state, called simply, North America. http://americas.irc-onlineorg/am/386 URL: http://www.americaspolicy.org/pdf/articles/0508pickard.pdf Complete archives at http://www.sitbot.net/ Please let us stay on topic and be civil. OM YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "cia-drugs" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
[cia-drugs] The right to be left alone
The right to be left alone- Thursday, August 25, 2005 SHOULD THE STATE have the ability to track your movements with tiny radio transmitters? This is the essence of the debate behind Senate Bill 682, which reaches a critical juncture today in the Assembly Appropriations Committee. The bill, authored by Sen. Joe Simitian, D-Palo Alto, would wisely put some restrictions and safeguards on government's use of radio frequency identification (RFID) technology. Simitian's bill was inspired by the controversy that erupted when middle- school students in Sutter County were required to wear badges that allowed the school to track their movements around campus. The school board last year scrapped the experimental program in the face of parental objections, but the implications of expanded government use of this technology are truly chilling. One of Simitian's concerns is that personal information contained on a government-issued RFID card could be picked up by criminals -- such as ID thiefs -- carrying one of the readily obtainable portable reading devices. The potential for abuse is staggering. Imagine if government authorities, political activists or private detectives wanted to identify individuals going to anti-war rallies, gun shows, abortion clinics or religious events? Simitian's SB682 takes the prudent approach of limiting the use of this technology until stronger safeguards can be developed. His bill would: -- Impose a three-year moratorium on the use of RFID technology on "mass distribution" documents such as driver's licenses, library cards, K-12 student IDs and Medi-Cal cards. -- Prohibit the "intentional remote reading" of personal information without the target's knowledge -- with penalties of up to a year in jail and a $5,000 fine. -- Establish strong encryption standards to reduce the chances of unauthorized reading of RFID data. The measure preserves the commonly accepted current uses of RFID, such as the FasTrack system on Bay Area bridges. Unfortunately, the bill has run into resistance from influential factions of the high-tech industry, which argue that the measure is founded on false fears about a secure and reliable technology. Their lobbyists are warning that additional safeguards would drive up the cost of RFID. By now, Americans should be wary of mere verbal assurances -- whether from government or industry -- about the level of privacy protection in this digital age. The recent wave of security breaches of personal information held by financial institutions is Exhibit A of the need for meaningful regulation. SB682 represents a restrained, reasoned approach to regulating a technology with potential for abuse. The Assembly Appropriations Committee must approve SB682 to keep it advancing toward the desk of Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger. Let legislators know you are tracking this important bill. You can find the names and contact numbers for your Senate and Assembly representatives by typing in your ZIP code at www.leginfo.ca.gov/yourleg.html. PageB - 8 URL: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/chronicle/archive/2005/08/25/EDGFREC5O71.DTL Complete archives at http://www.sitbot.net/ Please let us stay on topic and be civil. OM SPONSORED LINKS United state bankruptcy court western district of texas United state life insurance United state patent United state patent search United states patent office United state flag YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "cia-drugs" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
[cia-drugs] Domesticating the Anthropomorphic Apes
Domesticating the Anthropomorphic Apes- by Phillip D. Collins ©, Aug. 31st, 2005With the opening of the London Zoo's "human" exhibit, the masses havebeen further psychologically conditioned to accept the view of man asan animal. As this view becomes more entrenched in the public mind, sodoes the feasibility of a stratified society governed by atechnocratic elite.Read the entire article at:http://www.conspiracyarchive.com/Commentary/Anthropomorphic_Apes.htm Complete archives at http://www.sitbot.net/ Please let us stay on topic and be civil. OM YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "cia-drugs" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
[cia-drugs] Project Day Lily, book index by Nicolson PhD bio-weapons
PROJECT day lily An American Biological Warfare Tragedy © 2004 by Garth L. Nicolson, Ph.D. and Nancy L. Nicolson, Ph.D. THE FOLLOWING IS BASED ON A TRUE STORY Also see Proverbs 23:23 and did the Anthrax Vaccine cause the mailings ? - The Toxic Reverend The authors have written this book in order to shed light on a crisis facing our country and the world. They have chosen to use a fictional format to maximize dramatic impact. The events described are true, but fictitious names, places and composite characters have been used to develop the story. Dialogue between the characters was constructed from the recollections of various sources. The scientific principals and results discussed in this book are true and have been documented in the authors publications, reports and sworn testimony to Presidential Commissions and committees of the United States Congress http://www.angelfire.com/nm/guineapigs/bioweapI.html Complete archives at http://www.sitbot.net/ Please let us stay on topic and be civil. OM YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "cia-drugs" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
[cia-drugs] Legal Land Theft and the Supreme Court
"It is obvious that behind Robert's clean-cut conservative mask hides a proponent of oligarchy." Legal Land Theft and the Supreme Court- by Paul David Collins ©, Sept. 2nd, 2005If property can be taken away from the people for private economicdevelopment, then that means the government is giving preferentialtreatment to private forces. Those private forces would be correctlylabeled an aristocracy. The Supreme Court has been prostituted out tothe Power Elite for the purpose of transforming the Republic into anoligarchy.Read the entire article at:http://www.conspiracyarchive.com/Commentary/Eminent_Domain.htm Legal Land Theft and the Supreme Court - by Paul David Collins ©, Sept. 2nd, 2005 When a student is introduced to the subject of American political science, the three branches of the national government is one of the first topics explored. The student is taught that the judicial branch's primary task is to interpret the law. It was for this purpose that the Supreme Court was created. In June of 2005, a Supreme Court ruling in Kelo versus New London, a case concerning the issue of eminent domain, drastically redefined the Court's role in national politics. CNN's Parija Bhatnagar reported the following concerning the Supreme Courts ruling: The Supreme Court may have just delivered an early Christmas gift to the nation's biggest retailers by its ruling Thursday allowing governments to take private land for business development. Retailers such as Target, Home Depot and Bed, Bath Beyond have thus far managed to keep the "eminent domain" issue under the radar -- and sidestep a prickly public relations problem -- even as these companies continue to expand their footprint into more urban residential areas where prime retail space isn't always easily found. Eminent domain is a legal principle that allows the government to take private property for a "public use," such as a school or roads and bridges, in exchange for just compensation. Local governments have increasingly expanded the scope of public use to include commercial entities such as shopping malls or independent retail stores. Critics of the process maintain that local governments are too quick to invoke eminent domain on behalf of big retailers because of the potential for tax revenue generation and job creation. The Supreme Court's decision Thursday clarified that local governments may seize people's homes and businesses -- even against their will -- for private and public economic development. (No pagination) The Court's actions in this particular case make it painfully obvious that the justices have become little more than politicians in robes. Do not be deceived. Supreme Court nominees are no longer chosen based on their judicial philosophy. It is naive to believe that a potential nominee is called into the Oval Office by the President and asked whether he or she is a proponent of judicial activism or judicial restraint. A simple question is posed to the nominee: "Are you willing to dance?" Eager to ascend up the political ladder, the nominee will invariably answer in the affirmative. So the Supreme Court is now made up of justices dancing to a political tune. This leads to the next question: "Who is calling the tune?" The answer to the above question is disturbing. If property can be taken away from the people for private economic development, then that means the government is giving preferential treatment to private forces. Those private forces would be correctly labeled an aristocracy. The Supreme Court has been prostituted out to the Power Elite for the purpose of transforming the Republic into an oligarchy. The Kelo versus New London ruling will help preserve the blueblood tradition of stealing the commoners' lands in the name of profit. This is a tradition that goes back thousands of years. In fifteenth century England, major landowners began fencing in common land. Originally, those lower down the economic food chain used these lands as tilling and grazing grounds. All of that had changed by 1600. Major landowners had enclosed one-eighth of England's arable land (Chambers et al. 474). In the eighteenth century, notions and concepts of democratic institutions and representative, constitutional republicanism began to be popularized. With this rise in popularity, the masses began to breathe easy, believing Olympian delirium had finally been expunged. Perhaps now the common person would enjoy the property rights as well. After all, two of the inalienable rights recognized by America's Founding Fathers were the right to liberty and property. This meant that man had an inalienable right not only to produce, but also to keep that which he produced. One's incentive to be productive comes from these two rights. However, the plight of the Native Americans painfully illustrates the fact that the bluebloods' tradition of land theft was far
[cia-drugs] The Leipzig Connection - The Sabotage of American Education by German Experimental Psychology
The Leipzig Connection:Sabotage of the US Educational Systemby Paolo Lionni Chapter 1. A New Domain "Wilhelm Maximilian Wundt was born in 1832 in Neckarau, in a small town in southern Germany. Wundt entered the university at Tubingen when he was 19, transferred to Heidelberg after half a year, and graduated as a medical doctor from the university in 1856. He stayed on at Heidelberg for the next seventeen years, working first as a professor's assistant, and later as a professor himself, in the field of psychology. Psychology, at that time, meant simply the study (ology) of the soul (psyche), or mind." "In 1874, Wundt left Heidelberg to take a position as professor of philosophy at Zurich. He stayed there for only a year, and then accepted a chair in philosophy at the University of Leipzig, in Germany. He was to remain at Leipzig for the rest of his academic career, eventually being appointed rector of the university. Wundt died in 1920." "Those are some of the vital statistics. What they omit is that Wundt was the founder of experimental psychology and the force behind its dissemination throughout the western world." "To Wundt a thing made sense and was worth pursuing if it could be measured, quantified, and scientifically demonstrated. Seeing no way to do this with the human soul, he proposed that psychology concerns itself solely with experience." "Wundt asserted that man is devoid of spirit and self-determinism. He set out to prove that man is the summation of his experiences, of the stimuli which intrude upon his consciousness and unconsciousness. Before Wundt, the subject of psychology was largely philosophical in nature and dealt with the spirit, soul and mind. Wundt 's activity "redefined psychology as a physiological rather than a philosophical subject." Basically, everything previously considered to be a fundamental part of Man, the spirit, mind, soul, feelings, will, intention, hopes, and ideas, came to be ignored and explained solely as a response to external stimuli and physiology. Per Lionni, "What was will? For Wundt, will was the direct result of the combination of perceived stimuli, not an independent, individual intention as psychology and philosophy had, with some notable exceptions, held up to that time". There is nothing inherently wrong or incorrect about investigating the "mind" scientifically, using standard methods of theorizing, testing, and observing results until a workable understanding is arrived at. I am not "anti-science" or against careful analysis. The problem with "modern" psychology and psychiatry is that the "mind" has been ignored, NEVER investigated as a thing in itself, and instead, genetics, physiology and the environment have been "examined" ad nauseam and incorrectly explained to be the source of all Man's problems. The theories and beliefs, which existed before the advent of Wundt, while largely philosophical, and often vague, opinionated and confusing, did often suffer from a lack of "scientific basis", but they at least recognized the "mind" as an entity with its own functions and workings (as distinct from physiology and the environment). The "mind" has been studied extensively throughout the centuries in what are today called religions such as Hinduism, Sufiism and Buddhism. The material is often confusing, and has become interminably entwined with religious beliefs and ideas making it difficult to separate the basic psychological data from opinion and pure fantasy. An honest objective involvement with any of these traditional subjects, or more modern subjects, such as Rosicrucianism, Creative Visualization or Scientology, to mention only a few, can usually make it quite obvious to any serious student that the mind 1) exists and, 2) has its own nature, functions and capabilities quite separate and distinct from the body or physiology. Western Man's failure to understand the truths in these subjects has been a severe loss for us all. It is important to understand the magnitude in the change of viewpoint that occurred with the advent of Wundt's ideas. The spreading of Wundt's ideas had the effect of minimizing and erasing the notion of man as being or having an inner "personality", soul, or spirit. You are not viewed as a person with thoughts, feelings, ideas, will, hopes, and dreams. You are never appealed to on that level. Your "mind" is ignored. YOU are ignored. Those in control of education, psychology, and psychiatry largely view man as an animal to be controlled and manipulated. They view YOU as an animal. You are thought of as a piece of meat to be placed in suitable
[cia-drugs] This is working very well for them.
