Hi,
On Fri, Jun 01, 2007 at 02:57:06PM -0700, Simon Hamilton-Wilkes wrote:
The best solution for this is the 6509 NEB chassis.
Is this still sold? I have a bit lost track of what 65xx chassis variants
are EOS/EOL, and which ones are still available
Are there 65xx E chassis in NEB variant?
Greetings,
Just curious if anyone has had any luck with running an ipv6 capable ios
on the old 7200 npe200.
Of course since its no longer supported by cisco its not clear which IOS
will or will not work, and if any versions actually detect the hardware
and refuse to boot, but its surely worth
Hi,
On Sat, Jun 02, 2007 at 01:57:17PM +0200, Mark Pace Balzan wrote:
Just curious if anyone has had any luck with running an ipv6 capable ios
on the old 7200 npe200.
Of course since its no longer supported by cisco its not clear which IOS
will or will not work, and if any versions actually
On (2007-06-01 14:42 -0400), Richard A Steenbergen wrote:
Anyone have any idea whats going on here? Is this just a bug/oversight or
intentional meddling with the non Cisco branded optics support. :)
Intentional according to TAC, they broke DOM from cisco branded optics
too, that somehow are
What's the difference between the E and non E variant?
From what I can tell the only difference seems to be the up to 6k PSU,
which is supported in the 6509-NEB-A
~Matt
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gert Doering
Sent: Saturday, June
Hi,
On Sat, Jun 02, 2007 at 12:16:58PM -0400, Matt Addison wrote:
What's the difference between the E and non E variant?
More powa, faster backplane (if I'm informed right) on the 6513E.
From what I can tell the only difference seems to be the up to 6k PSU,
There's a 10k PSU for the E :-) -
On Sat, Jun 02, 2007 at 05:31:12PM +0300, Saku Ytti wrote:
On (2007-06-01 14:42 -0400), Richard A Steenbergen wrote:
Anyone have any idea whats going on here? Is this just a bug/oversight or
intentional meddling with the non Cisco branded optics support. :)
Intentional according to
Yes, the NEB-A chassis is a non-E design. There is a roadmap for an E version.
BTW, faster backplane is not quite right - more like, capable of
supporting a higher speed fabric at some point in the future.
Also, there is no 10kW PSU, it is 8700W (but you only get the full
8700W in an E
Thursday Rick Kunkel said:
Anyone know this? I meant to type show spanning tree int BLAH something
and hit enter prematurely and got this!
sw01#show spanning-tree in
this[0] = 1;
this[1] = 10;
this[2] = 80;
this[3] = 110;
this[4] = 120;
this[5] = 140;
this[6] = 150;
this[7] = 180;
This may be cheating, but...from your favorite unix host:
realOS$ ssh IOS124.example.com show log |tail
../C
Yesterday Rodney Dunn said:
I've had some preliminary discussions with them about some of
these ideas. Unfortunately the way it's implemented today it's
not as simple as it
10 matches
Mail list logo
