[c-nsp] (no subject)

2009-05-10 Thread Ibrahim Alsharif
Hello Dear, I'm trying to configure Failover on 2 ASA Firewalls, their work is in multiple context mode. so when I'm trying to connect them the synchronization between the primary unit secondary unit is not completed, I don't know why. there are 2 Security Contexts and only one context is

Re: [c-nsp] Stupid SNMP tricks.

2009-05-10 Thread Ziv Leyes
Also, you could use a combination of ipRouteNextHop followed by ipRouteProto which gives you the info about every routing type (BGP, local, etc) Hope this helps, Ziv -Original Message- From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of

Re: [c-nsp] SUP720 IDB Limit

2009-05-10 Thread Gert Doering
Hi, On Fri, May 08, 2009 at 10:47:30PM -0400, Stephen Kratzer wrote: Not doing anything too special. L2TP, VPDN, PPPoE, OSPF, netflow. No per-session shaping or policing. Does the 7600 family lack anything that the 7200 series has? The 7600 is incredibly fast and rock-solid *if* the feature

Re: [c-nsp] Nexus 5000?

2009-05-10 Thread Will Hargrave
Matthew Huff wrote: It's an SFP port rather than a copper 10/100/1000. Every Cisco SFP port fiber or copper is 1g only. Not true. E.g. on a c3750g ap-c3750g-1#show int status Port Name Status Vlan Duplex Speed Type Gi1/0/6 ap-974aconnected

Re: [c-nsp] eBGP -- OSPF -- eBGP vs eBGP -- iBGP -- eBGP

2009-05-10 Thread Charles
Thanks for the update. Yes this architecture seems to make a lot of sense. Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile -Original Message- From: Adam Greene maill...@webjogger.net Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 08:59:39 To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [c-nsp] eBGP -- OSPF -- eBGP vs eBGP --

[c-nsp] PIX 515E Downgrade

2009-05-10 Thread Paul Stainton
Hi Is it possible to downgrade a PIX 515E from pix804.bin to pix613.bin I have tried and so far been unsuccessful using copy ttfp and write net commands. I have heard that the pix613 uses a different flash file system than the pix804. Does anyone know if this is correct and if so can

Re: [c-nsp] MRTG on SONET APS?

2009-05-10 Thread Pete Templin
Aaron wrote: Just monitor both ports as normal. One for each. That's what we used to do. I'm not getting valid/expected data on either. pt ___ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp

Re: [c-nsp] The mechanics of SSO

2009-05-10 Thread Daryl G. Jurbala
On May 7, 2009, at 11:32 AM, Ross Vandegrift wrote: On Thu, May 07, 2009 at 02:03:44AM +0300, Ibrahim Abo Zaid wrote: actually i can't get if SUP running SSO why you think configuration will be loaded from active to standby during switchover ? ! SSO maintains control plane and data plane

Re: [c-nsp] Nexus 5000?

2009-05-10 Thread Matthew Huff
Thanks. It appears that some of the fixed configuration switches that have SFP ports can be 10/100/1000. I've never run into that, as all the SFP ports I've seen on the 6500/7600 are fixed at 1G. I thought it was a SFP thing, but apparently not. Matthew Huff   | One Manhattanville Rd

[c-nsp] Stupid Security Questions

2009-05-10 Thread Seth Mattinen
This is just me whining hoping someone from Cisco will listen. So I log in today to run a crashinfo file through the output interpreter and lo and behold, cisco is become infected with those stupid security question things I loathe to no end. For the love of $diety, why? Why must you force me to

[c-nsp] 3560 memory problem?

2009-05-10 Thread Dan Letkeman
Hello, I just noticed this on one of our switches: cisco WS-C3560-24TS (PowerPC405) processor (revision E0) with 0K/8184K bytes of memory. Processor board ID CAT1115RH2K Last reset from power-on 13 Virtual Ethernet interfaces 24 FastEthernet interfaces 2 Gigabit Ethernet interfaces The

Re: [c-nsp] 3560 memory problem?

2009-05-10 Thread Max Palatnik
Can you do a show memory statistics / show region? Max On 5/10/09 10:32 PM, cisco-nsp-requ...@puck.nether.net cisco-nsp-requ...@puck.nether.net wrote: Send cisco-nsp mailing list submissions to cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit

Re: [c-nsp] Nexus 5000?

2009-05-10 Thread Elmar K. Bins
mh...@ox.com (Matthew Huff) wrote: Thanks. It appears that some of the fixed configuration switches that have SFP ports can be 10/100/1000. I've never run into that, as all the SFP ports I've seen on the 6500/7600 are fixed at 1G. I thought it was a SFP thing, but apparently not. Well...

Re: [c-nsp] Nexus 5000?

2009-05-10 Thread Dale Shaw
Hi, On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 3:26 PM, Elmar K. Bins e...@4ever.de wrote: I'd say most Cisco devices will be able to use GLC-T's on 10/100/1000. I must admit, the only place I've encountered the 1000-only situation is on WS-X6724-SFP (and I assume 48-SFP) 6500 series line cards. Apart from here