TONE DEAF: IT'S CONTAGIOUS Link: Editor Publisher In case you were concerned that tone-deaf statements weren't a family tradition for the Bush's of Kennebunkport. Let them eat cake, indeed. Accompanying her husband, former President George H.W.Bush, on a tour of hurricane relief centers in Houston, Barbara Bush said today, referring to the poor who had lost everything back home and evacuated, "This is working very well for them." [snip] And so many of the people in the arena here, you know, were underprivileged anyway, so this--this (she chuckles slightly) is working very well for them." http://floricane.typepad.com/buttermilk/2005/09/tone_deaf_its_c.html THAT'S NOT ALL, FOLKS Link: Terrorism, Security America's Purpose An all-star conference on terrorism to be held tomorrow and Wednesday (September 6 and 7) will be broadcast live on the web. Among the heavy hitters: Madeleine Albright, Jim Fallows, Lee Hamilton, Chuck Hagel, Warren Rudman and retired General Wesley Clark. = HEADS SHOULD ROLL Link: Transcript for September 4 - Meet the Press Scroll past all the bullshit condolences for Chief Justice Rehnquist and the speculation about nominee John Roberts and the defensive babble of Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff and you'll find an impassioned call from the President of Jefferson Parish, Louisiana, which was completely flooded last week, for some heads to roll now: MR. BROUSSARD: Sir, they were told like me, every single day, "The cavalry's coming," on a federal level, "The cavalry's coming, the cavalry's coming, the cavalry's coming." I have just begun to hear the hoofs of the cavalry. The cavalry's still not here yet, but I've begun to hear the hoofs, and we're almost a week out. Let me give you just three quick examples. We had Wal-Mart deliver three trucks of water, trailer trucks of water. FEMA turned them back. They said we didn't need them. This was a week ago. FEMA--we had 1,000 gallons of diesel fuel on a Coast Guard vessel docked in my parish. The Coast Guard said, "Come get the fuel right away." When we got there with our trucks, they got a word. "FEMA says don't give you the fuel." Yesterday--yesterday--FEMA comes in and cuts all of our emergency communication lines. They cut them without notice. Our sheriff, Harry Lee, goes back in, he reconnects the line. He posts armed guards on our line and says, "No one is getting near these lines." Sheriff Harry Lee said that if America--American government would have responded like Wal-Mart has responded, we wouldn't be in this crisis. But I want to thank Governor Blanco for all she's done and all her leadership. She sent in the National Guard. I just repaired a breach on my side of the 17th Street canal that the secretary didn't foresee, a 300-foot breach. I just completed it yesterday with convoys of National Guard and local parish workers and levee board people. It took us two and a half days working 24/7. I just closed it. MR. RUSSERT: All right. MR. BROUSSARD: I'm telling you most importantly I want to thank my public employees... MR. RUSSERT: All right. MR. BROUSSARD: ...that have worked 24/7. They're burned out, the doctors, the nurses. And I want to give you one last story and I'll shut up and let you tell me whatever you want to tell me. The guy who runs this building I'm in, emergency management, he's responsible for everything. His mother was trapped in St. Bernard nursing home and every day she called him and said, "Are you coming, son? Is somebody coming?" And he said, "Yeah, Mama, somebody's coming to get you. Somebody's coming to get you on Tuesday. Somebody's coming to get you on Wednesday. Somebody's coming to get you on Thursday. Somebody's coming to get you on Friday." And she drowned Friday night. She drowned Friday night. MR. RUSSERT: Mr. President... MR. BROUSSARD: Nobody's coming to get us. Nobody's coming to get us. The secretary has promised. Everybody's promised. They've had press conferences. I'm sick of the press conferences. For God sakes, shut up and send us somebody. A LITANY OF QUESTIONS Link: The Washington Post I saw Post reporter Terry M. Neal several times this weekend on TV, and he continues to ask the questions that few people have been willing to answer this past week. While the urgent crisis in New Orleans is beginning to subside, the reality is that the recovery efforts along the entire Gulf Coast will take years; the hard work has barely even begun. Here are a few of Neal's questions: Why did Department of Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff and FEMA head Michael Brown appear on television
[cia-drugs] Re: FEMA Chief Sent Help Only After Storm Hit
The spin is this isn't the time to point fingers, even as the regime apologists say there is much blame to go around, all the way from the mayor of New Orleans to the Governor of Louisiana. The limited hang-out is FEMA's "incompetence," which may, eventually, cost Michael Brown his job. And they will make it so hard to wrest it from him that it will seem like a tremendous accomplishment when he's promoted sideways. But it's not incompetence that bars relief, declines to drop supplies, turns back evacuees and cuts lines of communication."Culling," a document of The Order of Nine Angles, states that "The time is now right - both strategically and tactically - to reveal the Satanic truth, the whole Satanic truth and nothing but the Satanic truth in clear, precise terms which are not open to mis-interpretation."There are no masks anymore. The whole Satanic truth is on display, from the disdain of mercy to the piling of horror upon horror. But the more grotesque the vision, the greater the need of those yet in denial to avert their eyes. This is the challenge before Americans at which the world holds its breath: Can they see, this time? Have they had enough, yet? http://rigorousintuition.blogspot.com/2005/09/last-refuge.html ~~~ --- In cia-drugs@yahoogroups.com, "Jim Rarey" [EMAIL PROTECTED]... wrote: http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/national/AP-Katrina-Disaster-Response.html?pagewanted=print September 7, 2005 FEMA Chief Sent Help Only After Storm Hit By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS Filed at 11:58 a.m. ET WASHINGTON (AP) -- The top U.S. disaster official waited hours after Hurricane Katrina struck the Gulf Coast before he proposed to his boss sending at least 1,000 Homeland Security workers into the region to support rescuers, internal documents show. Complete archives at http://www.sitbot.net/ Please let us stay on topic and be civil. OM SPONSORED LINKS United state bankruptcy court western district of texas United state life insurance United state patent United state patent search United states patent office United state flag YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "cia-drugs" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
[cia-drugs] The Google of the Defense Industry
The Google of the Defense Industry [Jonathan Caverley, Tuesday September 6, 2005 at 1:40pm EST] I Have not posted very much due to my own work schedule but also the sheer awe in the face of the Katrina disaster. However, I thought this article deserved highlighting for anyone interested in private military contractors, the Quadrennial Defense Review, and the state of the military-industrial complex: Science Applications International Corp., the largest privately held defense contractor, announced yesterday that it would go public early next year, aiming to raise $1.7 billion for insiders cashing in on the post-Sept. 11 government spending boom that fueled the firm's growth.The public offering would rival Google Inc.'s $1.8 billion deal in 2004 in size and be the largest IPO of a government contractor in many yearsIn a Securities and Exchange Commission filing, the San Diego-based company outlined its government work, which accounted for 87 percent of its $7.2 billion in revenue last year. Many of the company's 10,000 contracts are with the Defense Department, where it is known not for weapons, but for managing large projects to integrate information technology systems, including several in the intelligence field.SAIC cited its role in the Army's $100 billion modernization project, known as the Future Combat System, as one of its largest contracts. The filing did not hint at what type of classified work it does, but noted that about 20,000 of the firm's 42,500 employees have security clearances.It listed among its largest contracts one called "Trailblazer Technical Development Program," which has a "confidential" customer. Press reports have identified it as a modernization project at the National Security Agency, the agency that intercepts foreign communications.Analysis: SAIC is a legendary company shrouded in mystery, partially a function of its privately-owned status. This status probably allows the company to take on projects for which the Defense Department needs assistance while still avoiding the spotlight. SAIC's uniqueness has interesting implications for investors and for national security.The above article brings up an interesting dilemma: how can shareholders make an informed investment decision if much of SAIC's income is from classified sources (rather than well-known weapons systems with classified aspects)? Or will shareholders require SAIC to reveal more about its operations than its chief client, the Department of Defense, would like?For example, how would an investor analyze the risks to SAIC if the Future Combat System, perhaps the most ambitious conventional weapons acquisition program in history, is significantly altered? Before investing in SAIC, I would read the QDR as closely as I would read the company prospectus. http://inteldump.powerblogs.com/archives/archive_2005_09_04-2005_09_10.shtml#1126028424 Top Private Defense Contractor Plans an IPO to Rival Google's By Renae MerleWashington Post Staff WriterFriday, September 2, 2005; D01 Science Applications International Corp., the largest privately held defense contractor, announced yesterday that it would go public early next year,aiming to raise $1.7 billion for insiders cashing in on the post-Sept. 11 government spending boom that fueled the firm's growth. The public offering would rival Google Inc.'s $1.8 billion deal in 2004 in size and be the largest IPO of a government contractor in many years. The chief beneficiaries will be SAIC's more than 35,000 shareholders, which include many current and former employees, some of whom stand to make millions of dollars. The company has 16,000 employees in the Washington region. In a Securities and Exchange Commission filing, the San Diego-based company outlined its government work, which accounted for 87 percent of its $7.2 billion in revenue last year. Many of the company's 10,000 contracts are with the Defense Department, where it is known not for weapons, but for managing large projects to integrate information technology systems, including several in the intelligence field. SAIC cited its role in the Army's $100 billion modernization project, known as the Future Combat System, as one of its largest contracts. The filing did not hint at what type of classified work it does, but noted that about 20,000 of the firm's 42,500 employees have security clearances. It listed among its largest contracts one called "Trailblazer Technical Development Program," which has a "confidential" customer. Press reports have identified it as a modernization project at the National Security Agency, the agency that intercepts foreign communications. It also noted that SAIC is developing a wireless sensor, known as "smart dust," that can "self-configure into a network and gather and fuse information into actionable intelligence information." The increased government spending after the Sept. 11,
[cia-drugs] Edwards Tests Production Global Hawk For Possible Deployment
Edwards Tests Production Global Hawk For Possible Deployment by Tech. Sgt. Eric M. Grill95th Air Base Wing Public AffairsEdwards AFB CA (SPX) Sep 07, 2005 Global Hawk flight test efforts were completed Aug. 28, bringing the latest version of the aircraft one step closer to warfighter employment. The tests on the unmanned aerial vehicle, conducted here by the Air Force Operational Test and Evaluation Center's Detachment 5, the 31st Test and Evaluation Squadron and the 452nd Flight Test Squadron, were designed to support an upcoming Air Combat Command decision on whether the production Block 10 Global Hawk aircraft and sensor suite are ready for deployment. Global Hawks provide the Air Force and joint battlefield commanders near real-time, high-resolution intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance imagery. The plan, said Lt. Col. Andy Thurling, 452nd FLTS operations officer, is to replace the advanced concept technology demonstration Global Hawks that are currently deployed in support of Operation Enduring Freedom. "Each ACTD aircraft is a one-of-a-kind aircraft," he said. "Production Global Hawks are standardized and have technical orders to allow Air Combat Command to operate the aircraft with their blue-suit maintainers." Currently, the maintainers deployed are mostly contractors. "Because of the individuality of each ACTD aircraft, they require heavy contractor involvement, but the production aircraft can be deployed with mostly [Airmen maintaining it, rather than] the heavy contractor footprint," said David Morrow, deputy project manager for the Global Hawk program. The production Global Hawk encompasses some aspects of the advanced concept technology. "The Air Force desired to deploy a mixture of fielded ACTD components with the latest production aircraft and sensor suite because of the supportability issues with the currently fielded ACTD system," said Lt. Col. Kenneth Bock, Det. 5 deputy commander here. "Our role is to assess that configuration and provide information to Air Combat Command leadership to support a decision whether to deploy those specific parts of the production Global Hawk system." The aircraft are maintained here, but the operators for the three AFOTEC-led tests held Aug. 22, Aug. 24 and ending Aug. 28, were located at Beale Air Force Base, Calif. "Mission control was handed off to controllers at Beale ... which facilitated the image exploitation by image analysts," Mr. Morrow said. "This is the same way it is done when the Global Hawk is deployed. The weapon system doesn't end with the aircraft; it ends with the dissemination of the imagery taken to the warfighter." The tests fulfill the requirements for a series of combined developmental test and operational test integrated systems evaluation flights to demonstrate Global Hawk system performance, Mr. Morrow said. The capabilities evaluated were flying operations, electro-optical, infrared and synthetic aperture radar sensor functionality, and quality, timeliness and usefulness of sensor images. "Operationally representative sorties were flown to emulate, as closely as possible, the types of sorties to be flown in a combat environment," Colonel Thurling said. "Two of the three sorties lasted more than 28 hours, while the final sortie on (Aug. 28) lasted more than 13 and a half hours." Besides the local Edwards airspace, ranges at the Nellis Test and Training Range, Nev.; Utah Test and Training Range, Utah; Yuma, Ariz.; and Point Mugu, Calif.; were also used. "I am confident that all test objectives were met," Colonel Bock said. "That is to say we were able to test all the parts of the system we planned to test, not to pass judgment on the results yet. "It will be a number of weeks before our report is briefed out," he said. "The decision whether to deploy will come shortly after that." Related LinksSpaceWar UAV NEWS US Robot Plane Kills 11 Iraqi Insurgents Baghdad (AFP) Sep 05, 2005A unmanned US spy plane Monday thwarted an Iraqi rebel mortar attack on a sprawling US base, firing two missiles which killed 11 insurgents and wounded four more, the military said. http://www.spacewar.com/news/uav-05d.html Complete archives at http://www.sitbot.net/ Please let us stay on topic and be civil. OM SPONSORED LINKS United state bankruptcy court western district of texas United state life insurance United state patent United state patent search United states patent office United state flag YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "cia-drugs" on the web. To unsubscribe from this
[cia-drugs] CIA Publishes Its Own ''Assassin's Manual''
CIA Publishes Its Own ''Assassin's Manual'' The CIA 'Killer's Manual' was kept out of the public eye for years, but now we know it teaches the 'fine art' of assassination as if it was a mandatory college course.September 8, 2005 By Greg Szymanski If there are any lingering doubts about whether the U.S. government acts like a bunch of mafia hit men, the following documents, classified for years, should clear things up. And as the CIAs Killers Instruction Manual points out remember that possibly the only thing separating the mafia from the U.S. government is that the thugs in the underworld are much, much smarter. Never in a month of Sundays would mafia thugs ever think of leaving behind a paper trail, like the following CIA documents indicate, on how exactly to pull off the perfect assassination attempt. But thats exactly what the U.S. government did when the CIA distributed a training manual for would-be killers called A Study of Assassination, distributed to agents and operatives taking part in the agencys 1953 covert coup in Guatemala, which ousted the countrys democratically elected President. The killers training manual. hidden and classified until 1997, until the National Security Archive, a Washington D.C. public-interest group, obtained a copy among roughly 1,400 pages found by the group concerning the Guatemala coup, in light of CIA statements that it has destroyed all other secret files about the coup. Since the release of the documents, however, their contents have remained virtually hidden from the public eye, the messy details of how to pull off the perfect assassination never making it into the mainstream press and only viewed by a select few elsewhere. Presented by the CIA almost like a college course for future killers, the Department of Defense and CIA spokesmen this week denied knowing anything about the manual, adding they were not aware of any such teaching tool being distributed to agents or operatives. As the manual verifies purely by its publication, the U.S. government is involved up to its neck in the killing business, the involvement going back to the early 1950s and most likely much farther back. And its safe to say nothing has changed today, since reports by John Perkins in his latest book, The Economic Hit Man and other reports surfacing, seem to indicate the killing business is booming for the government. Take, for example, the recent story told by former Army wife Kay Griggs of Virginia, who recounts how her husband for more than 10 years told her about his involvement with training and participating in government hit squads, knowledge of which leads to the doorstep of some of the most powerful leaders in our country, including the Oval Office. Also, consider the recent stories coming out of Venezuela where democratically elected President Hugo Chavez is running for his life from the CIA after he publicly on numerous occasions has announced to the world that the Bush administration wants him dead for not cooperating with policies that would leave his country bankrupt and his people starving. And in a sick, twisted manner, working on a theory that the end justifies the means, the CIA published it s killers manual, breaking down the art of committing the perfect assassination into eight major categories, including definition, employment, justification, classification, the assassin, planning, techniques and examples. Here are the portions of the manual, the words taken directly from the CIA writers illustrating just how sick, twisted and distorted they really are: DEFINITION According to the CIA, assassination is a term thought to be derived from "Hashish", a drug similar to marijuana, said to have been used by Hassan al-Sabbah to induce motivation in his followers, who were assigned to carry out political and other murders, usually at the cost of their lives. It is here used to describe the planned killing of a person who is not under the legal jurisdiction of the killer, who is not physically in the hands of the killer, who has been selected by a resistance organization for death, and whose death provides positive advantages to that organization. EMPLOYMENT Assassination is an extreme measure not normally used in clandestine operations. It should be assumed that it will never be ordered or authorized by any U.S. Headquarters, though the latter may in rare instances agree to its execution by members of an associated foreign service. This reticence is partly due to the necessity for committing communications to paper. No assassination instructions should ever be written or recorded. Consequently, the decision to employ this technique must nearly always be reached in the field, at the area where the act will take place. Decision and instructions should be confined to an absolute minimum of persons. Ideally, only one person will be involved. No report may be made, but usually the act will be properly
[cia-drugs] CIA Assassination Manual
