Will "station-role root access-point fallback track fa 0" under the radio
interface work for you?
On 4/3/09 9:10 PM, "Dan Letkeman" wrote:
Hello,
Is there a command on an 1131ag aironet ap that allows you to disable
the ssid broadcast if there is no lan connection to the ap?
Thanks,
Dan.
__
Hello,
Is there a command on an 1131ag aironet ap that allows you to disable
the ssid broadcast if there is no lan connection to the ap?
Thanks,
Dan.
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-ns
What part exactly doesn't work? just the load balancing? do you have IP
connectivity ok to your real servers? how is that virtual IP being sent to
the box? it's not listed anywhere in your configuration on how 10.10.237.x
gets to the box.
On Sat, Apr 4, 2009 at 2:01 AM, Elmar K. Bins wrote:
> Ma
Sorry for the length. I have another Friday mind-bender.
We're going into an agreement with a new customer to replace their
existing shared radio infrastructure with several bonded PtP DS1s at a
number of sites and a DS3 at a main site. The owner of the radios
infrastructure currently places
I would strongly recommend keynote over gomez. It's what a lot of folks
use. Gomez has some interesting features, but I found them harder to
work with.
Pingdom is also a popular choice.
Or you could just use nagios or other monitoring tools do you have
any sort of network management/monit
Using a same-router tunnel loopback to move traffic between global and
vrf on a SUP720:
rtr-1#sh run int tun254
Building configuration...
Current configuration : 251 bytes
!
interface Tunnel254
vrf forwarding v101
ip address 10.1.0.254 255.255.255.254
ip mtu 1500
ipv6 address FE80:0:1970::254
Have you checked the capabilities being negotiated with that peer to see
if anything new was negotiated up after the change?
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Paul Stewart
Sent: Friday, April 03, 2009 09:02
To
Thank you - unfortunately I do not know about the equipment on the other
side but it was working perfectly up til the IOS release. This release also
seems to have reintroduced the ttl-security bug that was happening a couple
of releases back...;( The folks on the other side of the link tell me I'
Maybe someone can point me to a document that helps me through - or
Rodney cuts in and tells me it's a bug ;)
I have the following pretty simple (stripped down) configuration
which does work on a 7201 and does not work on the ASR1000...
(Yes, on the ASR the interface has 0/0/0 instead of 0/0 *g*)
Paul Stewart wrote:
Hi,
On a peering session we started getting the following:
%BGP-3-NOTIFICATION: received from neighbor 198.32.XXX.XX 6/7 (cease) 0
bytes
This all started when we "upgraded" to 12.2(18)SXF16 it seems or at least
the timeline matches up..
So, I've discovered that
Paul Stewart wrote:
Thank you - but what is the solution to my problem or is there one? By the
sounds of it I need to change out the IOS to a new version;)
In theory this should resolve automatically, but it is abnormal if your
session never establishes.
If this began to happen with 12.2
Forgot to mention that you control everything from their web-site (hence
SAAS) which makes it very easy. You could resell the service ...
http://www.gomez.com/
Joe Loiacono/CIV/c...@csc
Sent by: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
04/03/2009 10:14 AM
To
"Aaron Riemer"
cc
cisco-nsp-boun...@pu
Aaron, I have not delved into EEM but from what I have read about it and
its support for TCL, it's entirely possible that you can:
1) Create a TCL script to test your web server with a GET or other
method (see
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/interfaces_modules/services_modules/ace/
v3.00_A1/confi
Thank you - but what is the solution to my problem or is there one? By the
sounds of it I need to change out the IOS to a new version;)
-Original Message-
From: Christophe Fillot [mailto:c...@utc.fr]
Sent: Friday, April 03, 2009 10:01 AM
To: Paul Stewart
Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Paul Stewart wrote:
> Thanks what's happening (and perhaps I should have explained this a bit
> better) is the session is starting to become established and then dropping.
> This is repeated every 30-60 seconds over and over and the BGP session never
> actually establishes.
Paul,
Does the ses
Thanks what's happening (and perhaps I should have explained this a bit
better) is the session is starting to become established and then dropping.
This is repeated every 30-60 seconds over and over and the BGP session never
actually establishes.
Take care,
Paul
-Original Message-
F
* Paul Stewart:
> So, I've discovered that 6/7 means "Connection collision resolution" - does
> anyone know what that means in English? ;)
In general, it means that both peers successfully established a TCP
connection, and one connection was closed. This happens from time to
time and does not in
If you want to go commercial, we use a software-as-a-service (SAAS)
product called Gomez. You periodically contact your server from
browser-client nodes on their backbone. You can also execute scripts from
these nodes that will walk through your web-site in a pre-determined way.
The pricing mo
On a peering session we started getting the following:
%BGP-3-NOTIFICATION: received from neighbor 198.32.XXX.XX 6/7 (cease) 0
bytes
This all started when we "upgraded" to 12.2(18)SXF16 it seems or at least
the timeline matches up..
So, I've discovered that 6/7 means "Connection collisi
Not seeing it with the DFC here and sup720-10g.
2 24 CEF720 24 port 1000mb SFP WS-X6724-SFP
2 Distributed Forwarding Card WS-F6700-DFC3C
#sho ver
Cisco IOS Software, s72033_rp Software
(s72033_rp-ADVIPSERVICESK9_WAN-M), Version 12.2(33)SXI, RELEASE SOFTWARE
(fc2)
CAT650
On Thu, 2009-04-02 at 19:26 -0500, Tony Varriale wrote:
> You can reload the master without doing the whole stack.
Well, that would select a new master. And this new master has to be
running the same software version as the current master, otherwise it
would not be able to participate in the stack
21 matches
Mail list logo
