Hi all,
I'm getting below error in gsr chassis 12416 , please suggest
048724: .Aug 11 20:09:13.853 IST: %MBUS-6-SWITCHED_FABCLK: Slot 9 primary
clock switched to clock 0
048725: .Aug 11 20:09:17.191 IST: %FABRIC-3-ERR_HANDLE: Reconfigure all
fabric cards due to SUSHI REGISTER RESET ERROR error
OK, I am sure this is just something I haven't run into before, but I just
setup an ASA5520, and overall it's doing well, except this one gotcha.
We are using it in routed/NAT mode, but some internal servers need to be on
their own external IP's as well, we have multiple DNS, Mail, and so
Hi Howard,
What about doing something like:
static (LAN,Internet) MAIL1-Outside MAIL1-Inside netmask 255.255.255.255
Then using the ACL on the outside interface to control the access. With that,
you wouldn't need an individual mapping for each port - only to open it in the
ACL.
Regards,
Hello,
I have test lab with two routers connected together.
c7507-c7604
I can redistribute default ipv6 route from c7507(default table) to
c7604(default table).
I would like to know if it is possible to redistribute default ipv6 route from
c7507(default table) to VRF vpnv6 on c7604?
--
Thank you
Do you know what is cli to configure remote subnet and local subnet for vpn?
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 9:28 PM, Ryan West rw...@zyedge.com wrote:
You can configure the PIX for local and remote subnets using your
interesting traffic ACL.
Access-list vpn_myacl permit ip local
I have test lab with two routers connected together.
c7507-c7604
I can redistribute default ipv6 route from c7507(default table) to
c7604(default table).
I would like to know if it is possible to redistribute default ipv6 route
from c7507(default table) to VRF vpnv6 on c7604?
I
Does anyone know if a Cisco 6509-E w/ Sup720 WiSM will support OIR?
I've dug around Google and Cisco, but haven't found a concrete 'YES'.
My gut feeling is telling me it's okay; but I figure I'd ask the group J
Thanks!!!
___
cisco-nsp
Can you HTTPS to the device using a normal browser and get the initial
screen?
Chuck
- Original Message -
From: Leslie Meade lme...@signal.ca
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Sent: Tuesday, August 11, 2009 2:30 PM
Subject: [c-nsp] ASDM not working after upgrades
I am getting the error
On 12/08/2009 14:31, Jeff Cartier wrote:
Does anyone know if a Cisco 6509-E w/ Sup720 WiSM will support OIR?
I've dug around Google and Cisco, but haven't found a concrete 'YES'.
My gut feeling is telling me it's okay; but I figure I'd ask the group J
Online insertion and removal or online
On 8/12/09 9:31 AM, Jeff Cartier jcart...@acs.on.ca wrote:
Does anyone know if a Cisco 6509-E w/ Sup720 WiSM will support OIR?
I've dug around Google and Cisco, but haven't found a concrete 'YES'.
My gut feeling is telling me it's okay; but I figure I'd ask the group J
Thanks!!!
I've done it
I'm looking for a recommendation for upgrade and perhaps some possible
explanation of the code branches.
I am currently on 12.2(33)SRB1. The role of the box is Internet border, two
full feeds, 10 other bilateral peers. No MPLS.
Do I stick with SRB (I believe it's up to SRB6 now) or jump up to
I'm looking for a recommendation for upgrade and perhaps some possible
explanation of the code branches.
I am currently on 12.2(33)SRB1. The role of the box is Internet border,
two full feeds, 10 other bilateral peers. No MPLS.
Do I stick with SRB (I believe it's up to SRB6 now) or jump up
Hi,
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 03:08:52PM +0100, Nick Hilliard wrote:
My gut feeling is telling me it's okay; but I figure I'd ask the group J
Online insertion and removal or online insertion and reload?
Definitely the latter. Unfortunately, OIR stability is a hardware problem
and cannot
Can someone point me to the thread about the new IOS Upgrade Planner
changes that were made to the list?
I can't seem to find it.
Rodney
___
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive
Guys,
I second (or third) the do it inside a maintenance window recommendation.
The effect of doing an OIR in a 6500 chassis really depends on the types of
modules within the chassis at that timebasically--
DFCs = OK
CFC=bus stall i.e. traffic loss
I've personally been bitten by doing an OIR
Not folklore.
I've had a 6509 with Sup 720-3B crash twice during OIR. Cisco claims the
first time I inserted too fast, the second time too slow. I've also had a
6509 linecard scorch the backplane due to a short. Not a fun day.
Matthew Huff | One Manhattanville Rd
OTA Management LLC |
If you are going to move go to the latest SRB rebuild on Cisco.com.
There were a ton of fixes in the early SRB releases due to a huge
quality push on that throttle.