A STUDY OF ASSASSINATION the contrived accident is the most effective technique Care is required to insure that no wound or condition not attributable to the fall is discernible after death. http://www.frankolsonproject.org/Documents/Assassination%20Manual.html --- New York Times article reporting declassification of CIA assassination manual. May 28, 1997 C.I.A. Plotted Killing of 58 in Guatemala By TIM WEINER ASHINGTON, May 27 -- The Central Intelligence Agency, plotting to overthrow the Guatemalan Government in the early 1950's, drew up a ''disposal list'' of at least 58 key leaders, and it trained assassins to kill them, newly declassified documents show. The coup, code-named Operation Success, toppled the freely elected President of Guatemala, Jacobo Arbenz Guzman, and installed the first of a series of right-wing leaders friendly to the United States. The assassination plans were never carried out, according to an official C.I.A. history of the coup. ''Until the day that Arbenz resigned in June 1954 the option of assassination was still being considered,'' the history concludes. The 1,400 pages of newly declassified documents represent fewer than 1 percent of the C.I.A.'s files on the coup. A former C.I.A. official, Clair E. George, testified in 1983 that the agency's records on the coup ran to about 180,000 pages. The C.I.A. also deleted the names of the Americans who carried out the coup. Those whose titles show up, but whose names were stricken from the records, include agency officials whose identities have long been public, like Frank Wisner, then the agency's chief of covert operations, and his field commander for the coup, Col. Albert Haney. This censorship drew a statement of regret on Sunday from Guatemala's Minister of Foreign Affairs, Eduardo Stein. The documents add at least three sets of important new information to the historical record: the existence of the assassination plans of the agency, aspects of its propaganda campaign against Mr. Arbenz, and details of the agency's early efforts to recruit members of the Guatemalan military. The planning began in 1952, after the President of Nicaragua, Anastasio Somoza Debayle, proposed to President Harry S. Truman that they work together to overthrow Mr. Arbenz, who had been elected in 1950. Mr. Arbenz's left-wing politics angered the United States. Mr. Truman told the C.I.A. to go forward. The agency launched a short-lived operation, shipping guns and money to Guatemalan exiles. The operation's cover was blown within five weeks and it was abandoned in October 1952. But the plan lived on. In 1953, under President Eisenhower, the C.I.A. drew up plans for assassinations, sabotage and propaganda to overthrow Mr. Arbenz. The assassination list contained the names of at least 58 Guatemalan supporters of Mr. Guzman who the C.I.A. suspected were Communists. Late that year, the National Security Council gave Operation Success the go-ahead. The State Department, by then led by John Foster Dulles, the brother of the Director of Central Intelligence, Allen W. Dulles, worked closely with the C.I.A. The coup went quickly, from June 16 through June 27, 1954, with radio propaganda and political subversion proving to be the most effective weapons. Mr. Arbenz resigned, denounced the United States and took refuge in Mexico. C.I.A. plans for Operation Success called for the assassinations, and the plans were discussed in great detail at very high levels of the agency and the State Department, the records show. No record of the formal approval or disapproval of the plans by President Eisenhower or the Dulles brothers has been made public. None likely exists. The newly released files include a 22-page how-to manual on murder that says, ''No assassination instructions should ever be written or recorded.'' The C.I.A. records show that it conducted what it called a ''nerve war'' against some of these targets -- government officials, ''unfriendly army officers'' and the like -- in 1953 and 1954. Its plans included sending them death threats; telephoning them, ''preferably between 2 and 5 A.M.,'' with blood-curdling warnings, and denouncing them to their superiors with accusations ranging ''from treason to tax evasion.'' And they show that the agency considered the Guatemalan military ''the only organized element in Guatemala'' through which political change could take place. That change, says a 1953 C.I.A. document, had to begin with the ''subversion and defection of army leaders.'' The agency has had Guatemalan military men on its payroll ever since. The 1954 coup was the first chapter in the C.I.A.'s long and continuing liaison with the Guatemalan military. Those ties deepened over the decades during a scorched-earth campaign against a small Communist insurgency. The civil war in Guatemala, touched off in part by the coup, ended only five months ago. More than 100,000
[cia-drugs] conditioning
As a number of people have pointed out for years, when you "solve" a tragedy by giving the government more power and money to do better the next time, you are usually whistling in the dark. The entire collaboration between government and big medicine speaks of such madness. Every human behavior and "symptom" is chopped up into a new disease name, and toxic drugs inevitably follow. Whereas, on a level playing field, without government welfare for NIH and other major med institutions, America would be in far better health. Mike Ruppert (From the Wildnerness) has an article about the dangers of feeding more $$ and power into the FEMA machine to handle "the next Katrina." That way lies: further corruption, less freedom, and no solution. If FEMA is geared to do anything that verges on sanity, it's about forming contingency plans to deal with disasters. We can see how well that's been working in New Orleans. I have a number of eye-witness reports that state looting and crime exist at a far lower level than has been suggested in the press. If so, then of course these press articles serve to explain/justify why rescue efforts have been too little and too late. "We couldn't get in there. People would shoot at us." I just got back from a trip. I observed that most people are in a semi-dazed shock at the destruction of a major American city. They can't really believe that something like this could happen in this day and age. We're supposed to be, with all our vaunted technology/communication/organization, beyond it. People of every political stripe assume "the government will take care of us." But the government isn't saving New Orleans. In fact, as everyone now knows, federal funds for the improvement of those now-famous levees were cut. For the last several decades, it's been an open secret that a number of factors have been conspiring to set New Orleans up for exactly what has just happened: the destruction of all-important tree cover to protect the city against a direct hurricane hit; the mangling and shredding of the surrounding wetlands by thousands of miles of dug channels laid in by oil companies; New Orleans' position below sea level; the inability of the levees to deal with massive rains and wind; the strategic bottling up of the Mississippi River. A Katrina has been predicted by scores of people. It appears that there is at least one decent model for averting this horrendous tragedy: Holland. In the 1950s, that nation was flooded in many sectors. Its position vis-a-vis the level of the surrounding seas was a key. So Holland successfully instituted a plan to keep a disaster from reoccurring. The bland and impotent and leaderless position of the White House has driven home the fact that this administration lives its sealed-off life at a different level from what the rest of us would call human. Statements from federal officials have taken a vile tone: "We knew there could be some flooding, but the failure of the levees was a total shock." Serenely delivered bullshit. I often make pharmaceutical analogies, and here is yet another occasion for doing it. When you stop and add up the overall toxic effects of thousands of medical drugs, you are faced with a choice. You can say the millions of deaths and maimings caused by these drugs is the result of serial blundering by well-intentioned people, or you can go to another place and view, at the very least, a crime of depraved indifference---negligent homicide. You can go beyond that, because who benefits when a population is rendered unable to think or function or react in a normal fashion, as more and more people are poisoned? New Orleans, in all respects, has been sitting there without protection, a perfect target for a storm like Katrina. It's too easy to call this serial blundering. And images of armed troops now moving through the city add up to the idea that help is really all about restoring order, not saving lives. Conditioning the American population to martial law is a goal of the government and those men who, in the shadows, stand behind the known government. All the lunatic hoopla, for example, about the coming "pandemic flu" has the same purpose. Ditto for the so-called war on terrorism. To save democracy, we must destroy it. What better way to drive this point home than to allow a whole city to disappear? George Bush is the perfect puppet for this current "quickening." In all respects, he is a man who has been foreshortened in perspective by a desperate effort to assert his position as a legitimate member of a royal American family. The approaching end-times, the mission of saving the world from evil forces ranged against the messiah, the sword-wielding crusader against the heathens, the closed-out consciousness that builds walls against admitting mistakes, the sloganeering posing as intelligence...it all feeds into the maw of reducing the kind of freedom in which he, Bush, would
[cia-drugs] Why the use of a nuclear weapon on US city is probable (Michael Donovan)
I heard about Kay Griggs from Mike Donovanyears before her story became (relatively) widely known on the net. n. Why The Use Of A Nuclear Weapon,Most Probably On A U.S. City,Is Becoming Likely http://www.midcoast.com/~michael1/webnukeletter.htm home page: http://www.midcoastcom/~michael1/index.html THE FALL OF NORFOLK http://www.cyberspaceorbit.com/TheFall5.htm - Kay Pollard Griggs RE: MILITARY SEX RING http://www.apfn.net/messageboard/03-17-05/discussion.cgi.76.html Part 1 16 mb Conclusion 19 mb http://www.hugequestions.com/ http://www.kaygriggstalks.com/ Complete archives at http://www.sitbot.net/ Please let us stay on topic and be civil. OM YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "cia-drugs" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
[cia-drugs] The Biotech Brigade
"We are confronted with the most powerful technology the world has ever known, and it is being rapidly deployed with almost no thought whatsoever to its consequences." The Biotech Brigade is a global directory on the massive and deceptive PR push behind genetically modified (GM) food. The directory's profiles provide an A-Z of key players- corporate-friendly scientists, PR companies, front groups, lobbyistsand political networks The directory also provides information on how the public is being misled and themedia manipulated the corporate influence and funding that enmeshes 'independent' science and scientists, and the resulting conflicts of interest. The directory isintendedto be useful tojournalists, researchers, campaignersand students,as well asto the general reader interested inexploring the real agendas of thoseusing the media topromoteGM. A directory of disinformation The profiles contain many startling examples of the war of disinformation being waged. These include: covert PR campaigns aimed at portraying the industry's critics as extremists or even terrorists seeCenter For Food and Agricultural Research,Sense About Science and the article Corporate Ghosts manufactured support for GM via fake public protest, fake citizens, and even fake organisationssee L Val Giddings, Bivingsand the article The Fake Parade pro-GMlobby groups colonised by extreme political networkssee Sense About Science, Living Marxism and the article Invasion of the Entryists attempts tomanipulatethe views of childrensee Scottish Enterprise,Clare Robinson, the article Sweet As You Areandthe report Biospinology in our science communication? bogus accounts of scientific researchsee Prof David Baulcombe, Dennis Avery, Prof Mike Wilsonand the articleFalse Reports and the Smears of Men The background The introduction of GM foods and crops has triggered world-wide concern, uniting consumers, small farmers, especiallyin the developing world, and the environmental movement. Questions have been raised about potential health effects, environmental safety, agronomic and economicimpacts,and about the power of corporations to control what we grow and what we eat. There is also concern about the extent to which commercial interests are drivingthe science and the regulatory system. A key question remains why such an enormously powerful technology, about which there are stilldeep uncertainties, has been introducedso rapidlywithout meaningful public consultation. The hidden soapbox The corporations promoting GM, and the politicians, bureaucrats and scientists that support them, initially watched in dismay as opposition mushroomed and spread about the globe. The PR firm Burson Marsteller had previously warned the biotech industry lobby group EuropaBio, 'All the research evidence confirms that the perception of the profit motive fatally undermines industrys credibility on these questions'. (Communications Programmes for EuropaBio, January 1997) According to a former advisor to Tony Blair, 'What inflicted the greatest damage', as concerns over GM foods spread,'was that the case for the defence was fronted by the biotech groups', such asMonsanto. As a result of this experience, industry has increasingly been replaced in the front lineby a host of third parties : industry-friendly scientists see CS Prakash, Peter Raven,Royal Society, Derek Burke, Chris Leaver, Mike Wilson corporate public relations expertssee Bivings Group, Rick Berman, Jay Byrne, Mike Craven, Graydon Forrer, Lexington Communications, Martin Livermore, Foresight Communications trade and lobby groupssee Sense About Science, Scientific Alliance, CropGen, BIO, EuropaBio,ABC, AfricaBio,ISAAA, American Soybean Association political networks ideologically committed to supporting big business and new technologies seeSustainable Development Network, Congress of Racial Equality,International Policy Network, European Science and Environment Forum, Liberty Institute, Competitive Enterprise Institute, Living Marxism Cyber-wars and fake persuaders The Internet is a medium where the line between the virtual and the real can easily beerased. Images projectedon the netof grassroots organisations, institutes, NGOs and even 'citizens'may be misleadingor even entirely bogus. see CFFAR.org, Andura Smetacek, Mary Murphy, Bivings, Jay Byrne, Foodsecurity.net,and the article Biotech's Hall of Mirrors Faces from the South The image of the poor and hungryin the developing world has repeatedly beenused to pushGMOs. More recently'real, live'GM advocatesfrom the developing worldhaveemerged on the public stage (see The Fake Parade ). When, for instance,the U.S. Trade Repesentative launched a WTOcase against the European Unionover its moratorium on GM product approvals, he
[cia-drugs] Business Elite Ethnically Cleanse the Poor in New Orleans
http://rawstory.com/news/2005/They_just_dont_get_it_do_t_0910.html Saturday's Washington Post carried an article entitled "Some GOP Legislators Hit Jarring Notes in Addressing Katrina" which contained yet another installment in the "insensitive" series: "The latest elected official to step into the swamp was Rep. Richard H. Baker, a 10-term Republican from Baton Rouge. The Wall Street Journal reported yesterday that he was overheard telling lobbyists: "We finally cleaned up public housing in New Orleans. We couldn't do it, but God did." http://kurtnimmo.com/?p=12 Business Elite Ethnically Cleanse the Poor in New Orleans September 10th, 2005 Christopher Coopers War Street Journal article (Old-line families plot the future) is worth excerpting at length because it so shamelessly reveals how the rich elite business sociopaths of New Orleans think and operate: The mostly African-American neighborhoods of New Orleans are largely underwater, and the people who lived there have scattered across the country. But in many of the predominantly white and more affluent areas, streets are dry and passable. Gracious homes are mostly intact and powered by generators. Wednesday, officials reiterated that all residents must leave New Orleans, but its still unclear how far they will go to enforce the order. You can bet this guy didnt show up in the white and more affluent areas because if he had he would now be zipped up in a body bag at the temporary morgue set up in nearby St. Gabriel. Naturally, the eviction of recalcitrant citizens does not include New Orleans rich elite, who have hired security firms such as Blackwater. As the New York Times reported earlier in the week, the eviction order apparently does not apply to the hundreds of security guards whom businesses and some wealthy individuals have hired to protect their property. The guards, who are civilians working for private security firms like Blackwater, are openly carrying M-16s and other assault rifles. Of course, if civilians were carrying M-16s and other assault rifles downtown, they would be shot on site by cops and National Guard soldiers. The green expanse of Audubon Park, in the citys Uptown area, has doubled in recent days as a heliport for the citys richand a terminus for the small armies of private security guards who have been dispatched to keep the homes there safe and habitable. Mr. [Ashton] ODwyer has cellphone service and ice cubes to cool off his highballs in the evening. By Wednesday, the city water service even sprang to life, making the daily trips to his neighbors pool unnecessary. A pair of oil-company engineers, dispatched by his son-in-law, delivered four cases of water, a box of delicacies including herring with mustard sauce and 15 gallons of generator gasoline. I wonder if Mr. ODwyer heard the screams of drowning babies as he lofted one of his highballs. I wonder if he thought about the desperate poor folk trapped in their attics in 120 heat as he munched on his herring with mustard sauce. Naw, he was too busy on his cellphone, ordering up delicacies as the little people died horrible deaths a few blocks away. He was too busy planning the future of the new New Orleans. Despite the disaster that has overwhelmed New Orleans, the citys monied, mostly white elite is hanging on and maneuvering to play a role in the recovery when the floodwaters of Katrina are gone. New Orleans is ready to be rebuilt. Lets start right here, says Mr. ODwyer, standing in his expansive kitchen, next to a counter covered with a jumble of weaponry and electric wires. In other words, ODwyer has a damn good reason to stick aroundand there is a damn good reason the cops will not throw him out at gunpoint: he is hanging on so he can play a role in the recovery of New Orleans while the underclass has died (were deliberately killed through neglect) in large numbers and the remainder shipped out to FEMA re-location (i.e., concentration) camps. Im not sure how Christopher Cooper wrote this article without vomitingbut then maybe he did or more likely didnt. I mean, after all, he works for the War Street Journal, the preeminent newspaper of the business class where the most disgusting warmongering appeared on the editorial pages in the lead-up to Bushs invasion and occupation of Iraq. Of course, both war and forced re-location of undesirablesthink Native Americans clutching blankets infected with small poxare good for business, especially for the latest generation of robber barons and carpet-baggers who inevitably stream in to turn a fat profit on human . More than a few people in Uptown, the fashionable district surrounding St. Charles Ave., have ancestors who arrived here in the 1700s. High society is still dominated by these old-line families, represented today by prominent figures such
[cia-drugs] The Black Curtain around FEMA's Operations
Attacks on democratic rights, breaching legal barriers: FEMA and Katrina: REX-84 Revisited The "Black Curtain" around FEMA's Operations by Kurt Nimmo If you believe the corporate media, FEMA is simply a bungling and inept emergency management agency and its director, Michael Brown, according to the Washington Post, is simply an "accidental director" and "the failed head of an Arabian horse sporting group who was plucked from obscurity to become President Bush's point man for the worst natural disaster in U.S. history" and, as the Boston Globe notes, "got the job through an old college friend who at the time was heading up FEMA Brown -- formerly an estates and family lawyer -- this week has made several shocking public admissions, including interviews where he suggested FEMA was unaware of the misery and desperation of refugees stranded at the New Orleans convention center." In short, the corporate media would have us believe Brown is a clueless lawyer and former horse trader and FEMA an unresponsive federal bureaucratic leviathan wrapped up in red tape. But this does not explain the following:FEMA refused evacuation help from Amtrak; it turned away experienced fire fighters and first responders; it turned back Wal-Mart supply trucks; refused to allow the Red Cross to deliver food; blocked a 500-boat citizen flotilla from delivering aid; turned away generators and other equipment (see this page with links to news stories). In other words, FEMA went out of its way to deny aid and allow people to die from dehydration, starvation, and lack of medicine and medical help. In addition to denying aid, and thus killing an as of yet (and possibly forever) unknown number of people, FEMA is attempting to control media access to the worst natural disaster in American history (see Journalist Groups Protest FEMA Ban on Photos of Dead). Moreover, journalists and photographers have been assaulted by troops and had their notebooks and cameras confiscated (see The Eye of the Hurricane by Matthias Gebauer). Regardless of all the corporate media hype, FEMA was not created to respond to natural disasters and help American citizens (in fact, it is an unconstitutional construct, created by Executive Order, and draws its "lawful" facade not from the American people, but the fact Executive Order 12148 was published in the Federal Registry). "FEMA has only spent about 6 percent of its budget on national emergencies, the bulk of their funding has been used for the construction of secret underground facilities to assure continuity of government in case of a major emergency, foreign or domestic," writes Harry V. Martin. "General Frank Salzedo, chief of FEMA's Civil Security Division stated in a 1983 conference that he saw FEMA's role as a 'new frontier in the protection of individual and governmental leaders from assassination, and of civil and military installations from sabotage and/or attack, as well as prevention of dissident groups from gaining access to U.S. opinion, or a global audience in times of crisis.'" In the wake of Hurricane Katrina, a lot of criticism is focused on FEMA, but this is not the first time the agency has taken heat for "dropping the ball" after natural disasters. Martin writes:FEMA's deceptive role really did not come to light with much of the public until Hurricane Andrew smashed into the U.S. mainland. As Russell R. Dynes, director of the Disaster Research Center of the University of Delaware, wrote in The World and I, "...The eye of the political storm hovered over the Federal Emergency Management Agency. FEMA became a convenient target for criticism." Because FEMA was accused of dropping the ball in Florida, the media and Congress commenced to study this agency. What came out of the critical look was that FEMA was spending 12 times more for "black operations" than for disaster relief. It spent $1.3 billion building secret bunkers throughout the United States in anticipation of government disruption by foreign or domestic upheaval. Yet fewer than 20 members of Congress, only members with top security clearance, know of the $1.3 billion expenditure by FEMA for non-natural disaster situations. These few Congressional leaders state that FEMA has a "black curtain" around its operations. FEMA has worked on National Security programs since 1979, and its predecessor, the Federal Emergency Preparedness Agency, has secretly spent millions of dollars before being merged into FEMA by President Carter in 1979. One such black op was REX-84 (Alpha Explan, or Readiness Exercise 1984), exposed by the Miami Herald on July 5, 1987, and described as "a secret government within a government." Iran-Contra criminal Oliver North "worked closely with FEMA to redraw national contingency plans dealing with nearly everything from nuclear attack to civil insurrection," explains totse.com (FEMA: Blueprint For Tyranny). "FEMA's action plan included the
[cia-drugs] Drowning by Numbers
Drowning by Numbers "Forget the dead you've left, they will not follow you." - Bob Dylan New Orleans is beginning to look like Funeralgate, supersized.FEMA has relieved volunteers of their emergency mortuary services in Louisiana only, and contracted out to Kenyon, a "wholly-owned subsidiary of Service Corporation International" of Houston, Texas.Are the alarms sounding yet? LightUpTheDarkness reminds us why they should be:You may remember Service Corporation International, SCI, as it was part of the case against confirming Alberto Gonzales due to his involvement in the Texas and Florida scandals known as Funeralgate. As we covered back in February, Service Corporation International was "recycling" graves, removing the bodies that were there originally and throwing them in the woods to use the space to house new customers at two Jewish cemeteries in Florida . Service Corporation International, the worlds largest funeral service company, is headed by Robert Waltrip, a longtime friend and generous financial patron of the Bush family. Eliza May was head of the Texas Funeral Services Commission when it began receiving complaints about unlicensed embalmers, and sued when she was fired. Gonzales kept Bush from testifying in this case and was also under scrutiny when a memo surfaced that was sent to his office when he was Bushs gubernatorial counsel. The memo suggested possible improprieties by two funeral commissioners with ties to SCI and Joeseph Allbaugh, Bushs former chief of staff in Austin, 2000 presidential campaign manager, who now serves as director of the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). The case was suddenly settled in November 2001. The Menorah Gardens case in Florida, involving 72 families, was settled in Oct of 2004.So, coincident with the emergence of happy talk and silver linings - Sure, it's bad, but New Orleans rescuers find fewer dead than feared - the duties of processing Louisiana's fresh kill is consigned to Bush Texas mafia with a criminal record including desecration of human remains, "recycling" graves and dumping bodies.There is a deeply bizarre note to this, because to anyone who has paid attention to this slow-motion atrocity the bodies will be hidden in plain sight. (There is pointed irony, as well: in a bid at boosting government transparancy, China has just announced that it will no longer treat death tolls from natural disasters as state secrets.) The arrival of SCI in New Orleans is like a shredder truck pulling up outside the offices of a crooked firm expecting a forensic audit. The evidence - the bodies that are still tied to lamp posts - could be going up in the smoke of one of the city's uncontained fires, or weighted down and dumped in the bayou. It's not unimaginable - SCI has already done this.Can they hide all the dead? They're going to try to hide the living. The head of FEMA's housing effort, Brad Fair, says that 200,000 evacuees may need "temporary" shelter for five years.Now why, rather than offer aid which could lead, with speed, to a permanent solution in accord with the wishes of survivors, has the government determined to withhold the financial assistance necessary to support self-determination, and is spending more - five years of even basic food and shelter add up - to deny them autonomy?That's a scary question. The challenge to a long-disengaged populace: does it have the courage to ask, and maybe answer, scary questions? http://rigorousintuition.blogspot.com/2005/09/drowning-by-numbers.html ~~~ Bush Cronyism Extends To The Dead 9 September 2005 Kenyon International, under an agreement with the US Government and the Department of Homeland Security has deployed a mobile morgue to Louisiana. The mobile morgue includes equipment for search and recovery, victim identification, and pathology. Kenyon International Emergency Services is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Houston-based Service Corporation International. You may remember Service Corporation International, SCI, as it was part of the case against confirming Alberto Gonzales due to his involvement in the Texas and Florida scandals known as Funeralgate. As we covered back in February, Service Corporation International was "recycling" graves, removing the bodies that were there originally and throwing them in the woods to use the space to house new customers at two Jewish cemeteries in Florida . Service Corporation International, the worlds largest funeral service company, is headed by Robert Waltrip, a longtime friend and generous financial patron of the Bush family. Eliza May was head of the Texas Funeral Services Commission when it began receiving complaints about unlicensed embalmers, and sued when she was fired. Gonzales kept Bush from testifying in this case and was also under scrutiny when a memo surfaced that was sent to his office when he was Bushs gubernatorial counsel. The memo suggested possible
[cia-drugs] Re: F.A.A. Alerted on Qaeda in '98, 9/11 Panel Said
AP - A judge on Thursday ordered Sandy Berger, President Clinton's national security adviser, to pay a $50,000 fine for illegally taking classified documents from the National Archives. The punishment handed down by U.S. Magistrate Judge Deborah Robinson exceeded the $10,000 fine recommended by government lawyers. Under the deal, Berger avoids prison time but he must surrender access to classified government materials for three years. "The court finds the fine is inadequate because it doesn't reflect the seriousness of the offense," Robinson said, as a grim-faced Berger stood silently.Earlier in the hearing, Berger expressed remorse for his crime, which he described as a lapse of judgment that came while he was preparing to testify before the Sept. 11 commission. "I let considerations of personal convenience override clear rules of handling classified material," Berger said. "I believe this lapse, serious as it is, does not reflect the character of myself."[In fact, cutting up secret documents with a scissors is slightly more than a "lapse"]USA TODAY - The charging document states that between September 2 and October 2, 2003, Berger "knowingly removed classified documents from the National Archives and Records Administration and stored and retained such documents at places ... including his place of employment."An associate of Berger told CNN the former national security adviser admitted to the Justice Department he originally took five copies of an after-action report -- one during his September 2003 visit to the Archives and four during his October 2003 trip. When he returned to his office and compared the copies he had, he believed several were basically the same, the associate said. He admitted to officials that he then used scissors to cut up three copies that night while at his office, they said. At first he had said he had either misplaced or unintentionally thrown them away.When Archives officials contacted him after they realized documents were missing, he told them about the two copies he had and returned them, along with the handwritten notes he had taken, they said. He did not say anything about the three copies he had destroyed.Clinton had asked Berger to review thousands of pages of documents related to the millennium terror plot and its aftermath for submission to the September 11th commission. While reviewing those documents, his lawyer said, Berger inadvertently took some classified documents and intentionally took handwritten notes he put together while reviewing the documents. http://prorev.com/2005/09/why-is-judith-miller-in-jail-but-sandy.htm Berger to pay $50,000 for taking classified material WASHINGTON (AP) A judge on Thursday ordered Sandy Berger, President Clinton's national security adviser, to pay a $50,000 fine for illegally taking classified documents from the National Archives. The punishment handed down by U.S. Magistrate Judge Deborah Robinson exceeded the $10,000 fine recommended by government lawyers. Under the deal, Berger avoids prison time but he must surrender access to classified government materials for three years. "The court finds the fine is inadequate because it doesn't reflect the seriousness of the offense," Robinson said, as a grim-faced Berger stood silently. Earlier in the hearing, Berger expressed remorse for his crime, which he described as a lapse of judgment that came while he was preparing to testify before the Sept. 11 commission. "I let considerations of personal convenience override clear rules of handling classified material," Berger said. "I believe this lapse, serious as it is, does not reflect the character of myself." "In this case, I failed. I will not again," he said. The sentencing capped a bizarre sequence of events in which Berger admitted to sneaking classified documents out of the Archives in his suit, later destroying some of them in his office and then lying about it. After initially saying it was an "honest mistake," Berger pleaded guilty in April to a misdemeanor of unauthorized removal and retention of classified material, which contained information relating to terror threats in the United States during the 2000 millennium celebration. Copyright 2005 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed. http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2005-09-08-berger-sentenced_x.htm --- In cia-drugs@yahoogroups.com, "Jim Rarey" [EMAIL PROTECTED]... wrote: They still will not admit they knew the full Bojinka planincluding the intended targets. Sandy Berger risked going to prison to destroy the evidence that President Clinton, others and himself had knowledge of the plan well before 9/11. JR September 14, 2005 F.A.A. Alerted on Qaeda in '98, 9/11 Panel Said By ERIC LICHTBLAU WASHINGTON, Sept. 13 - American aviation officials were warned as early as 1998 that Al Qaeda could "seek
[cia-drugs] Deja Vu all over again: Daddy Bush mishandled a huge hurricane 13 years before his son did
Monday, September 12, 2005 DEJA VU ALL OVER AGAIN: DADDY BUSH MISHANDLED A HUGE HURRICANE 13 YEARS BEFORE HIS SON DID GENERAL ACCOUNTING OFFICE, JULY 23, 1993 - The nation's management of catastrophic disasters was intensely criticized after Hurricane Andrew leveled much of South Florida and Hurricane Iniki destroyed much of the Hawaiian island of Kauai in 1992. . . The response to Hurricane Andrew raised doubts about whether FEMA is capable of responding to catastrophic disasters . . .The federal strategy for responding to catastrophic disasters is deficient because it lacks provisions for the federal government to immediately(1) assess in a comprehensive manner the damage and the corresponding needs of disaster victims and(2) provide food, shelter, and other essential services when the needs of disaster victims outstrip the resources of the state, local, and private voluntary community.Moreover, the federal strategy - encompassing 26 different agencies - does not promote adequate preparedness when there is advance warning of a disaster because preparatory activities are not explicitly authorized until the President has issued a disaster declaration. . . To improve the federal response, the nation needs presidential involvement and leadership both before and after a catastrophic disaster strikes. To underscore the commitment of the President, responsibility for catastrophic disaster preparedness and response should be placed with a key official in the White House. This would institutionalize the direct presidential involvement that occurred on an ad hoc basis in Hurricane Andrew and other recent major disasters. . Within FEMA, a disaster unit is needed to provide the White House and the Director of FEMA with information, analysis, and technical support to improve federal decision-making on helping state and local governments before, during, and after catastrophic disasters. . .Current federal law governing disaster response does not explicitly authorize federal agencies to undertake preparatory activities before a disaster declaration by the President, nor does it authorize FEMA to reimburse agencies for such preparation, even when disasters like hurricanes provide some warning that such activities will be needed. Federal agencies may fail to undertake advance preparations because of uncertainty over whether costs incurred before a disaster declaration will ultimately be reimbursed by FEMA. . .FEMA needs to use its existing resources to better prepare state and local governments for catastrophic disaster response so that they are as effective as possible. . .Our review of Hurricanes Andrew and Iniki uncovered several problems with the response efforts, virtually all of which were revealed in South Florida because of the magnitude of the disaster there: an economic loss of about $30 billion, the largest loss from a natural disaster in U.S. history; the destruction of or serious damage to at least 75,000 homes and 8,000 businesses; and the newly created homelessness of more than 160,000 people. In Florida alone, federal assistance is expected to exceed $1.8 billion, making Andrew by far one of the most costly disasters to which FEMA has ever responded. . .While we clearly see a major role for DOD in providing mass care, we do not advocate turning over the entire disaster response, relief, and recovery operation to the military. DOD'S role in disaster response needs to remain under the direction of a civilian authority outside of the Department for two important reasons. First, DOD'S foremost responsibility is to deal with those military matters affecting national security; a full-time DOD mission of managing disaster preparedness and relief could detract from the Department's primary responsibility. Second, DOD officials strongly believe, and we agree, that assuming overall management responsibility could create the impression that the military is attempting to make or direct domestic policy, which runs contrary to principles that have guided the military's role in the United States. . .Federal response time could be reduced by encouraging agencies to do as much advance preparation as possible prior to a disaster declaration. When there is early warning, as there is for hurricanes, DOD and other federal agencies need to mobilize resources and deploy personnel before the catastrophe strikes. However, current law does not explicitly authorize such activities.. . . DOD officials told us that they take some actions to prepare for a disaster when there is warning-such as identifying quantities, locations, and transportation requirements for mass care supplies-but they take no additional measures because the Department might have to pay for the expenses if FEMA ultimately does not request its assistance. . .We may well face disasters or emergencies that could affect even more people than Hurricane Andrew did. As devastating as this
[cia-drugs] Re: Mice infected with deadly plague are missing in N.J.
And mice and rats and cats cancarry these plagueinfected fleas. The bacterium that causes bubonic plague, Yersinia pestis, lives inside the gut of its main carrier, the flea. The plague likely spread to Europe on the backs of shipboard black rats that carried plague-infested fleas. "It's the plague's unholy trinity," said Michael Antolin, a biologist at Colorado State University in Fort Collins, who studies bubonic plague in black-tailed prairie dogs. Inside the flea, bacteria multiply and block off the flea's throat-like area. The flea gets increasingly hungry. When it biteswhether rat or humanit spits some bacteria out into the bite wound. Pharaohs' Plague Panagiotakopulu came upon clues to the plague's presence in ancient Egypt by accident. She had been looking at fossil insect remains to learn about daily life more than 3,000 years ago. "People lived close to their domestic animals and to the pests that infected their household," Panagiotakopulu said. "I just started looking at what diseases people might have, what diseases their pigs might have, and what diseases might have been passed from other animals to humans." The researcher used a fine sieve to strain out remains of insects and small mammals from several sites. Panagiotakopulu, who is conducting similar work on Viking ruins in Greenland, said that looking at insects is a key way to reconstruct the past. "I can learn about how people lived by looking in their homes and at what was living with and on them," she said. In Egypt Panagiotakopulu combed the workers'-village site in Amarna, where the builders of the tombs of Egyptian kings Tutankhamun and Akhenaton lived. There, the researcher unearthed cat and human fleasknown to be plague carriers in some casesin and around the workers' homes. That find spurred Panagiotakopulu to believe that the bubonic plague's fleaborne bacteria could also have been lurking in the area, so she went in search of other clues. Previous excavations along the Nile Delta had turned up Nile rats, an endemic species, dating to the 16th and 17th century B.C. The plague's main carrier flea is thought to be native to the Nile Valley and is known to be a Nile rat parasite. According to Panagiotakopulu, the Nile provided an ideal spot for rats to carry the plague into urban communities. Around 3500 B.C., people began to build cities next to the Nile. During floods, the habitat of the Nile rat was disturbed, sending the rodentand its flea and bacterial hitchhikersinto the human domain. Egyptian writings from a similar time period point to an epidemic disease with symptoms similar to the plague. A 1500 B.C. medical text known as the Ebers Papyrus identifies a disease that "has produced a bubo, and the pus has petrified, the disease has hit." It's possible that trade spread the disease to black rats, which then carried the bacteria to other sites of plague epidemics. Panagiotakopulu suspects that black rats, endemic to India, arrived in Egypt with sea trade. In Egypt the rats picked up plague-carrying fleas and were later born on ships that sailed across the Mediterranean to southern Europe. Present-day Plague "Most people think of the plague as a historical disease," said Hinnebusch, who conducts plague research for the U.S. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases. "But it's still out there, and it's still an international public health issue." During the last ten years bubonic plague reappeared in Madagascar, which now has between 500 and 2,000 new cases each year. According to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the World Health Organization tallies as many as 3,000 plague cases each year around the world. Research interest in bubonic plague has been growing as, like anthrax, it could be used as a deadly bioterrorism agent (especially in pneumonic form). While antibodies can be extremely effective against early stages of the plague, scientists are trying to learn more about how it works to be able to predict outbreaks and counteract the bacterium's scrambling of the immune system. "There are so many unanswered questions about the plague," Hinnebusch said. http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2004/03/0310_040310_blackdeath.html --- In cia-drugs@yahoogroups.com, "mark urban" [EMAIL PROTECTED]... wrote: If you read any history at all you would know that bubonic plague isspread by fleas.--- In cia-drugs@yahoogroups.com, "Jim Rarey" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: OOPS. If the mice were caught by their traditional enemy, do wenow have some infected cats? JR http://www.nydailynews.com/front/breaking_news/v-pfriendly/story/346674p-295865c.html New York Daily News - Mice infected with deadly plague are missing in N.J. ASSOCIATED PRESS Thursday, September 15th, 2005 NEWARK, N.J. - Authorities are searching for three miceinfected with bubonic plague that disappeared from a researchlaboratory about two weeks