SRC and SRD simply have less field exposure.
Rodney
Bill Blackford wrote:
I'm looking for a recommendation for upgrade and
Personally, I've never had any problems, [..]
Personally, I think that this is all folklore from the 7500 times...
*Personally* I have never had a problem.
However, I *have* seen a bus reset/hang on a 6500 OIR
when a card was inserted by former colleague. His
memory about whether he
Have found the least bugs in SRD1, but non-cisco bgp neighbors
sometimes require the use of hidden command neighbor x.x.x.x dont-
capability-negotiate or the session won't restore.
We're also quite happy with SRD1. Early SRBx had a few issues with OSPF,
and SSO/ISSU with static routes up until
Hi Guys,
Our T3 controller is down and the SP has asked me what I am seeing on my
end. Below is the show controllers command on my router. Could you tell
me where the problem is based on the output below?
Router#sh controllers t3
T3 3/0 is down.
Applique type is Subrate T3
Receiver is getting AIS.
Looks like you have an open in the circuit. Your device is reporting an
AIS (All ones, usually indicative of an open circuit).
Ken Matlock
Network Analyst
Exempla Healthcare
(303) 467-4671
matlo...@exempla.org
-Original Message-
From:
Oddiraju, Kiran @ London SMC wrote:
Our T3 controller is down and the SP has asked me what I am seeing on my
end. Below is the show controllers command on my router. Could you tell
me where the problem is based on the output below?
Router#sh controllers t3
T3 3/0 is down.
Applique type is
Hi,
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 01:53:26PM -0400, Matthew Huff wrote:
Not folklore.
I've had a 6509 with Sup 720-3B crash twice during OIR. Cisco claims the
first time I inserted too fast, the second time too slow. I've also had a
6509 linecard scorch the backplane due to a short. Not a fun
...at the far-end...:-)
Tell your SP you are Rx is AIS
--- On Wed, 8/12/09, Oddiraju, Kiran @ London SMC kiran.oddir...@cbre.com
wrote:
From: Oddiraju, Kiran @ London SMC kiran.oddir...@cbre.com
Subject: [c-nsp] DS3 circuit error
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Date: Wednesday, August 12, 2009,
Hi Team,
Pardon me if this question seems dumb. I have deployed a number of Cisco
Content Services Switches for clients who needed Layer 4-7 application load
balancing and acceleration for their web-based applications in the data
centre.
I am presently reviewing the datasheet of the Cisco
Jack,
What changed prior to the errors? Also, is this a lab or production device?
Either way, reply all (or unicast) the complete sh tech and sh log along
with a sh controller fia from an attach session to all LCs.
-Eninja
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 10:54 PM, jack daniels
Cheers Jay. Have logged a call with the SP based on the below
explanation... :-)
Many thanks for your input guys
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Jay Hennigan
Sent: 12 August 2009 21:52
To:
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 02:21:43PM -0400, Rodney Dunn wrote:
If you are going to move go to the latest SRB rebuild on Cisco.com.
There were a ton of fixes in the early SRB releases due to a huge
quality push on that throttle.
SRC and SRD simply have less field exposure.
I can actually
I believe the ACE supports multiple contexts so it's like having a bunch of
independent (virtual) load balancers...
Bill Murphy
Network Architect
The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
-Original Message-
From: cisco-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
ACE is the product moving forward. Althought the EoL/S hasn't been
announced the writing is on the wall.
The most important thing moving forward is that your existing requirements
on CSS map into ACE. The ACE doesn't have feature parity yet (and the blade
and appliance even have different
Hi All,
I've set up an MPLS L3 VPN Internet Gateway on one of our PE routers and
need some ideas on how to collect netflow for public IP's in the
NAT-POOL so we can bill the customer for usage.
We are using NAT VRF aware as seen by the config below.
Just to be clear, the writing is on the wall for CSS not ACE.
tv
- Original Message -
From: Tony Varriale tvarri...@comcast.net
To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Sent: Wednesday, August 12, 2009 6:36 PM
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] OT: Difference between the CSS and ACE
ACE is the product moving
All,
I would appreciate speaking with anyone using EVDO technology to deliver WAN
services. Specifically I am looking for reputable kit's you have used to
extend EVDO outside of your computer rooms to get better signal or better
antenna's you have used.
Thank you
Hi All,
I found this error was coming on SLOT 18 which is SFC.
EARLIER OUTPUT WAS -
sh led
SLOT 0 : RUN IOS
SLOT 6 : WAITRTRY
SLOT 7 : RP ACTV
SLOT 8 : INITMEM
SLOT 9 : RUN IOS
SLOT 15 : WAITRTRY
FOR TROUBLESHOOT , then I saw -
1) output of sh gsr
Slot 18 type = Switch Fabric Card
34 matches
Mail list logo