[cia-drugs] Information supplied by Yahoo helped journalist Shi Tao get 10 years in prison
Information supplied by Yahoo! helped journalist Shi Tao get 10 years in prison The text of the verdict in the case of journalist Shi Tao - sentenced in April to 10 years in prison for divulging state secrets abroad - shows that Yahoo! Holdings (Hong Kong) Ltd. provided Chinas state security authorities with details that helped to identify and convict him, Reporters Without Borders said today. We already knew that Yahoo! collaborates enthusiastically with the Chinese regime in questions of censorship, and now we know it is a Chinese police informant as well, the press freedom organisation said. Yahoo! obviously complied with requests from the Chinese authorities to furnish information regarding an IP address that linked Shi Tao to materials posted online, and the company will yet again simply state that they just conform to the laws of the countries in which they operate, the organisation said. But does the fact that this corporation operates under Chinese law free it from all ethical considerations? How far will it go to please Beijing? Reporters Without Borders added: Information supplied by Yahoo! led to the conviction of a good journalist who has paid dearly for trying to get the news out. It is one thing to turn a blind eye to the Chinese governments abuses and it is quite another thing to collaborate. Translated into English by the Dui Hua Foundation (which works to document the cases of Chinese political prisoners), the verdict reveals that Yahoo! Holdings (Hong Kong) Ltd. provided the Chinese investigating organs with detailed information that apparently enabled them to link Shis personal e-mail account ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and the specific message containing information treated as a state secret to the IP address of his computer. Yahoo! Holdings (Hong Kong) is subject to Hong Kong legislation, which does not spell out the responsibilities in this kind of situation of companies that provide e-mail services. Nonetheless, it is reportedly customary for e-mail service and Internet access providers to transmit information to the police about their clients when shown a court order. Tests carried out by Reporters Without Borders seem to indicate that the servers used for the Yahoo.com.cn e-mail service, from which the information about Shi was extracted, are located on the Chinese mainland. Shi Tao Aged 37, Shi worked for the daily Dangdai Shang Bao (Contemporary Business News). He was convicted on 30 April of sending foreign-based websites the text of an internal message which the authorities had sent to his newspaper warning journalists of the dangers of social destabilisation and risks resulting from the return of certain dissidents on the 15th anniversary of the Tiananmen Square massacre. Chinese state security insisted during the trial that the message was "Jue Mi" (top secret). Shi admitted sending it out by e-mail but disputed that it was a secret document. He is still being held in a prison in Changsha to which he was sent after his arrest in the northeastern city of Taiyuan on 24 November 2004. Yahoo! and Chinese censorship For years Yahoo! has allowed the Chinese version of its search engine to be censored. In 2002, Yahoo! voluntarily signed the "Public Pledge on Self-Discipline for the China Internet Industry", agreeing to abide by PRC censorship regulations. Searches deemed sensitive by the Chinese authorities such as Taiwan independence in Chinese into the Yahoo! China search engine, retrieve only a limited and approved set of results. A US-based multinational, Yahoo! Appears to be willing to go to any lengths to gain shares of the Chinese market and it is investing heavily in local companies. In 2003, it spent 120 million dollars to buy the search engine 3721.com. More recently Yahoo! acquired a large stake in the Internet giant Alibaba in an operation that reportedly cost nearly a billion dollars. Reporters Without Borders has written several times to Yahoo! executives in an attempt to alert it to the ethical issues raised by its Chinese investments. These letters have so far received no answer. Shi Taos verdict: http://www.rsf.org/IMG/pdf/Verdict_Shi_Tao.pdf http://www.rsf.org/article.php3?id_article=14884 Complete archives at http://www.sitbot.net/ Please let us stay on topic and be civil. OM SPONSORED LINKS United state bankruptcy court western district of texas United state life insurance United state patent United state patent search United states patent office United state flag YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "cia-drugs" on
[cia-drugs] Christians in Name Only
Those who manipulate religion for political purposes are no different than the spammers who keep trying to sell me on a Christian health plan. The only difference is that spammers arent out for blood. The brutish neo-Christians who are on a mission to purify the human race are. CHRISTIANS IN NAME ONLY Rudy Takala September 10, 2005 Since New Orleans was demolished by Hurricane Katrina, there has been no end to the number of factors people have cited as responsible for the resulting damage. Among those reasons have been homosexuality and the Girls Gone Wild video production. If someone would just get rid of the gays and the pornographers, apparently, Americans would achieve immortality and disaster would cease to plague our nation. A quick search on any Internet search engine will quickly find those who have faulted liberal sin for the advent of Katrina. In light of these accusations, I found a recent poll by the Pew Research Center to be interesting. According to the study, the "religion gap" between Republicans and Democrats is widening. Twenty-nine percent of the public sees the Democratic Party as "generally friendly" toward religion, down from 40 percent a year ago and 42 percent in 2003. A 55 percent majority continues to see the GOP as friendly toward religion. How exactly are we to define friendly? Is that term simply a description of those who are most willing to give free money (also known as tax dollars) and institutional perks to their favorite religious establishments? Id like to know, because no one is in the mood these days to be particularly tolerant of anyone else. Neither party harbors members who are very friendly toward anyone elses religions or beliefs. Were witnessing the rise of a sort of neo-Christianity, defined by so-called Christians who are out to cleanse the earth of its iniquity. Theyre convinced that credit for all the worlds evils rests exclusively with non-Christians and liberals, and theyll find evidence of it everywhere. One religious group wrote, "The image of the hurricane ... with its eye already ashore [looked] like an unborn human baby facing to the left (west) in the womb, in the early weeks of gestation (approx. 6 weeks)." Liberal progressives, meanwhile, have been heard halfheartedly mumbling that Katrina was Gods vengeance against the United States on behalf of Saddam Hussein. Everyone is eager to claim that God supports their political cause; when people die, they believe God is killing them for not voting the right way. The arrogance inherent to believing that the worlds ills exist because God is killing people for not adhering to given political beliefs is astounding. In 1906, Italy was witnessing the rise of democracy. At the time, the Catholic Church was unsettled at the thought of losing its sway. In that year, the Italian A. Fogazzaro wrote, Social action is certainly good as a work of justice and brotherhood, but, like the Socialists, certain [Christians] mark it with the stamp of their religious and political opinions, [and] refuse to share it with men of good will unless they accept that stamp . They preach the just distribution of wealth, and that is good, but too often they forget to preach at the same time the poverty of the heart; and if they deliberately leave it out this is abominable in Gods eyes. Cleanse your action of these abominations. Fogazzaro was correct those who use religion as a means to political ends are nothing more than abominations. Contrary to their own beliefs, they are not the second coming of Christ. Theyre closer to false prophets. In Gods eyes, all sin is abhorrent. Homosexuals arent any more despicable than Rush Limbaughs stellar divorce rate. Newt Gingrich - affairs and all - is no more righteous than the producers of Girls Gone Wild. Death exists because of everyones sin not just the sins of specific political factions. In his book The Illuminating Icon, the Orthodox Russian Anthony Ugolnik noted of Christians during the Cold War, The proof that Christians have not suddenly arrayed themselves in robes of charity lies in their willingness to rip at each others garments when it comes to civil issues . The politics that divide us take precedence over the gospel that binds us as one. Ugolniks words were true when he wrote them, and theyre true today. Those who manipulate religion for political purposes are no different than the spammers who keep trying to sell me on a Christian health plan. The only difference is that spammers arent out for blood. The brutish neo-Christians who are on a mission to purify the human race are. © 2005 Rudy Takala - All Rights Reserved Rudy Takala is 16 years old and lives in Minnesota. He was homeschooled for nine years, and is currently attending a local community college. His columns appear regularly on NewsWithViews.com, MensNewsDaily.com,
[cia-drugs] Politically motivated disease causation - the biggest epidemic of all
Epidemics: Chemical Causes Or Virus Scares? The question of disease causation is a big issue. On its answer depend fortunes and - unfortunately - millions of lives. "What if we had strong evidence that, in fact, Aids is a multifactorial syndrome caused by drugs, malnutrition, toxic Aids medicine and the psychological devastation induced by the Hiv+ diagnosis, and that those who dont get sick arent protected by a genetic factor, but by the common factor of refusing to take toxic Aids drugs? What if polio is actually caused by pesticides, vaccinations and tonsillectomies; diabetes by antibiotics, other medicines and organocholorine chemicals in the environment; leukemia and most cancers by a wide variety of toxic chemicals that governments permit in food; hepatitis by medicine and chemicals in the environment..." asks Marcel Girodian, a writer on Aids and other health issues, in a thought provoking essay that examines the question of whether the answers we are given about disease causation might really have a political motivation, rather than being determined by altruistic concerns for our health. His conclusions leave little room for doubt: "Microbial and genetic disease causations predominate in science not because they are the real causes of disease, but because of a variety of economic and political factors. The primary factors are: 1) the enormous power wielded by the pharmaceutical and chemical industries; 2) the willingness of government, the medical and scientific establishments, the media and the NGO sector to prostitute themselves to these industries; 3) the need to keep the population frightened and bewildered in order to strengthen the government-corporate alliances power, deny people true freedom, justify interference in peoples private lives and provide a rationale for transferring the publics financial assets to corporations; 4) The fact that professionals involved in all these endeavors have attained wealth, power and status; and 5) the fact that they dont want to lose their wealth, power and status." Hard to swallow you say? Well, read the essay and draw your own conclusions or better yet, if what Girodian says does not tally with your own experience and knowledge, do your own research on the areas he points to. Certainly there is motive - on the part of the petrochemical and pharma complex of industries - to hide chemical causes and point to the ubiquitous threat of "viral agents". Such a slant on disease causation would protect chemical and nuclear pollution from blame and require ever new and expensive "anti-viral" treatments. Good business practice if nothing else. Here is the article... - - - POLITICALLY MOTIVATED DISEASE CAUSATION - THE BIGGEST EPIDEMIC OF ALLby Marcel GirodianMay 5, 2005 Why do current AIDS researchers not investigate, and not even consider the role of chemicals in AIDS or study other non-HIV AIDS theories to solve the AIDS dilemma? Dr. Mae-Wan Ho, Director, Institute of Science in Society, London Aids is caused by a virus, Hiv. Those who catch Hiv and dont get sick have a genetic factor that protects them. Monkeys get sick because they catch the Simian Immunodeficiency Virus (Siv), cats get sick from the Feline Immunodeficiency Virus (Fiv), and cows get sick when they catch the Bovine Immunodeficiency Virus (Biv). Polio is caused by a virus. Cancer is caused by viruses and genetic predisposition. We are closing in on the genetic causes of cancer, said Bill Clinton in 1998... read on here- http://www.thenhf.com/articles_117.htm See also: Harmless Virus Kills Some Cancers Related Articles Hepatitis C epidemic - where is the virus?On Friday, 13 June 2003, The Age in Australia reported that according to a secret Health Department report, hepatitis C has become "an epidemic". The report has been kept under wraps by Health Minister Kay Patterson since she received it in November last year. The epidemic However does not seem to be confined to Australia only. According to an article in The Toronto Star the Canadian Liver Foundation estimates that... [read more]July 05, 2003 - Sepp Hasslberger 'Bird Flu', SARS - Biowarfare or a Pandemic of Propaganda?Are we being stampeded into a pandemic? The announcement was made by Dr Nancy Cox of the US Centers for Disease Control. According to an article in The Scotsman, Cox says that a global epidemic of bird flu could dwarf historys worst infection disaster, which killed between 20 and 40 million people. The reference of course is to the "Spanish Flu" at the end of World War I which, according... [read more]March 02, 2005 - Sepp Hasslberger The Avian Flu and Drugless DoctorsBBC carried an article on 5 February titled "1918 killer flu secrets revealed" which tells us that the scientists claim to now have figured out that 50 million people were killed by a virus that "jumped from birds to humans". Obviously
[cia-drugs] FOIA Records Link U.S. Officials to Mass Murder in Mexico
FOIA Records Link U.S. Officials to Mass Murder in Mexico Newly Released Documents Trace House of Death Cover-Up to Upper Levels of the Justice Department The House of Death in Ciudad Júarez, MexicoPhoto: D.R. 2005 Klaas Wollstein http://www.narconews.com/Issue39/article1445.html ~ FOIA records reveal Justice Department cover-up in mass-murder case in Mexico By Bill Conroy September 15, 2005A dozen people were tortured and murdered between August 2003 and mid-January 2004 in a house in Ciudad Juárez, Mexico, just across the border from El Paso, Texas. The murders were carried out as part of a criminal enterprise overseen by Heriberto Santillan-Tabares, who U.S. prosecutors claim was a top lieutenant in Vicente Carrillo Fuentes' Juárez drug organization. The U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) field office in El Paso had a paid informant inside of Santillan's criminal syndicate. ICE, along with a U.S. prosecutor in El Paso, were using their informant to snare Santillan. However, a high-ranking DEA agent, Sandalio Gonzalez, claims something went terribly wrong with the Santillan investigation. Gonzalez, who served as the head of the DEA's field office in El Paso when the murders took place, contends ICE agents and a U.S. prosecutor knew their informant was participating in the homicides. He alleges that U.S. law enforcers allowed the murder spree to continue to assure their informant was not exposedso they could continue to use him to make their drug case against Santillan. Gonzalez first discovered the corruption in the Santillan "House of Death" investigation in early 2004, after a DEA agent and his family were confronted by Santillan's death squad, who had mistaken the agent for a competing smuggler. The agent and his family escaped unharmed, but had fate been against them that day, they might well have been in store for a trip to the House of Death, Gonzalez stresses. In the wake of that confrontation, and after discovering that the ICE informant was a participant in the House of Death murders, Gonzalez sent an internal letter on Feb. 24, 2004, to the top ICE official in El Paso and to Johnny Sutton, the U.S. Attorney in San Antonio, Texas. In that letter, Gonzalez dropped the dime on the whole sordid tale. But rather than investigate the charges, officials within the Department of Justice (DOJ) went after Gonzalez, seeing to it that he was reprimanded and his career tarnished with a negative job-performance review. Gonzalez also was ordered to remain silent on the whole matter. According to Gonzalez, the retaliation he experienced after writing the whistleblower letter was initiated at the behest of Sutton, who wanted to bury the letter to avoid compromising a career-boosting case against a major narco-trafficker. That means, according to Gonzalez, that a U.S. attorney is now implicated in the cover-up of a U.S. government informant's participation in mass murder. Santillan was eventually lured across the border and arrested. However, as part of an apparent attempt to keep a lid on the scandal, the U.S. Attorney's Office in San Antonio avoided a public trial by cutting a plea deal with Santillanwhich involved dropping the murder charges against him. Sutton's office has declined to comment on the cover-up allegations or the House of Death case. However, Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) documents unearthed recently by the online investigative newspaper Narco News pull back the dark shroud over the House of Death. Included in the FOIA records are internal Department of Justice e-mails concerning the House of Death case. In general, the FOIA documents, including the e-mails, are heavily redacted, based in part on alleged privacy-protection exemptions. As it turns out, among the items redacted in the e-mails are the names of the high-ranking DOJ officials who drafted or received the e-mails as part of performing their public dutieson the taxpayers' dime. However, despite the attempt to conceal those names through the FOIA process, an unredacted version of one of the DOJ e-mailsauthored by DEA Administrator Karen Tandyrecently surfaced in a federal court case. Tandy sent the e-mail, dated March 5, 2004, to the following DOJ officials: Catherine M. O'Neil, Associate Deputy Attorney General; Jeff Taylor, Counsel to the Attorney General for Criminal and National Security Matters; David Ayers, Chief of Staff to the Attorney General; James B. Comey, Deputy Attorney Generalwho earlier this summer took a job as general counsel for defense contractor Lockheed Martin Corp. Others within DOJ who received a copy of Tandy's e-mail included: Michele Leonhart, Deputy Administrator of DEA; Stuart Levey, former Principal Associate Deputy Attorney General who is now Under Secretary of the Treasury for Terrorism and Financial and Intelligence; Chuck Rosenberg, former Chief of Staff for
[cia-drugs] Clinton One-World Government Conference to Address Thre at of Religion
Clinton One-World Government Conference to Address Threat of Religion NEW YORK, September 16, 2005 - Former US President Bill Clinton has long dreamed of power in international affairs. He has long been rumoured to be the next to be tapped for UN Secretary General, and is a key player in the international movement that seeks to unite the worlds nations under a single, all-encompassing state governed by the UNs favoured class of leftist elites. Clintons latest project, the Clinton Global Initiative, (CGI), has attracted 1000 of the worlds most prominent internationalist movers and shakers this week. The three-day conference, which kicked off last night in New York, includes representatives of many of the worlds heads of state, is touted as a means to forge a new level of global cooperation. The stated goals of the meeting include finding solutions to global poverty, religious conflict, government corruption and global warming.CGIs goal is an integrated global community of shared benefits, responsibilities, and values.The list of goals, however innocuous and noble they may sound on the surface, will be recognized by pro-life UN-watchers as the usual roster of projects used by the UNs population and eugenics activists as a smokescreen. They are the standard tools for the universal imposition of abortion, sterilization, the destruction of the family and religious freedom and the erosion of the sovereign rights of independent nations. The CGI proposes to address Religion Conflict and Resolution. According to CGI, For many hundreds of millions, the most important community ties are born of faith not nation; the most authoritative pronouncements are those of religious leaders not statesmen . For many in the international movement towards a single world government, religion, particularly traditional Christianity and Judaism represent not a unifying and stabilizing force for good, but a major obstacle to their goals of a universal secular state. Religion, says CGI, represents a chief engine of deadly conflict.The online news service World Net Daily, asks under which set of "values" the CGI proposes the world ought to unite in the opinion of the CGI delegates. The advisory board for the Religion Forum, says WND reporter, Mary Jo Anderson, is "packed with those who are noted for their liberal views toward religion those for whom dogma is 'problematical,'" including the Catholic Archbishop of Washington, Cardinal McCarrick. Included in the list of delegates is British Prime Minister Tony Blair, US Secretary of State, Condoleeza Rice, Jordans King Abdullah, Ukraine President Victor Yushchenko and Dominique de Villepin, the French Prime Minister.The contingent from Canada includes Conservative Party turn-coat, Belinda Stronach, who has long had a personal friendship with Clinton. Along with Stronach, the Canadian contingent includes Prime Minister Paul Martin and his predecessor, Jean Chretien and International Development and Aid Minister, Aileen Carroll. Sponsors of the Clinton Global Initiative include internationalist groups interested in the UN agenda: Microsoft, Starbucks, Hewlett Packard, Google, Yahoo, Goldman Sachs, and the venerable eugenics/population control supporter, the Rockefeller Foundation, each of whom have donated at least US $250,000Pro-family groups are not the only ones skeptical of the goals and usefulness of the Clinton extravaganza. The headline in todays South China Morning Post reads, His plans are grand, but can he save the world? http://www.lifesite.net/ldn/2005/sep/05091603.html Complete archives at http://www.sitbot.net/ Please let us stay on topic and be civil. OM YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "cia-drugs" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
[cia-drugs] Fwd: The Unconventional Warrior ARCHIVES
--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]... wrote: I'm interested in the frivolous SFA lawsuit against marvin, millegan etal. i knew some of the people mentioned by Marvin and I was an accidentalwitness to the murder of nicoletti. it was not a mob hit. i think SFAis a helpless pawn in this. i think they know it. so...what is anunchallengable pentagon cabal seeking to cover up? that might be aprevious misuse of SF or CIA to settle old scores and maintain statusquo. it wasnt a mob hit. anon. http://www.expendableelite.com/UW_archives/UW_archive.0020.html --- End forwarded message --- Complete archives at http://www.sitbot.net/ Please let us stay on topic and be civil. OM SPONSORED LINKS United state bankruptcy court western district of texas United state life insurance United state patent United state patent search United states patent office United state flag YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "cia-drugs" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
[cia-drugs] Simon Wiesenthal, Dead at 96
Simon Wiesenthal, Dead at 96 by Peter Levenda It is a common question: why go after all those Nazis from World War II? They must be a hundred years old by now, if they are still alive. Who benefits? Ive been asked that question, and I know that others who have written about the Nazis and who hunt Nazis are frequently asked the same. Perhaps the life of Simon Wiesenthal can give us some answers. At the age of 96, the man who single-handedly created the popular image of the indefatigable Nazi hunter has died in Vienna. There are a few people around the world who are, today, breathing a sigh of relief; others who are celebrating the death of their nemesis, the man who has kept them on their toes and on the run for decades. But for most of us, today is a day to remember not only the Holocaust but the sixty-year career of a man who survived the death camps only to turn around and go after the perpetrators. If Simon Wiesenthal could keep up that struggle until the age of 96, you can be sure that Nazi war criminals who escaped justice in 1945 continued to struggle to evade his net for the same length of time, until they themselves died of old age or were brought to justice. Wiesenthals greatest contribution, however, may very well be his success at keeping the story of the Holocaust alive. He did so in a way that many of us can appreciate: with intelligence, careful study and evaluation, and discretion. Wiesenthal was a kind of conspiracy theorist, looking for hidden enemies in government, business, and culture around the world; these enemies existed, of course, and were not the product of speculation or imagination, and he performed this function in a manner we should emulate. He did not tar everyone with the same brush. Even when confronted by the Nazi past of Kurt Waldheim, he stopped short of declaring the Austrian Prime Minister a war criminal (although he did call for his resignation), because the evidence just wasnt there. Wiesenthal was only interested in apprehending the real perpetrators of the Holocaust: the sadistic butchers and fiends who populate the nightmares of the survivors. The Eichmanns, the Barbies, the Mengeles. It was the fictional story of Josef Mengele Ira Levins The Boys From Brazil that brought Wiesenthal tremendous fame around the world. He was portrayed by Laurence Olivier, not a bad choice. Wiesenthals character also made an appearance in the film version of The Odessa File, a well-done and thoughtful interpretation of the Frederick Forsythe novel that starred a youthful Jon Voigt (for those of you too young to remember, Voigt is the father of Angelina Jolie). Wiesenthal, in short, became iconic in the popular culture and he used that popularity to further his cause. The Simon Wiesenthal Center was the first place I called after my return from Chile and its notorious Colonia Dignidad. I received courteous responses from them, but they were as cautious as their namesake and founder when it came to the presence of actual Nazi war criminals at the Colony. They were aware of Colonia Dignidad, of course, and I had the impression that they were monitoring the situation in some manner, but their brief was more to the purpose of keeping the memory of the Holocaust alive at a time when its very existence was being questioned by the revisionists, a more important goal to be sure than hunting down a renegade war criminal lost in the mountains of Chile. There was a moment when I felt a little like the young man in the opening sequences of The Boys From Brazil, who is taking photographs of Mengele in Paraguay and phoning Wiesenthal to tell him what he has found. The Weisenthal character was necessarily skeptical and told the young man to forget about it and go home. Skepticism in the service of research and investigation is a tremendous tool. It saves one endless time going after wild geese, meaningless data, dead ends. For those of us involved in the darker areas of historical research sometimes confused with speculative history or even with conspiracy theorism skepticism is a necessity. It keeps us sane. And may even keep us alive. But imagination is skepticisms left hand. Without it, we wouldnt even be involved in looking behind the curtain, in revealing the deeper politics behind world events. Imagination gives us the ability to conceive of other patterns, other connections between events, and renders us invulnerable to the cover story, the accepted version of events, the spin. Unfortunately, Simon Wiesenthal did not need an active imagination. He had experienced the sinister forces of history first-hand, in the death camps that took over eighty of his own relatives lives and nearly took his own. It is my sincere hope that today Simon Wiesenthal who stirred the imaginations of so many others, including my own is now reunited with his wife (who died in 2003), with the family he
[cia-drugs] Re: British special forces caught pretending to be Iraqi 'insurgents'
--- In cia-drugs@yahoogroups.com, "David Guyatt" [EMAIL PROTECTED]... wrote: The important point that is being ignored here is that the Iraqi police turned over the two soldiers (prior to the rescue attempt at the prison) to the Shia militia. In other words, the thrust of this article is altogether barking up the wrong tree. I don't think so. Who are the sources pointing to the "turnover to the Shia militia" what might be their motives in pointing in that direction? This is a case where the special forces guys got caught doing the dirty deeds, and now the usual suspects are frantically spinning to turn our eyes away from the obvious. n. So what we have here is a clear instance of a foreign power attempting to fabricate a terrorist attack. Why else would the soldiers be dressed as Arabs if not to frame them? Why have a car laden with explosives if you don't plan to use them for destructive purposes? Iraq is headed towards civil war, and this operation was meant to accelerate the process by killing people and blaming others. Nothing more, nothing less. That the British army staged an over-the-top escape whenit could rely on normal diplomatic channels to recoverits people proves that. Such extreme methods highlight the need to keep secrets. There have been a number of insurgent bombings in Iraq recently. Who really is responsible for the bloodshed and destruction? The only tangible benefit of the bombings is justification for Coalition forces maintaining the peace in Iraq. Who benefits from that? Certainly not the Iraqis they already believe most suicide bombings are done by the United States to prompt religious war. After reading about this incident, I'm not inclined to disagree. Even though this false-flag operation was blown wide open, I'm afraid it might still be used in the mainstream media to incite further violence in the Middle East. Judging by the coverage that has emerged after the incident, my fears seem warranted. Several articles have already turned the story against the angry Iraqis who fought the British tanks as they demolished the jail wall, painting them as aggressive Shia militia attacking the doe-eyed, innocent troops responding to the concern that their comrades were held by religious fanatics. A photograph of a troop on fire comes complete with commentary that the vehicles were under attack during a "bid to recover arrested servicemen" that were possibly undercover. All criminal elements of British treacheryare downplayed, the car's explosive cache is never mentioned and the soldiers who instigated the affair are made victims of an unstable country they are defending. Hilariously, all of this spin has already landed Iran at the top of the blame game. Because when the war combine botches its own clandestine terrorist acts, what better way to recover than by painting the soulless, freedom-hating country you'd love to invade next as the culprit? In a way, I almost admire the nerve of officials who are able to infer that Basra's riots have nothing to do with fake insurgent bombing raids and everything to do with religious ties to a foreign country. It's a sheer unmitigated gall that flies in the face of logic and reason. "The Iranians are careful not to be caught," a British official said as the UK threatened to refer Iran to the UN Security Council for sanctions. Too bad the British aren't! Maybe then they'd be able to complete their black-ops mission without looking like complete fools in the process! Make no mistake any and all violence to erupt from Basra over this incident lands squarely on the shoulders of the British army and its special forces. Instead of stoking the flames of propaganda against a nationit hasno hope of ever conquering, maybeBritain should quit trying to intimidate the Iraqis with fear and torture and start focusing on fixing its mistakes and getting out of the Middle East. http://www.thesimon.com/magazine/articles/canon_fodder/0961_fake_terrorism_coalition_best_friend.html --- In cia-drugs@yahoogroups.com, "David Guyatt" [EMAIL PROTECTED]... wrote: The important point that is being ignored here is that the Iraqi police turned over the two soldiers (prior to the rescue attempt at the prison) to the Shia militia. In other words, the thrust of this article is altogether barking up the wrong tree. - Original Message - From: E Bryant Holman To: cia-drugs@yahoogroups.com ; El Paso Greens ; 1zapatista Sent: Tuesday, September 20, 2005 3:32 PM Subject: [cia-drugs] British special forces caught pretending to be Iraqi 'insurgents' British special forces caught pretending to be Iraqi 'insurgents' http://www.theinsider.org/news/article.asp?id=1556 the gig is up Complete archives at http://www.sitbot.net/ Please let us stay on topic and be civil. OM SPONSORED LINKS United state bankruptcy
[cia-drugs] British Undercover Soldiers Caught driving Booby Trapped Car
British "Undercover Soldiers" Caught driving Booby Trapped Car "They refused to say what their mission was." Michel Chossudovsky | September 21 2005 GlobalResearch.ca The following Reuters report raises some disturbing questions. Why were undercover British "soldiers" wearing traditional Arab headscarves firing at Iraqi police? The incident took place just prior to a major religious event in Basra. The report suggests that the police thought the British soldiers looked "suspicious". What was the nature of their mission? Occupation forces are supposesd to be collaborating with Iraqi authorities. Why did Britsh Forces haveto storm the prison using tanks and armoured vehicles to liberate the British undercover agents? "British forces used up to 10 tanks " supported by helicopters " to smash through the walls of the jail and free the two British servicemen." Was there concern that the British "soldiers" who were being held by the Iraqi National Guard would be obligedto reveal the nature and objective of their undercover mission? A report of Al Jazeera TV, which preceeded the raid on the prison, suggests that the British undercover soldiers were driving a booby trapped car loaded with ammunition. The Al Jazeera report (see below) also suggests that the riots directed againstBritish military presence were motivated because the British undercover soldiers were planning to explode the booby trapped car in the centre of Basra: [Anchorman Al-Habib al-Ghuraybi] We have with us on the telephone from Baghdad Fattah al-Shaykh, member of the Iraqi National Assembly. What are the details of and the facts surrounding this incident?[Al-Shaykh] In the name of God, the merciful, the compassionate. There have been continuous provocative acts since the day before yesterday by the British forces against the peaceful sons of Basra. There have been indiscriminate arrests, the most recent of which was the arrest of Shaykh Ahmad al-Farqusi and two Basra citizens on the pretext that they had carried out terrorist operations to kill US soldiers. This is a baseless claim. This was confirmed to us by [name indistinct] the second secretary at the British Embassy in Baghdad, when we met with him a short while ago. He said that there is evidence on this. We say: You should come up with this evidence or forget about this issue. If you really want to look for truth, then we should resort to the Iraqi justice away from the British provocations against the sons of Basra, particularly what happened today when the sons of Basra caught two non-Iraqis, who seem to be Britons and were in a car of the Cressida type. It was a booby-trapped car laden with ammunition and was meant to explode in the centre of the city of Basra in the popular market. However, the sons of the city of Basra arrested them. They [the two non-Iraqis] then fired at the people there and killed some of them. The two arrested persons are now at the Intelligence Department in Basra, and they were held by the National Guard force, but the British occupation forces are still surrounding this department in an attempt to absolve them of the crime. [Al-Ghuraybi] Thank you Fattah al-Shaykh, member of the National Assembly and deputy for Basra.Text of report by Qatari Al-Jazeera satellite TV on 19 September (emphasis added) Is this an isolated incident or is part of a pattern? More significantly, have theoccupation forces been involved in similar undercover missions? Syrian TV (Sept 19, 2005) reports the following: Ten Iraqis - seven police commandos, two civilians and a child - were killed and more than 10 others wounded in the explosion of two car bombs near two checkpoints in Al-Mahmudiyah and Al-Latifiyah south of Baghdad while hundreds of thousands of Iraqis were heading towards the city of Karbala to mark the anniversary of a religious event. And in a significant incident in the city of Basra, which is also marking the same religious event, Iraqi demonstrators set fire to two British tanks near a police station after Iraqi police had arrested two British soldiers disguised in civilian clothes for opening fire on police. Eight armoured British vehicles surrounded the police station before the eruption of the confrontations. A policeman at the scene said the two detained Britons were wearing traditional Iraqi jallabahs [loose cloaks] and wigs. [Italics added]An indepth independent inquiry should be ordered by Britain's House of Commons into the circumstances of this event.Michel ChossudovskyGlobal Research Editor, 20 Sept 2005 ~~ UK denies storming Iraqi jail to free soldiersReuter, 20 September 2005 British forces have freed two undercover soldiers from jail in Basra after a day of rioting in the Iraqi city that was sparked when the soldiers fired on a police patrol. An Iraqi
[cia-drugs] Al Qaeda and the Iraqi Resistance Movement
Al Qaeda and the Iraqi Resistance Movement by Michel Chossudovsky September 18, 2005 You know, I hate to predict violence, but I just understand the nature of the killers. This guy, Zarqawi, an al Qaeda associate -- who was in Baghdad, by the way, prior to the removal of Saddam Hussein -- is still at large in Iraq. And as you might remember, part of his operational plan was to sow violence and discord amongst the various groups in Iraq by cold- blooded killing. And we need to help find Zarqawi so that the people of Iraq can have a more bright -- bright future. (George W. Bush, Press Conference, 1 June 2004) US forces are waging a major attack on the Northern city of Tal Afar directed against the Iraqi resistance. The US siege on the city, which includes aerial bombardments has resulted in countless civilians deaths. The bombing raids have led toa humanitarian crisis marked by the mass exodus, at gun point, of a large part of Tal Afar's population of some 300,000 people. Both within the city as well as in the refugee camps, US forces and their Iraqi counterparts have been involved in a "storming and searching operation", which has terrorized the civilian population. Similar in nature to the 2004 siege of Fallujah, the attack on Tal Afar is casually identified as a US-Iraqi initiative to weed out terrorists. It involves some 6000 heavily armed US forces and some 4000 Iraqi troops (Kurdish Peshmerga and Shia Badr Army). Tal Afar is portrayed by the media as an "Al Qaeda stronghold" under the leadership of terror mastermind Abu Musab Al Zarqawi. The city is close to the Syrian border and Syria is identified as facilitating the movement of "terrorists" into Iraq. Iraqi and US troops are said to be "going after" so-called "foreign fighters", who are "mostly religious zealots and Sunni fanatics". While the media reports focus on the presence of "foreign fighters", most of the resistance fighters in Tal Afar are Iraqis. There have been no reliable reports of mass arrests of foreign fighters. (See Statement of Colonel Robert Brown, US State Department, States News Services, 14 September 2005). There are an estimated 400 to 500 Iraqi fighters. Reports suggest that most of the resistance fighters have abandoned the city: It is estimated that 90% of the residents have left their homes because of the violence and destruction of the siege, as well as to avoid home raids and snipers.The Fallujah model is being applied yet again, albeit on a smaller scale... While the US military claims to have killed roughly 200 "terrorists" in the operation, reports from the ground state that most of the fighters inside the city had long since left to avoid direct confrontation with the overwhelming military force (a basic tenet of guerrilla warfare). (See Dahr Jamail, http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=viewArticlecode=20050916articleId=959 ) The US military has identified the Euphrates region as a "Zarqawi stronghold" and plans, according to The New York Times, to wage similar operations in other cities in the following weeks: [S]enior officials at the Pentagon and in Iraq say they believe that Mr. Zarqawi and the insurgency's ''center of gravity'' is now in the bends and towns of the Euphrates River valley near the Syrian border. Commanders say they plan to squeeze the Zarqawi leadership and Iraqi insurgents in those areas. Throughout the spring and summer marines and Army forces staged raids into those same towns, confiscating weapons and killing scores of insurgents. But many fighters melted into the countryside, and there were not enough coalition troops to keep a sufficient presence in the villages. Commanders say new offensives in Anbar Province in coming weeks will be modeled on the siege of Tal Afar, which used 8,500 American and Iraqi troops. (New York Times, 17 September 2005) According to UPI, hundreds of families from Samara situated on the bank of the river Tigris, were fleeing the city (18 September) following an announcement by Iraqi Defense Minister Saadoun al-Duleimi of a planned military attack against the city to "cleanse it from the terrorists." Media Blackout There has been a virtual blackout on what is actually happening in Tal Afar. The humanitarian crisis and the plight of civilians is not an object of media attention or debate.Moreover, there are no details on the precise nature of the military operation from the embedded newsman in the war theater. In fact, it would appear that the embedded mediahas also been excluded. Most of the reports out of Iraq are focusing on the suicide bombings in Shia populated areas, which have led to some than 200 civilian deaths. Without evidence, these suicide attacks are described as part of Musab Al Zarqawi's "counter-offensive", as "acts of revenge" for the attacks on Tal Afar. In a text published on a mysterious website, Al Zarqawi
[cia-drugs] British prison break and blown covert operation, exposes war on terrorism lie
British prison break and blown covert operation, exposes "war on terrorism" lie by Larry Chin September 20, 2005 GlobalResearch.ca On Monday, September 19, 2005, six British armored vehicles smashed into an Iraqi jail in Basra to free two undercover SAS elite special forces commandos who were engaged in a bungled espionage operation involving the planting of explosives. Michel Chossudovsky breaks the story down here and puts it in to context: British "Undercover Soldiers" Caught driving Booby Trapped Car. See also the mainstream coverage from BBC, Washington Post, The Independent and the Christian Science Monitor. This incident is as obvious and embarrassing as the 1986 downing of Oliver Norths Southern Air Transport/CIA supply plane over Nicaragua (piloted by Eugene Hasenfus), which started what is known as the Iran-Contra scandal. In the wake of official denials and tap-dancing from the British, a new cover-up is already underway, What this scandal confirms, in spectacular fashion, is that the "war on terrorism" is a lie. It has been a lie, from the manufactured 9/11 to the present; one huge covert operation spearheaded by the US and the British governments, built upon endless faked intelligence and Downing Paper lies. It further confirms that the lie itself is becoming increasingly difficult to control. Here we have British agents caught planting explosives, setting up a bombing and the murder of civilians, and fighting between the British and the Iraqi police ("allies"). Why? In the timely and thorough analysis Al-Qaeda and the Iraqi Resistance Movement, Chossudovsky asks: "Has the US [and Britain] created as part of a covert intelligence operation, a bogus resistance movement made up of its own Al Qaeda sponsored terrorists? Their suicide attacks target Iraqi civilians rather than the US military. The suicide bombings tend to encourage sectarian divisions not only within Iraq, but throughout the entire Middle East. They serve Washington's interests. They contribute to undermining the development of a broader resistance movement uniting Shia, Sunni, Kurds and Christians against the illegal occupation of the Iraqi homeland. They also tend to create, at the international level, divisions within the antiwar and peace movements." The answer to the question, emphatically underscored by the British prison break, is yes. A manufactured and guided "terrorism", including suicide bombings set up by Western forces, and blamed on "terrorists" (Zarqawi, etc.), and "real" blowback violence (anti-occupation resistance)---fomented by the West, for geostrategic purposes. The real terror threat originates from Washington, and its brethren in London and Tel Aviv. http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=viewArticlecode=CHI20050920articleId=982 Complete archives at http://www.sitbot.net/ Please let us stay on topic and be civil. OM YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "cia-drugs" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
[cia-drugs] Who's Blowing up Iraq? - New evidence that bombs are being planted by British Commandos
Who's Blowing up Iraq? New evidence that bombs are being planted by British Commandos by Mike Whitney September 20, 2005 www.opednews.com Whos Blowing Up Iraq? New evidence that bombs are being planted by British Commandos by Mike WhitneyThe Iraqi security officials on Monday variously accused two Britons they detained of shooting at Iraqi forces or TRYING TO PLANT EXPLOSIVES. Washington Post, Ellen Knickmeyer, 9-20-05; British Smash into Jail to Free Two Detained SoldiersIn more than two years since the United States initiated hostilities against Iraq, there has never been a positive identification of Abu Musab al-Zarqawi.Never. That doesnt mean that he doesnt exist; it simply suggests that prudent people will challenge the official version until his whereabouts and significance in the conflict can be verified. At present, much of the rationale for maintaining the occupation depends on this elusive and, perhaps, illusory figure. Its odd how Al-Zarqawi appears at the precise coordinates of Americas bombing-raids, and then, miraculously vanishes unscathed from the scene of the wreckage. This would be a remarkable feat for anyone, but especially for someone who only has one leg. Al-Zarqawi may simply be a fantasy dreamed up by Pentagon planners to put a threatening face on the Iraqi resistance. The Defense Dept has been aggressive in its effort to shape information in a way that serves the overall objectives of the occupation. The primary aim of the Pentagons Strategic Information program is to distort the truth in a way that controls the storyline created by the media. Al-Zarqawi fits perfectly within this paradigm of intentional deception. The manipulation of information factors heavily in the steady increase of Iraqi casualties, too. Although the military refuses to do body counts; many people take considerable interest in the daily death toll. Last week, over 200 civilians were killed in seemingly random acts of violence purportedly caused by al-Zarqawi. But, were they?Were these massive attacks the work of al-Zarqawi as the western media reports or some other more shadowy force? One member of the Iraqi National Assembly. Fatah al-Sheikh, stated, It seems that the American forces are trying to escalate the situation in order to make the Iraqi people suffer . There is a huge campaign for the agents of the foreign occupation to enter and plant hatred between the sons of the Iraqi people, and spread rumors in order to scare the one from the other. The occupiers are trying to start religious incitement and if it does not happen, then they will try to start an internal Shiite incitement.Al-Sheikhs feelings are shared by a great many Iraqis. They can see that everything the US has done, from the forming a government made up predominantly of Shiites and Kurds, to creating a constitution that allows the breaking up to the country (federalism), to using the Peshmerga and Badr militia in their attacks on Sunni cities, to building an Interior Ministry entirely comprised of Shiites, suggests that the Pentagons strategy is to fuel the sectarian divisions that will lead to civil war. Al-Zarqawi is an integral facet of this broader plan. Rumsfeld has cast the Jordanian as the agent-provocateur; the driving force behind religious partition and antagonism. But, al-Zarqawi has nothing to gain by killing innocent civilians, and everything to lose. If he does actually operate in Iraq, he needs logistical supporting all his movements; including help with safe-houses, assistants, and the assurance of invisibility in the community. (The ocean in which he swims) These would disappear instantly if he recklessly killed and maimed innocent women and children. Last week the Imam of Baghdads al-Kazimeya mosque, Jawad al-Kalesi said, that al-Zarqawi is dead but Washington continues to use him as a bogeyman to justify a prolonged military occupation .Hes simply an invention by the occupiers to divide the people. Al-Kalesi added that al-Zarqawi was killed in the beginning of the war in the Kurdish north and that His family in Jordan even held a ceremony after his death. (AFP)Most Iraqis probably agree with al-Kalesi, but that hasnt deterred the Pentagon from continuing with the charade. This is understandable given that al-Zarqawi is the last tattered justification for the initial invasion. Its doubtful that the Pentagon will ditch their final threadbare apology for the war. But the reality is vastly different from the spin coming from the military. In fact, foreign fighters play a very small role in Iraq with or without al-Zarqawi. As the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) revealed this week in their report, Analysts and government officials in the US and Iraq overstated the size of the foreign element in the Iraqi insurgency Iraqi fighters made up less than 10% of the armed groups ranks, perhaps, even
[cia-drugs] ID cards: a story I thought I'd never write.
ID cards: a story I thought I'd never write.Por Henk Ruyssenaars - Tuesday, Sep. 20, 2005 at 12:51 PM[EMAIL PROTECTED] Holanda Freedom is buried in 'Apartheid' state The Netherlands: from the 1st of Jan. 2006 all 16 million people in the country will get a new 'Citizen's Service Number', turning the country into one big jail. The first Apartheid process against 250 people - out of ten thousands who could not show an ID Card - starts next week. by Henk Ruyssenaars Amsterdam - Sept. 20th 2005 - This is a story I thought I would never have to write. But, the neocons* managing The Netherlands, like in the US a so called 'Christian government', gave its approval last Friday Sept. 16, 2005, for the introduction of a biometric type of ID from October next year, a credit card style 'driving license'. It's the last nail in the Dutch coffin for freedom: after the yoke of compulsory ID cards now the Dutch get an electronic bit in their mouth, completing the electronic steering. Freedom in Holland officially died Jan. 1st 2005 when a new law came into effect, making it compulsory in the Netherlands for everybody above the age of 14 to - at all times and outside of one's home - carry an official ID. Leaving home without it means at least a fifty Euro fine, eventually a court case. The first trial - in which a batch of two-hundred-and-fifty people is taken to court for not carrying an ID card - starts next week Sept. 28th in the central dutch city of Utrecht. Demonstrations against this Dutch, and also global shame, have been announced. At the end of last August close to fourty-seven-thousand people had been fined, of which four thousand were children aged 14 and 15. Last January around 100 people a day were stopped, checked by the police and fined when they were not able to immediately produce a valid ID card. NOW, 8 MONTHS LATER THIS ABUSE HAS MORE THAN DOUBLED. And I've never thought I'd ever have to cover the same trials in my native Holland. Compassionate, understanding people and groups always were fighting Apartheid and the compulsory passes for the blacks in South Africa. Thirty years ago I saw in Johannesburg what will happen in Holland next week: the inhumane spectacle of hundreds of people who have been dragged into court because they - in their own country - could not immediately show an ID card and are punished. And remember: we were promised a European Union without borders, where we all would be able to travel freely, not even needing a passport. None of it was true: it was all a pack of lies. According to the dutch industry's disinformation bureau ANP, the new ID card c.q. driving license "includes an anti forgery kinegram - a sort of hologram formed by fine lines of different thickness and shape. As the angle of the light changes, the image of kinegram also changes, producing the effect of a moving picture." It is of course not mentioned that the new 'driving license' also includes with data information loaded chips (RFID's) which will make it possible to control anybody anywhere. RFID-chips which can be de-activated by the people in power. They have given themselves the tools to limit at will the freedom of movement of anybody, anytime and anywhere. SOCIALLY AND ECONOMICALLY 'DEAD' The Netherlands is paving the repressive way for the European Union countries: if the neocon management of a country does not like your ideas or you are not 'profitable', you will be socially and economically 'dead', and your movements will be curbed. It means for instance that the overhead display on a highway can warn you that you are not allowed to drive any further: all traffic lights will show 'red' if you do. You probably can't drive your own car anyhow, because if you are critical of their system you will not be allowed to own one. Those having a car will - depending on their behavior - have fuel rationed or not. It's up to 'them' if you're allowed to tank and how much, or leave a city, suburb, province, state or country. With their new ID card/driving license - which you pay a hefty price for, to them - you are electronically fettered, and will or will not be able to buy air line, train, boat or bus tickets. Your bank account can be blocked at any moment, like the other bank's credit cards which you must use. And anywhere - in any building, office, shop, subway or your place of work - entrance can be electronically denied. Your new ID card will confine you to the area and possibilities and/or limitations they choose. Not you! Like receiving medical care or not: it's not only indicating your blood group, your card. The same ID card will be your key - or not - to an Internet which they control. It is electronical slavery optima forma, controlling and restricting your life. Without an ID you don't exist anymore: you are a non-person. A pariah in the New World Order, without a fully valid ID, the new status symbol of the slaves. The
[cia-drugs] Al-Qaeda: A CIA protégé
Al-Qaeda: A CIA protégé Edited 18 September 2005 Franklin Freemancopyright © the author 2003-5You may download the article for your own use,and reproduce it, as a whole or in part (but include thefull copyright notice), on non-commercial websites Contents:-The Breeding-Ground and Birth of al-Qaeda(Chossudovsky's article on US-Qaeda relations in the 1990s [particularly for Yugoslavia])"Dollars For Terror" (from Labévière's book on CIA-Qaeda relations in the 1990s)Ali Mohammed: A Key Link?The CIA's "Bin Laden Issue Station", founded Jan. 1996Able Danger "identifies Atta's cell in Brooklyn", 1999/2000 The Breeding-Ground and Birth of al-QaedaThe USA, via the CIA, originally backed the Islamic guerrilla resistance against the Marxist regime and Soviet occupation of Afghanistan in the late 1970s and 1980s. They focused their efforts on a hardline faction which was to spawn al-Qaeda in 1987-88. ... "Between 1978 and 1992, the US government poured in at least US $6 billion (some estimates range as high as $20 billion) worth of arms, training and funds to prop up the mujaheddin [in Afghanistan]. Other western governments, as well as oil-rich Saudi Arabia, kicked in as much again. Wealthy Arab fanatics, like Osama bin Laden, provided millions more. ... "Washington's favoured mujaheddin faction was one of the most extreme, led by Gulbuddin Hekmatyar. ... Osama bin Laden was a close associate of Hekmatyar and his faction." (Norm Dixon, "How the CIA created Osama bin Laden" [autumn 2001]) "As his unclassified CIA biography states, bin Laden left Saudi Arabia to fight the Soviet army in Afghanistan after Moscow's invasion in 1979. By 1984, he was running a front organization known as Maktab al-Khidamar the MAK which funneled money, arms and fighters from the outside world into the Afghan war. "What the CIA bio[graphy] conveniently fails to specify (in its unclassified form at least) is that the MAK was nurtured by Pakistan's state security services, the Inter-Services Intelligence agency, or ISI, the CIA's primary conduit for conducting the covert war against Moscow's occupation." ... (Michael Moran, "Bin Laden comes home to roost", MSNBC, 24 Aug. 1998) "In 1986, bin Laden brought heavy construction equipment from Saudi Arabia to Afghanistan. Using his extensive knowledge of construction techniques, (he has a degree in civil engineering), he built "training camps", some dug deep into the sides of mountains, and built roads to reach them. "These camps, now dubbed "terrorist universities" by Washington, were built in collaboration with the ISI and the CIA. The Afghan contra fighters, including tens of thousands of mercenaries recruited and paid for by bin Laden, were armed by the CIA. Pakistan, the US and Britain provided military trainers. ... "Al Qaeda (the Base), bin Laden's organisation, was established in 1987-88 to run the camps and other business enterprises. It is a tightly-run capitalist holding company albeit one that integrates the operations of a military force and related logistical services with `legitimate' business operations." (Norm Dixon, "How the CIA created Osama bin Laden") "... bin Laden split from the relatively conventional MAK in 1988 and established a new group, al-Qaida, that included many of the more extreme MAK members he had met in Afghanistan. ... Afghan vet[eran]s, or Afghanis .." (Michael Moran, "Bin Laden comes home to roost", MSNBC, 24 Aug. 1998) Michel Chossudovsky's article "Osamagate" describes the US administrations' post-Cold-War connections with al-Qaeda, concentrating on militant-Muslim involvement in the former Yugoslavia. The CIA apparently considered that bin Laden's "Arab Afghans" were too useful an asset to sever connections with, even after the Soviet withdrawal from Afghanistan and the collapse of the puppet regime ... "Dollars for Terror"Richard Labévière (Algora, 2000; translation of Les Dolleurs de la Terreur, Grasset, 1999) Amongst other things, this book charts the connections between the CIA and al-Qaeda during the latter's history from its beginnings during the Soviet occupation of Afghanistan to the US embassy bombings in 1998. The motives as portrayed by Labévière seem a little fuzzy to me (but they've become abundantly clear since 9/11). The CIA decided that bin Laden's "Arab Afghans" were much too useful an ally to abandon after the Soviets left Afghanistan, and in a meeting at Green's Hotel, Peshawar, Pakistan, in late 1991, between their local representatives, Prince Turki bin Faisal (Fayçal) (head of the Saudi intelligence service) and the "Arab Afghans", they decided to continue links. The "strategic" position of Afghanistan vis-a-vis Central Asian oil was a factor in this decision. (Dollars for Terror, pp.104-5) You get the impression that Labeviere is either waffling through his hat, or else grasping at something embryonic, only half-formed. The
[cia-drugs] Were British Special Forces Soldiers Planting Bombs in Basra?
Spokesmen for the American and British occupation of Iraq, together with the media, have rejected with indignation any suggestion that their forces could have been involved in false-flag terrorist operations in Iraq. Were British Special Forces Soldiers Planting Bombs in Basra? Suspicions Strengthened by Earlier Reports by Michael Keefer September 25, 2005 GlobalResearch.ca Does anyone remember the shock with which the British public greeted the revelation four years ago that one of the members of the Real IRA unit whose bombing attack in Omagh on August 15, 1998 killed twenty-nine civilians had been a double agent, a British army soldier? That soldier was not Britains only terrorist double agent. A second British soldier planted within the IRA claimed he had given forty-eight hours advance notice of the Omagh car-bomb attack to his handlers within the Royal Ulster Constabulary, including "details of one of the bombing team and the mans car registration." Although the agent had made an audio tape of his tip-off call, Sir Ronnie Flanagan, chief constable of the RUC, declared that "no such information was received" (http://www.sundayherald.com/17827). This second double agent went public in June 2002 with the claim that from 1981 to 1994, while on full British army pay, he had worked for "the Force Research Unit, an ultra-secret wing of British military intelligence," as an IRA mole. With the full knowledge and consent of his FRU and MI5 handlers, he became a bombing specialist who "mixed explosive and helped to develop new types of bombs," including "light-sensitive bombs, activated by photographic flashes, to overcome the problem of IRA remote-control devices having their signal jammed by army radio units." He went on to become "a member of the Provisional IRAs internal security squadalso known as the torture unitwhich interrogated and executed suspected informers" (http://www.sundayherald.com/print25646). The much-feared commander of that same "torture unit" was likewise a mole, who had previously served in the Royal Marines Special Boat Squadron (an elite special forces unit, the Marines equivalent to the better-known SAS). A fourth mole, a soldier code-named "Stakeknife" whose military handlers "allowed him to carry out large numbers of terrorist murders in order to protect his cover within the IRA," was still active in December 2002 as "one of Belfasts leading Provisionals" (http://www.sundayherald.com/29997). Reliable evidence also emerged in late 2002 that the British army had been using its double agents in terrorist organizations "to carry out proxy assassinations for the British state"most notoriously in the case of Belfast solicitor and human rights activist Pat Finucane, who was murdered in 1989 by the Protestant Ulster Defence Association. It appears that the FRU passed on details about Finucane to a British soldier who had infiltrated the UDA; he in turn "supplied UDA murder teams with the information" (http://www.sundayherald.com/29997). Recent events in Basra have raised suspicions that the British army may have reactivated these same tactics in Iraq. Articles published by Michel Chossudovsky, Larry Chin and Mike Whitney at the Centre for Research on Globalizations website on September 20, 2005 have offered preliminary assessments of the claims of Iraqi authorities that two British soldiers in civilian clothes who were arrested by Iraqi police in Basra on September 19and in short order released by a British tank and helicopter assault on the prison where they were being heldhad been engaged in planting bombs in the city See: http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=viewArticlecode=20050920articleId=972http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=viewArticlecode=CHI20050920articleId=982http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=viewArticlecode=WHI20050920articleId=981A further article by Kurt Nimmo points to false-flag operations carried out by British special forces troops in Northern Ireland and elsewhere, and to Donald Rumsfelds formation of the P2OG, or Proactive Preemptive Operations Group, as directly relevant to Iraqi charges of possible false-flag terror operations by the occupying powers in Iraq (http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=viewArticlecode=20050924articleid=992). These accusations by Iraqi officials echo insistent but unsubstantiated claims, going back at least to the spring of 2004, to the effect that many of the terror bombings carried out against civilian targets in Iraq have actually been perpetrated by U.S. and British forces rather than by Iraqi insurgents. Some such claims can be briskly dismissed. In mid-May 2005, for example, a group calling itself "Al Qaeda in Iraq" accused U.S. troops "of detonating car bombs and falsely accusing militants" (http://siteinstitute.org/bin/articles.cgi?ID=publications45605Category=publicationsSubcategory=0). For
[cia-drugs] Re: Able Danger and total awareness
The agenda is pretty muchclearly laid out in the article below: Despite last year's legislative and regulatory reforms, we cannot seem to break down the barriers to sharing intelligence, law enforcement and the other categories of information relevant to terrorism threats. Even more fundamental, the roles and missions of various departments and agencies have not yet changed to reflect the new threat of domestic terrorism. For example, and as ironic as it might now be, DARPA could be exactly the right place for continued government research on advanced, terrorism-related information technologies, including those needed to protect the personal privacy of the innocent while allowing access to data for legitimate security reasons. This is precisely because DARPA is a pure research and development agency and has no law enforcement, intelligence, regulatory or policy responsibilities -- nor should it have. Mr. Specter's interest in reviewing Able Danger is very timely. It should cause a thoughtful re-examination of defining, collecting and responsibly using the right and best information no matter its category to protect us from another terrorist attack. -- Rather than 'bogging down' the committee arguing about Posse Comitatus, it is instead the destruction of Posse Comitatus and the 'seamless' integration of data gathering and intelligence, and the 'breaking down of barriers' to the complete surveillance of citizens and doing away of obstacles to this agenda that is the desired goal, and has been since9-11 and before. The end result of looking into Able Danger will be to underline the 'necessity' of integrating intel agencies, so that there is a defacto Total Information Awareness data and intelligence gathering means written into law without that pesky "uninformed" publicity impacting negatively on this operationand those pesky "uninformed" people who oppose this goal of the elites. This was the same goal of the 9-11 commission, and the same goal of past and future 'terrorist' activities on home turf. norgesen ~~ --- In cia-drugs@yahoogroups.com, "Jim Rarey" [EMAIL PROTECTED]... wrote: http://washingtontimes.com/functions/print.php?StoryID=20050925-102113-4111r Specter will bog the committee down arguing about Posse Comitatus rather than finding out who knew what and when.The thing the elite fear the most is that concentrating on Atta will lead back to Ramzi Youssef and Project Bojinka. So far rhey have been successful in keeping any mention of Bojinkaout of any investigations or reports. - JR The Washington Times Able Danger and total awarenessBy Daniel GallingtonPublished September 26, 2005 What will Arlen Specter, Pennsylvania Republican and chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, discover as he looks into covert military intelligence program Able Danger, said to have discovered Mohamed Atta, by name, and his al Qaeda cell working in the U.S. before the attacks of September 11, 2001? Here are some of the senator's likely findings, including the "who knew what... and when" part: Able Danger was a military intelligence activity apparently looking at open-source, and other, yet unspecified, information, including some that was "domestic" rather than foreign. Able Danger was very similar to -- if not the same as -- the "Total Information Awareness" or "TIA" program, the ill-fated Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) study killed off by Congress because of an avalanche of adverse publicity, much of it uninformed. The September 11 Commission either knew, or should have known -- or didn't and could not have known -- about Able Danger's specific activities. From public accounts so far, this seems to hinge on the response and objectivity of the commission senior staff, who were briefed on Able Danger. Mr. Specter is also a past chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee, and as such is uniquely qualified to take his inquiry as far as needed to address these and other key issues. How might he proceed? He would want to know, in detail, about the "reporting of crimes" procedures in effect between the Defense Department and the FBI -- and if both followed them, in letter and spirit. These longstanding procedures would have been the vehicle for reporting -- to the FBI -- any criminal activity allegedly discovered by Able Danger. As a collateral matter, the procedures themselves should be reviewed for currency. He would want to know if the FBI otherwise knew about Able Danger, as they perhaps should have -- if other Defense and FBI agreements on intelligence operations and activities were followed and if these agreements remain adequate. He would want to know if Able Danger complied with internal Defense Department regulations, insofar as it used "domestic information." Important in this determination would be whether A
[cia-drugs] Hillary's Brave New World of Internet Censorship
Hillarys Brave New World of Internet Censorship Kurt Nimmo September 26th, 2005 China has stepped up its war against the internet and the dissemination of uncensored informationor as the totalitarian free trade government of the worlds most populous nation (or most populated slavery gulag) describes it, internet news sites must be directed toward serving the people and socialism and insist on correct guidance of public opinion for maintaining national and public interests, in other words serving the interests of a tyrannical clique of former communists (now practicing a mix of bastardized Marxism and global-corporatist capitalism) and severely punishing those who would criticize the monolithic Chinese state, a nightmarish behemoth that would inspire George Orwell, if he was alive, to rewrite considerable chunks of his seminal novel, 1984. China has a dedicated band of cyber police who patrol the Internet with the aim of regulating content. Postings that criticize the government or address sensitive topics are quickly removed, and no doubt Chinese posters of such criticism are hauled off to torture dungeons and ultimately reduced to cosmetics for narcissistic western women desperately in search of collagen. Meanwhile, Matt Drudge, purveyor of a sort of National Enquirer website for conservatives, has dragged out an old Hillary Clinton quote: We are all going to have to rethink how we deal with [an uncensored internet], because there are all these competing values Without any kind of editing function or gatekeeping function, what does it mean to have the right to defend your reputation? Clinton said in 1998, in response to offscourings in the wake of the so-called White House sex scandal (actually, a well-orchestrated attempt by sulking Republicans to evict a Democrat from officenot that there is a dimes worth of difference between the two camps). Of course, it makes sense for Drudge to refloat this bit of almost ancient political history, since he was the source of the Monica Lewdinsky, er Lewinsky revelations. Now he wants to sink Hillary once and for allor at least tarnish her carefully groomed imageas the Grand Dame of Statism plans to run for the presidency. I dont have any clue about what were going to do legally, regulatorily, technologicallyI dont have a clue. But I do think we always have to keep competing interests in balance. Im a big pro-balance person. Thats why I love the founderschecks and balances; accountable power. Anytime an individual or an institution or an invention leaps so far out ahead of that balance and throws a system, whatever it might bepolitical, economic, technologicalout of balance, youve got a problem, because then it can lead to the oppression peoples rights, it can lead to the manipulation of information, it can lead to all kinds of bad outcomes which we have seen historically. So were going to have to deal with that, Clinton declared. Of course, this is a complete load of hogwash, a cynical twisting of history and facts. First and foremost, the checks and balances Clinton mentions here are intended to prevent what we now havean emerging dictatorship usurping all branches of governmentand the original checks and balances were not devised to check the competing interests of citizens, especially citizens who criticize the president or Congress (apparently, Clinton believes the government needs to check the balance of free speech, especially when free speech she disagrees with is directed at her husband). Clinton believes free speech needs to be held accountable to power (the power of the government and its corporatist owners) and only government can decide when speech leaps so far out ahead of statist power (reference the actions of China, noted above) and is deemed out of balance, or insulting or dangerous to rulers. Unfettered and unmolested speech can lead to all kinds of bad outcomes, for instance overturning the regnancy of our pedigreed rulers, so were going to have to deal with that. It should be remembered Clinton was singling out websitesmost notably Drudges rumor-mongering websitefor posting stories about the prurient activity of her husband, not the government, although she once claimed there was a right-wing conspiracy afoot in Congress to impeach her oral sex obsessed and philandering husband. It should be remembered as well that Bill Clinton faced impeachment not for engaging in sex but for lying about it while under oath. Hillary Clinton is not alone in her desire to censor and impose regulations on the internet. The Communications Decency Act (CDA) was passed by Congress to control obscenity on the internet (once upon a time, protecting children from obscenity was the duty of parents, not government). In 1997, the Supreme Court ruled the CDA to be unconstitutional. Justice John Paul Stevens held that the CDA places an
[cia-drugs] Beslan Mothers Seek Probe Into Russian Cult Leader Offering to Resurrect Victims
Beslan Mothers Seek Probe Into Russian Cult Leader Offering to Resurrect Victims Created: 28.09.2005 10:23 MSK (GMT +3), Updated: 10:34 MSK MosNews Mothers of children who perished in Russias Beslan school tragedy last year have demanded a probe into a cult leader who has offered to resurrect the victims, saying he is trying to discredit their campaign for justice, Reuters news agency reports. Grigory Grabovoi, who says he can heal, save people and cure AIDS with his mind, convinced several Beslan mothers at a seance in Moscow last weekend that their children would return prompting the press to characterize them as deranged by grief.This cultists cynical promise to resurrect those killed in the terrorist act is blasphemous to all those who suffered in this dreadful tragedy, said an appeal to General Prosecutor Vladimir Ustinov faxed to Reuters on Tuesday. We ... ask you to investigate the legality of Grigory Grabovois actions and to bring him to justice under Russian law, said the appeal, signed by a group of mothers.Earlier the Beslan Mothers group had been celebrated for their efforts to bring to justice officials they say were inept or too corrupt to stop the tragedy from unfurling in September 2004, leading to the deaths of 331 people most of them children. At the meeting with President Vladimir Putin, they blamed him for the tragedy, which they said was caused above all by the incompetent and corrupt behavior of his police and officials.Some mothers said unnamed officials were now using Grabovoi to discredit their demands that top officials be brought to account by making it appear the mothers were deranged, thereby insinuating that their demands were not valid. The designers of this attack are presenting us to all Russia as psychologically ill, said a statement.Who paid $10,000 for these women to go and see Grabovoi? ... Obviously those who did not like the womens visit to Putin and the demands that he admit his guilt, which would mean the guilt of the secret services and the whole state.Russian newspapers compared Grabovoi to Grigory Rasputin the mad monk who gained influence over Russias royal family during and before World War One. The mothers who met Grabovoi, including group head Susanna Dudiyeva, were not available for comment.I believe in this miracle and know that it will happen. My maternal heart and my maternal faith tells me this, Dudiyeva was quoted by the Izvestia daily saying. Dudiyevas mobile phone was turned off on Tuesday and Grabovoi did not return repeated calls to his office. http://www.mosnews.com/news/2005/09/28/beslancultprobe.shtml SEE ALSO 28.09.2005 12:28 MSK, MOSNEWS.COM Russian Forces Were First to Fire Beslan Witness 23.09.2005 14:12 MSK, MOSNEWS.COM Head of Beslan Investigation Commission Plans Private Anti-Terrorist Center 23.09.2005 11:58 MSK, MOSNEWS.COM Beslan Mothers Accuse Russian Authorities of Discrediting Campaign for Justice 13.09.2005 13:16 MSK, MOSNEWS.COM Russian Prosecutors Question Head of Alternative Beslan Investigation 12.09.2005 11:12 MSK, MOSNEWS.COM Russian Prosecutor Says International Terrorists Planned Beslan 07.09.2005 16:20 MSK, MOSNEWS.COM Local Parliament Official Twice Refuses to Testify on Beslan Tragedy 03.09.2005 16:14 MSK, MOSNEWS.COM Putin Orders Russian Prosecutor General to Investigate Beslan Mothers Claims 03.09.2005 11:06 MSK, MOSNEWS.COM Beslan Mothers Call Meeting With Putin Was Tough 02.09.2005 17:58 MSK, MOSNEWS.COM Putin Meets Beslan Mothers in Moscow 02.09.2005 11:57 MSK, MOSNEWS.COM Relatives of Beslan Victims Go on Hunger Strike 01.09.2005 17:13 MSK, MOSNEWS.COM Government Must Be Held Liable for Impotence 01.09.2005 13:58 MSK, MOSNEWS.COM Condoleezza Rice Sends Russia Letter of Beslan Condolences 01.09.2005 13:28 MSK, MOSNEWS.COM Families of Beslan Victims Ask for Political Asylum Abroad 01.09.2005 11:50 MSK, MOSNEWS.COM Beslan Marks School Siege Anniversary 01.09.2005 11:36 MSK, MOSNEWS.COM Video Shows Chechen Terrorists Preparations for Beslan School Attack 31.08.2005 17:12 MSK, MOSNEWS.COM Beslan Mothers Blame President Putin for 331 School Siege Deaths 31.08.2005 13:56 MSK, MOSNEWS.COM Beslan Teachers Write to Putin as Last Resort 31.08.2005 11:10 MSK, MOSNEWS.COM Russian Security Services Facilitated Beslan Raid Basayev 28.08.2005 15:37 MSK, MOSNEWS.COM Beslan Mothers Accept Putins Invitation to Kremlin Year After Tragedy 25.08.2005 12:24 MSK, MOSNEWS.COM Security Stepped up in Schools Across Russia 24.08.2005 14:17 MSK, MOSNEWS.COM Russia Says Beslan-Type School Terrorist Attack Thwarted 24.08.2005 11:22 MSK, MOSNEWS.COM Angry Beslan Mothers Blame Putin, Demand Trial for Authorities 22.08.2005 17:23 MSK, MOSNEWS.COM Beslan Hostage Claims Terrorists Asked Her to Become Suicide Bomber to Save Her Children 19.08.2005 15:46 MSK, MOSNEWS.COM Authorities Dispatch Armed Guards to All St. Petersburg Schools on September 1 17.08.2005